DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Relative Importance of Board Game Development Models

보드게임 개발 모형의 상대적 중요도 분석

  • Kim, Ji-Hye (Dept. of Game Design, Kongju National University) ;
  • Ho, Ryu Seuc (Dept. of Game Design, Kongju National University)
  • 김지혜 (공주대학교 게임디자인학과) ;
  • 유석호 (공주대학교 게임디자인학과)
  • Received : 2021.10.18
  • Accepted : 2022.01.20
  • Published : 2022.01.28

Abstract

In the current era of Corona, the positive potential of board games is emerging as the 'untact' is accelerating. This situation can be seen as an opportunity to have a positive impact on the development of the board game industry depending on how to develop board games in a more interesting, high-quality and educational way than before. To this end, this study intends to present a methodology for deriving the relative importance of important factors in board game development among the preceding studies and methodologies for more advanced board game development by board game developers and experts. This study is to derive the relative importance of important factors in board game development. To this end, important factors in board game development for board game developers and experts were derived through the Delphi method, and the Delphi method in the ranking format was used to rank the relative importance of the derived factors. This study focused on the development model of playing cards among board games. Priority analysis result, development and planning composition, prior research analysis, draft production, production, validation, application, and review in order of importance were derived(were derived in the order of importance). The results of this study are expected to provide practical guidelines for companies to prioritize and utilize development according to their importance when developing board games.

코로나 시대를 맞고 있는 현 시대에 '언택트화'가 가속화 되어 가면서 보드게임의 긍정적 가능성이 새롭게 부각되고 있다. 이러한 상황은 앞으로 보드게임을 이전보다 재미있고 질 높은 그리고 교육적으로 어떻게 개발을 하느냐에 따라 보드게임 산업 발전에 긍정적인 영향을 줄 수 있는 기회라고 볼 수 있을 것이다. 이를 위해 본 연구는 보드게임 개발자 및 전문가들의 더욱 발전적인 보드게임 개발을 위해 선행적 연구 및 방법론 중 보드게임 개발 시 중요한 요인들에 대한 상대적 중요도를 도출하는 방법론을 제시해 보고자 한다. 이는 보드게임 개발자, 전문가를 대상으로 보드게임 개발 시의 중요한 요인들을 델파이법을 통해 도출하고, 도출된 요인들의 상대적 중요도에 대한 순위를 위해 순위형식의 델파이법을 사용하였다. 본 연구에서는 보드게임 중 놀이카드 개발 모형에 초점을 맞추었다. 우선순위 분석결과, 개발 및 기획 구성, 선행연구 분석, 초안제작, 제작, 타당화, 적용 및 평가 순으로 그 중요도가 도출이 되었다. 본 연구의 결과는 기업에서 보드게임을 개발하고자 할 때 중요도에 따라 개발의 우선순위를 정하고 활용할 수 있는 실무적인 지침을 제공할 것으로 본다.

Keywords

References

  1. Y. K. Kim & S. T. Park. (2021). Effect of internal and external capabilities and activities of a company on absorptive capacity and performance. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 11(11), 125-136. DOI : 10.22156/CS4SMB.2021.11.11.125
  2. H. Jin, Y. Miao, X. Chen, J. H. Seo & E. M. Park. (2021). Motivation research on the participation of multimedia Web page users in "share" behavior: a case study of Alipay. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 80(26), 34571-34589. DOI : 10.1007/s11042-020-08819-4
  3. https://ko.wikipedia.org
  4. S. T. Oh. (2004). A Study On Board Game Development. Master's thesis. Sangmyung University, Cheonan.
  5. S. H. Kim. (2011). Effect of board game play activities on social improvement for low income children. Master's thesis. Sangji Universitym, Wonju.
  6. G. Mead. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago.
  7. E. Park, W. J. Jeong & S. H. Oh. (2020). A study on the development of digital board game contents for music education of elementary schoolchild to improve cognitive recognition. Journal of Korea Game Society, 20(1), 133-142. DOI : 10.7583/JKGS.2020.20.1.133
  8. H. I. Lee. (2021). Gather up on the board. The Korea Economic Daily(Online). https://www.hankyung.com/life/article/2021022588161
  9. J. H. Park. (2012). A Study on Development of a Board Game which Utilizes Enneagram - Focusing on development of the board game -. Master's thesis. Duksung Woman's University, Seoul.
  10. J. H. Bae & S. S. Kim. (2010). Board Game Design and Development Based on Intelligent Humanoid Robot. Journal of The Korean Society for Computer Game, 20, 63-72.
  11. M. W. Kim, W. H. Lee & J. W. Park. (2013). The Development of a Hybrid Board Game that Integrates a Digital Game with an Analogue Game and its Application-Focusing on a Monopoly Board Game. Design Converg Stud, 12(5), 273-287.
  12. J. K. Ahn & H. E. Park. (2016). A Model of Storytelling Board Game based on Motif. Journal of Korea Game Society, 16(4), 15-24. DOI : 10.7583/JKGS.2016.16.4.15
  13. H. W. Jeong, M. J. Park, M. S. Choe, H. J. Kwon & J. H. Sung. (2020). Development of Multi-Experience AR Board Game'ZOOCUS'For Intellectual Disabled Students. Journal of Korea Game Society, 20(1), 121-132. DOI : 10.7583/JKGS.2020.20.1.121
  14. S. T. Park. (2010). Analysis of the Relative Importance of Patent Valuation Criteria for Product Categories. Doctoral thesis. Chungbuk National University, Cheongju.
  15. S. T. Park, S. J. Lee, S. H. Jung & Y. K. Kim. (2010). A Study of the Secure Plan of Profit in R&D: Focusing on Cellular Phone Parts Industry. Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences. 28, 139-162.
  16. Y. K. Kim, S. T. Park & S. J. Lee. (2010). Selection of important factors for Patent Valuation using Delphi Method. Entrue Journal of Information Technology, 9(1), 7-17.
  17. R. Goldscheider. (2002). Licensing Best Practices: The LESI Guide to Strategic Issues and Contemporary Realities. John Wiley & Sons.
  18. R. C. Schmidt. (1997). Managing Delphi surveys using nonparametric statistical techniques. Decision Sciences, 28(3), 763-774. DOI : 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01330.x
  19. S. T. Park, Y. K. Kim. (2014). Difference Across Indutries of Innovation Appropriability Mechanism's Effectiveness and Classification. Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(6), 135-144. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2014.12.6.135
  20. E. M. Park & J. H. Seo. (2021). A Study on the Appropriability Mechanism by Industry : Focus on China Industry. Journal of Digital Convergence, 19(2), 161-168. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2021.19.2.161
  21. S. T. Park, S. J. Lee & Y. K. Kim. (2015). Appropriability of innovation results: case of the Korean industry. Indian journal of Science and Technology, 8(21), 1-6. DOI : 10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i21/79271