DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

New PWM predictive control suitable for low carrier ratio of permanent magnet synchronous motor drive systems

  • Lu, Jinnan (School of Mechanical Engineering, Liaoning Technical University) ;
  • Liu, Zhixiang (School of Mechanical Engineering, Liaoning Technical University) ;
  • Zeng, Wei (State Grid Zhejiang Tongxiang Power Supply Company) ;
  • Ren, Ze (School of Mechanical Engineering, Liaoning Technical University)
  • Received : 2020.10.24
  • Accepted : 2021.01.27
  • Published : 2021.06.20

Abstract

The drive inverters for high-power motors often need to reduce the carrier ratio (usually by reducing the lower switching frequency) to increase its capacity. However, the low carrier ratio results in motor control performance degradation. In this paper, an inverter and a permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) are integrated to establish a unified prediction model with the delay caused by sampling and modulation that cannot be ignored under a low carrier ratio. Based on this model, a new PWM predictive control suitable for low carrier ratio (PPC-LCR) is proposed, which has better stability, dynamic performance, model accuracy and robustness under a low carrier ratio. To further enhance the control accuracy of the proposed strategy, prediction errors by parameter mismatch are analyzed, and a correction method of feedbacking the last beat prediction error is proposed to compensate for model error and parameter mismatch. Finally, experimental results are presented to support theoretical analysis and the proposed strategy.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was funded by Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51874158), Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51904142), and Key project of Liaoning Provincial Department of Education (LJ2019ZL003)

References

  1. Boglietti, A., Pastorelli, M.: Induction and synchronous reluctance motors comparison. In: 34th annual conference of IEEE industrial electronics, pp. 2041-2044 (2008)
  2. Diao, L.J., Sun, D.N., Dong, K., Zhao, L.T., Liu, Z.G.: Optimized design of discrete traction induction motor model at low-switching frequency. IEEE J. Mag. 28(10), 4803-4810 (2013)
  3. Geyer, T.: A comparison of control and modulation schemes for medium-voltage drives: emerging predictive control concepts versus field oriented control. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 47(3), 1380-1389 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2011.2127433
  4. Chen, G., Yang, S., Li, K.: Position sensing of permanent magnet machine position sensorless drive at high speed with low sample over rotor operating frequency ratio. In: IEEE 3rd International Future Energy Electronics Conference and ECCE, pp. 1205-1209 (2017)
  5. Kim, H., Degner, M.W., Guerrero, J.M., Briz, F., Lorenz, R.D.: Discrete-time current regulator design for AC machine drives. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 46(4), 1425-1435 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2010.2049628
  6. Holtz, J., Quan, J., Pontt, J., Rodriguez, J.: Design of fast and robust current regulators for high-power drives based on complex state variables. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 40(5), 1388-1397 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2004.834049
  7. Ke, M., Liserre, M., Blaabjerg, F.: Operating and loading conditions of a three-level neutral-point-clamped wind power converter under various grid faults. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 50(1), 520-530 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2013.2269894
  8. Yepes, A.G., Vidal, A., Lopez, O., Doval-Gandoy, J.: Evaluation of techniques for cross-coupling decoupling between orthogonal axes in double synchronous reference frame current control. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 61(7), 3527-3531 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2013.2281160
  9. Bahrani, B., Kenzelmann, S., Rufer, A.: Multivariable-PI-based dq current control of voltage source converters with superior axis de-coupling capability. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 58(7), 3016-3026 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2010.2070776
  10. Jung-Sikl, Y.: Modified current control schemes for high-performance permanent-magnet AC drives with low sampling to operating frequency ratio. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 45(2), 763-771 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2009.2013600
  11. Freijedo, F.D., Vidal, A., Yepes, A.G., Guerrero, J.M., Lopez, O., Malvar, J., Doval-Gandoy, J.: Tuning of synchronous-frame pi current controllers in grid-connected converters operating at a low sampling rate by MIMO root locus. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 62(8), 5006-5017 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2015.2402114
  12. Marko, H., Qu, Z.: Current control for synchronous motor drives: direct discrete-time pole-placement design. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 52(2), 1530-1541 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2015.2495288
  13. Yim, J.S., Sul, S.K., Bae, B.H.: Modified current control schemes for high-performance permanent-magnet AC drives with low sampling to operating frequency ratio. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 45(2), 763-771 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2009.2013600
  14. Wang, Y., Wang, W., Wang, C., Wu, X.: Coupling analysis on current control at low switching frequency for the three-phase PWM converter based on RGA and a novel output feedback decoupling method. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 63(11), 6684-6694 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2016.2582474
  15. Tan, K., Ge, Q., Yin, Z., Tan, L.: The optimized strategy for input current harmonic of low switching frequency PWM rectifier. In: Industrial Electronics and Applications, pp. 1057-1061 (2011)
  16. Ghoshal, A., John, V.: Active damping of LCL filter at low switching to resonance frequency ratio. Iet Power Electron. 8(4), 574-582 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-pel.2014.0355
  17. Hwang, J.G., Lehn, P.W., Winkelnkemper, M.: A generalized class of stationary frame-current controllers for grid-connected AC-DC converters. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 25(4), 2742-2751 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2010.2045136
  18. Morel, F., Lin-Shi, X., Retif, J.M.: A comparative study of predictive current control schemes for a permanent-magnet synchronous machine drive. IEEE IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 56(7), 2715-2728 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2009.2018429
  19. Preindl, M., Schaltz, E., Thogersen, P.: Switching frequency reduction using model predictive direct current control for highpower voltage source inverters. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 58(7), 2826-2835 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2010.2072894
  20. Cortes, P., Vattuone, L., Rodriguez, J.: Predictive current control with reduction of switching frequency for three phase voltage source inverters. In: Proceedings-ISIE 2011: IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, pp. 1817-1822 (2011)
  21. Ahmed, A.A, Kim, J.S., Lee, Y.I.: Model predictive torque control of PMSM for EV drives: A comparative study of finite control set and predictive dead-beat control schemes. In: 18th International Middle East Power Systems Conference, pp. 1-8 (2016)
  22. Yang, S.M., Lee, C.H.: A deadbeat current controller for field oriented induction motor drives. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 17(5), 772-778 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2002.802182
  23. Naouar, M.W.: FPGA-based predictive current controller for synchronous machine speed drive. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 23(4), 2115-2126 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2008.924849
  24. Cortes, P., Rodriguez, J., Silva, C., et al.: Delay compensation in model predictive current control of a three-phase inverter. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 59(2), 1323-1325 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2011.2157284