DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국 조경수목 근원직경 측정의 합리적 위치 설정에 대한 연구

A Study on the Reasonable Measurement Point of Root Collar Diameter of Landscape Trees in Korea

  • 한용희 (광주.전남환경보전협회) ;
  • 김화정 (순천대학교 대학원 조경학과) ;
  • 김도균 (순천대학교 정원문화산업학과)
  • Han, Yong-Hee (Gwangju.Jeonnam Environmental Preservation Association) ;
  • Kim, Hwa-Jeong (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Sunchon National University) ;
  • Kim, Do-Gyun (Dept. of Garden Culture Industry, Sunchon National University)
  • 투고 : 2021.08.27
  • 심사 : 2021.09.22
  • 발행 : 2021.11.05

초록

본 연구는 한국 조경수목의 근원직경 측정의 모호성으로 생산자와 시공자 간의 검측 기준이 달라서 발생되는 분쟁을 줄일 수 있는 합리적인 근원직경 측정 위치 설정 방안에 대하여 실증 조사·분석하였다. 조경수목의 근원직경 측정 부위별 차이는 지하부 -6cm에서 표토부인 0cm까지는 3.59cm이었고, 지상부의 표토 0cm에서부터 6cm까지는 1.35cm로 근원직경의 측정위치별 차이는 지상부보다는 지하부에서 더 크게 나타났다. 조경수목 근원직경의 표준편차의 크기는 지하부 -6cm에서 표토부인 0cm까지는 0.64이었고, 지상부의 표토 0cm에서부터 6cm까지의 표준편차 차이는 0.16으로 근원직경의 측정위치별 차이는 지상부보다는 지하부에서 더 크게 나타났다. 조경수목 근원직경의 합리적 측정 위치 설정은 근원직경 측정 위치별 규격의 크기 변화 추세선에서 수간직경의 표준편차가 가장 적어지는 변곡점으로 설정하는 것이 제안되었다. 수종별 합리적인 측정 위치는 산딸나무 지상 18cm, 이팝나무 지상 12cm·느티나무 지상 12cm·팽나무 지상 12cm, 때죽나무 지상 10cm·산수유 지상 10cm, 단풍나무 지상 6cm·먼나무 지상 6cm, 가시나무 지상 4cm, 배롱나무 지상 2cm 이상으로 나타났다. 조경수목 근원직경 측정 부위별 차이가 공시수종 전체에서 표준편차가 작고, 편차의 기울기가 안정적인 합리적인 평균 측정위치는 지상부 평균 12cm 이상으로 나타났다. 조경수목 근원직경의 합리적인 측정위치 설정은 지상부 평균 12cm 이상에서부터라고 할 수 있으나 전통적인 관행상으로 익숙한 1자(尺) 30cm 인식이 빠르며, 측정자의 측정 위치의 편리성, 외국의 조경수목 측정기준에 대한 통일성 등 조경수목 근원직경의 합리적인 측정위치는 지표면 30cm 높이에서 측정하는 것이 좋을 것으로 추천되었다.

