DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Cultural Identity of Malaysian Housing

  • Seo Ryeung, Ju (Department of Housing & Interior Design (Age Tech-Convergence Major), Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Wan Nor Azriyati Binti Wan Abd, Aziz (School of Built Environment, University of Technology Sarawak) ;
  • Helena Aman Binti, Hashim (Department of Architecture, University of Malaya) ;
  • Suyeon, Bae (Department of Housing & Interior Design (Age Tech-Convergence Major), Kyung Hee University)
  • 투고 : 2022.03.23
  • 심사 : 2022.12.23
  • 발행 : 2022.12.30

초록

In contemporary housing design, this cultural value has been ignored. Contemporary design has adapted quickly to global trends and houses have gradually lost their cultural identity (GhaffarianHoseini & Dahlan, 2012; Lim, 2001). Nevertheless, traditional housing culture persists in people's behavior and thoughts. Therefore, there is currently a pressing need to rebuild cultural identity in housing for cultural sustainability. This study aimed to analyze the traditional culture which was maintained, then transformed and disappeared in housing design through the quantitative survey and explore the cultural identity of Malaysian housing as a result. A quantitative survey was distributed to mothers of 129 married households living in a metropolitan area of Kuala Lumpur in August 2019. As a result, it was found that hosting guest was important even though the designated space (serambi) was disappeared. The LD/K layout, separating kitchen from living and dining area was philosophical and practical culture, still strong among older generation, but weakened among younger generation. To accommodate the traditional habit of diverse household work, wet kitchen, utility space for washing machine & drying, and outdoor space were needed to design carefully. When applied to future housing design, the findings will contribute to enhancing quality of life by strengthening residents' sense of place and social cohesion and by providing a culturally inherent design that eases the effects of globalization.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIP) (No. NRF-2016R1A2B201024716).

참고문헌

  1. Abidin, W. B. W. (1981). The Malay house: Rationale and change (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). USA: MIT
  2. Altman, I., & Chemers, M. (1980), Culture and Environment, USA: Brooks/Cole Pub.
  3. Ariffin, S. I. (2001). Order in traditional Malay house form. Oxford, England: Oxford Brookes University.
  4. Ariffin, S. I. (2017). Made to order: A place called home. In S. R. Ju (Ed.), Southeast Asian houses: Expanding Tradition. 55-78. USA: Seoul Selection.
  5. Fernandez, J. (1986). Persuasion and performances: the play of Tropes in culture, Indiana: Indian University Press
  6. GhaffarianHoseini A., & Dahlan, N. D. (2012). The essence of Malay vernacular house: Towards understanding the socio-cultural and environmental values. Journal of the International Society for the Study of Vernacular Settlements. Vol. 2, Issue 2. 53-73.
  7. Hashim, A., Rahim, Z., Rashid. S., & Yahya, N. (2006). Visual privacy and family intimacy: A case study of Malay inhabitants living in two-storey low-cost terrace housing. Journal of Environment and Planning, 33, 301‍-318. https://doi.org/10.1068/b31053
  8. Hawkes, J. (2001). The fourth pillar of sustainability: Culture's essential role in public planning. Cultural Development Network. Melbourne, VIC: Common Ground Publishing.
  9. Hosseini, E., Mursib, G., Nafida, R., & Shahedi, B (2012). Design values in traditional architecture: Malay house, 6th International Seminar on Vernacular Settlements, Contemporary Vernacular Places, Processes and Manifestations, Famagusta, North Cyprus
  10. Ju, S. R., & Saari, B. O. (2010). A Typology of Modern Housing in Malaysia. International Journal of Human Ecology, 11(1), 109-119.
  11. Ju, S. (Ed). (2017). Southeast Asian houses: Expanding tradition. USA: Seoul Selection.
  12. Ju, S.R., & Kim, D. Y. (2014). A Comparative Study of Housing Consciousness and Space Usage between Korean and Chinese College Students, Journal of Korean Housing Association, 25(4), 111-123. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2014.25.4.111
  13. Ju, S. R., & Lee, L. (2015). Space organization for unit plans in Malaysia: Focus on landed properties in Ara Damansara. International Journal of Human Ecology, 16(2), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.6115/ijhe.2015.16.2.33
  14. Kim, M. K. (2015). A study of the modernization characteristics of vernacular houses in Malaysia (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Kyung Hee University, Seoul.
  15. Ju, S. R., & Kim, M. K. (2020). Space grammar of apartment unit plans in Malaysia: Focused on PR1MA project. Journal of Korean Housing Association, 31(6) 141-151. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2020.31.6.141
  16. Kellett, P. (1999). Cultural values and housing behavior in spontaneous settlements, Journal of Architecture and Planning Research, 16(3) Autumn, 205-224
  17. Kent, S. (1984). Analyzing Activity Areas (An Ethnoarchaeological Study of the Use of Space), Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press
  18. Kim, M. K., & Ju, S. R. (2022). The housing behavior of Malaysian apartment residents, Journal of Korean Housing Association, 33(2).
  19. Lim, J. Y. (1987). The Malay house: Rediscovering Malaysia's indigenous shelter system. Malaysia: Institut Masyarakat.
  20. Lim, J. Y. (2001). Transforming tradition: Architecture in Asean countries. Singapore: Asean Committee on Culture and Information.
  21. Low, S.M. (1988). Cultural aspects of Design: An introduction to the field, Journal Architecture & Behaviour, 4(3), 187-190.
  22. Rapoport, A. (2001). Theory, culture, and housing. Housing, Theory and Society. 17, 145-165. doi:10.1080/140360900300108573
  23. Shin, Y.S. (2009). A Study on Apartment Design Preferences by Resident's Lifestyle, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 25(9), pp. 141-150.
  24. Yang, S., Jun, N., Hong, H., & Sohn, S. (2006). Housing consciousness revealed from the discourse of idea housing since the enlightenment era. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 44(5), 33-48.
  25. Utabert, N. et al. (2010). Design flexibility of growing and transformable house in Malaysia, Advanced Material Research, 168-170.
  26. Wilk, R. R. (1990). The built environment and consumer decisions. In Kent, S. (ed.), Domestic Architecture and the Use of Space, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 34-42.
  27. Zhori, F.M. (2011). The Malay women and terrace housing in Malaysia, M.Arch., Thesis, VUW, New Zealand