Korean journal of aerospace and environmental medicine (항공우주의학회지)

Aerospace Medical Association of Korea (한국항공우주의학협회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Crew Resource Management in Industry 4.0: Focusing on Human-Autonomy Teaming

4차 산업혁명 시대의 CRM: 인간과 자율 시스템의 협업 관점에서

  • Yun, Sunny (Department of Applied Artificial Intelligence, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Woo, Simon (Department of Applied Artificial Intelligence, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • Received : 2021.08.05
  • Accepted : 2021.08.23
  • Published : 2021.08.31
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In the era of the 4th industrial revolution, the aviation industry is also growing remarkably with the development of artificial intelligence and networks, so it is necessary to study a new concept of crew resource management (CRM), which is required in the process of operating state-of-the-art equipment. The automation system, which has been treated only as a tool, is changing its role as a decision-making agent with the development of artificial intelligence, and it is necessary to set clear standards for the role and responsibility in the safety-critical field. We present a new perspective on the automation system in the CRM program through the understanding of the autonomous system. In the future, autonomous system will develop as an agent for human pilots to cooperate, and accordingly, changes in role division and reorganization of regulations are required.

Keywords

References

  1. Presidential Committee on the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Recommendations to the government for the fourth industrial revolution [Internet]. Seoul: Presidential Committee on the Fourth Industrial Revolution; 2019 [cited 2019 Oct]. Available from: https://www.4th-ir.go.kr/cdn/recommendation(eng).pdf.
  2. Chen H, Wen Y, Zhu M, Huang Y, Xiao C, Wei T, Hahn A. From automation system to autonomous system: an architecture perspective. J Mar Sci Eng 2021;9:645. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9060645
  3. Ouellette RP, Thomas LW, Mangold EC, Cheremisinoff PN. Automation impacts on industry. Ann Arbor (MI): Ann Arbor Science; 1983.
  4. Veres SM, Molnar L, Lincoln NK, Morice CP. Autonomous vehicle control systems - a review of decision making. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part I J Syst Control Eng 2011;225:155-195. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041304110394727
  5. Murphy R, Shields J. Task force report: the role of autonomy in DoD systems. Washington, D.C.: Defense Science Board; 2012. pp. 13.
  6. Clapper JR Jr, Young JJ Jr, Cartwright JE, Grimes JG. Unmanned systems roadmap 2007-2032. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense; 2007. p. 188-206.
  7. Kim MY. Latest technology trends and commercialization of autonomous vehicles (trend report) [Internet]. Daejeon: KOSEN; 2018 [cited 2018 Sep 21]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.22800/kisti.kosenexpert.2018.10.
  8. On-Road Automated Driving (ORAD) Committee. Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles [Internet]. Warrendale (PA): SAE International; 2014 [updated 2021 Apr 30; cited 2018 Jun 15]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4271/J3016_201806.
  9. National Transportation Safety Board. Preliminary report highway HWY18MH010 [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: National Transportation Safety Board; 2018 [cited 2018 May 24]. Available from: https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/HWY18MH010-prelim.pdf.
  10. Botargues P. Airbus AP/FD TCAS mode: a new step towards safety Improvement [Internet]. Leiden: Airbus; 2009 [cited 2009 Feb]. Available from: https://safetyfirst.airbus.com/app/themes/mh_newsdesk/documents/archives/airbus-apfd-tcas-mode.pdf.
  11. Airbus P. Is autonomy the future of aerial mobility?: autonomous technologies are showing real promise in the development of more autonomous aircraft [Internet]. Leiden: Airbus; 2020 [cited 2020 Jan]. Available from: https://www.airbus.com/newsroom/stories/autonomy-aerial-mobility.html.
  12. European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). EASA artificial intelligence roadmap 1.0 [Internet]. Cologne: EASA; 2020 [cited 2020 Feb 7]. Available from: https://www.easa.europa.eu.
  13. Civil Aviation Authority. CAP 720: flight crew training: cockpit resource management (CRM) and line-oriented flight training (LOFT) [Internet]. Crawley: Civil Aviation Authority; 2002 [cited 2002 Aug 1]. Available from: http://publicapps.caa.co.uk/docs/33/CAP720.PDF.
  14. Comerford D, Brandt SL, Lachter J, Wu SC, Mogford R, Battiste V, et al. NASA's single-pilot operations technical interchange meeting: proceedings and findings. Moffett Field (CA): Ames Research Center; 2013.
  15. Tokadli G, Dorneich MC, Matessa M. Toward human-autonomy teaming in single-pilot operations: domain analysis and requirements. J Air Transp 2021. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.D0240 [Epub ahead of print]
  16. Jay SR, Brandt SL, Lachter J, Matessa M, Sadler G, Battiste H. Application of human-autonomy teaming (HAT) patterns to reduced crew operations (RCO). In: Harris D, editor. EPCE 2016: engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 244-255.
  17. Johnson EN. Methodology to support dynamic function allocation policies between humans and flight deck automation. Hampton (VA): NASA Langley Research Center; 2010.
  18. Matessa M, Strybel T, Vu K, Battiste V, Schnell T. Concept of Operations for RCO SPO. Moffett Field (CA); NASA: 2017.
  19. Shively RJ, Lachter J, Brandt SL, Matessa M, Battiste V, Johnson WW. Why human-autonomy teaming? In: Baldwin C, editor. AHFE 2017: advances in neuroergonomics and cognitive engineering. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 3-11.
  20. Vierhauser M, Md Nafee Al I, Agrawal A, Cleland-Huang J, Mason J. Hazard analysis for human-on-the-loop interactions in sUAS systems. In: Spinellis D, Gousios G, Chechik M, Di Penta M, editors. ESEC/FSE '21: 29th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering. New York (NY): Association for Computing Machinery; 2021. p. 8-19.