This study was to investigate the measurement point of root collar diameter of landscape trees in Korea. It may contribute to avoiding disputes caused by the difference in measurement criteria of root collar diameter of landscape trees between tree growers and constructors. The difference between landscape trees' root collar diameter measurement point was 3.59cm from 6cm underground to the surface and 1.35cm from 0cm to 6cm above ground. The source root collar diameter measurement point difference was larger in the basement than in the ground. The standard deviation of the root collar diameter of the landscape tree was 0.64 from 6cm underground to the surface, and the difference in standard deviation from 0cm to 6cm above ground was 0.16. The difference by measurement point of the root collar diameter was larger in the basement than in the ground. It has been proposed to set the reasonable measurement point of the landscaping tree root collar diameter at the inflection point where the standard deviation of the tree trunk diameter is the smallest in line with the size change of the standard for each root collar diameter measurement point. By tree species, Cornus officinalis Siebold & Zucc. 18cm above the ground, Chionanthus retusus Lindl. & Paxton. 12cm above the ground, Zelkova serrata (Thunb.) Makino. 12cm above the ground, Celtis sinensis Pers. 12cm above the ground, Styrax japonicus Siebold & Zucc. 10 cm above the ground, Cornus officinalis Siebold & Zucc. 10cm above the ground, Acer palmatum Thunb. ex Murray. 6cm above the ground, Ilex rotunda Thunb. 6cm above the ground, Quercus myrsmaefolia Blume. 4cm above the ground, Lagerstroemia indica L. 2cm above the ground The above heights were shown as reasonable measurement points. The difference by landscape tree root collar diameter measurement site showed that the standard deviation was small throughout the tree species, and the reasonable average measurement point with a stable slope of the deviation was 12cm or more on average. It can be said that the reasonable measurement point of the root collar diameter of a landscape tree is set at an average of 12cm above the ground. However, recognizing 30cm, which is a familiar ruler(尺) in traditional practices, is quick, It was recommended to measure at the height of 30cm from the surface for a reasonable measurement point of the root collar diameter of a landscape tree, for the uniformity of measurement standards.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. A Nonprofit Corporation, Japan Greenery Research and Development Center(2018) Green Tree Supply.Technical Information.
  2. American Nursery & Landscape Association(2004) American Standard for Nursery Stok: ANSI Z 60.1-2004. American Nursery & Landscape Association, DC.
  3. Choi, S. B.(2016) Landscape Planting. Seoul: Kimundang.
  4. Canadian Nursery & Landscape Association(2006). Canadian Standards for Nursery Stock. 8th Edition.
  5. Harris, R. W., J. R. Clark and N. P. Matheny(2004) Integrated Management of Landscape Trees, Shrubs, Vines. 4th Ed. Lee, G. H (Translation)(2012) Tree Management. Seoul: Corporation Bioscience Publishing.
  6. Hur, J. N., J. B. Ahn and K. M. Shim(2015) Projection on first flowering date of cherry, peach and pear in 21st century simulated by WRF v 3.4 based on RCP 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios. Atmosphere. Korean Meteorological Society 25(4): 693-706. https://doi.org/10.14191/Atmos.2015.25.4.693
  7. Korea Forest Service(2007) Reasonable Landscaping Tree Creation and Management and Production and Distribution Improvement Measures. Korea Landscaping Tree Association.
  8. Korea Forest Service(2014) Measures to Foster Landscape and Fisheries Industry.
  9. Korea Forest Service(2017) 2016 Forest Product Production Survey.
  10. Korea Forest Service(2018) Forestry Glossary.
  11. Korea National Park Service(2013) Korea National Park Research Institute.
  12. Korea Policy Briefing(2014) Beautiful Urban Greenery, from Standardization of Landscape Tree Standards and Quality.
  13. Kim, D. G(2006) Tree-ring growth characteristics of Zelkova Serrata Makino after replanting on the reclaimed land from the sea in Gwangyang Bay. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 33(6): 40-50.
  14. Kim, D. G. and Y. S. Kwak.(2004) Growth characteristics of Pinus thunbergii Parl. after replanting in reclaimed from the sea( I ) - On the spatial distribution of fine root phytomass -. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 31(6): 77-84.
