Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society

  • 제65권1호
  • /
  • Pages.57-63
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2005-3711(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-7876(eISSN)
대한신경외과학회 (The Korean Neurosurgical Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Epidemiologic Study of Operative Treatment for Spinal Metastasis in Thailand : A Review of National Healthcare Data from 2005 to 2014

  • Luksanapruksa, Panya (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University) ;
  • Santipas, Borriwat (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University) ;
  • Ruangchainikom, Monchai (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University) ;
  • Korwutthikulrangsri, Ekkapoj (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University) ;
  • Pichaisak, Witchate (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University) ;
  • Wilartratsami, Sirichai (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University)
  • 투고 : 2020.11.30
  • 심사 : 2021.04.07
  • 발행 : 2022.01.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective : To study the factors relating to operative treatment for spinal metastasis in Thailand during 2005-2014 and to determine the hospital costs, mortality rate, and incidence of perioperative complication. Methods : Inpatient reimbursement data from 2005 to 2014 was reviewed from three national healthcare organizations, including the National Health Security Office, the Social Security Office, and the Comptroller General's Department. The search criteria were secondary malignant neoplasm of bone and bone marrow patients (International Classification of Diseases 10th revision, Thai modification codes [ICD 10-TM], C79.5 and C79.8) who underwent spinal surgical treatment (ICD 9th revision, clinical modification procedure with extension codes [ICD 9-CM], 03.0, 03.4, 03.09, and 81.0) during 2005-2014. Epidemiology, comorbidity, and perioperative complication were analyzed. Results : During the study period, the number of spinal metastasis patients who underwent operative treatment was significantly increased from 0.30 to 0.59 per 100000 (p<0.001). More males (56.14%) underwent surgical treatment for spinal metastasis than females. The most common age group was 45-64 (55.1%). The most common primary tumor sites were the unknown origin, lung, breast, prostate, and hepatocellular/bile duct. Interestingly, the proportion of hepatocellular/bile duct, breast, and lung cancer was significantly increased (p<0.001). The number of patients who had comorbidity or in-hospital complication significantly increased over time (p<0.01); however, the in-hospital mortality rate decreased. Conclusion : During the last decade, operative treatment for spinal metastasis increased in Thailand. The overall in-hospital complication rate increased; however, the in-hospital mortality rate decreased.

키워드

과제정보

This study was funded by a grant from the faculty of Medicine, Mahidol University, Siriraj Hospital (grant no. R015832033). The authors would like to thank Miss Nhathita Panatreswas for statistical analysis, editing the manuscript, and assisting with the journal submission process.

참고문헌

  1. Aebi M : Spinal metastasis in the elderly. Eur Spine J 12 Suppl 2 : S202-S213, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-003-0609-9
  2. Fehlings MG, Nater A, Holmer H : Cost-effectiveness of surgery in the management of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39 : S99-S105, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000525
  3. Fehlings MG, Nater A, Tetreault L, Kopjar B, Arnold P, Dekutoski M, et al. : Survival and clinical outcomes in surgically treated patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: results of the prospective multicenter AOSpine study. J Clin Oncol 34 : 268-276, 2016
  4. Horn SR, Dhillon ES, Poorman GW, Tishelman JC, Segreto FA, Bortz CA, et al. : Epidemiology and national trends in prevalence and surgical management of metastatic spinal disease. J Clin Neurosci 53 : 183-187, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2018.04.022
  5. Hsiue PP, Kelley BV, Chen CJ, Stavrakis AI, Lord EL, Shamie AN, et al. : Surgical treatment of metastatic spine disease: an update on national trends and clinical outcomes from 2010 to 2014. Spine J 20 : 915-924, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2020.02.010
  6. Luksanapruksa P, Buchowski JM, Zebala LP, Kepler CK, Singhatanadgige W, Bumpass DB : Perioperative complications of spinal metastases surgery. Clin Spine Surg 30 : 4-13, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000484
  7. Patil CG, Lad SP, Santarelli J, Boakye M : National inpatient complications and outcomes after surgery for spinal metastasis from 1993-2002. Cancer 110 : 625-630, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22819
  8. Schoenfeld AJ, Losina E, Ferrone ML, Schwab JH, Chi JH, Blucher JA, et al. : Ambulatory status after surgical and nonsurgical treatment for spinal metastasis. Cancer 125 : 2631-2637, 2019 https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32140
  9. Schoenfeld AJ, Schwab JH, Ferrone ML, Blucher JA, Balboni TA, Barton LB, et al. : Non-operative management of spinal metastases: a prognostic model for failure. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 188 : 105574, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105574
  10. Siegal T, Siegal T : Current considerations in the management of neoplastic spinal cord compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14 : 223-228, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198902000-00015
  11. Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H, Oda H, Oshima M, Ryu J : A revised scoring system for preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30 : 2186-2191, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000180401.06919.a5
  12. Wright E, Ricciardi F, Arts M, Buchowski JM, Chung CK, Coppes M, et al. : Metastatic spine tumor epidemiology: comparison of trends in surgery across two decades and three continents. World Neurosurg 114 : e809-e817, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.091
  13. Yoshihara H, Yoneoka D : Trends in the surgical treatment for spinal metastasis and the in-hospital patient outcomes in the United States from 2000 to 2009. Spine J 14 : 1844-1849, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.029