Animal Bioscience

  • 제35권1호
  • /
  • Pages.29-38
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2765-0189(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2765-0235(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of feeding a diet comprised of various corn silages inclusion with peanut vine or wheat straw on performance, digestion, serum parameters and meat nutrients in finishing beef cattle

  • Zhang, Hongrui (Henan International Joint Laboratory of Nutrition Regulation and Ecological Raising of Domestic Animal, College of Animal Science and Technology) ;
  • Zhang, Liyang (Henan International Joint Laboratory of Nutrition Regulation and Ecological Raising of Domestic Animal, College of Animal Science and Technology) ;
  • Xue, Xiao (Henan International Joint Laboratory of Nutrition Regulation and Ecological Raising of Domestic Animal, College of Animal Science and Technology) ;
  • Zhang, Xiaoxia (Henan Forage Feeding Technology Extension Station) ;
  • Wang, Hongyi (Nanyang Animal Husbandry Technology Extension Station) ;
  • Gao, Tengyun (Henan International Joint Laboratory of Nutrition Regulation and Ecological Raising of Domestic Animal, College of Animal Science and Technology) ;
  • Phillips, Clive (Curtin University Sustainability Policy (CUSP) Institute, Curtin University)
  • 투고 : 2021.02.25
  • 심사 : 2021.05.23
  • 발행 : 2022.01.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the feeding value, meat nutrients and associative effects of a diet comprised of various corn silages inclusion with peanut vine or wheat straw in finishing beef cattle. Methods: One hundred and eighty Simmental crossbred beef steers were blocked and assigned to the follow treatments: i) whole plant corn silage-based diet (control, WPCS), ii) mixed forages-based diet (replacing a portion of corn silage with wheat straw, WPCSW), iii) corn stalklage-based diet (CS), and iv) sweet corn stalklage-based diet (SCS). Each group consisted of 5 repeated pens with 9 steers/pen. The diets were formulated to be isonitrogenous and isoenergetic with same forage to concentrate ratio. Experimental diets were fed for 90 d. Results: The effective ruminal degradability of dry matter and crude protein were highest for WPCS diet (p<0.05), for neutral detergent fiber was highest in SCS diet (p<0.05). The average daily gain was greater for cattle offered the WPCS diet, intermediate with WPCSW and SCS and lowest with CS (p<0.001). The concentration of non-esterified fatty acid in serum was higher for steers fed with CS and SCS diets than those offered WPCS and WPCSW steers (p<0.001). The treatments did not affect the general nutritional contents and amino acids composition of Longissimus dorsi of steers (p>0.05). Conclusion: The corn silage-based diet exhibited the highest feeding value. The sweet corn stalklage and wheat straw as an alternative to corn silage offered to beef cattle had limited influence on feeding value and meat nutrients. However, the value of a corn stalklage-based diet was relatively poor. To sum up, when the high quality forage resources, such as corn silage, are in short supply, or the growth rate of beef cattle decreases in the later finishing period, the sweet stalklage and wheat straw could be used as a cheaper alternative in feedlot cattle diet without sharp reducing economic benefits.

키워드

과제정보

This research was financially supported by China Agriculture Research System (Beijing, China; No. CARS-36); Application and Demonstration of High Quality Beef Cattle High Efficient and Safe Feeding Technology (2018YFD0501704); Henan Province planting and feeding technology integration demonstration application promotion project (2007).

