References
- Alvermann, D. E., Swafford, J., & Montero, M. K. (2004). Content Area Literacy Instruction for the Elementary Grades. NJ: Pearson.
- Avraamidou, L., & Osborne, J. (2009). The role of narrative in communicating science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(12), 1683-1707. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802380695
- Barton, M. L., & Jordan, D. L. (2001). Teaching reading in science: A supplement to "Teaching reading in the content areas teacher's manual". VA: ASCD.
- Bulman, L. (1985). Teaching Language and Study Skills in Secondary Science. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
- Cho, H., Kwon, D., Kang, E., Park, J., Son, J., & Nam, J. (2018). Impacts of Collaborative Problem Solving for Character Competency (CoProC) Strategy on the Practical Character Competency and Collaborative Problem Solving Competency in Middle School Science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(5), 681-691. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2018.38.5.681
- Davis, F., & Greene, T. (1984). Reading for Learning in the Sciences. Edinburgh:Oliver and Boyd.
- Eshet, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93-106.
- Gomez, K., Kwon, S., Gomez, L., & Sherer, J. (2014). Supporting reading to learn inscience: The Application of Summarization technology in multicultural urbanhigh school classrooms. Chapter 7. In R. Bloymeyer, T. Ganesh, & H. Waxman (Eds.), Research on technology in multicultural settings (pp. 139-158). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publications
- Jacobson, J. M. (1998). Content Area Reading: Integration with the Language Arts. NY: Delmar Publishers.
- Jun, J., Park, J., Cho, H., Ki m, G., Park, J., & Nam, J. (2021). The Effects of Collaborative Problem-solving for Character Competence (CoProC) Instruction Strategy on Character Competence of Elementary School Students. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 25(6), 496-509. https://doi.org/10.24231/RICI.2021.25.6.496
- Kang, S., Park, J., & Nam, J. (2021). The Impact of Science Classes Applying Collaborative Problem solving for Character Competency (CoProC) on the Character Competence and Scientific Affective Characteristics of Vocational High School Students. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 65(6), 468-483. https://doi.org/10.5012/JKCS.2021.65.6.468
- Kim, N., Lee, D., & Choi, H. (2017). Investigations on Techniques and Applications of Text Analytics. The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, 42(2), 471-492. https://doi.org/10.7840/kics.2017.42.2.471
- Korea Institute Of Curriculum & Evaluation (2013). OECD programme for international students assessment: Analyzing PISA 2012 results (Report No. RRE 2013-6-1). Chungbuk: KICE.
- Korea Institute Of Curriculum & Evaluation (2015). Toward the enhancement of reading competency in the digital era focused on elementary school students (Report No. RRC 2015-5). Chungbuk: KICE.
- Korea Institute Of Curriculum & Evaluation (2021). 교과교육과정 및 독서교육 정책 분석을 통한 학교 독서교육 체계화 방안 연구 (Report No. ORM 2021-40-9). Chungbuk: KICE.
- Korea Institute Of Curriculum & Evaluation. (2016). OECD programme for international student assessment: establishing a foundation of PISA 2018 field trial (Report No. RRC 2016-2-1). Chungbuk: KICE.
- Krosnick, J. A., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1997). Designing rating scales for effective measurement in surveys. In L. Lyberg, P. Biemer, M. Collins, et al. (Eds.), Survey Measurement and Process Quality. NY: Wiley
- Kuhfeld, M., Soland, J., Tarasawa, B., Johnson, A., Ruzek, E., & Liu, J. (2020). Projecting the potential impact of COVID-19 school closures on academic achievement. Educational Researcher, 49(8), 549-565. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20965918
- Kwon, C., & Cho, H. (2011). Comparative Analysis of System and Contents in the Elementary Science Textbooks of Korea and Finland. The Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 4(2), 143-141.
- Kwon, J., & Nam, J. (2017). Impact of Collaborative Problem-Solving Instruction Model on Character Competence of High School Students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(5), 847-857. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2017.37.5.847
- Lee, C., & Kwon, C. (2013). Comparison of Illustrations of Elementary Science Textbooks in Korea and Singapore. The Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 6(1), 13-19.
- Lee, J., Maeng, S., Ki m, H., & Ki m, C. (2007). The systemic functional linguistics analysis of texts in elementary science textbooks by curriculum revision. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 27(3), 242-252.
- Lee, K., & Maeng, S. (2022). Grammatical analysis on the language of explanatory texts in elementary science textbooks. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 25(1), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2022.25.1.103
- Lee, S., Park, S., & Kim, J. (2017). A study on the methods to improve hangul literacy of primary school entrants. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 2(3), 1-24.
- Lorch, R. F.(2015). What about Expository Text?. Inferences During Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- McKenna, M. C., & Robinson, D. R. (1997). Teaching through Text: A Content Literacy approach to Content Area Reading (2nd ed). NY: Longman.
- Ministry of Education (2015). 2015 Revised National Curriculum. Ministry of Education.
- Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224-240. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10066
- OECD (2000). OECD annual report 2000. OECD Publishing.
- OECD (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do - Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Volume I). OECD Publishing.
- OECD (2013). PISA 2012 Results: What makes schools successful? - Resources, policies and practices (Vol. IV). OECD Publishing.
- OECD (2019). PISA 2018 Results: What students know and can do (Vol.I). OECD Publishing.
- Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2009). Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 228-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.04.003
- Park, H. (2016). International comparative analysis on characteristics of Korean students' reading achievements in PISA 2012 results. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 19(3), 101-125. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2016.19.3.101
- Park, S. (2003). Reading strategies and reading comprehension instruction. Journal of Reading Research, 9, 117-145.
- Raphael, T., George, M., Weber, C., & Nies, A. (2009). Approaches to teaching reading comprehension. In S. Israel & G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension. (pp. 449-469). NY: Routledge.
- Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). "What's all the fuss about metacognition?". In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education (pp. 189-215). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Son, J. (2013). An analysis of narrative text described in high school science textbooks: Energy related content. Journal of Energy and Climate Change Education, 3(1), 33-46.
- Vacca, R. T., & Vacca, J. L. (2008). Content Area Reading. NY: Pearson.
- Wallace, C. S. (2004). Framing new research in science literacy and language use: Authenticity, multiple discourses, and the "third space". Science Education, 88, 901-914. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20024
- Waltz, C. F., & Bausell, R. B. (1981). Nursing Research: Design, Statistics, and Computer Analysis. PA: FA Davis company.
- Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and Literacy in Science Education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
- Yoon, G., & Hong, Y. (2021). A study on vocabulary and sentence level through readability analysis of 2015 revised elementary science textbook. Journal of Science Education, 45(3), 317-325. https://doi.org/10.21796/JSE.2021.45.3.317