대한치과교정학회지 (The korean journal of orthodontics)

  • 제51권6호
  • /
  • Pages.387-396
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2234-7518(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-372X(eISSN)
대한치과교정학회 (The Korean Association Of Orthodontists)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Miniscrew insertion sites of infrazygomatic crest and mandibular buccal shelf in different vertical craniofacial patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study

  • 투고 : 2020.11.02
  • 심사 : 2021.04.28
  • 발행 : 2021.11.25
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: To identify optimal areas for the insertion of extra-alveolar miniscrews into the infrazygomatic crest (IZC) and mandibular buccal shelf (MBS), using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging in patients with different craniofacial patterns. Methods: CBCT reconstructions of untreated individuals were used to evaluate the IZC and MBS areas. The participants were divided into three groups, based on the craniofacial pattern, namely, brachyfacial (n = 15; mean age, 23.3 years), mesofacial (n = 15; mean age, 19.24 years), and dolichofacial (n = 15; mean age, 17.79 years). In the IZC, the evaluated areas were at 11, 13, and 15 mm above the buccal cusp tips of the right and left first molars. In the MBS, the evaluated areas were at the projections of the first molars' distal roots and second molars' mesial and distal roots, at a 4- and 8-mm distance from the cementoenamel junction. Intergroup comparisons were performed with analysis of variance and the Tukey test. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the IZC bone thickness among the groups. For MBS bone availability, some comparisons revealed no difference; meanwhile, other comparisons revealed increased MBS bone thickness in the brachyfacial (first molars distal roots) and dolichofacial (second molars mesial and distal roots) patterns. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in the IZC bone thickness among the groups. The facial skeletal pattern may affect the availability of ideal bone thickness for the insertion of extra-alveolar miniscrews in the MBS region; however, this variability is unlikely to be clinically meaningful.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baumgaertel S. Temporary skeletal anchorage devices: the case for miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145:558-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.03.009
  2. Baumgaertel S. Cortical bone thickness and bone depth of the posterior palatal alveolar process for mini-implant insertion in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:806-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.05.020
  3. Baumgaertel S, Hans MG. Buccal cortical bone thickness for mini-implant placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:230-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.045
  4. Gracco A, Lombardo L, Cozzani M, Siciliani G. Quantitative cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of palatal bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:361-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.027
  5. Baumgaertel S, Hans MG. Assessment of infrazygomatic bone depth for mini-screw insertion. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:638-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01691.x
  6. Chang C, Liu SS, Roberts WE. Primary failure rate for 1680 extra-alveolar mandibular buccal shelf mini-screws placed in movable mucosa or attached gingiva. Angle Orthod 2015;85:905-10. https://doi.org/10.2319/092714.695.1
  7. Nucera R, Lo Giudice A, Bellocchio AM, Spinuzza P, Caprioglio A, Perillo L, et al. Bone and cortical bone thickness of mandibular buccal shelf for mini-screw insertion in adults. Angle Orthod 2017;87:745-51. https://doi.org/10.2319/011117-34.1
  8. Liou EJ, Chen PH, Wang YC, Lin JC. A computed tomographic image study on the thickness of the infrazygomatic crest of the maxilla and its clinical implications for miniscrew insertion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:352-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.04.044
  9. Chang C, Huang C, Roberts WE. 3D cortical bone anatomy of the mandibular buccal shelf: a CBCT study to define sites for extra-alveolar bone screws to treat Class III malocclusion. Int J Orthod Implantol 2016;41:74-82.
  10. Elshebiny T, Palomo JM, Baumgaertel S. Anatomic assessment of the mandibular buccal shelf for miniscrew insertion in white patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;153:505-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.014
  11. Tsunori M, Mashita M, Kasai K. Relationship between facial types and tooth and bone characteristics of the mandible obtained by CT scanning. Angle Orthod 1998;68:557-62.
  12. Ozdemir F, Tozlu M, Germec-Cakan D. Cortical bone thickness of the alveolar process measured with cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different facial types. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143:190-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.09.013
  13. Sadek MM, Sabet NE, Hassan IT. Alveolar bone mapping in subjects with different vertical facial dimensions. Eur J Orthod 2015;37:194-201. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cju034
  14. Gandhi V, Upadhyay M, Tadinada A, Yadav S. Variability associated with mandibular buccal shelf area width and height in subjects with different growth pattern, sex, and growth status. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2021;159:59-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.11.020
  15. Murugesan A, Sivakumar A. Comparison of bone thickness in infrazygomatic crest area at various miniscrew insertion angles in Dravidian population - a cone beam computed tomography study. Int Orthod 2020;18:105-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2019.12.001
  16. Ricketts RM. Cephalometric analysis and synthesis. Angle Orthod 1961;31:141-56.
  17. Neves LS, Pinzan A, Janson G, Canuto CE, de Freitas MR, Cancado RH. Comparative study of the maturation of permanent teeth in subjects with vertical and horizontal growth patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:619-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.05.026
  18. Li JL, Kau C, Wang M. Changes of occlusal plane inclination after orthodontic treatment in different dentoskeletal frames. Prog Orthod 2014;15:41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-014-0041-1
  19. Houston WJ. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 1983;83:382-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(83)90322-6
  20. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London: Allen & Unwin; 1940.
  21. Liu H, Wu X, Yang L, Ding Y. Safe zones for mini-screws in maxillary dentition distalization assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;151:500-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.07.021
  22. de Freitas LM, de Freitas KM, Pinzan A, Janson G, de Freitas MR. A comparison of skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue characteristics in white and black Brazilian subjects. J Appl Oral Sci 2010;18:135-42. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000200007
  23. Castilla EE, Luquetti DV. Brazil: public health genomics. Public Health Genomics 2009;12:53-8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000153424
  24. Cunha A, Nelson-Filho P, Maranon-Vasquez GA, Ramos AGC, Dantas B, Sebastiani AM, et al. Genetic variants in ACTN3 and MYO1H are associated with sagittal and vertical craniofacial skeletal patterns. Arch Oral Biol 2019;97:85-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2018.09.018
  25. Janson G, Quaglio CL, Pinzan A, Franco EJ, de Freitas MR. Craniofacial characteristics of Caucasian and Afro-Caucasian Brazilian subjects with normal occlusion. J Appl Oral Sci 2011;19:118-24. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000200007
  26. Storniolo-Souza JM, Seminario MP, Pinzan-Vercelino CRM, Pinzan A, Janson G. McNamara analysis cephalometric parameters in White-Brazilians, Japanese and Japanese-Brazilians with normal occlusion. Dental Press J Orthod 2021;26:e2119133. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.26.1.e2119133.oar
  27. Vargas EOA, Lopes de Lima R, Nojima LI. Mandibular buccal shelf and infrazygomatic crest thicknesses in patients with different vertical facial heights. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2020;158:349-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.08.016
  28. Masumoto T, Hayashi I, Kawamura A, Tanaka K, Kasai K. Relationships among facial type, buccolingual molar inclination, and cortical bone thickness of the mandible. Eur J Orthod 2001;23:15-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/23.1.15