DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Review of Ice Characteristics in Ship-Iceberg Collisions

  • Lee, Tak-Kee (Department of Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Park, Hyun-Jin (Department of Ocean System Engineering, Graduate School, Gyeongsang National University)
  • Received : 2021.06.17
  • Accepted : 2021.08.21
  • Published : 2021.10.31

Abstract

The International Ice Patrol (IIP) was established after the Titanic collided with an iceberg off the eastern coast of Canada in 1912 and sank, killing more than 1,500 people. Recently, the IIP has analyzed satellite images and provided safe operation information to vessels by tracking the occurrence and movement of icebergs. A large number of recent arctic studies mainly deal with sea ice formed by freezing seawater related to sea routes and resource development. The iceberg that collided with the Titanic was land-based ice that dislodged from a glacier and fell into the sea. The properties of these two types of ice are different. In addition, vessels operating in ice-covered waters such as the Arctic sea have an ice-breaking function or minimum ice-strengthened functions. Ships operating on transatlantic routes including the eastern coast of Canada do not necessarily require ice-strengthened functions. Hundreds to thousands of icebergs are discovered each year near the area where the Titanic sank. In this study, the status of ship-iceberg collision accidents was investigated to provide useful information to researchers, and the physical and mechanical characteristics of icebergs were investigated and summarized.

