Neonatal Medicine

  • 제28권3호
  • /
  • Pages.108-115
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2287-9412(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-9803(eISSN)
대한신생아학회 (The Korean Society of Neonatology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Implementation of the Feed and Swaddle Technique as a Non-Pharmacological Strategy to Conduct Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Very Low Birth Weight Infants

  • Yoo, Yeong Myong (Department of Pediatrics, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Ji Eun (Department of Radiology, Ajou University Hospital, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Moon Sung (Department of Pediatrics, Ajou University Hospital, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Jang Hoon (Department of Pediatrics, Ajou University Hospital, Ajou University School of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2021.05.07
  • 심사 : 2021.06.28
  • 발행 : 2021.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a useful tool for evaluating brain injury and maturation in preterm infants and often requires sedation to acquire images of sufficient quality. Infant sedation is often associated with adverse events, despite extreme precautions. In this study, the swaddling technique was investigated as an alternative non-pharmacological strategy to obtain brain MRIs of sufficient quality. Methods: We applied the feed and swaddle technique during routine brain MRI as a quality improvement project and compared its morbidity with that of sedation in a historic age-matched group. Seventy-nine very low birth weight infants in the neonatal intensive care unit of Ajou University Hospital (Suwon, Korea) were enrolled. Thirty-two (40.5%) infants were in the feed and swaddling group, and 47 (59.5%) were in the sedation group. Results: The morbidity associated with the cardiopulmonary system (swaddling group vs. sedation group: 53.13% [n=17] vs. 63.83% [n=30], P=0.723) and central nervous system (40.63% [n=13] vs. 29.79% [n=14], P=0.217) were not significantly different between groups. The MRI failure rate was not significantly different (swaddling group vs. sedation group: 12.5% [n=4] vs. 4.3% [n=2], P=0.174). The MRI scanning time was longer in the swaddling group than in the sedation group (76.5±20.3 minutes vs. 61.5±13.6 minutes, P=0.001). Cardiopulmonary adverse events were significantly less common in the swaddling group than in the sedation group (3.13% [n=1] vs. 34.04% [n=16], P=0.002). Conclusion: The success rate of MRI was comparable between the swaddling technique and sedation. Furthermore, despite the drawback of prolonged scan time, cardiopulmonary adverse events are fewer with swaddling than with sedative agents. Therefore, swaddling can be an alternative to sedation or anesthesia when performing neonatal MRI scans.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Blencowe H, Lee AC, Cousens S, Bahalim A, Narwal R, Zhong N, et al. Preterm birth-associated neurodevelopmental impairment estimates at regional and global levels for 2010. Pediatr Res 2013;74 Suppl 1:17-34. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2013.204
  2. Sutton PS, Darmstadt GL. Preterm birth and neurodevelopment: a review of outcomes and recommendations for early identification and cost-effective interventions. J Trop Pediatr 2013;59:258-65. https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmt012
  3. Banihani R, Seesahai J, Asztalos E, Terrien Church P. Neuroimaging at term equivalent age: is there value for the preterm infant? A narrative summary. Children (Basel) 2021;8: 227.
