DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

On the optimum design of reinforcement systems for old masonry railway tunnels

  • Ghyasvand, Soheil (Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology) ;
  • Fahimifar, Ahamd (Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology) ;
  • Nejad, Fereidoon Moghadas (Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology)
  • 투고 : 2021.07.12
  • 심사 : 2021.10.22
  • 발행 : 2022.01.25

초록

Safety is a most important parameters in underground railway transportation; Also stability of underground tunnel is very important in tunneling engineering. Design of a reliable support system requires an evaluation of both ground demand and support capacity. Iran's traditional railway tunnels are mainly supported with masonry structures or unsupported in high quality rock masses. A decrease in rock mass quality due to changes in groundwater regime creep and fatigue in rock and similar phenomena causes tunnel safety to decrease during time. The case study is an old tunnel in Iran, called "Keshvar"; it is more than 50 years old railway organization. In operating this Tunnel, until the several problems came up based on stability and leaking water. The goal of study is evaluation of the various reinforcement systems for supporting of the tunnel. The optimal selection of the reinforcement system is examined using TOPSIS Fuzzy method in light of the looming and available uncertainties. Several factors such as; the tunnel span, maintenance, drainage, sealing, ventilation, cost and safety were based to choose the method and system of designing. Therefore, by identifying these parameters, an optimal reinforcement system was selected and introduced. Based on optimization system for analysis, it is revealed that the systematic rock bolts and shotcrete protection had a most appropriate result for these kind of tunnel in Iran.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Barla, G. (2001), "Tunnelling under squeezing rock conditions", Eurosummer-School Tunnel Mech., Innsbruck, 169-268.
  2. Bergeson, W. and Ernst, S.L. (2015), Tunnel Operations, Maintenance, Inspection, and Evaluation (TOMIE), Manual No. FHWA-HIF-15-005, United States. Federal Highway Administration.
  3. Chen, C.T. (2000), "Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment", Fuzzy Sets Syst., 114(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-0114(97)00377-1.
  4. Gharouni Nik, M., Berry Dizaji, R. and Katibeh, H. (2006), "Fundamentals of designing railway tunnel ventilation, case study: Lorestan railway tunnel No. 102 [in Persian]", J. Transport. Res., 3(2), 111-121.
  5. ITA Report0 (1991), Report on the Damaging Effects of Water on Tunnels During their Working Life", Tunnell. Underground Space Technol., 6(1), 11-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-7798(91)90005-o.
  6. Kahraman, C., Ruan, D. and Tolga, E. (2002), "Capital budgeting techniques using discounted fuzzy versus probabilistic cash flows", Information Sci., 142(1-4), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-0255(02)00157-3.
  7. Li, D.F. (2007), "Compromise ratio method for fuzzy multiattribute group decision making", Appl. Soft Comput., 7(3), 807-817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2006.02.003.
  8. Lukic, D.C., Zlatanovic, E.M. and Jokanovic, I.M. (2020), "Tunnel lining load with consideration of the rheological properties of rock mass and concrete", Geomech. Eng., 21(1), 53-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/gae.2020.21.2.053.
  9. Luo, Y., Chen, J., Chen, Y., Diao, P. and Qiao, X. (2018), "Longitudinal deformation profile of a tunnel in weak rock mass by using the back analysis method", Tunnell. Underground Space Technol., 71, 478-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.10.003.
  10. Mathew, M., Chakrabortty, R.K. and Ryan, M.J. (2020), "A novel approach integrating AHP and TOPSIS under spherical fuzzy sets for advanced manufacturing system selection", Eng. Applic. Artificial Intel., 96, 103988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103988.
  11. Mohamad, H., Bennett, P.J., Soga, K., Mair, R.J. and Bowers, K. (2010), "Behaviour of an old masonry tunnel due to tunnelling-induced ground settlement", Geotechnique, 60(12), 927-938. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.8.p.074.
  12. Motiee, H. (2003), "Geology of Iran: Zagros stratigraphy", Tehran: Geolo. Survey Mineral Explor. Iran (GSI).
  13. Nejati, H.R., Ahmadi, M., Hashemolhosseini, H. and Hayati, M. (2012), "Probabilistic analysis of ground surface vibration due to train movement, a case study on Tehran metro line 4", Geotech. Geolo. Eng., 30(5), 1137-1146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-012-9528-z.
  14. Nejati, H.R., Ghazvinian, A. and Saemi, M. (2012), "Reliability and uncertainty of prediction of dynamic elastic constants in reservoir rock", J. Canadian Petroleum Technol., 51(03), 198-204. https://doi.org/10.2118/155503-pa.
  15. Oh, D. W., Ahn, H.Y. and Lee, Y.J. (2018), "Behaviour of vertically and horizontally loaded pile and adjacent ground affected by tunneling", Geomech. Eng., 15(3), 861-868. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2018.15.3.861.
  16. Rooh, A., Nejati, H.R. and Goshtasbi, K. (2018), "A new formulation for calculation of longitudinal displacement profile (LDP) on the basis of rock mass quality", Geomech. Eng., 16(5), 539-545. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/gae.2018.16.5.539.
  17. Rubinstein, R.Y. and Kroese, D.P. (2016), Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118631980.
  18. Sagong, M. and Lee, J.S. (2006), "Induction of tunnel reinforcement selection rules by using decision tree technique", Tunnell. Underground Space Technol., 21(3-4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2005.12.200.
  19. Sandrone, F. and Labiouse, V. (2010), "Analysis of the evolution of road tunnels equilibrium conditions with a convergence-confinement approach", Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 43(2), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-009-0056-y.
  20. Su, Y., Su, Y., Zhao, M. and Vlachopoulos, N. (2021), "Tunnel stability analysis in weak rocks using the convergence confinement method", Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 54(2), 559-582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02304-y.
  21. Sun, H. and Sun, W. (2019), "Effect of soil reinforcement on tunnel deformation as a result of stress relief", Appl. Sci., 9(7), 1420. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9071420.
  22. Tsaur, S.H., Chang, T.Y. and Yen, C.H. (2002), "The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM", Tourism Manage., 23(2), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0261-5177(01)00050-4.
  23. Wang, Y.J., Lee, H.S. (2007), "Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making", Comput. Math. Appl. 53(11), 1762-1772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2006.08.037.
  24. Wang, Z.Z. and Chen, C. (2017), "Fuzzy comprehensive Bayesian network-based safety risk assessment for metro construction projects", Tunnell. Underground Space Technol., 70, 330-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.09.012.
  25. Wu, K., Shao, Z., Hong, S. and Qin, S. (2020), "Analytical solutions for mechanical response of circular tunnels with double primary linings in squeezing grounds", Geomech. Eng., 22(6), 509-518. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/gae.2020.22.6.509.
  26. Yazdani-Chamzini, A. and Yakhchali, S.H. (2012), "Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) selection using fuzzy multicriteria decision making methods", Tunnell. Underground Space Technol., 30, 194-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2012.02.021.
  27. Young-Jou, L. and Ching-Lai, H. (1994), Fuzzy Multiple Objective Decision Making-Methods and Applications, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
  28. Zammori, F.A., Braglia, M. and Frosolini, M. (2009), "A fuzzy multi-criteria approach for critical path definition", Int. J. Project Manage, 27(3), 278-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.03.006.