한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제42권5호
  • /
  • Pages.487-499
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

최근 20년 동안의 초등 과학 교과서 연구 동향 분석

Research Trends of Elementary Science Textbook: Focus on Papers Published in Domestic Journals in the Last Twenty Years

  • 투고 : 2022.07.22
  • 심사 : 2022.09.28
  • 발행 : 2022.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 초등 과학 교과서 연구의 동향과 특징을 파악하기 위해 2001년부터 2021년까지 과학과 관련 학술지에 게재된 논문 중, 초등 과학 교과서와 관련된 연구 156편을 분석하여 교과서 분석에 관한 연구 동향을 살펴보았다. 분석 기준은 '형식'과 '주제' 두 개의 대범주로 구성하고, '형식'의 하위 범주로 '발행연도', '대상 교육과정', '분석 학년', '과학 내용 영역', '분석 대상', '발행 기관'을 '주제'의 하위 범주로는 '비교 연구', '내용 분석', '삽화', '탐구활동', '교과서에 대한 인식', '기타'로 설정하였다. '형식'에 대한 분석 결과 거의 매년 교과서 관련 연구가 수행되고 있었고 2009 개정 교육과정기에 가장 많은 연구가 수행되었으며, 전 학년(3~6학년) 및 과학의 전 영역을 대상으로 다룬 연구가 대부분을 차지하였다. 또한 과학교육 관련 학회지뿐만 아니라 비관련 학회지에서도 과학 교과서에 관한 연구가 수행되었다. '주제'에 대한 분석 결과 비교 연구, 내용 분석, 삽화, 탐구활동, 교과서에 대한 인식 순으로 연구 비율이 높았다. 초등 과학 교과서 연구 동향에 대한 분석을 바탕으로 초등 과학 검정 교과서에 대한 시사점을 얻고자 하였다.

