DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characterization of exopolysaccharide-producing lactic acid bacteria from Taiwanese ropy fermented milk and their application in low-fat fermented milk

  • Ng, Ker-Sin (Department of Animal Science and Technology, College of Bioresources and Agriculture, National Taiwan University) ;
  • Chang, Yu-Chun (Department of Animal Science and Technology, College of Bioresources and Agriculture, National Taiwan University) ;
  • Chen, Yen-Po (Department of Animal Science, National Chung Hsing University) ;
  • Lo, Ya-Hsuan (Department of Animal Science and Technology, College of Bioresources and Agriculture, National Taiwan University) ;
  • Wang, Sheng-Yao (Department of Animal Science and Technology, College of Bioresources and Agriculture, National Taiwan University) ;
  • Chen, Ming-Ju (Department of Animal Science and Technology, College of Bioresources and Agriculture, National Taiwan University)
  • Received : 2021.05.29
  • Accepted : 2021.08.06
  • Published : 2022.02.01

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to characterize the exopolysaccharides (EPS)-producing lactic acid bacteria from Taiwanese ropy fermented milk (TRFM) for developing a clean label low-fat fermented milk. Methods: Potential isolates from TRFM were selected based on the Gram staining test and observation of turbid suspension in the culture broth. Random amplified polymorphic DNA-polymerase chain reaction, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and API CHL 50 test were used for strain identification. After evaluation of EPS concentration, target strains were introduced to low-fat milk fermentation for 24 h. Fermentation characters were checked: pH value, acidity, viable count, syneresis, and viscosity. Sensory evaluation of fermented products was carried out by 30 volunteers, while the storage test was performed for 21 days at 4℃. Results: Two EPS-producing strains (APL15 and APL16) were isolated from TRFM and identified as Lactococcus (Lc.) lactis subsp. cremoris. Their EPS concentrations in glucose and lactose media were higher than other published strains of Lc. lactis subsp. cremoris. Low-fat fermented milk separately prepared with APL15 and APL16 reached pH 4.3 and acidity 0.8% with a viable count of 9 log colony-forming units/mL. The physical properties of both products were superior to the control yogurt, showing significant improvements in syneresis and viscosity (p<0.05). Our low-fat products had appropriate sensory scores in appearance and texture according to sensory evaluation. Although decreasing viable cells of strains during the 21-day storage test, low-fat fermented milk made by APL15 exhibited stable physicochemical properties, including pH value, acidity, syneresis and sufficient viable cells throughout the storage period. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that Lc. lactis subsp. cremoris APL15 isolated from TRFM had good fermentation abilities to produce low-fat fermented milk. These data indicate that EPS-producing lactic acid bacteria have great potential to act as natural food stabilizers for low-fat fermented milk.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

We acknowledge the funding of this research by the Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, Taiwan (Project number: 107AS-3.1.1-AD-U1 and 109AS-3.1.1-AD-U1) and the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Project number: 108-2313-B-002-008 and 109-2313-B-002-017).

