The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of internal and marginal fit of crown according to milling order in a single machinable wax disc

단일 절삭가공용 왁스 디스크 내에서 순차적 절삭가공 순서에 따른 크라운의 내면 및 변연 적합도 비교

  • Song, Jun-Beom (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Lee, Jonghyuk (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Ha, Seung-Ryong (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Choi, Yu-Sung (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 송준범 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이종혁 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 하승룡 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 최유성 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2021.05.25
  • Accepted : 2021.08.17
  • Published : 2021.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of present study was to evaluate the effect of changing structural stability of wax disc on the fit of prosthesis when the milling proceeded in order. Materials and methods. Prepared maxillary left first molar was used to fabricate a Ni-Cr alloy reference model. This was scanned to design crown and then wax pattern was milled, invested and cast to fabricate prosthesis. The wax patterns located in a row centrally within a single wax disc were set into a total of five groups ranging from WM1 group that was first milled to WM5 group that was last milled and the number of each group was set as 10. Silicone replica technique was used to measure the marginal gap, axial internal gap, line angle internal gap, occlusal internal gap. Data was evaluated with one-way ANOVA with significance level set at α = .05 and then Tukey HSD test was conducted for post analysis. Results. Marginal gap measured in each group, it was 40.41 ± 2.15 ㎛ in WM1 group, 40.44 ± 2.23 ㎛ in WM2 group, 39.96 ± 2.25 ㎛ in WM3 group, 39.96 ± 2.48 ㎛ in WM4 group, and 40.57 ± 2.53 ㎛ in WM5 group. No significant difference was found between groups. The significant difference between the groups was also not found in the axial internal gap, line angle internal gap, and occlusal internal gap. Conclusion. Internal and marginal fit of single crown to the sequential order of milling processing in the single machinable wax disc did not seem to be affected by the sequence.

목적: 본 연구의 목적은 절삭가공이 순차적으로 진행됨에 따른 왁스 디스크의 구조적 안정성의 변화가 보철물의 적합도에 미치는 영향을 평가하는 것이다. 재료 및 방법: 삭제된 상악 제1대구치 인공치아를 이용하여 Ni-Cr 합금 표준모형을 제작하였고, 이를 스캔하여 크라운을 디자인한 뒤 왁스 디스크를 절삭가공하고 매몰 및 Ni-Cr 합금으로 주조하여 보철물을 제작하였다. 단일 왁스 디스크 내에서 중앙에 일렬로 위치한 납형들은 가장 처음 절삭가공 되는 WM1군부터 마지막에 절삭가공 되는 WM5군으로 총 5개의 군을 설정하였고 각 군의 수는 10개로 하였다. 적합도는 실리콘 레플리카 방법을 이용하여 변연 간극, 축면 간극, 선각간극, 교합면 간극을 측정하였다. 측정값은 일원배치분산분석(one-way ANOVA)을 사용하여 유의 수준은 95%로 그룹 간의 차이를 평가한 뒤, 사후 분석을 위해 Tukey HSD test를 시행하였다(α = .05). 결과: 각 군의 변연 간극은 WM1군(40.41 ± 2.15 ㎛), WM2군(40.44 ± 2.23 ㎛), WM3군(39.96 ± 2.25 ㎛), WM4군(39.96 ± 2.48 ㎛), WM5군(40.57 ± 2.53 ㎛)으로 각 군간에 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 축면 간극, 선각 간극, 교합면 간극에서도 각 군간에 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 결론: 단일 절삭가공용 왁스 디스크 내에서 순차적 절삭가공 시 크라운의 내면 및 변연 적합도는 절삭 순서에 영향 받지 않는 것으로 보인다.