Keywords

References

  1. Addario, N., Rizzuto, E., & Prestileo, A. (2014). Ship Side Damage Due to Collision with Icebergs. in G. Soares, and L. Pena, (Eds.), Developments in Maritime Transportation and Exploitation of Sea Resources. London: Taylor & Francis Group.
  2. Atlantic Survey. (1982). Iceberg Aerial Reconnaissance. Atlantic Survey Report for Mobil Hibernia Development Studies.
  3. Bailey, J., Marino, A., & Akbari, V. (2021). Comparison of Target Detectors to Identify Icebergs in Quad-polarimetric L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar Data. Remote Sensing, 13(9). 1753. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13091753
  4. Barbat, M.M., Wesche, C., Werhli, A.V., & Mata, M.M. (2019). An Adaptive Machine Learning Approach to Improve Automatic Iceberg Detection From SAR Images. Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 156, 247-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.08.015
  5. BBC News. (2007, November 24). Stricken Antarctic Ship Evacuated. BBC News. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7108835.stm
  6. Bercha, F.G. (1983). Iceberg Aerial Reconnaissance 1983. F.G. Bercha and Associates Report for Mobil Hibernia Development Studies.
  7. Bercha, F.G. (1984). Iceberg Aerial Reconnaissance 1984. F.G. Bercha and Associates Report for Mobil Hibernia Development Studies.
  8. Bigg, G., & Billings, S. (2014). The Iceberg Risk in the Titanic Year of 1912: Was It exceptional?. Significance, 11(3), 6-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2014.00746.x
  9. Bureau of Maritime Affairs, Liberia. (2009), Report of Investigation in the Matter of Sinking of Passenger Vessel EXPLORER (O.N. 8495) on 23 November 2007 in the Bransfield Strait near the South Shetland Islands. Retrieved from http://www.photobits.com/dl/Explorer%20-%20Final%20Report.PDF
  10. Cammaert, A.B., & Muggeridge, D.B. (1988). Ice Interaction with Offshore Structures. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  11. Canadian Coast Guard. (2012). Ice Navigation in Canadian Waters (Cat. Fs154-31/2012E-PDF). Retrieved June 8 2021 from https://www.ccg-gcc.gc.ca/publications/icebreaking-deglacage/ice-navigation-glaces/page05-eng.html
  12. Choi, J. (2018). Iceberg-ship Classification in SAR Images Using Convolutional Neural Network with Transfer Learning. Journal of Internet Computing and Services, 19(4), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.7472/jksii.2018.19.4.35
  13. Choi, K. (2013). Sea Ice in Polar Regions. Seoul, Korea: GeoBook Publishing Co.
  14. Dasgupta, S. (2019, October 11). 10 Ships Sunk by Accident with Iceberg, Maritime History. Retrieved from https://www.marineinsight.com/maritime-history/10-ships-sunk-by-accident-with-iceberg/
  15. Daley, C., & Veitch, B. (2000). Iceberg Evolution Modeling: A Background Study (PERD/CHC Report, OERC Report 2000-05-06). National Research Council of Canada. https://doi.org/10.4224/12341002
  16. Dobrocky Seatech. (1984). Iceberg Field Survey 1984. Mobil Hibernia Development Studies.
  17. Dobrocky Seatech. (1985). Iceberg Dimensions and Shape Field Survey 1985. Terra Nova Development Studies.
  18. Fenco. (1971). Iceberg Dynamics Project. Report by Fenco (Newfoundland) Ltd.
  19. Foumler, M., Lasserre, F., Beveridge, L., & Tetu, P.L. (2020). A European Shipping Companies Survey on Arctic Shipping: Expectation vs. Reality. Quebec Council for Geopolitical Studies (CQEG). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11794/39514
  20. Frost, A., Ressel, R., & Lehner, S. (2016). Automated Iceberg Detection Using High Resolution X-band SAR Images. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 42(4), 354-366. https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2016.1177451
  21. Gagnon, R.E. (2007). Results of numerical simulations of growler impact tests, Cold Regions Science and Technology, 49(3), 206-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2007.03.016
  22. Gagnon, R.E., & Gammon, P.H. (1995). Charaterization and Flexural Strength of Iceberg and Glacier Ice. Journal of Glaciology, 41(137), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000017809
  23. Gammon, P.H., Gagnon, R.E., Bobby, W., & Russell, W.E. (1983). Physical and Mechanical Properties of Icebergs. Proceedings of the Offhsore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, 143-150. https://doi.org/10.4043/4459-MS
  24. Gold, L.W. (1988). On the Elasticity of Ice Plates. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 15(6), 1080-1084. https://doi.org/10.1139/l88-140
  25. Hanninen, S. (2005). Incidents and Accidents in Winter Navigation in the Baltic Sea, Winter 2002-2003 (Research Report 54). Winter Navigation Research Board, Finnish and Swedish Maritime Administration. Retrieved from https://arkisto.trafi.fi/filebank/a/1352716465/5666a0c12549e09d1f84c3075353d3de/10732-No_54_incidents_and_accidents_2003.pdf
  26. Haynes, F.D. (1978). Effect of Temperature on the Strength of Snow-ice (CRREL Report 78-27). Hanover, New Hampshire: Department of the Army, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Corps of Engineers.
  27. Hill, B. (2001). Ship Collisions with Icebergs: an Historical Record of Collisions in the Seas Around North America and Greenland. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions, Ottawa, Canada, 2, 997-1002.
  28. Hill, B. (2006). Ship Collision with Iceberg Database (ICETECH06-117-RF). National Research Council of Canada. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Brian-Hill-6/publication/44084643_Ship_Collision_with_Iceberg_Database/links/02e7e5346dc8b41281000000/Ship-Collision-with-Iceberg-Database.pdf
  29. Hodgson, G.J., Lever, J.H., Woodworth-Lynas, C.M., & Lewis, C.F. (1988). The Dynamics of Iceberg Grounding and Scouring (DIGS) Experiment and Repetitive Mapping of the Eastern Canadian Cntinental Self (ESRF Report 09). Ottawa: Environmental Studies Research Funds.
  30. Hoyland, K.V., Kim, E., Marchenko, A., Lishman, B., & Barrette, P. (2020), Ice Properties in ISO 19906's (2nd ed.). Proceedings of 25th IAHR International Symposium on Ice, Trondheim, Virtual Conference.
  31. ICE Engineering Ltd. (1983a). Iceberg Field Survey. Ice Engineering Report for Mobil Hibernia Development Studies.
  32. ICE Engineering Ltd. (1983b). A Survey of Icebergs in the Strait of Belle Isle. Ice Engineering Report to Bedford Institute of Oceanography.
  33. ICE Engineering Ltd. (1984). Iceberg Survey - Grand Banks - Hibernia, Contract Report Prepared for BIO.
  34. ICE Engineering Ltd. (1985). Iceberg Survey - Grand Banks - Hibernia, Contract Report Prepared for BIO.
  35. Intera. (1981). Iceberg Dimensions by Aerial Photography. Intera Environmental Consultants Ltd., Report for Mobile Hibernia Development Studies.
