DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Are Politically Connected Firms More Likely to Export? Evidence from Vietnam

기업의 정치적 연계와 수출성과의 관련성: 베트남 사례를 중심으로

  • Yuri Kim (Asia-Pacific Research Center, Hanyang University) ;
  • Yasuyuki Todo (School of Political Science and Economics, Waseda University) ;
  • Taewoo Roh (Department of International Trade and Commerce, Soonchunhyang University)
  • Received : 2021.10.09
  • Accepted : 2021.10.28
  • Published : 2021.10.30

Abstract

Political connections may facilitate firms' exporting activities, particularly in developing countries, because politically connected firms may be more likely to receive informational and financial support, allowing them to overcome barriers to export. We test this hypothesis using a unique, firm-level dataset from traditional apparel and textile clusters in the Red River Delta Region in Northern Vietnam. We find that political connection of certain types increases the chance of receiving valuable information or financial support from the government. Moreover, those firms that have access to government information have higher chances of being direct exporters. However, firms that receive financial support from the government are not necessarily engaged in exporting activities. Although politically connected firms are more willing to export, they do not necessarily engage in more exporting activities than firms without such connections. These results suggest that the misallocation of information and financial resources to politically connected but insufficiently productive firms leads to a failure to promote exporting activities. In contrast, political connection increases the chance of importing materials and parts, possibly because high productivity is necessary for exporting, but not for importing.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Daichi Shimamoto, Fumio Hayashi, Aya Suzuki, and seminar participants at the European Trade Studies Group Annual Conference and International Conference of the Association of Korean Economic Studies for helpful comments. This study was conducted as part of a project titled 'Research on Global Inter-Firm Networks and Related Policies,' which was undertaken at the Research Institute of Economy, Trade, and Industry (RIETI). The opinions expressed and arguments employed in this paper are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of RIETI, Hanyang University, Waseda University, Soonchunhyang University, or any institution with which the authors are affiliated.