Keywords

References

  1. Karlsson S. The fit of procera titanium crowns. An in vitro and clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:129-34. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359309041158
  2. Oden A, Andersson M, Krystek-Ondracek I, Magnusson D. Five-year clinical evaluation of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:450-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70010-1
  3. Besimo C, Jeger C, Guggenheim R. Marginal adaptation of titanium frameworks produced by CAD/CAM techniques. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:541-6.
  4. May KB, Russell MM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Precision of fit: the Procera AllCeram crown. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:394-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70002-2
  5. Jacobs MS, Windeler AS. An investigation of dental luting cement solubility as a function of the marginal gap. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:436-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90239-S
  6. Felton DA, Kanoy BE, Bayne SC, Wirthman GP. Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:357-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90225-L
  7. Taggart WH. A new and accurate method of making gold inlays. Dental Cosmos 1907;49:1117-21.
  8. Chochlidakis KM, Papaspyridakos P, Geminiani A, Chen CJ, Feng IJ, Ercoli C. Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:184-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.017
  9. Ahlholm P, Sipila K, Vallittu P, Jakonen M, Kotiranta U. Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: a review. J Prosthodont 2018;27:35-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12527
  10. Homsy FR, Ozcan M, Khoury M, Majzoub ZAK. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:783-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.025
  11. Real-Voltas F, Romano-Cardozo E, Figueras-Alvarez O, Brufau-de Barbera M, Cabratosa-Termes J. Comparison of the marginal fit of cobalt-chromium metal-ceramic crowns fabricated by CAD/CAM techniques and conventional methods at three production stages. Int J Prosthodont 2017;30:304-5. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5038
  12. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204:505-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350
  13. Lebon N, Tapie L, Vennat E, Mawussi B. Influence of CAD/CAM tool and material on tool wear and roughness of dental prostheses after milling. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:236-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.021
  14. Yara A, Goto S, Ogura H. Correlation between accuracy of crowns fabricated using CAD/CAM and elastic deformation of CAD/CAM materials. Dent Mater J 2004;23:572-6. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.23.572
  15. Ito M, Shinya A, Yokozuka S. Working accuracy of CAD-CAM crown restorations with material cuts. J Jpn Prosthodont Soc 1999;43:614-25. https://doi.org/10.2186/jjps.43.614
  16. Andersson M, Carlsson L, Persson M, Bergman B. Accuracy of machine milling and spark erosion with a CAD/CAM system. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:187-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90305-4
  17. Hotta Y, Miyazaki T, Lee G, Kobayashi Y. Accuracy of the ceramic crown fabricated by the newly developed CAD/CAM system. J Showa Univ Dent Soc 1996;16:230-4.
  18. Eames WB, O'Neal SJ, Monteiro J, Miller C, Roan JD Jr, Cohen KS. Techniques to improve the seating of castings. J Am Dent Assoc 1978;96:432-7. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1978.0090
  19. Fathi HM, Al-Masoody AH, El-Ghezawi N, Johnson A. The accuracy of fit of crowns made from wax patterns produced conventionally (hand formed) and via CAD/CAM technology. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2016;24:10-7.
  20. Molin M, Karlsson S. The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:201-6. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359309040568
  21. Konstantoulakis E, Nakajima H, Woody RD, Miller AW. Marginal fit and surface roughness of crowns made with an accelerated casting technique. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:337-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70135-0
  22. Kim KB, Kim JH, Kim WC, Kim JH. Three-dimensional evaluation of gaps associated with fixed dental prostheses fabricated with new technologies. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1432-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.07.002
  23. Kashani HG, Khera SC, Gulker IA. The effects of bevel angulation on marginal integrity. J Am Dent Assoc 1981;103:882-5. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1981.0431
  24. McLean JW. Polycarboxylate cements. Five years' experience in general practice. Br Dent J 1972;132:9-15. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802795
  25. Gulker I. Margins. N Y State Dent J 1985;51:213-5, 217.
  26. Assif D, Rimer Y, Aviv I. The flow of zinc phosphate cement under a full-coverage restoration and its effect on marginal adaptation according to the location of cement application. Quintessence Int 1987;18:765-74.
  27. Hung SH, Hung KS, Eick JD, Chappell RP. Marginal fit of porcelain-fused-to-metal and two types of ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:26-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90260-J
  28. Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Comparison and evaluation of marginal and internal gaps in cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated using subtractive and additive manufacturing. J Prosthodont Res 2018;62:56-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.05.008
  29. Khaledi AA, Farzin M, Akhlaghian M, Pardis S, Mir N. Evaluation of the marginal fit of metal copings fabricated by using 3 different CAD-CAM techniques: Milling, stereolithography, and 3D wax printer. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:81-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.002
  30. Jorgensen KD, Esbensen AL. The relationship between the film thickness of zinc phosphate cement and the retention of veneer crowns. Acta Odontol Scand 1968;26:169-75. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016356809026130
  31. Passon C, Lambert RH, Lambert RL, Newman S. The effect of multiple layers of die-spacer on crown retention. Oper Dent 1992;17:42-9.
  32. Son YH, Han CH, Kim S. Influence of internal-gap width and cement type on the retentive force of zirconia copings in pullout testing. J Dent 2012;40:866-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.07.007
  33. Sorensen JA. A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:18-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90147-5
  34. Lee H, Lee DH, Lee KB. In vitro evaluation methods on adaptation of fixed dental prosthesis. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2017;33:63-70. https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2017.33.2.63
  35. Chan C, Weber H. Plaque retention on teeth restored with full-ceramic crowns: a comparative study. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:666-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90140-X
  36. Moon BH, Yang JH, Lee SH, Chung HY. A study on the marginal fit of all-ceramic crown using ccd camera. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1998;36:273-92.
  37. Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, van Noort R. Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM. J Dent 2007;35:68-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.04.008