  36. International Standards Organization (2019), Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries - Arctic Offshore Structures (ISO 19906).
  37. Jacka, T.H., & Giles, A.B. (2007), Antarctic Iceberg Distribution and Dissolution from Ship-based Observations. Journal of Glaciology, 53(182), 341-356. https://doi.org/10.3189/002214307783258521
  38. Jalonen, R., Riska, K., & Hanninen, S. (2005). A Preliminary Risk Analysis of Winter Navigation in the Baltic Sea (Rsearch Report 57). Winter Navigation Research Board, Finnish and Swedish Maritime Administration. Retrieved from https://arkisto.trafi.fi/filebank/a/1352716465/403d393475700af91c1f06711532924c/10735-No_57_A_preliminary_risk_analysis.pdf
  39. Jang, K.B., Che, J.S. and Choo, I.H. (1997). Iceberg Collision Simulation for Ice Class Shuttle Tanker. Samsung Internal Technical Report M37 KR 96001.
  40. Jia, Z., Ringsberg, J.W., & Jia, J. (2009). Numerical Analysis of Nonlinear Dynamic Structural Behaviour of Ice-loaded Side-shell Structures. International Journal of Steel Structures, 9, 219-230. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03249496
  41. Kim, J.H. (2007). A Study on Standardization of Ice Mechanics Experimental Techniques with a Cold Room (Master thesis). Korea Maritime University.
  42. Korzhavin, K.N. (2002). Action of Ice on Engineering Structures. New York: Books for Business. (Original work published 1971)
  43. Kujala, P. (1991). Damage Statistics of Ice-strengthened Ships in the Baltic Sea 1984-1987 (Research Report 50). Winter Navigation Research Board, Finnish and Swedish Maritime Administration. Retrieved from https://arkisto.trafi.fi/filebank/a/1352716465/2c77653e6c15301e82555185992ed8a0/10728-No_50_Damage_statistics_of_ice-strengthened_ships_in_the.pdf
  44. Lee, R.W., & Schulson, E.M. (1988). The Strength and Ductility of Ice Under Tension. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 110(2), 187-191. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3257049
  45. Liu, Z. (2011). Analytical and Numerical Analysis of Iceberg Collisions with Ship Structures (Doctoral theses). NTNU. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/238036
  46. Marchenko, N. (2012). Russian Arctic Seas: Navigational Conditions and Accidents. Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media.
  47. Marchenko, N. (2014). Floating Ice Induced Ship Casualties. Proceeding of 22nd IAHR International Symposium on Ice, Singapore.
  48. McKenna, R.F. (2004). Development of Iceberg Shape Characterization for Risk to Grand Banks Installations (PERD/CHC Report 20-73). https://doi.org/10.4224/12340897
  49. McKenna, R.F. (2005). Iceberg Shape Charaterization. Proceedings 18th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, 2, 555-564.
  50. Mejlaelander-Larsen, M., & Hysing, T. (2006). Ice Collision Scenario (Technical Report 2006-0672). DNV.
  51. NSIDC. (2021). Quick Facts on Icebergs - Why Are Icebergs Important?. https://nsidc.org/cryosphere/quickfacts/icebergs.html
  52. Oceans Ltd. (2004). Determination of Iceberg Draft and Shape (PERD/CHC Report). Oceans Ltd.
  53. Paik, J.K. (1992). Lessons from Grounding Accident of Exxon Vadez. Bullutin of Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 29(2), 27-31.
  54. Palmer, A., & Croasdale, K. (2013). Arctic Offshore Engineering. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
  55. Paterson, W.S.B. (1994). The Physics of Glaciers (3rd ed.), Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
  56. Petrovic, J.J. (2003). Review Mechanical Properties of Ice and Snow. Journal of Materials Science, 38, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021134128038
  57. Ralph, F., McKenna, R,& Gagnon, R. (2008). Iceberg Characterization for the Bergy Bit Impact Study. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 52(1), 7-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2007.04.016
  58. Rudkin, P., Young, C., Barron Jr., P., & Timco, G. (2005). Analysis and Results of 30 Years of Iceberg Management. Proceedings of 18th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions (POAC'05), 2, 595-604. Potsdam, NY, USA. Retrieved from https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/accepted/?id7deaaa28-c001-4bf1-8261-1628c0802627
  59. Sanderson, T.J.O. (1988). Ice Mechanics: Risks to Offshore Structures. London: Graham & Trotman.
  60. Schulson, E.M. (1999). The Structure and Mechanical Behavior of Ice. Journal of Minerals, Metals, Materials Society, 51, 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-999-0206-4
  61. Smith, S.D., & Donaldson, N.R. (1987). Dynamic Modelling of Iceberg Drift Using Current Profiles. Canadian Technical Report of Hydrography and Ocean Sciences 91, Bedford Institute of Oceanography.
  62. Soldal, I., Dierking, W., Korosov, A., & Marino, A. (2019). Automatic Detection of Small Icebergs in Fast Ice Using Satellite Wide-swath SAR Images, Remote Sensing, 11(7), 806. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11070806
  63. Sosnowski, A. (2012). Icebergs Still Threaten Ships 100 Years After Titanic. AccuWeather, Retrieved from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/icebergs-still-threaten-ships-100-years-after-titanic/
  64. Suh, Y., Ito, H., Chun, S., Han, S., Choi, J., & Urm, H. (2008). Ice Collision Analysis for Membrane Tank Type LNG Carrier. Journal of Ship & Ocean Technology, 12(1), 35-44.
  65. Thompson-Monsen, M. (2021). Icebergs. Retrieved from http://www.antarcticglaciers.org/glacier-processes/glacier-types/icebergs/
  66. Timco, G.W., & Weeks, W.F. (2010). A Review of the Engineering Properties of Sea Ice. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 60(2), 107-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2009.10.003
  67. Turnbull, I.D., Fournier, N., Stolwijk, M., Fosnaes, T., & McGonigal, D. (2015). Operational Iceberg Drift Forecasting in Northwest Greenland. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 110, 1-18. https://doi.org/10/1016/j.coldregions.2014.10.006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2014.10.006
  68. US Army Corps of Engineers. (2005). Engineering and Design: Ice Engineering. Honolulu, Hawaii. USA: University Press of the Pacific. (Original work published 2002)
  69. USCG. (2020). Report of the International Ice Patrol in the North Atlantic, 2020 Season Bulletin, 106, CG-188-75, U.S. Homeland Security, U.S. Coast Guard.
  70. Wikipedia. (2021). Ship Collision. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship_collision
  71. WMO (2015), Sea Ice Nomenclature. World Meteorological Organization. https://library.wmo.int/doc_num.php?explnum_id4651
  72. Yu, Z., & Amdahl, J. (2021). A Numerical Solver for Coupled Dynamic Simulation of Glacial Ice Impacts Considering Hydrodynamic-ice- Structure Interaction. Ocean Engineering, 226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108827