The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

All-on-6 implant fixed prosthesis restoration with full-digital system on edentulous patient: A case report

무치악 환자에서 완전 디지털 시스템을 활용한 All-on-6 임플란트 고정성 보철물 수복 증례

  • Lee, SeungJin (Department of Prosthodontics, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University) ;
  • Jeong, Seung-Mi (Department of Prosthodontics, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University) ;
  • Chung, Chae-Heon (Department of Prosthodontics, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University) ;
  • Fang, YiQin (Department of Prosthodontics, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University) ;
  • Choi, Byung-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University)
  • 이승진 (연세대학교 원주세브란스기독병원 치과보철과) ;
  • 정승미 (연세대학교 원주세브란스기독병원 치과보철과) ;
  • 정재헌 (연세대학교 원주세브란스기독병원 치과보철과) ;
  • 방일흠 (연세대학교 원주세브란스기독병원 치과보철과) ;
  • 최병호 (연세대학교 원주세브란스기독병원 구강악안면외과)
  • Received : 2021.07.13
  • Accepted : 2021.09.13
  • Published : 2021.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

All-on-six concept can be used as one of the treatment options to maximize the use of available residual alveolar bone for implant-supported fixed prosthesis on edentulous patients. But this process is complex and cumbersome. Digital system can be used at multiple steps, from implantation to prosthetic restoration, to overcome this shortcoming. In this case of a maxillary edentulous patient aged 76, digital system was used for restoration of 1-piece design, screw retained fixed prosthesis from diagnosis, implant surgery to fabrication of provisional and final prosthesis. For preoperative diagnosis and treatment planning stage, intra-oral information of a patient was digitalized by direct intra-oral scan. Surgical guide and immediate provisional prosthesis was designed based on this digitalized data. Patient's inconvenience was minimized by applying immediate provisional prosthesis, which was delicately fabricated according to the location data of six implants on most suitable residual alveolar bone. Then, final prosthesis was designed and fabricated going through new interim prosthesis which was newly designed and fabricated, considering patient's requests, stable vertical dimension and occlusion, and esthetic factors using digital system. We hereby report a case successfully applying digital system to multiple steps including implant surgery to fabricating prosthesis, to simplify existing complicated implant treatment procedure to an edentulous patient.

무치악 환자에서 잔존 치조골을 최대의 효율로 활용해 임플란트 고정성 보철물을 수복하는 치료법 중 하나로 All-on-6 개념을 사용할 수 있으나, 치료과정에서 복잡함과 번거로움이 동반된다. 나날이 발전해 온 디지털 시스템을 활용한다면 무치악 환자의 임플란트 식립부터 보철물 제작 및 수복까지 높은 효용성으로 활용할 수 있다. 본 증례에서는 76세 상악 무치악 환자의 일체형 나사 유지형 고정성 임플란트 보철 수복(1-piece design, screw retained implant fixed prosthesis)에 대해 진단부터 임플란트 식립 그리고 보철물 제작까지 전 과정에서 디지털 시스템을 활용하였다. 술전 진단에서 구강직접스캔(Direct intraoral scan)을 통해 환자의 정보를 데이터화 하였으며 이를 토대로 임플란트 식립 수술 가이드와 식립직후 장착할 즉시 임시보철물을 디자인 하였다. 최적의 잔존 치조골 위치에 식립된 6개의 임플란트 위치정보에 따라 정밀하게 제작된 즉시 임시보철물을 수복하여 술 후 사용 가능하도록 하여 환자의 불편감을 최소화하였다. 디지털 시스템을 활용하여 환자의 요구사항, 안정된 수직고경과 교합, 심미성을 고려하여 제작한 새로운 임시보철물을 거쳐 최종보철물을 디자인하고 제작하였다. 디지털 시스템을 활용하여 무치악 환자의 효율적이고 정확한 임플란트 식립부터 보철물 제작까지 전 과정에 있어서 복잡한 임플란트 치료과정을 단순화하여 환자의 불편감을 최소화시키고 기능적이고 심미적인 결과를 얻어 보고하는 바이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Palomares T, Montero J, Rosel EM, Del-Castillo R, Rosales JI. Oral health-related quality of life and masticatory function after conventional prosthetic treatment: A cohort follow-up study. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:755-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.023
  2. Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. 1972. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:427-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00158-6
  3. Gosavi SS, Ghanchi M, Malik SA, Sanyal P. A survey of complete denture patients experiencing difficulties with their prostheses. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14:524-7. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1355
  4. Kutkut A, Bertoli E, Frazer R, Pinto-Sinai G, Fuentealba Hidalgo R, Studts J. A systematic review of studies comparing conventional complete denture and implant retained overdenture. J Prosthodont Res 2018;62:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.06.004
  5. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The edentulous predicament. I: A prospective study of the effectiveness of implant-supported fixed prostheses. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:59-65. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0031
  6. Zitzmann NU, Marinello CP. Treatment plan for restoring the edentulous maxilla with implant-supported restorations: removable overdenture versus fixed partial denture design. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:188-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70155-1
  7. Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, Weinstein R. Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24:565-77.
  8. Malo P, Rangert B, Nobre M. "All-on-Four" immediate-function concept with Branemark System implants for completely edentulous mandibles: a retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5:2-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00010.x
  9. Patzelt SB, Bahat O, Reynolds MA, Strub JR. The allon-four treatment concept: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014;16:836-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12068
  10. Kim YJ, Jeong SM, Kim KH, Fang JW, Kim DH, Choi BH. Application of digital implant system on implant treatment with "All-on-4" concept. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2018;56:88-94. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2018.56.1.88
  11. Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. 3rd ed. St. Louis; CV Mosby; 2007. p. 379-80.
  12. Choi BH, Jeong SM. Digital full arch. 1st ed. Seoul; Quintessence Pub; 2020. p. 224-42.
  13. Joda T, Bragger U. Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: a cost/time analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:1430-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12476
  14. Chochlidakis K, Papaspyridakos P, Tsigarida A, Romeo D, Chen YW, Natto Z, Ercoli C. Digital versus conventional full-arch implant impressions: a prospective study on 16 edentulous maxillae. J Prosthodont 2020;29:281-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13162
  15. Choi BH, Jeong SM. Digital flapless implantology. 1st ed. Seoul; Jisung Pub; 2015. p. 9-30.
  16. Cho IH, Professor's committee of complete denture prosthodontics. Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients. 2nd ed. Seoul; Yenang; 2014. p. 229-34. p. 280-1.
  17. Katsoulis J, Mericske-Stern R, Rotkina L, Zbaren C, Enkling N, Blatz MB. Precision of fit of implant-supported screw-retained 10-unit computer-aided-designed and computer-aided-manufactured frameworks made from zirconium dioxide and titanium: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:165-74.
  18. Juodzbalys G, Kubilius M. Clinical and radiological classification of the jawbone anatomy in endosseous dental implant treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2013;4:e2.
  19. Kelly E. Changes caused by a mandibular removable partial denture opposing a maxillary complete denture. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27:140-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(72)90190-4
  20. Vecsei B, Joos-Kovacs G, Borbely J, Hermann P. Comparison of the accuracy of direct and indirect three-dimensional digitizing processes for CAD/CAM systems - An in vitro study. J Prosthodont Res 2017;61:177-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.07.001
  21. Kihara H, Hatakeyama W, Komine F, Takafuji K, Takahashi T, Yokota J, Oriso K, Kondo H. Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: A literature review. J Prosthodont Res 2020;64:109-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2019.07.010
  22. Abduo J, Elseyoufi M. Accuracy of intraoral scanners: a systematic review of influencing factors. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2018;26:101-21.