References

  1. Allen, T. (2014), "Information frictions in trade", Econometrica, 82(6), 2041-2083. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA10984
  2. Balassa, B. (1978), "Exports and economic growth: Further evidence", Journal of Development Economics, 5(2), 181-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(78)90006-8
  3. Beck, T., A. Demirguc-Kunt and R. Levine (2005), "SMEs, growth, and poverty: Cross-country evidence", Journal of Economic Growth, 10(3), 199-229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-005-3533-5
  4. Boubakri, N., J.-C. Cosset and W. Saffar (2008), "Political connections of newly privatized firms", Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(5), 654-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.08.003
  5. Boubakri, N., J. C. Cosset and W. Saffar (2012), "The impact of political connections on firms' operating performance and financing decisions", Journal of Financial Research, 35(3), 397-423. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6803.2012.01322.x
  6. Castellani, D., F. Serti and C. Tomasi (2010), "Firms in international trade: Importers' and exporters' heterogeneity in Italian manufacturing industry", World Economy, 33(3), 424-457. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2010.01262.x
  7. Coviello, N. and H. Munro (1997), "Network relationships and the internationalisation process of small software firms", International Business Review, 6(4), 361-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(97)00010-3
  8. Ding, H., H. Fan and S. Lin (2018), "Connect to trade", Journal of International Economics, 110, 50-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2017.10.004
  9. Diwan, I., P. Keefer and M. Schiffbauer. (2015). "Pyramid Capitalism: Political Connections, Regulation, and Firm Productivity in Egypt", Washington: DC, The World Bank
  10. Ellis, P. (2000), "Social ties and foreign market entry", Journal of International Business Studies, 31(3), 443-469. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490916
  11. Ellis, P. D. (2011), "Social ties and international entrepreneurship: Opportunities and constraints affecting firm internationalization", Journal of International Business Studies, 42(1), 99-127. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.20
  12. Faccio, M. (2006), "Politically connected firms", American Economic Review, 96(1), 369-386. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282806776157704
  13. Faccio, M., R. W. Masulis and J. J. McConnell (2006), "Political connections and corporate bailouts", Journal of Finance, 61(6), 2597-2635. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.01000.x
  14. Fan, H., Y. A. Li and S. R. Yeaple (2015), "Trade liberalization, quality, and export prices", Review of Economics and Statistics, 97(5), 1033-1051. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00524
  15. Feder, G. (1983), "On exports and economic growth", Journal of Development Economics, 12(1-2), 59-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(83)90031-7
  16. Fisman, R. (2001), "Estimating the value of political connections", American Economic Review, 91(4), 1095-1102. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.4.1095
  17. Fu, J., D. Shimamoto and Y. Todo (2017), "Can firms with political connections borrow more than those without? Evidence from firm-level data for Indonesia", Journal of Asian Economics, 52, 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2017.08.003
  18. Halpern, L., M. Koren and A. Szeidl (2015), "Imported inputs and productivity", American Economic Review, 105(12), 3660-3703. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150443
  19. Kasahara, H. and J. Rodrigue (2008), "Does the use of imported intermediates increase productivity? Plant-level evidence", Journal of Development Economics, 87(1), 106-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.12.008
  20. Khwaja, A. I. and A. Mian (2005), "Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(4), 1371-1411. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355305775097524
  21. Lages, L. F., G. Silva and C. Styles (2009), "Relationship capabilities, quality, and innovation as determinants of export performance", Journal of International Marketing, 17(4), 47-70. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.17.4.47
  22. Kinghan, C. and C. Newman (2015), Social capital, political connections, and household enterprises: Evidence from Vietnam, WIDER Working Paper Series, WP-2015-001.
  23. Li, H., L. Meng, Q. Wang and L.-A. Zhou (2008), "Political connections, financing and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese private firms", Journal of Development Economics, 87(2), 283-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.03.001
  24. Lu, Y. (2011), "Political connections and trade expansion: Evidence from Chinese private firms", Economics of Transition, 19(2), 231-254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.2010.00402.x
  25. Malesky, E., N. McCulloch and N. D. Nhat (2015), "The impact of governance and transparency on firm investment in Vietnam", Economics of Transition, 23(4), 677-715. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12068
  26. Manova, K. (2012), "Credit constraints, heterogeneous firms, and international trade", Review of Economic Studies, 80(2), 711-744.
  27. Markussen, T. and F. Tarp (2014), "Political connections and land-related investment in rural Vietnam", Journal of Development Economics, 110, 291-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2014.01.011
  28. McMillan, J. and C. Woodruff (2002), "The central role of entrepreneurs in transition economies", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(3), 153-170. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533002760278767
  29. Melitz, M. J. (2003), "The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity", Econometrica, 71(6), 1695-1725. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467
  30. Muuls, M. and M. Pisu (2009), "Imports and exports at the level of the firm: Evidence from Belgium", World Economy, 32(5), 692-734. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2009.01172.x
  31. OpenDataBarometer (2015), ODB Methodology - v1.0 (Webpage), Available from http://opendatabarometer.org/doc/3rdEdition/ODB-3rdEdition-Methodology.pdf
  32. Paul, J., S. Parthasarathy and P. Gupta (2017), "Exporting challenges of SMEs: A review and future research agenda", Journal of World Business, 52(3), 327-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.01.003
  33. Rijkers, B., L. Baghdadi and G. Raballand (2015), "Political connections and tariff evasion evidence from Tunisia", World Bank Economic Review, 31(2), 459-482. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhv061
  34. Schor, A. (2004), "Heterogeneous productivity response to tariff reduction. Evidence from Brazilian manufacturing firms", Journal of Development Economics, 75(2), 373-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.06.003
  35. Sequeira, S. (2016), "Corruption, trade costs, and gains from tariff liberalization: Evidence from Southern Africa", American Economic Review, 106(10), 3029-3063. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150313
  36. Steer, L. and K. Sen (2010), "Formal and informal institutions in a transition economy: The case of Vietnam", World Development, 38(11), 1603-1615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.03.006
  37. Stiglitz, J. E. and A. Charlton (2006), "Aid for trade", International Journal of Development Issues, 5(2), 1-41. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb045861
  38. Tran, T. B., R. Q. Grafton and T. Kompas (2009), "Institutions matter: The case of Vietnam", Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2008.05.012
  39. Wagner, J. (2012), "International trade and firm performance: A survey of empirical studies since 2006", Review of World Economics, 148(2), 235-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-011-0116-8
  40. Zhou, L., W.-p. Wu and X. Luo (2007), "Internationalization and the performance of born-global SMEs: The mediating role of social networks", Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 673-690.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400282