Nuclear Engineering and Technology

  • 제53권11호
  • /
  • Pages.3675-3684
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1738-5733(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-358X(eISSN)
한국원자력학회 (Korean Nuclear Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

New method for dependence assessment in human reliability analysis based on linguistic hesitant fuzzy information

  • Zhang, Ling (School of Management, Shanghai University) ;
  • Zhu, Yu-Jie (School of Management, Shanghai University) ;
  • Hou, Lin-Xiu (School of Management, Shanghai University) ;
  • Liu, Hu-Chen (College of Economics and Management, China Jiliang University)
  • 투고 : 2021.03.23
  • 심사 : 2021.05.10
  • 발행 : 2021.11.25
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Human reliability analysis (HRA) is a proactive approach to model and evaluate human systematic errors, and has been extensively applied in various complicated systems. Dependence assessment among human errors plays a key role in the HRA, which relies heavily on the knowledge and experience of experts in real-world cases. Moreover, there are ofthen different types of uncertainty when experts use linguistic labels to evaluate the dependencies between human failure events. In this context, this paper aims to develop a new method based on linguistic hesitant fuzzy sets and the technique for human error rate prediction (THERP) technique to manage the dependence in HRA. This method handles the linguistic assessments given by experts according to the linguistic hesitant fuzzy sets, determines the weights of influential factors by an extended best-worst method, and confirms the degree of dependence between successive actions based on the THERP method. Finally, the effectiveness and practicality of the presented linguistic hesitant fuzzy THERP method are demonstrated through an empirical healthcare dependence analysis.

키워드

과제정보

The authors are very grateful to the respected editor and the anonymous referees for their insightful and constructive comments, which helped to improve the overall quality of the paper. This study was supported by the major project of the National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 21ZDA024).

