DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Relationship between hazardous risk factors and subjective health conditions in the working environment of dental hygienists

치과위생사의 작업환경 유해위험요인과 주관적 건강상태와의 관계

  • Hyoung-Joo, Kim (Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Health Science, Eulji University) ;
  • Jun-Yeong, Kwon (Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Health Science, Eulji University) ;
  • Hee-Jung, Lim (Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Health Science, Eulji University)
  • Received : 2022.09.16
  • Accepted : 2022.10.31
  • Published : 2022.12.30

Abstract

Background: This study was aimed at investigating the type of work of dental hygienists and identifying factors affecting the subjective health status according to hazardous risk factors in the working environment. Methods: From May 15 to 31, 2019, we surveyed 411 dental hygienists working at dental hospitals in the metropolitan area. SPSS 25.0 was used to perform the frequency analysis, t-test, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson's correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis. Results: Regarding factors related to the degree of exposure to hazardous risk factors in the work environment and subjective health status, the more exposed the ergonomic (p<0.05) and psychological (p< 0.001)factors, the worse is the subjective health status. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that the working environment should be improved for dental hygienists such that they can perform their duties in a safe environment.

Keywords

References

  1. Jeon SH. A Study on dental hygienist work environment and subjective pain symptoms. Unpublished master's thesis, Gachon University, Gyeonggi, 2010.
  2. Peak DM. Non-communicable occupational health hazards in the hospital. J Korean Acad Nurs. 1992;31(3):12-21.
  3. Kim HK. Assessment of work-related symptoms and occupational exposure to methyl methacrylate for dental hygienists. Unpublished master's thesis, Catholic University of Daegu, 2014.
  4. Cho YS, et al. Dental clinic management. Komoonsa, Seoul, 2003:pp.255.
  5. Yassi A, Warshaw LJ. Occupational health services. In: Stellman JM, ed. ILO Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety. 4th ed. Geneva, Swiss: International Labour Office, 1998;97:2-64.
  6. Ministry of Employment and Labor: Retrieved May 10, 2019. from http://www.moel.go.kr/local/tongyeong/news/notice/noticeView.do;jsessionid=4nRh28v0AcUDm1J343DRubFBWVqOsAnwj9uuWF7mRNLIfFqPMYG7uSPK2JVk1KiZ.moel_was_outside_servlet_wwwlocal?bbs_seq=20180500123. (2018, May 3)
  7. Kim HK, et al. Relationship between musculoskeletal subjective symptoms and work environment in dental hygienists. J Kor Soc Dent Hyg 2012; 12(6):1128-1137. https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2012.12.6.1128
  8. Cho OH, et al. Subjective health status, attitude toward death and spiritual well-being of nurse. Jour. of KoCon.a, 2013;13(10):375-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.10.375
  9. Yoon JH, et al. The relationship of self-rated health condition to stress recognition, health related habits, serum biochemical indices, and nutritional intakes in Korean healthy adults. Korean J Food Nutr 2017;30(1):83-95. https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2017.30.1.083
  10. Kwon SS. A study of the health related habits of dental technicians. J Tech Dent 2010;32(4):369-386.
  11. Kim MJ, Kim KH. Factors influencing subjective health status perception of obese college students. J Korean Soc Sch Health, 2017:30(3):336-343. https://doi.org/10.15434/kssh.2017.30.3.336
  12. Jun HJ. A study on of subjective health status, health concern and health behavior of elderly in senior centers. Unpublished master's thesis, Chonnam national Univercity, Kwangju, 2008.
  13. Sung HK. Factor analysis on health status perception among korean military officers. Unpublished master's thesis, Yonsei University. Seoul, 2002.
  14. Lim HJ. Factors affecting the health status of dental hygienist based on theoty of salutogenic. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ehwa Women University, Seoul, 2017.
  15. Choi MJ, Park EJ. A study on factors influencing perceptions of dental hygienists' environmental working conditions. J Environ Health Sci. 2020;46(5):539-547. https://doi.org/10.5668/JEHS.2020.46.5.539
  16. Lee HE. A study on the determinants of quality of life of the dental technician. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Chungnam National Univercity, Daejeon, 2013.
  17. Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency. Retrieved September 5, 2019, from https://www.kosha.or.kr/kosha/data/registration.do?mode=view&articleNo=327741&article.offset=0&articleLimit=10#/list (2015, December 4)
  18. Kim NS, et al., The effect of dental hygienist's work environment on job satisfaction and organizational commitment. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg, 2018;18(2): 153-163 https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2018.18.02.153
  19. Freeman R, et al. Occupational stress and dentistry :theory and pract ice. Part II. Assessment and control. Br Dent J 1995;178(6): 218-222. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4808717
  20. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Interim Infection Prevention and Control Guidance for Dental Settings During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic. 2020.[cited 2020 May 30]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/dental-settings.html.
  21. Smith A, et al. Management of needlestick injuries in general dental practice. Br Dent J 2001;190(12):645-650. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801064a
  22. Retrieved September 2, 2022. from https://www.esk.or.kr/conference/2018_spring/file/OralSessions/S6-B/2.pdf(2018)
  23. Go EJ. Dental hygienist's lifestyle and musculoskeletal symptoms. J Kor Dent Hyg Sci 2018;1(1):1-10
  24. Park HY. The effects of emotional labor on occupational stress and mental health among dental hygienists. Unpublished master's thesis, Dong-Eui University, Busan, 2016.
  25. NIOSH. Stress at work. DHHS(NIOSH) Publication. 1999;pp.99-101.
  26. Yoon SU, Kim JS. Relations between emotional labor and job stress among some dental hygienists. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg. 2011;11(2):179-188.
  27. Mary A. Fox, et al. Implications of applying cumulative risk assessment to the workplace. Environment International, 2018;115:230-238.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.03.026