DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

2020 한국인 영양소 섭취기준 제·개정: 교훈과 도전

The development of the 2020 Dietary Reference Intakes for Korean population: Lessons and challenges

  • 권오란 (이화여자대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 김혜숙 (이화여자대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 김정선 (국립암센터 국제암대학원대학교) ;
  • 황지윤 (상명대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 이정희 (군산대학교 식품생명과학부 식품영양학전공) ;
  • 윤미옥 (한국영양학회)
  • Kwon, Oran (Department of Nutritional Science and Food Management, Graduate Program in System Health Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Kim, Hyesook (Department of Nutritional Science and Food Management, Graduate Program in System Health Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Kim, Jeongseon (Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Hwang, Ji-Yun (Department of Foodservice Management and Nutrition, Sangmyung University) ;
  • Lee, Jounghee (Department of Food and Nutrition, Kunsan National University) ;
  • Yoon, Mi Ock (Nutrition Information Committee, The Korean Nutrition Society)
  • 투고 : 2021.09.06
  • 심사 : 2021.09.17
  • 발행 : 2021.10.31

초록

The discovery of the relationship between nutrients and deficiency diseases during the 100 years from the mid-1800s to the mid-1900s was a breakthrough that led to advances in the study of nutrition. The Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDA) were created as a quantitative standard for avoiding diseases caused by nutrient deficiency. In addition, a reductionism paradigm has become generally accepted among nutrition scholars in health and disease, which focused on the properties of individual nutrients, content in foods, cellular levels, and mechanisms of action. The reductionist paradigm worked very well for the prevention and treatment of malnutrition diseases. However, as the incidence of nutrient deficiencies decreased and that of chronic diseases increased, the nutrition goals have been changed to secure safe and adequate nutrient intake and to reduce chronic disease risks. Accordingly, Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs), a set of nutrient-based reference values, were designed to replace the RDA. The revised Korean DRIs were published for 40 nutrients in 2020. However, there is still room for improvement in the reference intake levels targeted at reducing the risk of chronic disease. The reductionist approach can no longer be practical because chronic diseases are related to the interactions between multi-components in the foods and multi-targets in the body. Therefore, a second innovative leap is needed following the nutrition development breakthrough made over 100 years ago. To this end, the nutrition paradigm must evolve from reductionism to a holism approach. Cutting-edge scientific technologies, such as metabolomics, transcriptomics, microbiomics, and bioinformatics, should also be acceptable in nutrition science based on the knowledge gained from basic nutrition studies.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Murphy SP, Yates AA, Atkinson SA, Barr SI, Dwyer J. History of nutrition: the long road leading to the Dietary Reference Intakes for the United States and Canada. Adv Nutr 2016; 7(1): 157-168. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.115.010322
  2. Shin S, Kim S, Joung H. Evidence-based approaches for establishing the 2015 Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans. Nutr Res Pract 2018; 12(6): 459-468. https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2018.12.6.459
  3. Carpenter KJ. A short history of nutritional science: part 3 (1912-1944). J Nutr 2003; 133(10): 3023-3032. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/133.10.3023
  4. Mozaffarian D, Rosenberg I, Uauy R. History of modern nutrition science-implications for current research, dietary guidelines, and food policy. BMJ 2018; 361: k2392. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2392
  5. Paik HY. Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans (KDRIs). Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2008; 17 Suppl 2: 416-419.
  6. Murphy SP, Poos MI. Dietary Reference Intakes: summary of applications in dietary assessment. Public Health Nutr 2002; 5(6A): 843-849. https://doi.org/10.1079/PHN2002389
  7. Russell RM. Current framework for DRI development: What are the pros and cons? Nutr Rev 2008; 66(8): 455-458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2008.00074.x
  8. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (US). Guiding principles for developing Dietary Reference Intakes based on chronic disease. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2017.
  9. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (US). Dietary Reference Intakes for sodium and potassium. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2019.
  10. Jung EK. 2019 Chronic disease status and issues; chronic disease fact book. [Internet]. Cheongju: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2020 [cited 2020 Feb 18]. Available from: http://nih.go.kr/gallery.es?mid=a20503020000&bid=0003&b_list=9&act=view&list_no=144581&nPage=1&vlist_no_npage=2&keyField=&keyWord=&orderby.
  11. Chung M, Balk EM, Ip S, Lee J, Terasawa T, Raman G, et al. Systematic review to support the development of nutrient reference intake values: challenges and solutions. Am J Clin Nutr 2010; 92(2): 273-276. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2009.29092
  12. Jorgensen L, Paludan-Muller AS, Laursen DR, Savovic J, Boutron I, Sterne JA, et al. Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews. Syst Rev 2016; 5: 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0259-8
  13. Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses [Internet]. Ottawa: The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2009 [cited 2018 Jun 16]. Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
  14. STROBE Group. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology [Internet]. Bern: Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine at the University of Bern; 2009 [cited 2018 Jun 16]. Available from: https://www.strobe-statement.org/checklists.
  15. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee Nutrition Evidence Library Methodology [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: USDA's Nutrition Evidence Library (NEL); 2015 [cited 2017 Mar 21]. Available from: https://nesr.usda.gov/2015-dietary-guidelines-advisory-committee-nutrition-evidence-library-methodology-0.
  16. Russell R, Chung M, Balk EM, Atkinson S, Giovannucci EL, Ip S, et al. Opportunities and challenges in conducting systematic reviews to support the development of nutrient reference values: vitamin A as an example. Am J Clin Nutr 2009; 89(3): 728-733. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2008.27154
  17. Aranceta J, Perez-Rodrigo C. Recommended dietary reference intakes, nutritional goals and dietary guidelines for fat and fatty acids: a systematic review. Br J Nutr 2012; 107 Suppl 2: S8-S22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114512001444
  18. Ministry of Health and Welfare (KR); The Korean Nutrition Society. Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans 2020. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2020.
  19. Yetley EA, MacFarlane AJ, Greene-Finestone LS, Garza C, Ard JD, Atkinson SA, et al. Options for basing Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) on chronic disease endpoints: report from a joint US-/Canadian-sponsored working group. Am J Clin Nutr 2017; 105(1): 249S-285S. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.116.139097
  20. Kim JH, Yun S, Hwang SS, Shim JO, Chae HW, Lee YJ, et al. The 2017 Korean National Growth Charts for children and adolescents: development, improvement, and prospects. Korean J Pediatr 2018; 61(5): 135-149. https://doi.org/10.3345/kjp.2018.61.5.135
  21. Atkinson SA, Koletzko B. Determining life-stage groups and extrapolating nutrient intake values (NIVs). Food Nutr Bull 2007; 28 (1 Suppl International): S61-S76. https://doi.org/10.1177/15648265070281S107

피인용 문헌

  1. Establishment and future tasks of estimated energy requirement in 2020 dietary reference intakes for Koreans vol.54, pp.6, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2021.54.6.573
  2. The development of the 2020 Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans: carbohydrate vol.54, pp.6, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2021.54.6.584