참고문헌

  1. S. Gupta, P. Kumar, G. Yuga Raju, A fuzzy causal relational mapping and rough set-based model for context-specific human error rate estimation, Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 27 (1) (2021) 63-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2019.1578114
  2. Y. Chen, W. Feng, Z. Jiang, L. Duan, S. Cheng, An accident causation model based on safety information cognition and its application, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 207 (2021) 107363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107363
  3. L.X. Hou, R. Liu, H.C. Liu, S. Jiang, Two decades on human reliability analysis: a bibliometric analysis and literature review, Ann. Nucl. Energy 151 (2021) 107969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107969
  4. S.F. Greco, L. Podofillini, V.N. Dang, A Bayesian model to treat within-category and crew-to-crew variability in simulator data for human reliability analysis, Reliability Engineering and System Safety 206 (2021), 107309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107309
  5. E. Zarei, F. Khan, R. Abbassi, Importance of human reliability in process operation: a critical analysis, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 211 (2021) 107607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107607
  6. Y. Kim, J. Kim, J. Park, S.Y. Choi, S. Kim, W. Jung, H.E. Kim, S.K. Shin, An algorithm for evaluating time-related human reliability using instrumentation cues and procedure cues, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 53 (2) (2021) 368-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.08.015
  7. M.M. Aliabadi, Human error analysis in furnace start-up operation using HEART under intuitionistic fuzzy environment, J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 69 (2021) 104372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104372
  8. Y.A. Suh, J. Kim, S.Y. Park, Time uncertainty analysis method for level 2 human reliability analysis of severe accident management strategies, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 53 (2) (2021) 484-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.07.028
  9. Y. Kirimoto, Y. Hirotsu, K. Nonose, K. Sasou, Development of a human reliability analysis (HRA) guide for qualitative analysis with emphasis on narratives and models for tasks in extreme conditions, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 53 (2) (2021) 376-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.10.004
  10. H. Kim, S. Kim, J. Park, E.-C. Lee, S.J. Lee, The effect of communication quality on team performance in digital main control room operations, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 52 (6) (2020) 1180-1187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.11.030
  11. X. Pan, D. Zuo, W. Zhang, L. Hu, H. Wang, J. Jiang, Research on human error risk evaluation using extended bayesian networks with hybrid data, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 209 (2021) 107336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107336
  12. M. Mirzaei Aliabadi, I. Mohammadfam, K. Salimi, Identification and evaluation of maintenance error in catalyst replacement using the HEART technique under a fuzzy environment, Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. (2021), https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.
  13. M.A. Sujan, D. Embrey, H. Huang, On the application of human reliability analysis in healthcare: opportunities and challenges, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 194 (2020) 106189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.06.017
  14. C. Kandemir, M. Celik, Determining the error producing conditions in marine engineering maintenance and operations through HFACS-MMO, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 206 (2021) 107308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107308
  15. X. Chen, X. Liu, Y. Qin, An extended CREAM model based on analytic network process under the type-2 fuzzy environment for human reliability analysis in the high-speed train operation, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 37 (1) (2021) 284-308. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2736
  16. S. Bicen, C. Kandemir, M. Celik, A human reliability analysis to crankshaft overhauling in dry-docking of a general cargo ship, Proc. IME M J. Eng. Marit. Environ. 235 (1) (2021) 93-109.
  17. L. Podofillini, V. Dang, E. Zio, P. Baraldi, M. Librizzi, Using expert models in human reliability analysis-A dependence assessment method based on fuzzy logic, Risk Anal. 30 (8) (2010) 1277-1297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01425.x
  18. M. Cepin, Depend-HRA-A method for consideration of dependency in human reliability analysis, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 93 (10) (2008) 1452-1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2007.10.004
  19. X. Su, S. Mahadevan, P. Xu, Y. Deng, Inclusion of task dependence in human reliability analysis, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 128 (2014) 41-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.04.007
  20. E. Zio, P. Baraldi, M. Librizzi, L. Podofillini, V.N. Dang, A fuzzy set-based approach for modeling dependence among human errors, Fuzzy Set Syst. 160 (13) (2009) 1947-1964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2009.01.016
  21. L. Chen, X. Zhou, F. Xiao, Y. Deng, S. Mahadevan, Evidential analytic hierarchy process dependence assessment methodology in human reliability analysis, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 49 (1) (2017) 123-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2016.10.003
  22. X. Su, S. Mahadevan, P. Xu, Y. Deng, Dependence assessment in human reliability analysis using evidence theory and AHP, Risk Anal. 35 (7) (2015) 1296-1316. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12347
  23. H.C. Liu, Z. Li, J.Q. Zhang, X.Y. You, A large group decision making approach for dependence assessment in human reliability analysis, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 176 (2018) 135-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.04.008
  24. B. Kirwan, The validation of three human reliability quantification techniques - THERP, HEART and JHEDI: Part 1 - technique descriptions and validation issues, Appl. Ergon. 27 (6) (1996) 359-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(96)00044-0
  25. M. Konstandinidou, Z. Nivolianitou, C. Kiranoudis, N. Markatos, A fuzzy modeling application of CREAM methodology for human reliability analysis, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91 (6) (2006) 706-716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2005.06.002
  26. K.M. Groth, L.P. Swiler, Bridging the gap between HRA research and HRA practice: a Bayesian network version of SPAR-H, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 115 (2013) 33-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.015
  27. X. Zheng, Y. Deng, Dependence assessment in human reliability analysis based on evidence credibility decay model and Iowa operator, Ann. Nucl. Energy 112 (2018) 673-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.10.045