This study aims to understand the trends and characteristics of elementary science textbook research. For this purpose, among the papers published in science-related journals from 2001 to 2021, 156 studies related to elementary science textbooks were analyzed to examine the research trends on textbook analysis. The analysis criteria consisted of two major categories, 'outward feature' and 'topic.' The subcategories of 'outward feature' consist of 'year of publication,' 'target curriculum,' 'target grade,' 'science content area,' 'subject of study,' and 'publishing institution.' The sub-categories of 'topic' consist of 'comparison,' 'content,' 'illustration,' 'inquiry activity,' 'perception of textbooks,' and 'others.' As a result of the analysis on 'outer feature,' textbook-related research was conducted almost every year, and the research on the 2009 revised science curriculum, on the 3-6 grades, and on the whole field of science had the most. The science textbook researches were published not only in science education-related journals but also in other areas' journals. As a result of the analysis of the 'topic,' the number of papers was higher in the order of comparative research, content analysis, illustration, inquiry activities, and perception of textbooks. Implications for accredited textbook system of elementary science were discussed based on the analyses on the elementary science textbook research trends.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abruscato, J. (1988). Teaching children science. Englewood Sliffs. Prentice Hall Inc.
  2. Ahn, S. H. (2020). Analysis of Changes in the Actual Condition of Distance Learning due to COVID-19. 6(3), 189-197. https://doi.org/10.32823/JCIC.6.3.202012.189
  3. Ball, D. L., Feiman-Nemser, S. (1988). Using Textbooks and Teachers' Guides: A Dilemma for Beginning Teachers and Teacher Educators. Curriculum Inquiry, 18(4), 401-423. https://doi.org/10.2307/1179386
  4. Chiappetta. E. L., Fillman, D. A., Sethna, G. H. (1991) A method to quantify major themes of scientific literacy in science textbooks. Journal of research in science teaching, 28(8), 713-725. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280808
  5. Choi, B. S. (1985). The Trends of Research on Scince Education. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 1(1), 37-50.
  6. Choi, Y. R. & Lee, H. C. (1998). The illustration analysis of the elementary science textbooks. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 17(2), 45-53.
  7. Harms, N. C., Yager, R. E. (1981). What research says to the science teacher. vol 3. Washinton, D.C.: NSTA.
  8. Jang, B. G. (2003). Overview on Research Trend in the Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 22(2), 192-199.
  9. Jung, J. S. (2007). A critical review on the policy of textbook in Korea. Youth Culture publishes Forum, 16, 202-231.
  10. Lee, D. H., Kang, H. S., Yoon, H. G. (2014). Elementary School Teachers' Perceptions on Effects of 'Basic Inquiry'Units in Experimental Grade 3~4 Science Textbooks developed for2009 Revised National Curriculum, 66, 39-40.
  11. Kesidou, S., Roseman, J. E. (2002). How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum review. JRST, 39(6), 522-549.
  12. Kim, M. (2013b). A comparative study of the unit of metabolism in biology I textbooks according to the 7th curriculum and life science I textbooks according to the revised 2009 curriculum. Biology Education, 41(2), 211-224. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2013.41.2.211
  13. Hwang, Y. & Kim Y. K. (2017). Research Trends in Elementary Mathematics Education: Focused on the Papers Published in Domestic Journals During the Resent Seven Years. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 20(1), 19-36.
  14. Lee, H. C. & Ahn, J. H. (2005). The Comparative Analysis on the Illustrations of the Elementary Science Textbooks between Korea and Japan. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 24(2), 138-144.
  15. Lee, Y. H., Son, Y. A., Kim, K. R. (2014). Analysis of the Presentation for the Nature of Science in Elementary Science Textbooks using the Four Themes of Scientific Literacy. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(2), 207-516. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2014.33.2.207
  16. Lee, Y. J. (2015). Research Trends of Therapeutic Factors in Group Counseling: A Systematic Review of Journals published domestically and internationally from 1994 to 2013. Journal of Asia Pacific Counseling. 16(1), 51-71.
  17. Lloyd, C. V. (1990). The elaboration of concepts in three biology textbooks: Facilitating student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 1019-1032. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660271009
  18. Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational research. 17(2), 13~17. https://doi.org/10.2307/1174583
  19. MOE(Ministry of Education) (2015a). Elementary and Secondary School Curriculum. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
  20. MOE(Ministry of Education) (2015b). High School Science Curriculum. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
  21. No, M. Y., Jeong, H. S., Yoon, J. C. (2004). A Study on the Concept of Textbook and It's Internal System for Effective Teaching-Learning in Schools. Hanguk Kyogwaso Yongu Chaedan.
  22. Oh, K., Kang, M., & Lee, P. (2004). Inquiry activities analysis on the environment unit of the high school science textbooks for the 7th curriculum. Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation Research, 7(2), 305-323. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2004.7.2.305
  23. Park, J. Y. (2014). A Development Plan for Textbook of the Future in accordance with Educational Environment Change. SEOUL:Korea Institute Of Curriculum & Evaluation.
  24. Park, J. Y., Kwon, H. S. (2007). Analysis of Questions in the 'Matter' Units of Elementary Science Textbooks under the 7th Curriculum. 26(5), 551-557.
  25. Shin, W. S., Park, H. M., Kim, N. I. (2021). Research Trend Analysis according to the Change of 'Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education' from 1983 to 2020. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 40(4), 545-555.
  26. Song, S. C. (2019). Analysis of Inquiry Activity Types in the Elementary School Science according to the 2015 Revised Science National Curriculum - Focusing on Science Textbooks for Grade 3 and 4 -. Biology Education, 47(3), 310-323. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2019.47.3.310
  27. Song, S. M. (2013). An Analysis of Trends in Curriculum Research in Social Studies Education. Korea Association of Social Education, 45(2), 123-159.
  28. Tyson, H., Christison, M. (1997). Who will teach the children? Progress & resistance in teacher education//Review. Canadian Social Studies, 31(2), 108.
  29. Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H., Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the book: Using TIMSS to investigation the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  30. Wang, H. A. (1998). Science Textbook Studies Reanalysis: Teachers.
  31. Weiss, I. R., Pasley, J. D., Smith, P. S., Banilower, E. R., Heck, D. J. (2003). Looking inside the classroom: A study of K-12 mathematics and science education in the United States. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.
  32. Weiss, R. L., Rajotte, E. G. (2001). Combining Education with Science in Graduate Student Work. American Entomologist, 74-77. https://doi.org/10.1093/ae/tmz025
  33. Wellington, J., Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
  34. Yun, E. J., Park, Y. B. (2013). Research on Science Teacher's Perception of Teaching Science Terminology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(7), 1343-1353.