Acknowledgement
This study was supported by National Science and Technology Support Program Project of China (2015BAH13F02).
References
- Guth JF, Runkel C, Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Edelhoff D, Keul C. Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization. Clin Oral Investig 2017; 21:1445-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1902-4
- Wismeijer D, Mans R, van Genuchten M, Reijers HA. Patients' preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:1113-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12234
- Belur D, Nagy WW. An alternative digital workflow for fabricating a mandibular implant-supported complete fixed dental prosthesis with limited restorative space: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.11.023
- van der Zande MM, Gorter RC, Wismeijer D. Dental practitioners and a digital future: an initial exploration of barriers and incentives to adopting digital technologies. Br Dent J 2013;215:E21. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.1146
- Ries JM, Grunler C, Wichmann M, Matta RE. Three-dimensional analysis of the accuracy of conventional and completely digital interocclusal registration methods. J Prosthet Dent 2022;128:994-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.03.005
- Renne W, Ludlow M, Fryml J, Schurch Z, Mennito A, Kessler R, Lauer A. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118:36-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.024
- Wang ZY, Chao JR, Zheng JW, You M, Liu Y, Shen JF. The influence of crown coverage on the accuracy of static guided implant surgery in partially edentulous models: An in vitro study. J Dent 2021;115:103882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103882
- Gomez-Polo M, Piedra-Cascon W, Methani MM, Quesada-Olmo N, Farjas-Abadia M, Revilla-Leon M. Influence of rescanning mesh holes and stitching procedures on the complete-arch scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vitro study. J Dent 2021;110:103690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103690
- Freilich MA, Altieri JV, Wahle JJ. Principles for selecting interocclusal records for articulation of dentate and partially dentate casts. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68: 361-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90346-C
- Davies S, Al-Ani Z, Jeremiah H, Winston D, Smith P. Reliability of recording static and dynamic occlusal contact marks using transparent acetate sheet. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:458-61.
- Ren S, Morton D, Lin WS. Accuracy of virtual interocclusal records for partially edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123:860-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.08.013
- Solaberrieta E, Arias A, Brizuela A, Garikano X, Pradies G. Determining the requirements, section quantity, and dimension of the virtual occlusal record. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:52-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.013
- Solaberrieta E, Garmendia A, Brizuela A, Otegi JR, Pradies G, Szentpetery A. Intraoral digital impressions for virtual occlusal records: section quantity and dimensions. Biomed Res Int 2016;2016:7173824.
- Park JH, Kim JE, Shim JS. Digital workflow for a dental prosthesis that considers lateral mandibular relation. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:340-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.034
- Wong KY, Esguerra RJ, Chia VAP, Tan YH, Tan KBC. Three-dimensional accuracy of digital static interocclusal registration by three intraoral scanner systems. J Prosthodont 2018;27:120-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12714
- Yun D, Choi DS, Jang I, Cha BK. Clinical application of an intraoral scanner for serial evaluation of orthodontic tooth movement: A preliminary study. Korean J Orthod 2018;48:262-7. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2018.48.4.262
- Edher F, Hannam AG, Tobias DL, Wyatt CCL. The accuracy of virtual interocclusal registration during intraoral scanning. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:904-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.024
- Arslan Y, Bankoglu Gungor M, Karakoca Nemli S, Kokdogan Boyaci B, Aydin C. Comparison of maximum intercuspal contacts of articulated casts and virtual casts requiring posterior fixed partial dentures. J Prosthodont 2017;26:594-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12439
- Villarraga-Gomez H, Lee C, Smith ST. Dimensional metrology with X-ray CT: A comparison with CMM measurements on internal features and compliant structures. Precis Eng 2018;51:291-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.08.021
- Renne W, Ludlow M, Fryml J, Schurch Z, Mennito A, Kessler R, Lauer A. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118:36-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.024
- Hayama H, Fueki K, Wadachi J, Wakabayashi N. Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible. J Prosthodont Res 2018;62:347-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2018.01.003
- Schmidt A, Benedickt CR, Schlenz MA, Rehmann P, Wostmann B. Torsion and linear accuracy in intraoral scans obtained with different scanning principles. J Prosthodont Res 2020;64:167-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2019.06.006
- Kanjanasavitree P, Thammajaruk P, Guazzato M. Comparison of different artificial landmarks and scanning patterns on the complete-arch implant intraoral digital scans. J Dent 2022;125:104266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104266
- Kim JE, Amelya A, Shin Y, Shim JS. Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions using an artificial landmark. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:755-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.016
- Abduo J, Elseyoufi M. Accuracy of intraoral scanners: A systematic review of influencing factors. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2018;26:101-21.
- Revilla-Leon M, Alonso Perez-Barquero J, Zubizarreta-Macho A, Barmak AB, Att W, Kois JC. Influence of the number of teeth and location of the virtual occlusal record on the accuracy of the maxillo-mandibular relationship obtained by using an intraoral scanner. J Prosthodont 2022 Apr 21. Doi: 10.1111/jopr.13526. Epub ahead of print.
- Moon YG, Lee KM. Comparison of the accuracy of intraoral scans between complete-arch scan and quadrant scan. Prog Orthod 2020;21:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-020-00337-1
- Iwaki Y, Wakabayashi N, Igarashi Y. Dimensional accuracy of optical bite registration in single and multiple unit restorations. Oper Dent 2013;38:309-15. https://doi.org/10.2341/12-233-L