DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Immediate Effects of Cervical and Thoracic Mobilization on Cervical Range of Motion in the Sagittal Plane and Pain in Patients with Forward Head Posture

  • Choi, Won-Jae (Department of Physical Therapy, Joongbu University) ;
  • Kang, Si-Nae (Physical Therapy Clinic, Mureupnalgae Orthopedic Surgery) ;
  • Lee, Seung-Won (Department of Physical Therapy, Sahmyook University)
  • Received : 2022.10.21
  • Accepted : 2022.11.24
  • Published : 2022.12.31

Abstract

Purpose: Forward head posture (FHP) is known to cause pain, limit range of motion, and reduce quality of life. Joint mobilization is commonly used to correct FHP. However, no study has compared cervical, thoracic, and combined cervical and thoracic joint mobilization for FHP. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the effects of each mobilization technique on range of motion in the sagittal plane and pain in patients with FHP. Methods: Forty-five patients were recruited and randomly divided into three groups: the mobilization group (CM; n = 15), the cervical and thoracic mobilization group (CTM; n = 15), and the thoracic mobilization group (TM; n = 15). Each intervention was performed in sets of three and repeated six times. Range of motion and pain were assessed pre- and post-intervention. The cervical range of motion was evaluated using a goniometer, and pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale and pain thresholds of the suboccipital and upper trapezius muscles. Results: All groups showed an increase in range of motion post-intervention, but the increase in the CTM group was significantly greater than in the CM and TM groups (p < 0.05). Pain measured using the visual analogue scale decreased in all groups, but the decreases in the CM and CTM groups were significantly greater than in the TM group (p < 0.05). The pain thresholds of the suboccipital and upper trapezius muscles increased in all groups, but the increase in the CTM group was significantly greater than in the CM and TM groups (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Overall, our findings suggest that CTM may be more effective than CM or TM for improving cervical range of motion in the sagittal plane and pain in patients with FHP.