  28. X. Guo, Y. Zhou, J. Qian, Y. Deng, Using evidence credibility decay model for dependence assessment in human reliability analysis, Ann. Nucl. Energy 100 (2017) 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.10.007
  29. W. Jiang, Y. Cao, X. Deng, A novel Z-network model based on bayesian network and Z-number, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 28 (8) (2020) 1585-1599. https://doi.org/10.1109/tfuzz.2019.2918999
  30. F. Meng, X. Chen, Q. Zhang, Multi-attribute decision analysis under a linguistic hesitant fuzzy environment, Inf. Sci. 267 (2014) 287-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.02.012
  31. B. Farhadinia, E. Herrera-Viedma, A vertical ranking technique for linguistic hesitant fuzzy sets, Soft Computing 24 (12) (2020) 8997-9009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04426-0
  32. H. Zhou, J.Q. Wang, H.Y. Zhang, Multi-criteria decision-making approaches based on distance measures for linguistic hesitant fuzzy sets, J. Oper. Res. Soc. 69 (5) (2018) 661-675. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2017.1400780
  33. J. Guan, D. Zhou, F. Meng, Distance measure and correlation coefficient for linguistic hesitant fuzzy sets and their application, Informatica 28 (2) (2017) 237-268. https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2017.128
  34. J.W. Gong, H.C. Liu, X.Y. You, L. Yin, An integrated multi-criteria decision making approach with linguistic hesitant fuzzy sets for E-learning website evaluation and selection, Appl. Soft Comput. 102 (2021) 107118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107118
  35. Y. Wu, T. Zhang, K. Chen, L. Yi, A risk assessment framework of seawater pumped hydro storage project in China under three typical public-private partnership management modes, Journal of Energy Storage 32 (2020) 101753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2020.101753
  36. J. Yuan, X. Luo, X. Ding, C. Liu, C. Li, Biomass power generation fuel procurement and storage modes evaluation: a case study in Jilin, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 111 (2019) 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.079
  37. Y. Gao, F. Gao, K. Zhou, Evaluation model of surrounding rock stability based on fuzzy rock engineering systems (RES)-connection cloud, Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 79 (6) (2020) 3221-3230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01744-8
  38. J.Y. Dong, F.F. Yuan, S.P. Wan, Extended VIKOR method for multiple criteria decision-making with linguistic hesitant fuzzy information, Comput. Ind. Eng. 112 (2017) 305-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.07.025
  39. X. Zhou, X. Deng, Y. Deng, S. Mahadevan, Dependence assessment in human reliability analysis based on D numbers and AHP, Nucl. Eng. Des. 313 (2017) 243-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.12.001
  40. X. Deng, W. Jiang, Dependence assessment in human reliability analysis using an evidential network approach extended by belief rules and uncertainty measures, Ann. Nucl. Energy 117 (2018) 183-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.03.028
  41. L. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Chen, X. Pan, W. Zhang, Performance shaping factors dependence assessment through moderating and mediating effect analysis, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 202 (2020) 107034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107034
  42. A. Zhang, F. Gao, M. Yang, W. Bi, Belief rule-based dependence assessment method under interval uncertainty, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 36 (7) (2020) 2459-2477. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2708
  43. J. Rezaei, Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method, Omega 53 (2015) 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009
  44. E. Zarei, F. Khan, M. Yazdi, A dynamic risk model to analyze hydrogen infrastructure, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 46 (5) (2021) 4626-4643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.191
  45. M. Yazdi, F. Khan, R. Abbassi, R. Rusli, Improved DEMATEL methodology for effective safety management decision-making, Saf. Sci. 127 (2020) 104705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104705
  46. H. Nasirzadeh, H. Amin-Tahmasbi, H. Amoozad Khalili, Investment analysis in privatization of National Iranian Drilling Company using systems dynamics and BWM technique, Energy Pol. 148 (2021) 111963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111963
  47. R. Liu, Z. Liu, H.C. Liu, H. Shi, An improved alternative queuing method for occupational health and safety risk assessment and its application to construction excavation, Autom. ConStruct. 126 (2021) 103672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103672
  48. M.A. Moktadir, A. Dwivedi, N.S. Khan, S.K. Paul, S.A. Khan, S. Ahmed, R. Sultana, Analysis of risk factors in sustainable supply chain management in an emerging economy of leather industry, J. Clean. Prod. 283 (2021) 124641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124641
  49. A. Kumar, S.K. Mangla, P. Kumar, M. Song, Mitigate risks in perishable food supply chains: learning from COVID-19, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 166 (2021) 120643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120643
  50. M. Yazdi, A. Nedjati, E. Zarei, R. Abbassi, A reliable risk analysis approach using an extension of best-worst method based on democratic-autocratic decision-making style, J. Clean. Prod. 256 (2020) 120418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120418
  51. A. Rostamabadi, M. Jahangiri, E. Zarei, M. Kamalinia, M. Alimohammadlou, A novel fuzzy Bayesian Network approach for safety analysis of process systems: an application of HFACS and SHIPP methodology, J. Clean. Prod. 244 (2020) 118761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118761
  52. S.R. Mohandes, H. Sadeghi, A. Mahdiyar, S. Durdyev, A. Banaitis, K. Yahya, S. Ismail, Assessing construction labours' safety level: a fuzzy MCDM approach, J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 26 (2) (2020) 175-188. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2020.11926
  53. E.K. Delice, G.F. Can, A new approach for ergonomic risk assessment integrating KEMIRA, best-worst and MCDM methods, Soft Computing 24 (19) (2020) 15093-15110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05143-9
  54. H.W. Lo, J.J.H. Liou, C.N. Huang, Y.C. Chuang, A novel failure mode and effect analysis model for machine tool risk analysis, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 183 (2019) 173-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.11.018
  55. A. Mora, L. Ayala, R. Bielza, F. Ataulfo Gonz alez, A. Villegas, Improving safety in blood transfusion using failure mode and effect analysis, Transfusion 59 (2) (2019) 516-523. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.15137
  56. Y. Lu, F. Teng, J. Zhou, A. Wen, Y. Bi, Failure mode and effect analysis in blood transfusion: a proactive tool to reduce risks, Transfusion 53 (12) (2013) 3080-3087. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.12174