Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

FALCON code-based analysis of PWR fuel rod behaviour during RIA transients versus new U.S.NRC and current Swiss failure limits

  • Khvostov, G. (Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI)) ;
  • Gorzel, A. (Swiss Nuclear Safety Inspectorate (ENSI))
  • Received : 2021.04.19
  • Accepted : 2021.06.01
  • Published : 2021.11.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Outcomes of the FALCON code analysis-related part of the STARS-ENSI Service Project on Evaluation of the new U.S.NRC RIA Fuel Safety Criteria and Application to the Swiss Reactors are presented. Substantial conservatism of the updated safety limits for high-temperature and PCMI cladding failure, as proposed in the NRC Regulatory Guide RG 1.236, is confirmed. Applicability of the updated failure limits to fuel safety analysis in the Swiss PWRs, as applied to standard fuel designs using UO2 fuel pellets and SRA Zry-4 as cladding materials is discussed. Conducting of new integral RIA tests with irradiated samples using doped- and gadolinia fuel pellets to support appropriate fuel safety criteria for RIA events is recommended.

Keywords

References

  1. RG 1.236, Pressurized-water reactor control rod ejection and boiling water reactor control rod drop accidents, U.S. NRC Regulatory Guide RG 1.236 (2020).
  2. ENSI-G20/e, Reactor Core, Fuel Assemblies and Control Rods: Design and Operation Guideline for Swiss Nuclear Installations, Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate (ENSI), Brugg, Switzerland, 2015.
  3. EPRI Report 1011307, Fuel analysis and licensing Code: FALCON MOD01: volume 1: theoretical and numerical bases, Electric Power Research Institute, 2004. Product id: 1011307, web: https://www.epri.com/#/pages/product/000000000001011307/, 2004.
  4. EPRI Report 1011308, Fuel analysis and licensing Code: FALCON MOD01: volume 2: code user's guide, Electric Power Research Institute, 2004. Product id: 1011307, web: https://www.epri.com/#/pages/product/000000000001011308/, 2004.
  5. G. Khvostov, FALCON-PSI Code Management Report, November 2020. Version 4.03, Revision 4, PSI STARS SB-FALC-ACT-001-05.
  6. G. Khvostov, K. Mikityuk, M.A. Zimmermann, A model for fission gas release and gaseous swelling of the uranium dioxide fuel coupled with the FALCON code, Nucl. Eng. Des. 241 (2011) 2983-3007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.06.020
  7. G. Khvostov, Models for numerical simulation of burst FGR in fuel rods under the conditions of RIA, Nucl. Eng. Des. 328 (2018) 36-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.12.028
  8. G. Khvostov, Analytical criteria for fuel fragmentation and burst FGR during a LOCA, Nucl. Eng. Tech. 52 (2020) 2402-2409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.03.009
  9. NRC Memorandum 2015, Technical and Regulatory Basis for the Reactivity-Initiated Accident Acceptance Criteria and Guidance, US.NRC, 2015. ADAMS ML14188C423.
  10. EPRI Report 1021036, Fuel Reliability Program: Proposed RIA Acceptance Criteria, December 2010, EPRI, 2010. ADAMS ML13094A232.
  11. NRC Memorandum 2007, Technical and Regulatory Basis for the Reactivity-Initiated Accident Interim Acceptance Criteria and Guidance, January 2007, US.NRC, 2007. ADAMS ML070220400.
  12. Epri Report 3002005540, Fuel reliability program: proposed RIA acceptance criteria, revision 1, electric power Research institute, Product id: 3002005540, November 2015, web: https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000000001021036, 2015.
  13. NUREG-0630 (1980). Cladding Swelling and Rupture Models for LOCA Analysis, US.NRC, 1980. ADAMS ML053490337.