참고문헌

  1. Queiroz OCM, Ogunade IM, Weinberg Z, Adesogan AT. Silage review: Foodborne pathogens in silage and their mitigation by silage additives. J Dairy Sci 2018;101:4132-42. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13901
  2. Saunders CS. Growth performance, ruminal fermentation characteristics, and economic returns of growing beef steers fed brown midrib, corn, silage-based diet. Logan, Utah, USA: Utah State University; 2015.
  3. He L, Yang J, Chen W, Zhou Z, Meng Q. Growth performance, carcass trait, meat quality and oxidative stability of beef cattle offered alternative silages in a finishing ration. Animal 2017;12:657-66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117001902
  4. Wang M, Wang L, Yu Z. Fermentation dynamics and bacterial diversity of mixed lucerne and sweet corn stalk silage ensiled at six ratios. Grass Forage Sci 2019;74:264-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12431
  5. Qin MZ, Shen YX. Effect of application of a bacteria inoculant and wheat bran on fermentation quality of peanut vine ensiled alone or with corn stover. J Integr Agric 2013;012:556-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60257-9
  6. Lu D. Study on association effect of feed ingredients Beijing, China: China Agricultural Press; 2000.
  7. Cantalapiedra-Hijar G, Yanez-Ruiz DR, Martin-Garcia AI, Molina-Alcaide E. Effects of forage:concentrate ratio and forage type on apparent digestibility, ruminal fermentation, and microbial growth in goats. J Anim Sci 2009;87:622-31. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1142
  8. Nazli MH, Halim RA, Abdullah AM, Hussin G, Samsudin AA. Potential of feeding beef cattle with whole corn crop silage and rice straw in Malaysia. Trop Anim Health Pro 2018;50:1119-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-018-1538-2
  9. Mazzenga A, Gianesella M, Brscic M, Cozzi G. Feeding behaviour, diet digestibility, rumen fluid and metabolic parameters of beef cattle fed total mixed rations with a stepped substitution of wheat straw with maize silage. Livest Sci 2009; 122:16-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2008.07.015
  10. FASS. Guide for the care and use of agricultural animals in research and teaching. Champaign, IL, USA: FASS; 2010.
  11. Mehrez AZ, Orskov ER. A study of artificial fibre bag technique for determining the dig estibility of feeds in the rumen. J Agric Sci 1977;88:645-50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600037321
  12. Orskov ER, McDonald I. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J Agric Sci 1979;92:499-503. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600063048
  13. Dhanoa MS. On the analysis of dacron bag data for low degradability feeds. Grass Forage Sci 1988;43:441-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1988.tb01901.x
  14. Krishnamoorthy U, Muscato TV, Sniffen CJ, Soest PJV. Nitrogen fractions in selected feedstuffs. J Dairy Sci 1982;65: 217-25. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(82)82180-2
  15. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991;74:3583-97. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  16. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 18th ed. Arlington, VA, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 2006.
  17. Wang C, Nishino N. Effects of storage temperature and ensiling period on fermentation products, aerobic stability and microbial communities of total mixed ration silage. J Appl Microbiol 2013;114:1687-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12200
  18. Broderick GA, Kang JH. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. J Dairy Sci 1980;63:64-75. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)82888-8
  19. Samuelson KL, Hubbert ME, Galyean ML, Loest CA. Nutritional recommendations of feedlot consulting nutritionists: The 2015 New Mexico State and Texas Tech University survey. J Anim Sci 2016;94:2648-63. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016-0282
  20. Rondahl T, Bertilsson J, Martinsson K. Mixing whole-crop pea-oat silage and grass-clover silage: positive effects on intake and milk production of dairy cows. Grass Forage Sci 2010;62:459-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2007.00601.x
  21. Wang F, Nishino N. Ensiling of soybean curd residue and wet brewers grains with or without other feeds as a total mixed ration. J Dairy Sci 2008;91:2380-7. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0821
  22. Su H, Akins MS, Esser NM, et al. Effects of feeding alfalfa stemlage or wheat straw for dietary energy dilution on nutrient intake and digestibility, growth performance, and feeding behavior of Holstein dairy heifers. J Dairy Sci 2017; 100:7106-15. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12448
  23. Yang WZ, Beauchemin KA. Increasing the physically effective fiber content of dairy cow diets may lower efficiency of feed use. J Dairy Sci 2006;89:2694-704. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72345-1
  24. Jung HG, Allen MS. Characteristics of plant cell walls affecting intake and digestibility of forages by ruminants. J Anim Sci 1995;73:2774-90. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.7392774x
  25. Stierwalt MR, Blalock HM, Felix TL. Effects of the interaction of forage and supplement type on digestibility and ruminal fermentation in beef cattle. J Anim Sci 2017;95:892-900. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016.1072
  26. Rosero DS, Odle J, Arellano C, Boyd RD, Heugten EV. Development of prediction equations to estimate the apparent digestible energy content of lipids when fed to lactating sows. J Anim Sci 2015;93:1165-76. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8402
  27. Duckett SK, Neel JPS, Lewis RM, Fontenot JP, Clapham WM. Effects of forage species or concentrate finishing on animal performance, carcass and meat quality. J Anim Sci 2013;91:1454-67. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5914
  28. He LW, Wu H, Wang GG, Meng QX, Zhou ZM. The effects of including corn silage, corn stalk silage, and corn grain in finishing ration of beef steers on meat quality and oxidative stability. Meat Sci 2018;139:142-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.01.023
  29. Walsh K, O' Kiely P, Moloney AP, Boland TM. Intake, performance and carcass characteristics of beef cattle offered diets based on whole-crop wheat or forage maize relative to grass silage or ad libitum concentrates. Livest Sci 2008;116:223-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.10.010
  30. Moloney AP, Drennan MJ. Characteristics of fat and muscle from beef heifers offered a grass silage or concentrate-based finishing ration. Livest Sci 2013;152:147-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.12.001