Keywords

References

  1. Ali A, Shakil-Ur-Rehman S, & Sibtain F. The efficacy of sustained natural apophyseal glides with and without isometric exercise training in non-specific neck pain. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2014;30(4):872-874.
  2. Alkhawajah HA, & Alshami AM. The effect of mobilization with movement on pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized double-blind controlled trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2019;20(1):452. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2841-4
  3. Andrews DP, Odland-Wolf KB, May J, Baker R, Nasypany A, & Dinkins EM. Immediate and short-term effects of mulligan concept positional sustained natural apophyseal glides on an athletic young-adult population classified with mechanical neck pain: an exploratory investigation. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy. 2018;26(4):203-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2018.1460965
  4. Balzini L, Vannucchi L, Benvenuti F, Benucci M, Monni M, Cappozzo A, et al. Clinical characteristics of flexed posture in elderly women. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2003;51(10):1419-1426. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51460.x
  5. Buran Cirak Y, Yurdaisik I, Elbasi ND, Tutuneken YE, Koce K, & Cinar B. Effect of sustained natural apophyseal glides on stiffness of lumbar stabilizer muscles in patients with nonspecific low back pain: randomized controlled trial. Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics. 2021;44(6):445-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2021.06.005
  6. Chiu TT, Lam T-H, & Hedley AJ. A randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of exercise for patients with chronic neck pain. Spine. 2005;30(1):E1-E7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000149082.68262.b1
  7. Choi JH, Kim NJ, & An HJ. Effect of kinesiotaping and joint mobilization on the metatarsophalangeal joint angle and pain in hallux valgus patients. Journal of International Academy of Physical Therapy Research. 2017;8(2):1152-1157. https://doi.org/10.20540/JIAPTR.2017.8.2.1152
  8. Cipriano JJ. (1985). Photographic manual of regional orthopaedic tests: Williams & Wilkins.
  9. Cleland JA, Glynn P, Whitman JM, Eberhart SL, MacDonald C, & Childs JD. Short-term effects of thrust versus nonthrust mobilization/manipulation directed at the thoracic spine in patients with neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. Physical Therapy. 2007;87(4):431-440. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20060217
  10. Dixon JS, & Bird HA. Reproducibility along a 10 cm vertical visual analogue scale. Annals of Rheumatic Diseases. 1981;40(1):87-89. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.40.1.87
  11. Engell S, Triano JJ, & Howarth SJ. Force transmission between thoracic and cervical segments of the spine during prone-lying high-velocity low-amplitude spinal manipulation: A proof of principle for the concept of regional interdependence. Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon). 2019;69:58-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.07.006
  12. Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Alonso-Blanco C, Cleland JA, Rodriguez-Blanco C, & Alburquerque-Sendin F. Changes in pressure pain thresholds over C5-C6 zygapophyseal joint after a cervicothoracic junction manipulation in healthy subjects. Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics. 2008;31(5):332-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.04.006
  13. Fischer AA. Pressure threshold meter: its use for quantification of tender spots. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 1986;67(11):836-838.
  14. Friedrich KM, Trattnig S, Millington SA, Friedrich M, Groschmidt K, & Pretterklieber ML. High-field magnetic resonance imaging of meniscoids in the zygapophyseal joints of the human cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(2):244-248. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000251952.36735.fb
  15. Gong W. The effects of cervical joint manipulation, based on passive motion analysis, on cervical lordosis, forward head posture, and cervical ROM in university students with abnormal posture of the cervical spine. Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2015;27(5):1609-1611. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.1609
  16. Gonzalez-Iglesias J, Fernandez-de-las-Penas C, Cleland JA, Alburquerque-Sendin F, Palomeque-del-Cerro L, & Mendez-Sanchez R. Inclusion of thoracic spine thrust manipulation into an electro-therapy/thermal program for the management of patients with acute mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. Manual therapy. 2009;14(3):306-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2008.04.006
  17. Good M, Stiller C, Zauszniewski JA, Anderson GC, Stanton-Hicks M, & Grass JA. Sensation and distress of pain scales: reliability, validity, and sensitivity. Journal of Nursing Measurement. 2001;9(3):219-238. https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.9.3.219
  18. Gross AR, Hoving JL, Haines TA, Goldsmith CH, Kay T, Aker P, et al. A Cochrane review of manipulation and mobilization for mechanical neck disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29(14):1541-1548. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000131218.35875.ED
  19. Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Betz JJ, Janik TJ, Holland B, Colloca CJ, et al. Increasing the cervical lordosis with chiropractic biophysics seated combined extension-compression and transverse load cervical traction with cervical manipulation: nonrandomized clinical control trial. Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics. 2003;26(3):139-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-4754(02)54106-3
  20. Jull G, Sterling M, Falla D, Treleaven J, & O'Leary S. (2008). Whiplash, headache, and neck pain: research-based directions for physical therapies: Elsevier Health Sciences.
