과제정보
The work was supported by the Research Fund of Trakya University. Project No. 2020/126.
참고문헌
- Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes A, Ferro A, Botto J. The All-on-4 treatment concept for the rehabilitation of the completely edentulous mandible: A longitudinal study with 10 to 18 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2019;21:565-77.
- Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes A, Ferro A, Nunes M. The All-on-4 concept for full-arch rehabilitation of the edentulous maxillae: A longitudinal study with 5-13 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2019;21:538-49.
- Katsoulis J, Takeichi T, Sol Gaviria A, Peter L, Katsoulis K. Misfit of implant prostheses and its impact on clinical outcomes. Definition, assessment and a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Oral Implantol 2017;10:121-38.
- Tohme H, Lawand G, Chmielewska M, Makhzoume J. Comparison between stereophotogrammetric, digital, and conventional impression techniques in implant-supported fixed complete arch prostheses: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2021 Jun 7;S0022-3913(21)00269-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.05.006. Online ahead of print.
- Di Fiore A, Graiff L, Savio G, Granata S, Basilicata M, Bollero P, Meneghello R. Investigation of the accuracy of four intraoral scanners in mandibular full-arch digital implant impression: a comparative in vitro study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19:4719.
- Schmidt A, Wostmann B, Schlenz MA. Accuracy of digital implant impressions in clinical studies: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2022;33:573-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13951
- Chen SY, Liang WM, Chen FN. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials. J Dent 2004;32:603-9.
- Nissan J, Laufer BZ, Brosh T, Assif D. Accuracy of three polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:161-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)80007-4
- Mizumoto RM, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy EA Jr, Seidt J, Johnston WM. Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2020; 123:96-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.01.003
- Keul C, Guth JF. Accuracy of full-arch digital impressions: an in vitro and in vivo comparison. Clin Oral Investig 2020;24:735-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02965-2
- Di Fiore A, Meneghello R, Graiff L, Savio G, Vigolo P, Monaco C, Stellini E. Full arch digital scanning systems performances for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: a comparative study of 8 intraoral scanners. J Prosthodont Res 2019;63:396-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2019.04.002
- Muller P, Ender A, Joda T, Katsoulis J. Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner. Quintessence Int 2016;47:343-9.
- Gimenez B, Ozcan M, Martinez-Rus F, Pradies G. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation, and depth. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:e54-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12124
- Bilmenoglu C, Cilingir A, Geckili O, Bilhan H, Bilgin T. In vitro comparison of trueness of 10 intraoral scanners for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:755-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.017
- Arcuri L, Pozzi A, Lio F, Rompen E, Zechner W, Nardi A. Influence of implant scanbody material, position and operator on the accuracy of digital impression for complete-arch: A randomized in vitro trial. J Prosthodont Res 2020;64:128-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2019.06.001
- International Organization for Standardization. ISO 5725-1. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results. Part 1: General principles and definitions. Geneva; 1994.
- Nedelcu RG, Persson AS. Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1461-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.027
- Ongul D, Gokcen-Rohlig B, Sermet B, Keskin H. A comparative analysis of the accuracy of different direct impression techniques for multiple implants. Aust Dent J 2012;57:184-9.
- Naini RB, Nokar S, Borghei H, Alikhasi M. Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:776-81.
- De Rossi M, Santos CM, Miglioranca R, Regalo SC. All on Four® fixed implant support rehabilitation: a masticatory function study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014;16:594-600. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12031
- Soni R, Yadav H, Pathak A, Bhatnagar A, Kumar V. Comparative evaluation of biting force and chewing efficiency of all-on-four treatment concept with other treatment modalities in completely edentulous individuals. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2020;20:312-20. https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_464_19
- Taruna M, Chittaranjan B, Sudheer N, Tella S, Abusaad M. Prosthodontic perspective to all-on-4® concept for dental implants. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:ZE16-9.
- Mehl A, Ender A, Mormann W, Attin T. Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 2009;12:11-28.
- Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:121-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60028-1
- Luthardt RG, Loos R, Quaas S. Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression. Int J Comput Dent 2005;8:283-94.
- Steinhauser-Andresen S, Detterbeck A, Funk C, Krumm M, Kasperl S, Holst A, Hirschfelder U. Pilot study on accuracy and dimensional stability of impression materials using industrial CT technology. J Orofac Orthop 2011;72:111-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-011-0015-6
- Revilla-Leon M, Gohil A, Barmak AB, Zandinejad A, Raigrodski AJ, Alonso Perez-Barquero J. Best-fit algorithm influences on virtual casts' alignment discrepancies. J Prosthodont 2022 May 7. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13537. Online ahead of print.
- Patzelt SB, Emmanouilidi A, Stampf S, Strub JR, Att W. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:1687-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1132-y
- Diker B, Tak O. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2022;128:187-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.007
- Mangano FG, Admakin O, Bonacina M, Lerner H, Rutkunas V, Mangano C. Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health 2020;20:263.
- Mangano FG, Hauschild U, Veronesi G, Imburgia M, Mangano C, Admakin O. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: a comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health 2019;19:101.
- Roth I, Czigola A, Feher D, Vitai V, Joos-Kovacs GL, Hermann P, Borbely J, Vecsei B. Digital intraoral scanner devices: a validation study based on common evaluation criteria. BMC Oral Health 2022;22:140.