Animal Bioscience

  • 제35권1호
  • /
  • Pages.1-12
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2765-0189(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2765-0235(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Expression of FKBP prolyl isomerase 5 gene in tissues of muscovy duck at different growth stages and its association with muscovy duck weight

  • Hu, Zhigang (College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University) ;
  • Ge, Liyan (College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University) ;
  • Zhang, Huilin (College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University) ;
  • Liu, Xiaolin (College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University)
  • 투고 : 2020.09.14
  • 심사 : 2021.04.25
  • 발행 : 2022.01.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: FKBP prolyl isomerase 5 (FKBP5) has been shown to play an important role in metabolically active tissues such as skeletal muscle. However, the expression of FKBP5 in Muscovy duck tissues and its association with body weight are still unclear. Methods: In this study, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction was used to detect the expression of FKBP5 in different tissues of Muscovy duck at different growth stages. Further, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were detected in the exon region of FKBP5 and were combined analyzed with the body weight of 334 Muscovy ducks. Results: FKBP5 was highly expressed in various tissues of Muscovy duck at days 17, 19, 21, 24, and 27 of embryonic development. In addition, the expression of FKBP5 in the tissues of female adult Muscovy ducks was higher than that of male Muscovy ducks. Besides, an association analysis indicated that 3 SNPs were related to body weight trait. At the g.4819252 A>G, the body weight of AG genotype was significantly higher than that of the AA and the GG genotype. At the g.4821390 G>A, the genotype GA was extremely significantly related to body weight. At the g.4830622 T>G, the body weight of TT was significantly higher than GG and TG. Conclusion: These findings indicate the possible effects of expression levels in various tissues and the SNPs of FKBP5 on Muscovy duck body weight trait. FKBP5 could be used as molecular marker for muscle development trait using early marker-assisted selection of Muscovy ducks.

키워드

과제정보

This study was supported by funds from the National Waterfowl Industrial Technology System of China (CARS-42-2) and the Research on the Effect of New Breeding of the Black Muscovy Duck of Shaanxi (2019QYPY-130).