References

  1. Sandrou DK, Arvanitoyannis IS. Low-fat/calorie foods: current state and perspectives. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2000;40:427-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408690091189211
  2. Babio N, Becerra-Tomas N, Martinez-Gonzalez M, et al. Consumption of yogurt, low-fat milk, and other low-fat dairy products is associated with lower risk of metabolic syndrome incidence in an elderly Mediterranean population. J Nutr 2015;145:2308-16. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.115.214593
  3. Forss DA. Role of lipids in flavors. J Agric Food Chem 1969;17:681-5. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf60164a015
  4. Brauss MS, Linforth RST, Cayeux I, Harvey B, Taylor AJ. Altering the fat content affects flavor release in a model yogurt system. J Agric Food Chem 1999;47:2055-9. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf9810719
  5. Prasanna PHP, Grandison AS, Charalampopoulos D. Screening human intestinal Bifidobacterium strains for growth, acidification, EPS production and viscosity potential in lowfat milk. Int Dairy J 2012;23:36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2011.09.008
  6. Behare PV, Singh R, Nagpal R, Rao KH. Exopolysaccharides producing Lactobacillus fermentum strain for enhancing rheological and sensory attributes of low-fat dahi. J Food Sci Technol 2013;50:1228-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-013-0999-6
  7. London LE, Chaurin, Auty MA, et al. Use of Lactobacillus mucosae DPC 6426, an exopolysaccharide-producing strain, positively influences the techno-functional properties of yoghurt. Int Dairy J 2015;40:33-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2014.08.011
  8. Prasanna PHP, Grandison AS, Charalampopoulos D. Microbiological, chemical and rheological properties of low fat set yoghurt produced with exopolysaccharide (EPS) producing Bifidobacterium strains. Food Res Int 2013;51:15-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2012.11.016
  9. Wang SY, Chen HC, Dai TY, Huang IN, Liu JR, Chen MJ. Identification of lactic acid bacteria in Taiwanese ropy fermented milk and evaluation of their microbial ecology in bovine and caprine milk. J Dairy Sci 2011;94:623-35. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3503
  10. Caggianiello G, Kleerebezem M, Spano G. Exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria: from health-promoting benefits to stress tolerance mechanisms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2016;100:3877-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7471-2
  11. Watanabe K, Fujimoto J, Sasamoto M, Dugersuren J, Tumursuh T, Demberel S. Diversity of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts in Airag and Tarag, traditional fermented milk products of Mongolia. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2008;24:1313-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-007-9604-3
  12. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016;33:1870-4. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054
  13. Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 1956;28:350-6. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017
  14. Dried milk: determination of titratable acidity (ISO 6901:2010). International Organization for Standardization; 2010 [cited 2019 Sep 19]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/55777.html
  15. Mani-Lopez E, Palou E, Lopez-Malo A. Probiotic viability and storage stability of yogurts and fermented milks prepared with several mixtures of lactic acid bacteria. J Dairy Sci 2014;97:2578-90. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7551
  16. Damin MR, Minowa E, Alcantara MR, Oliveira MN. Effect of cold storage on culture viability and some rheological properties of fermented milk prepared with yogurt and probiotic bacteria. J Texture Stud 2008;39:40-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4603.2007.00129.x
  17. Rimada PS, Abraham AG. Comparative study of different methodologies to determine the exopolysaccharide produced by kefir grains in milk and whey. Lait 2003;83:79-87. https://doi.org/10.1051/lait:2002051
  18. Meilgaard MC, Carr BT, Civille GV. Sensory evaluation techniques. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press; 1999. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439832271
  19. Tanigawa K, Kawabata H, Watanabe K. Identification and typing of Lactococcus lactis by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010;76:4055-62. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02698-09
  20. Perez T, Balcazar JL, Peix A, et al. Lactococcus lactis subsp. tructae subsp. nov. isolated from the intestinal mucus of brown trout (Salmo trutta) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011;61:1894-8. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.023945-0
  21. Meucci A, Zago M, Rossetti L, et al. Lactococcus hircilactis sp. nov. and Lactococcus laudensis sp. nov., isolated from milk. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015;65:2091-6. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.000225
  22. Li TT, Tian WL, Gu CT. Elevation of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris to the species level as Lactococcus cremoris sp. nov. and transfer of Lactococcus lactis subsp. tructae to Lactococcus cremoris as Lactococcus cremoris subsp. tructae comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021;71:004727. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004727
  23. Boels IC, Kleerebezem M, de Vos WM. Engineering of carbon distribution between glycolysis and sugar nucleotide biosynthesis in Lactococcus lactis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003;69:1129-36. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.2.1129-1135.2003
  24. Marshall VM, Cowie EN, Moreton RS. Analysis and production of two exopolysaccharides from Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris LC330. J Dairy Res 1995;62:621-8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029900031356
  25. Looijesteijn PJ, Hugenholtz J. Uncoupling of growth and exopolysaccharide production by Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris NIZO B40 and optimization of its synthesis. J Biosci Bioeng 1999;88:178-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1723(99)80198-4
  26. Codex stan 243-2003: codex standard for fermented milks. Codex Alimentarius; 2003 [cited 2019 Sep 19]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/input/download/standards/400/CXS_243e.pdf
  27. Pearse MJ, Linklater PM, Hall RJ, Mackinlay AG. Effect of casein micelle composition and casein dephosphorylation on coagulation and syneresis. J Dairy Res 1986;53:381-90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029900025000
  28. Kristo E, Miao Z, Corredig M. The role of exopolysaccharide produced by Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris in structure formation and recovery of acid milk gels. Int Dairy J 2011;21:656-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2011.02.002
  29. Yvon M, Thirouin S, Rijnen L, Fromentier D, Gripon JC. An aminotransferase from Lactococcus lactis initiates conversion of amino acids to cheese flavor compounds. Appl Environ Microbiol 1997;63:414-9. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.63.2.414-419.1997
  30. Vinderola CG, Bailo N, Reinheimer JA. Survival of probiotic microflora in Argentinian yoghurts during refrigerated storage. Food Res Int 2000;33:97-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(00)00011-9