Structural Monitoring and Maintenance

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of foundation uplift on seismic behavior of three-dimensional structure controlled with tuned mass damper

  • Mortezaie, Hamid (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Hamedan, Hamedan Branch, Technical and Vocational University (TVU)) ;
  • Zamanian, Reza (Department of Earthquake Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University)
  • Received : 2019.05.27
  • Accepted : 2021.06.23
  • Published : 2021.09.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In general, uplift causes changes in the structural system making its behavior and dynamic characteristics very different to common soil-structure models where no uplift is applied. Changes in rotational stiffness and lateral stiffness of structures, variations in radiation damping as well as the effective damping of structure are among the examples of these changes. Many valuable studies have been carried out in the past years about seismic control of structures with tuned mass damper (TMD) in case of two-dimensional shear structures with few performed in case of three-dimensional shear buildings. More realistic and complex models should be used in evaluating the seismic performance and design of controllers to simulate the actual behavior of buildings with higher accuracy. In this research, a three-dimensional finite element model has been created in OpenSees software with completely nonlinear and updated behavior of soil-structure system. The effects of uplift on soil-structure system equipped with TMD have been assessed using it. The conditions of employing TMD with variable stiffness have been evaluated with respect to the process carried out in this research. According to the results, based on the type of soil the structure has been designed based on, the uplift of structure can be reduced by installing TMD while it cannot be reliably used for reducing displacement and lateral acceleration of the structure. Finally, evaluation of other responses of the structure related to damages to the structure revealed the good performance of TMD.