  21. Kim DH, Kim CJ, & Son SM. Neck Pain in Adults with Forward Head Posture: Effects of Craniovertebral Angle and Cervical Range of Motion. Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives. 2018;9(6):309-313. https://doi.org/10.24171/j.phrp.2018.9.6.04
  22. Kim G, Lee S, & Jeong H. Effects of upper thoracic joint mobilization on dynamic stability of patients with chronic neck pain. Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2011;23(5):753-756. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.23.753
  23. Konstantinou K, Foster N, Rushton A, & Baxter D. The use and reported effects of mobilization with movement techniques in low back pain management; a cross-sectional descriptive survey of physiotherapists in Britain. Manual therapy. 2002;7(4):206-214. https://doi.org/10.1054/math.2002.0469
  24. Krauss J, Creighton D, Ely JD, & Podlewska-Ely J. The immediate effects of upper thoracic translatoric spinal manipulation on cervical pain and range of motion: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy. 2008;16(2):93-99. https://doi.org/10.1179/106698108790818530
  25. Lau HM, Wing Chiu TT, & Lam TH. The effectiveness of thoracic manipulation on patients with chronic mechanical neck pain - a randomized controlled trial. Manual therapy. 2011;16(2):141-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2010.08.003
  26. Lau KT, Cheung KY, Chan MH, Lo KY, & Chiu TTW. Relationships between sagittal postures of thoracic and cervical spine, presence of neck pain, neck pain severity and disability. Manual therapy. 2010;15(5):457-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2010.03.009
  27. Lee J, Lee Y, Kim H, & Lee J. The effects of cervical mobilization combined with thoracic mobilization on forward head posture of neck pain patients. Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2013;25(1):7-9. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.25.7
  28. Moutzouri M, Billis E, Strimpakos N, Kottika P, & Oldham JA. The effects of the Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide (SNAG) mobilisation in the lumbar flexion range of asymptomatic subjects as measured by the Zebris CMS20 3-D motion analysis system. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2008;9:131. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-131
  29. Mulligan BR. (2006). Manual therapy. Wellington, New Zealand: Plane View Services.
  30. Park SY, & Yoo WG. Effects of the sustained computer work on upper cervical flexion motion. The Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2014;26(3):441-442. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.441
  31. Quek J, Pua YH, Clark RA, & Bryant AL. Effects of thoracic kyphosis and forward head posture on cervical range of motion in older adults. Manual therapy. 2013;18(1):65-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2012.07.005
  32. Reid SA, Rivett DA, Katekar MG, & Callister R. Comparison of mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides and maitland mobilizations for treatment of cervicogenic dizziness: a randomized controlled trial. Physical Therapy. 2014;94(4):466-476. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20120483
  33. Reiner K, Tibi L, & Lipsitz JD. Do mindfulness-based interventions reduce pain intensity? A critical review of the literature. Pain Medicine. 2013;14(2):230-242. https://doi.org/10.1111/pme.12006
  34. Seo UH, Kim JH, & Lee BH. Effects of mulligan mobilization and low-level laser therapy on physical disability, pain, and range of motion in patients with chronic low back pain: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Healthcare (Basel). 2020;8(3).
  35. Sinaki M, Brey RH, Hughes CA, Larson DR, & Kaufman KR. Balance disorder and increased risk of falls in osteoporosis and kyphosis: significance of kyphotic posture and muscle strength. Osteoporosis International. 2005;16(8):1004-1010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1791-2
  36. Skyba DA, Radhakrishnan R, Rohlwing JJ, Wright A, & Sluka KA. Joint manipulation reduces hyperalgesia by activation of monoamine receptors but not opioid or GABA receptors in the spinal cord. Pain. 2003;106(1-2):159-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00320-8
  37. Szeto GP, Straker L, & Raine S. A field comparison of neck and shoulder postures in symptomatic and asymptomatic office workers. Applied Ergonomics. 2002;33(1):75-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(01)00043-6
  38. Takahashi T, Ishida K, Hirose D, Nagano Y, Okumiya K, Nishinaga M, et al. Trunk deformity is associated with a reduction in outdoor activities of daily living and life satisfaction in community-dwelling older people. Osteoporosis International. 2005;16(3):273-279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1669-3
  39. Travell JG, Simons DG, & Yunus MB. Myofacial Pain and Dysfunction: The Trigger Point Manual, Volume 2. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 1995;10(3):254-255.
  40. Von Korff M, Jensen MP, & Karoly P. Assessing global pain severity by self-report in clinical and health services research. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3140-3151. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00009
  41. Wilson E. The Mulligan concept: NAGS, SNAGS and mobilizations with movement. Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies. 2001;2(5):81-89. https://doi.org/10.1054/jbmt.2000.0191
  42. Yao Y, Cai B, Xu LL, & Wang JW. [Correlation between neck pressure pain threshold and forward head posture in patients with temporomandibular joint disorders]. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2021;56(8):759-763.
  43. Youdas JW, Carey JR, & Garrett TR. Reliability of measurements of cervical spine range of motion-comparison of three methods. Physical Therapy. 1991;71(2):98-104; discussion 105-106. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/71.2.98