DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Flow cytometric evaluation of the potential of metal oxide nanoparticles for skin sensitization using 5-Bromo-2-deoxyuridine

  • Lee, Dong Han (Division of Toxicological Research, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Hyun (Division of Toxicological Research, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation) ;
  • Lee, Jin Hee (Division of Toxicological Research, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation) ;
  • Yang, Jun-Young (Division of Toxicological Research, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation) ;
  • Seok, Ji-Hyun (Division of Toxicological Research, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation) ;
  • Jung, Kikyung (Division of Toxicological Research, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation) ;
  • Lee, Jong Kwon (Division of Toxicological Research, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation)
  • Received : 2020.04.05
  • Accepted : 2020.11.04
  • Published : 2021.07.15

Abstract

Although skin sensitization potential of various chemicals has been extensively studied, there are only a few reports on nanoparticles induced skin sensitization. Aiming to fill this lacuna, in this study we evaluated the potential of metal oxide nanoparticles (NPs) to induce skin sensitization with flow cytometry. Seven different metal oxide NPs, including copper oxide, cobalt oxide, nickel oxide, titanium oxide, cerium oxide, iron oxide, and zinc oxide were applied to Balb/c mice. After selecting the proper vehicle, the NPs were applied, and the skin sensitization potential were assessed using 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine with flow cytometry. Physiochemical properties such as hydrodynamic size, polydispersity, and zeta potential were measured for the NPs prior to the tests. All the seven metal oxide NPs studied showed negative responses for skin sensitization potential. These results suggest that the OECD TG 442B using 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine with flow cytometry can be applied to evaluate the potential of NPs for skin sensitization.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety [Grant Numbers 18181MFDS361 (2018, 2019)]. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.co.kr) for English language editing.

References

  1. OECD skin, Sensitisation (1992) OECD Guideline for the testing of chemicals no. 406. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264070660-en
  2. OECD (2010a) Skin sensitization: local lymph node assay, OECD guidelines for chemical testing no. 429. OECD, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264071100-en
  3. OECD (2010b) Skin sensitisation: local lymph node assay: BrdU-ELISA, OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals no. 442B. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264090996-en
  4. Han BI, Yi JS, Seo SJ, Kim TS, Ahn I, Ko et al (2019) Evaluation of skin sensitization potential of chemicals by local lymph node assay using 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine with flow cytometry. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 107:104401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.05.026
  5. Park J, Kwak BK, Bae E, Lee J, Kim Y, Choi K, Yi J (2009) Characterization of exposure to silver nanoparticles in a manufacturing facility. J Nanopart Res 11:1705-1712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-009-9725-8
  6. Cho WS, Duffin R, Bradley M, Megson IL, MacNee W, Lee JK et al (2013) Predictive value of in vitro assays depends on the mechanism of toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. Part Fibre Toxicol 10:55. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-10-55
  7. Nel AE, Madler L, Velegol D, Xia T, Hoek EM, Somasundaran P et al (2009) Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nature Mater 8:543-557. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2442
  8. Warheit DB, Laurence BR, Reed KL, Roach DH, Reynolds GA, Webb TR (2004) Comparative pulmonary toxicity assessment of single-wall carbon nanotubes in rats. Toxicol Sci 77:117-125. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfg228
  9. Jiang J, Oberdorster G, Biswas P (2009) Characterization of size, surface charge, and agglomeration state of nanoparticle dispersions for toxicological studies. J Nanopart Res 11:77-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-008-9446-4
  10. Mahmoudi M, Laurent S, Shokrgozar MA, Hosseinkhani M (2011) Toxicity evaluations of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: cell "vision" versus physicochemical properties of nanoparticles. ACS Nano 5:7263-7276. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn2021088
  11. Gate L, Disdier C, Cosnier F, Gagnaire F, Devoy J, Saba W, Mabondzo A (2017) Biopersistence and translocation to extrapulmonary organs of titanium dioxide nanoparticles after subacute inhalation exposure to aerosol in adult and elderly rats. Toxicol Lett 265:61-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2016.11.009
  12. Gosens I, Post JA, de la Fonteyne LJ, Jansen EH, Geus JW, Cassee FR, de Jong WH (2010) Impact of agglomeration state of nano- and submicron sized gold particles on pulmonary inflammation. Part Fibre Toxicol 7:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-7-37
  13. Bihari P, Vippola M, Schultes S, Praetner M, Khandoga AG, Reichel CA et al (2008) Optimized dispersion of nanoparticles for biological in vitro and in vivo studies. Part Fibre Toxicol 5:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-5-14
  14. Park YH, Jeong SH, Yi SM, Choi BH, Kim YR, Kim IK et al (2011) Analysis for the potential of polystyrene and TiO2 nanoparticles to induce skin irritation, phototoxicity, and sensitization. Toxicol Vitro 25:1863-1869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2011.05.022
  15. Yoshioka Y, Kuroda E, Hirai T, Tsutsumi Y, Ishii KJ (2017) Allergic responses induced by the immunomodulatory effects of nanomaterials upon skin exposure. Front Immunol 8:169. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00169
  16. Dwivedi PD, Tripathi A, Ansari KM, Shanker R, Das M (2011) Impact of nanoparticles on the immune system. J Biomed Nanotechnol 7:193-194. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbn.2011.1264
  17. Dykman LA, Khlebtsov NG (2017) Immunological properties of gold nanoparticles. Chemical Sci 8:1719-1735. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6SC03631G
  18. OECD (2017) Test No. 318: dispersion stability of nanomaterials in simulated environmental media, OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals, Section 3. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264284142-en
  19. Ahn I, Kim TS, Jung ES, Yi JS, Jang WH, Jung KM et al (2016) Performance standard-based validation study for local lymph node assay: 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine-flow cytometry method. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 80:183-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.06.009
  20. OECD (2018a) In vitro skin sensitisation: in vitro skin sensitisation assays addressing the key event on activation of dendritic cells on the adverse outcome pathway for skin sensitisation (OECD TG 442E). OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264264359-en
  21. OECD (2018b) Test No. 442B: skin sensitization: local lymph node assay: BrdU-ELISA or -FCM, OECD Guidelines for the testing of chemicals, section 4. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264090996-en
  22. Jang YS, Lee EY, Park YH, Jeong SH, Lee SG, Kim YR et al (2012) The potential for skin irritation, phototoxicity, and sensitization of ZnO nanoparticles. Mol Cell Toxicol 8:171-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13273-012-0021-9
  23. Kim SH, Heo Y, Choi SJ, Kim YJ, Kim MS, Kim H et al (2016) Safety evaluation of zinc oxide nanoparticles in terms of acute dermal toxicity, dermal irritation and corrosion, and skin sensitization. Mol Cell Toxicol 12:93-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13273-016-0012-3
  24. Bronaugh RL, Stewart RF (1985) Methods for in vitro percutaneous absorption studies V: permeation through damaged skin. J Pharm Sci 74:1062-1066. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600741008
  25. Zanoni I, Crosera M, Ortelli S, Blosi M, Adami G, Filon FL, Costa AL (2019) CuO nanoparticle penetration through intact and damaged human skin. New J Chem 43:17033-17039. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NJ03373D

Cited by

  1. ChemSkin Reference Chemical Database for the Development of an In Vitro Skin Irritation Test vol.9, pp.11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics9110314