Keywords

References

  1. Abd-Elhamed, A. and Mahmoud, S. (2019), "Simulation analysis of TMD controlled building subjected to far-and near-fault records considering soil-structure interaction", J. Build. Eng., 26, 100930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100930
  2. Aguirre, J. and Almzan, J. (2014), "Optimum seismic design of nonlinear asymmetric structures controlled by large tuned mass dampers", Proceedings of the 10th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering, anchorage, AL, USA, July.
  3. Aguirre, J.J. and Almazan, J.L. (2015), "Damage potential reduction of optimally passive-controlled nonlinear structures", Eng. Struct., 89, 130-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.01.009
  4. ASCE (2013), Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, Amer Society of Civil Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412916
  5. Bakre, S.V. and Jangid, R.S. (2007), "Optimum parameters of tuned mass damper for damped main system", Struct. Control Health Monitor., 14(3), 448-470. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.166
  6. Bekdas, G. and Nigdeli, S.M. (2017), "Metaheuristic based optimization of tuned mass dampers under earthquake excitation by considering soil-structure interaction", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 92, 443-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.10.019
  7. Comartin, C.D., Niewiarowski, R.W., Freeman, S.A. and Turner, F.M. (2000), "Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings: a practical overview of the ATC 40 Document", Earthq. Spectra, 16(1), 241-261. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586093
  8. Fajfar, P. (2000), "A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design", Earthq. spectra, 16(3), 573-592. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586128
  9. Farshidianfar, A. and Soheili, S. (2013), "Ant colony optimization of tuned mass dampers for earthquake oscillations of high-rise structures including soil-structure interaction", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 51, 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.04.002
  10. FEMA, A. (2005), "440, Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures", FEMA-440, Redwood City.
  11. Gerges, R.R. and Vickery, B.J. (2005), "Optimum design of pendulum-type tuned mass dampers", Struct. Des. Tall Special Build., 14(4), 353-368. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.273
  12. Ghannad, M.A. and Jafarieh, A.H. (2014), "Inelastic displacement ratios for soil-structure systems allowed to uplift", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 43(9), 1401-1421. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2405
  13. Ghosh, A. and Basu, B. (2004), "Effect of soil interaction on the performance of tuned mass dampers for seismic applications", J. Sound Vib., 274(3), 1079-1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2003.09.060
  14. Greco, R. and Marano, G.C. (2013), "Optimum design of tuned mass dampers by displacement and energy perspectives", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 49, 243-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.02.013
  15. Haselton, C.B. (2006), "Assessing seismic collapse safety of modern reinforced concrete moment frame buildings", Doctoral Dissertation; Stanford University.
  16. IBC (2000), International building code, International Code Council: Falls Church.
  17. Jafarieh, A.H. and Ghannad, M.A. (2014), "The effect of foundation uplift on elastic response of soil-structure systems", Int. J. Civil Eng., 12(2), 146-157.
  18. Jia, F. and Jianwen, L. (2019), "Performance degradation of tuned-mass-dampers arising from ignoring soil-structure interaction effects", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 125, 105701.a https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.05.040
  19. Khatibinia, M., Gholami, H. and Labbafi, S. (2016), "Multi-objective optimization of tuned mass dampers considering soil-structure interaction", Int. J. Optim. Civil Eng., 6(4), 595-610.
  20. Khoshnoudian, F., Ziaei, R. and Ayyobi, P. (2017), "Effects of nonlinear soil-structure interaction on the seismic response of structure-TMD systems subjected to near-field earthquakes", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 15(1), 199-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9963-y
  21. Li, C. and Qu, W. (2006), "Optimum properties of multiple tuned mass dampers for reduction of translational and torsional response of structures subject to ground acceleration", Eng. Struct., 28(4), 472-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.09.003
  22. Liu, M.-Y., Chiang, W.-L., Hwang, J.-H. and Chu, C.-R. (2008), "Wind-induced vibration of high-rise building with tuned mass damper including soil-structure interaction", J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodyn., 96(6), 1092-1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2007.06.034
  23. Moehle, J.P., Hooper, J.D. and Lubke, C.D. (2008), "Seismic design of reinforced concrete special moment frames: a guide for practicing engineers", In: NEHRP Seismic Design Technical Brief No. 1, National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce.
  24. Mortezaie, H. and Rezaie, F. (2018a), "Effect of soil in controlling the seismic response of three-dimensional PBPD high-rise concrete structures", Struct. Eng. Mech., Int. J., 66(2), 217-227. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.66.2.217
  25. Mortezaie, H. and Rezaie, F. (2018b), "Optimization and evaluation of three-dimensional high-rise concrete structure equipped by TMD with considering the soil-structure interaction effect", J. Vibroeng., 20(5), 2099-2110. https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2017.18628
  26. Nigdeli, S.M. and Boduroglu, M.H. (2013), "Active tendon control of torsionally irregular structures under near-fault ground motion excitation", Comput.-Aided Civil Infrastr. Eng., 28(9), 718-736. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12046
  27. Salvi, J., Pioldi, F. and Rizzi, E. (2018), "Optimum tuned mass dampers under seismic soil-structure interaction", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 114, 576-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.014
  28. Sgobba, S. and Marano, G.C. (2010), "Optimum design of linear tuned mass dampers for structures with nonlinear behaviour", Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 24(6), 1739-1755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.01.009
  29. Shooshtari, M. and Mortezaie, H. (2017), "Effect of using linear multiple tuned mass dampers on concrete structures with hysteresis behavior", J. Vibroeng., 19(2), 1158-1172. https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2016.17487
  30. Singh, M.P., Singh, S. and Moreschi, L.M. (2002), "Tuned mass dampers for response control of torsional buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(4), 749-769. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.119
  31. Spencer Jr, B. and Nagarajaiah, S. (2003), "State of the art of structural control", J. Struct. Eng., 129(7), 845-856. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:7(845)
  32. Takewaki, I. (2000), "Soil-structure random response reduction via TMD-VD simultaneous use", Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 190(5), 677-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00434-X
  33. Tse, K., Kwok, K. and Tamura, Y. (2012), "Performance and cost evaluation of a smart tuned mass damper for suppressing wind-induced lateral-torsional motion of tall structures", J. Struct. Eng., 138(4), 514-525. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000486
  34. Wang, J.-F. and Lin, C.-C. (2005), "Seismic performance of multiple tuned mass dampers for soil-irregular building interaction systems", Int. J. Solids Struct., 42(20), 5536-5554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.02.042
  35. Wu, J., Chen, G. and Lou, M. (1999), "Seismic effectiveness of tuned mass dampers considering soil-structure interaction", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 28(11), 1219-1233. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199911)28:11<1219::AID-EQE861>3.0.CO;2-G