  14. OECD/NEA RIA SOAR. Nuclear Fuel Behaviour under Reactivity-Initiated Accident (RIA) Conditions. State-Of-The-Art-Report, OECD/NEA, 2020. OCDE NEA Report No. 6847, NEA/CSNI/R(2010).
  15. G. Khvostov, A. Romano, M.A. Zimmermann, Modeling the Effects of Axial Fuel Relocation in the IFA-650.4 LOCA Test, 2007 Enlarged Halden Programme Group Meeting (EHPGM), 2007. Paper F.5.7.
  16. G. Khvostov, A. Pautz, E. Kolstad, G. Ledergerber, Analysis of Halden LOCA test with the BWR high burnup fuel, SAVE Proc.: 2013 LWR Fuel Performance Meeting / Top Fuel, Charlotte, NC, USA (2013). Paper 8297 Conference proceedings.
  17. V. Brankov, et al., Analysis of effects of pellet-cladding bonding on trapping of the released fission gases in high-burnup KKL BWR fuels, Nucl. Eng. Des. 305 (2016) 559-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.06.021
  18. SRP Chapter 4.2 Appendix B, Interim Acceptance Criteria and Guidance for the Reactivity Initiated Accidents, Revision 3, US NRC Standard Review Plan NUREG-0800, US.NRC, 2007.
  19. PNNL Report 22549, Pellet-Cladding Mechanical Interaction Failure Threshold for Reactivity Initiated Accidents for Pressurized Water Reactors and Boiling Water Reactors, PNNL, 2013. ADAMS ML13277A368.
  20. RG 1.224, in: Establishing Analytical Limits for Zirconium-Alloy Cladding Material, Revision 0, US.NRC, 2014. U.S. NRC Regulatory Guide RG 1.224, Draft was issued as DG-1263, March 2014.
  21. K. Geelhood, C. Beyer, Hydrogen Pickup Models for Zircaloy-2, Zircaloy-4, M5TM and ZIRLOTM, WRFPM 2011, 2011. Paper No. T2-011, Chengdu, China, September 11-14.
  22. NUREG/Cr-7022, FRAPCON-3.5: A Computer Code for the Calculation of Steady- State, Thermal-Mechanical Behaviour of Oxide Fuel Rods for High Burnup, vol. 1, US.NRC, 2014. Revision 1, U.S. NRC, Washington, DC, October 2014.
  23. MATPRO, MATPRO - Version 11: A Handbook of Materials Properties for Use in the Analysis of Light Water Reactor Fuel Rod Behavior, US.NRC, 1979. US NRC NUREG/CR-0497 TREE-1280.
  24. International Atomic Energy Agency, Improvement of Computer Codes Used for Fuel Behaviour Simulation (FUMEX-III), IAEA, 2013, IAEA-TECDOC-1697.
  25. Oecd/Nea-Csni Report, RIA fuel codes benchmark, NEA/CSNI/R(2013)7, November 2013, web.: http://www.oecd-nea.org/nsd/docs/2013/csni-r2013-7.pdf, 2013.
  26. F. Ribeiro, G. Khvostov, Multi-scale approach to advanced fuel modelling for enhanced safety, Prog. Nucl. Energy 84 (2015) 24-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2015.03.022
  27. Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Advanced LWR Fuel Performance and Safety Research Program, Annual Report FY 2009 (In Japanese), Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai-Mura, Japan, 2010.
  28. V. Bessiron, T. Sugiyama, T. Fuketa, Clad-to-coolant heat transfer in NSRR experiments, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 44 (5), 723-732. https://doi.org/10.3327/jnst.44.723
  29. International Atomic Energy Agency, Fuel Modelling at Extended Burnup (FUMEX-II), IAEA, 2012, IAEA-TECDOC-1687.
  30. G. Khvostov, W. Wiesenack, Analysis of selected Halden overpressure tests using the FALCON code, Nucl. Eng. Des. 310 (2016) 395-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.10.033
  31. A. Gorzel, Swiss regulatory RIA criteria and the verification procedures by the operators, Proc. OECD/NEA Workshop on Nuclear Fuel Behaviour during Reactivity Initiated Accidents, Paris, France, September 9-11 (2009).
  32. L.O. Jernkvist, Computational assessment of burnup-dependent fuel failure thresholds for reactivity initiated accidents, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 43 (2006) 546-561. https://doi.org/10.3327/jnst.43.546

Cited by

  1. Modelling effects of transient FGR in LWR fuel rods during a LOCA vol.559, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.153446