  4. Antonov NK, Ruzal-Shapiro CB, Morel KD, Millar WS, Kashyap S, Lauren CT, et al. Feed and wrap MRI technique in infants. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2017;56:1095-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922816677806
  5. Eker HE, Cok OY, Cetinkaya B, Aribogan A. Oral 30% glucose provides sufficient sedation in newborns during MRI. J Anesth 2017;31:206-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-016-2296-9
  6. Parad RB. Non-sedation of the neonate for radiologic procedures. Pediatr Radiol 2018;48:524-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-4002-y
  7. Boutros A, Pavlicek W. Anesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging. Anesth Analg 1987;66:367. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-198704000-00018
  8. Hupp JR. Pediatric anesthesia: concerns about neurotoxicity. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;73:1021-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.04.001
  9. Durrmeyer X, Vutskits L, Anand KJ, Rimensberger PC. Use of analgesic and sedative drugs in the NICU: integrating clinical trials and laboratory data. Pediatr Res 2010;67:117-27. https://doi.org/10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181c8eef3
  10. Sun L. Early childhood general anaesthesia exposure and neurocognitive development. Br J Anaesth 2010;105 Suppl 1:i61-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeq302
  11. Sprung J, Flick RP, Katusic SK, Colligan RC, Barbaresi WJ, Bojanic K, et al. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder after early exposure to procedures requiring general anesthesia. Mayo Clin Proc 2012;87:120-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2011.11.008
  12. DiMaggio C, Sun LS, Li G. Early childhood exposure to anesthesia and risk of developmental and behavioral disorders in a sibling birth cohort. Anesth Analg 2011;113:1143-51. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3182147f42
  13. Cote CJ, Karl HW, Notterman DA, Weinberg JA, McCloskey C. Adverse sedation events in pediatrics: analysis of medications used for sedation. Pediatrics 2000;106:633-44. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.106.4.633
  14. Havidich JE, Beach M, Dierdorf SF, Onega T, Suresh G, Cravero JP. Preterm versus term children: analysis of sedation/anesthesia adverse events and longitudinal risk. Pediatrics 2016;137:e20150463. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-0463
  15. Haney B, Reavey D, Atchison L, Poull J, Dryer L, Anderson B, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging studies without sedation in the neonatal intensive care unit: safe and efficient. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2010;24:256-66. https://doi.org/10.1097/JPN.0b013e3181e8d566
  16. Ureta-Velasco N, Martinez-de Aragon A, Moral-Pumarega MT, Nunez-Enamorado N, Bergon-Sendin E, Pallas-Alonso CR. Magnetic resonance imaging without sedation in neonates. An Pediatr (Barc) 2015;82:354-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpedi.2014.05.019
  17. Finnemore A, Toulmin H, Merchant N, Arichi T, Tusor N, Cox D, et al. Chloral hydrate sedation for magnetic resonance imaging in newborn infants. Paediatr Anaesth 2014;24:190-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12264
  18. Executive summary: neonatal encephalopathy and neurologic outcome, second edition. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Task Force on Neonatal Encephalopathy. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:896-901. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000445580.65983.d2
  19. Cote CJ, Wilson S; American Academy of Pediatrics; American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients before, during, and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: update 2016. Pediatrics 2016;138:e20161212. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1212
  20. Davidson AJ, Becke K, de Graaff J, Giribaldi G, Habre W, Hansen T, et al. Anesthesia and the developing brain: a way forward for clinical research. Paediatr Anaesth 2015;25:447-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12652
  21. Gleich SJ, Flick R, Hu D, Zaccariello MJ, Colligan RC, Katusic SK, et al. Neurodevelopment of children exposed to anesthesia: design of the Mayo Anesthesia Safety in Kids (MASK) study. Contemp Clin Trials 2015;41:45-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2014.12.020
  22. Fogel MA, Pawlowski TW, Harris MA, Whitehead KK, Keller MS, Wilson J, et al. Comparison and usefulness of cardiac magnetic resonance versus computed tomography in infants six months of age or younger with aortic arch anomalies without deep sedation or anesthesia. Am J Cardiol 2011;108:120-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.008
  23. Golan A, Marco R, Raz H, Shany E. Imaging in the newborn: infant immobilizer obviates the need for anesthesia. Isr Med Assoc J 2011;13:663-5.
  24. Mathur AM, Neil JJ, McKinstry RC, Inder TE. Transport, monitoring, and successful brain MR imaging in unsedated neonates. Pediatr Radiol 2008;38:260-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-007-0705-9
  25. Shariat M, Mertens L, Seed M, Grosse-Wortmann L, Golding F, Mercer-Rosa L, et al. Utility of feed-and-sleep cardiovascular magnetic resonance in young infants with complex cardiovascular disease. Pediatr Cardiol 2015;36:809-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-014-1084-2
  26. Windram J, Grosse-Wortmann L, Shariat M, Greer ML, Crawford MW, Yoo SJ. Cardiovascular MRI without sedation or general anesthesia using a feed-and-sleep technique in neonates and infants. Pediatr Radiol 2012;42:183-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2219-8
  27. Yamamura K, Takatsu Y, Miyati T, Inatomi T. Brain magnetic resonance imaging using a customized vacuum shape-keeping immobilizer without sedation in preterm infants. Magn Reson Imaging 2018;54:171-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2018.08.015
  28. Heller BJ, Yudkowitz FS, Lipson S. Can we reduce anesthesia exposure? Neonatal brain MRI: swaddling vs. sedation, a national survey. J Clin Anesth 2017;38:119-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.01.034