참고문헌

  1. Mitchell PO, Mills ST, Pavlath GK. Calcineurin differentially regulates maintenance and growth of phenotypically distinct muscles. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2002;282:C984-92. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00483.2001
  2. Iizuka K, Machida T, Hirafuji M. Skeletal muscle is an endocrine organ. J Pharmacol Sci 2014;125:125-31. https://doi.org/10.1254/jphs.14r02cp
  3. Norring M, Valros A, Valaja J, Sihvo HK, Immonen K, Puolanne E. Wooden breast myopathy links with poorer gait in broiler chickens. Animal 2019;13:1690-5. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118003270
  4. Glass DJ. Signalling pathways that mediate skeletal muscle hypertrophy and atrophy. Nat Cell Biol 2003;5:87-90. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb0203-87
  5. Stewart CE, Rittweger J. Adaptive processes in skeletal muscle: molecular regulators and genetic influences. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2006;6:73-86.
  6. Grand FL, Rudnicki MA. Skeletal muscle satellite cells and adult myogenesis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2007;19:628-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2007.09.012
  7. Gaali S, Gopalakrishnan R, Wang Y, Kozany C, Hausch F. The chemical biology of immunophilin ligands. Curr Med Chem 2011;18:5355-79. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986711798194342
  8. Menke A, Klengel T, Rubel J, et al. Genetic variation in FKBP5 associated with the extent of stress hormone dysregulation in major depression. Genes Brain Behav 2013;12:289-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/gbb.12026
  9. Wang Q, Shelton RC, Dwivedi Y. Interaction between early-life stress and FKBP5 gene variants in major depressive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2018;225:422-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.08.066
  10. O'Leary JC, Zhang B, Koren J, Blair L, Dickey CA. The role of FKBP5 in mood disorders: Action of FKBP5 on steroid hormone receptors leads to questions about its evolutionary importance. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 2013;12:1157-62. https://doi.org/10.2174/187152731131200121
  11. Herman JP, McKlveen JM, Ghosal S, et al. Regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical stress response. Compr Physiol 2016;6:603-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c150015
  12. Touma C, Gassen NC, Herrmann L, et al. FK506 binding protein 5 shapes stress responsiveness: modulation of neuroendocrine reactivity and coping behavior. Biol Psychiatry 2011;70:928-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.07.023
  13. Hartmann J, Wagner KV, Liebl C, et al. The involvement of FK506-binding protein 51 (FKBP5) in the behavioral and neuroendocrine effects of chronic social defeat stress. Neuropharmacology 2012;62:332-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.07.041
  14. Oakley RH, Cidlowski JA. The biology of the glucocorticoid receptor: new signaling mechanisms in health and disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2013;132:1033-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2013.09.007
  15. Pei HD, Li L, Fridley BL, et al. FKBP51 affects cancer cell response to chemotherapy by negatively regulating Akt. Cancer Cell 2009;16:259-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2009.07.016
  16. Gassen NC, Hartmann J, Zschocke J, et al. Association of FKBP51 with priming of autophagy pathways and mediation of antidepressant treatment response: evidence in cells, mice, and humans. PLoS Med 2014;11:e1001755. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001755
  17. Su AI, Wiltshire T, Batalov S, et al. A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101;6062-7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0400782101
  18. Pereira MJ, Palming J, Svensson MK, et al. FKBP5 expression in human adipose tissue increases following dexamethasone exposure and is associated with insulin resistance. Metabolism 2014;63:1198-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2014.05.015
  19. Balsevich G, Uribe A, Wagner KV, et al. Interplay between diet-induced obesity and chronic stress in mice: potential role of FKBP51. J Endocrinol 2014;222:15-26. https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-14-0129
  20. Stechschulte LA, Bin Q, Warrier M, et al. FKBP51 null mice are resistant to diet-induced obesity and the PPARgamma agonist rosiglitazone. Endocrinology 2016;157:3888-900. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2015-1996
  21. Zannas AS, Balsevich G, Gassen NC. The emerging role of FKBP5 in the regulation of metabolism and body weight. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2016;12:1560-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.05.016
  22. Lu BR, Jiao YL, Wang YC, et al. A FKBP5 mutation is associated with Paget's disease of bone and enhances osteoclastogenesis. Exp Mol Med 2017;49:e336. https://doi.org/10.1038/emm.2017.64
  23. Hartmann IB, Fries GR, Bucker J, Scotton E, von Diemen L, Kauer-Sant'Anna M. The FKBP5 polymorphism rs1360780 is associated with lower weight loss after bariatric surgery: 26 months of follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2016;12:1554-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.04.016
  24. Yeo S, Enoch MA, Gorodetsky E, et al. The influence of FKBP5 genotype on expression of FKBP5 and other glucocorticoid-regulated genes, dependent on trauma exposure. Genes Brain Behav 2017;16:223-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/gbb.12342
  25. Wang G, Zhang S, Wei S, et al. Novel polymorphisms of SIX4 gene and their association with body measurement traits in Qinchuan cattle. Gene 2014;539:107-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2014.01.042
  26. Zhang C, Chen KK, Zhao XH, Wang C, Geng ZY. Effect of L-theanine on the growth performance, immune function, and jejunum morphology and antioxidant status of ducks. Animal 2019;13:1145-53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118002884
  27. Dou TF, Li ZT, Wang K, et al. Regulation of myostatin expression is associated with growth and muscle development in commercial broiler and DMC muscle. Mol Biol Rep 2018; 45:511-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-018-4187-7
  28. Li H, Zhu C, Tao Z, et al. MyoD and Myf6 gene expression patterns in skeletal muscle during embryonic and posthatch development in the domestic duck (Anas platyrhynchos domestica). J Anim Breed Genet 2014;131:194-201. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12057
  29. Shimoide T, Kawao N, Tamura Y, Morita H, Kaji H. Novel roles of FKBP5 in muscle alteration induced by gravity change in mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2016;479:602-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.09.126
  30. MacMillan D. FK506 binding proteins: cellular regulators of intracellular Ca2+ signalling. Eur J Pharmacol 2013;700:181-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2012.12.029
  31. Garabedian MJ, Harris CA, Jeanneteau F. Glucocorticoid receptor action in metabolic and neuronal function. F1000Res 2017;6:1208. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11375.1
  32. Laine AL, Laclie C, Furlong J, Crowe MA, Monniaux D. A bovine-specific FSH enzyme immunoassay and its application to study the role of FSH in ovarian follicle development during the postnatal period. Animal 2019;13:1666-75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118003233
  33. Shi L, Liu L, Ma Z, et al. Identification of genetic associations of ECHS1 gene with milk fatty acid traits in dairy cattle. Anim Genet 2019;50:430-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12833
  34. Cao F, Zhang HB, Feng JL, Gao CG, Li SB. Association study of three microsatellite polymorphisms located in introns 1, 8, and 9 of DISC1 with schizophrenia in the Chinese Han population. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2013;17:407-11. https://doi.org/10.1089/gtmb.2012.0438
  35. Wilkie GS, Dickson KS, Gray NK. Regulation of mRNA translation by 5'- and 3'-UTR-binding factors. Trends Biochem Sci 2003;28:182-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0004(03)00051-3
  36. Ju ZH, Wang CF, Wang XG, et al. The effect of the SNP g.18475 A>G in the 3'UTR of NCF4 on mastitis susceptibility in dairy cattle. Cell Stress Chaperones 2018;23:385-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12192-017-0848-z