  15. Kim, I. Y.(2014) Issues and Improvement Schemes of Calculating Official Prices to Landscape Trees. Master's Thesis, Chung-Ang University. Korea.
  16. Kim, J. H., S. O. Kim and D. J. Kim(2017) Estimation of climatological standard deviation distribution. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 19(3): 93-101. https://doi.org/10.5532/KJAFM.2017.19.3.93
  17. Kim, T. J. and H. B. Kim(2001) The effects of containerized landscape tree production methods on post-tansplant strees. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 29(1): 152-160.
  18. Kim, T. Y.(2013) The Detailed Dimensions and Quality Assessment Standards in Korean Landscape Woody Plants. Ph. D. Dissertation. Seoul National University. Korea.
  19. Kim, Y. G.(2018) A Study on Track Quality Evaluation Using Standard Deviations of Track Irregularity for Ballasted Track. Master's Thesis, Seoul National University of Science and Technology. Korea.
  20. Kim, Y. S. and K. D. Kim(2014) Relationships between annual ring growth of pitch pine and climate factors in Cheongju. Korea National University of Education. Environmental Studies Education Research 18: 127-146.
  21. Kim, Y. S., H. C. Kim, K. D. Kim, D. Y. Kim, I. H. Kim, C. H. Kim, J. H. No, M. S. Byun, G. J. Song, H. T. Sin, Y. H. Ahn, G. G. Oh, K. J. Lee, Y. M. Lee, D. O. Im, B. G. Jang, S. H. Jeon, J. C. Jeong, M. C. Joo, S. H Choi and B. H. Han(2009) New Landscape Botany. Seoul: Gwangil Cultural History.
  22. Lafent(2017) Landscape News.
  23. Lee, B. H.(2006) A Study on the Standardized Form and its Quality Assessment of Some Landscape Plants in Korea. Master's Thesis, Kyungwon University. Korea.
  24. Lee, K. H and J. C. Yoon(2009) Characteristics of periodical changes on standard of estimated unit manpower and material of landscape architectural construction Korea. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 37(1): 131-138.
  25. Lee, K. J.(2017) Tree Physiology. Seoul: Seoul National University Press Center.
  26. Lee, S. S.(2013) Landscape Materials. Seoul: Iljogag.
  27. Ministry of Environment(2016) Topsoil Conservation and Environmental Impact Assessment.
  28. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, Japan(2008) Quality Dimension Standard (draft) for Publicly used Trees The Fifth Revision. National Capital Green Ring No. 47.
  29. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs(2016) Standard Specification for Landscape Construction.
  30. Park, W. K.(2013) An analysis of the price fluctuation of landscaping plants. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 16(6): 63-75. https://doi.org/10.13087/KOSERT.2013.16.6.063
  31. Park, Y. C., K. S. Chang and H. Kim(2017) The application of species richness estimators and species accumulation curves to traditional ethnobotanical knowledges in South Korea. Korean J. Plant Res 30(5): 481-488. https://doi.org/10.7732/KJPR.2017.30.5.481
  32. Park, Y. J., H. K. Kang, I. H. Park, J. S. Baek, J. H. Yoo, J. S. Lee and M. C. Joo(2017) Samgo Landscape Arboretum. Seoul: Hyangmunsa.
  33. Public Procurement Service Country Marketplace(2017) Landscaping Tree Prices.
  34. Ramsey F. L., Schafer D. W.(2013) The Statistical Sleuth: A Course in Methods of Data Analysis. 3rd edition. Brokks/Cole Cengage Learning, Australia.
  35. So, Y. S.(2016) Interpretation of standard deviation, standard error and confidence interval in the data analysis of crop breeding research. Korean J. Breed. Sci. 48(2): 102-110. https://doi.org/10.9787/KJBS.2016.48.2.102
  36. Treedb(2014) Landscape Tree Archives.
  37. Treedb(2016) A Survey of Landscape Trees in 2015.
  38. Yun, J. C and K. H. Lee(2011) A studies of amendment a standard of estimated unit manpower and material of landscape architectural construction work classification. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 39(5): 119-126. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2011.39.5.119
  39. A Nonprofit Corporation, Japan Greenery Research and Development Center(2018) Green Tree Supply.Technical Information. https://www.jpgreen.or.jp
  40. Cafe Landscapeworld(2018) http://cafe.daum.net/landscapeworld. I am a landscaper
  41. Cafe Teamsis(2018) http://cafe.naver.com/teamsis/45566, Landscape Communication
  42. https://wilsontreecare.ca/2016/03/avoiding-root-collar-disorders/. 2016.
  43. https://dict.naver.com/. 2018.
  44. https://www.google.com. 2018.
  45. https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/. 2018.