DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Middle School Students' Similarities Revealed in the Process of Word Problems Solving According to Covariational Reasoning

두 중학생의 공변 추론 수준에 따른 연립방정식 문장제의 해결에서 나타나는 유사성 비교

  • Received : 2021.08.26
  • Accepted : 2021.09.27
  • Published : 2021.09.30

Abstract

The purpose of this case study is to explore the similarities revealed in the process of solving and generalizing word problems related to systems of linear equations in two variables according to covariational reasoning. As a result, student S, who reasoned with coordination of value level, had a static image of the quantities given in the situation. student D, who reasoned with smooth continuous covariation level, had a dynamic image of the quantities in the problem situation and constructed an invariant relationship between the quantities. The results of this study suggest that the activity that constructs the relationship between the quantities in solving word problems helps to strengthen the mathematical problem solving ability, and that teaching methods should be prepared to strengthen students' covariational reasoning in algebra learning.

본 사례 연구의 목적은 중학교 1학년 학생 2명을 대상으로 실시한 수업에서 공변 추론 수준에 따른 연립방정식 문장제를 해결하고 일반화하는 과정에서 나타나는 유사성을 비교·분석하는 것이다. 그 결과, 값의 조정 수준으로 추론하는 학생 S는 연립방정식 문장제에 주어진 양들에 대해 정적인 이미지를 가졌고, 부드러운 연속 공변 수준으로 추론하는 학생 D는 문제 상황의 양들에 대해 동적인 이미지를 갖고 양들 사이의 불변인 관계를 식과 그래프로 나타내었다. 이와 같은 연구 결과는 연립방정식 문장제의 학습에서 공식이나 전략의 사용에 앞서 주어진 상황에서 다양한 양들 사이의 관계를 추론하는 활동이 문제해결력 신장에 도움을 줄 수 있으며, 학생들의 공변 추론을 강화하기 위한 대수 교수·학습 방안에 대한 논의가 앞으로도 계속 이루어져야 함을 시사한다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 안동대학교 기본연구지원사업에 의하여 연구되었음.

References

  1. Ministry of Education (2015). Mathematics curriculum. Notification of the Ministry of Education No. 2015-74.
  2. Koo, D. H., & Shin, J. H. (2020). Students' problem solving based on their construction of image about problem contexts. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics, 23(1), 129-158. https://doi.org/10.30807/KSMS.2020.23.1.007
  3. Kwon, S. I., & Yim, J. H. (2007). Crossing the gap between elementary School mathematics and secondary school mathematics: The case of systems of linear equations. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 17(2), 91-109.
  4. Kim, Y. A., & Kim, S. J. (2013). An analysis on elementary students' error types of word problem solving strategy. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics, 16(1), 113-139.
  5. Kim, J. H., & Park, K. S. (2015). On representations of linear systems and analysis for the meaning of elimination method. School Mathematics, 17(3), 407-421.
  6. Kim, C. Y. (2018). A study of students' construction of quantities and quantitative operations in representing changes with graphs in non-numerical situations. Doctor's thesis, Korea National University of Education.
  7. Kim, C. Y., & Shin, J. H. (2016). How does the middle school students' covariational reasoning affect their problem solving. The Mathematical Education, 55(3), 251-279. https://doi.org/10.7468/MATHEDU.2016.55.3.251
  8. Ma, M. Y., & Shin, J. H. (2016). Gifted Middle School Students' Covariational Reasoning Emerging through the Process of Algebra Word Problem Solving. School Mathematics, 18(1), 43-59.
  9. Park, K. S., Lee, J. H., Kim, J. H., Nam, J. Y., Kim, N. H., Lim, J. H., ..., Hwang, J. Y. (2019). Middle school math 2. Donga Publishing Company.
  10. Park, J. H., Ryu, S. K., & Lee, J. K. (2012). The analysis of mathematics error type that appears from the process of solving problem related to real life. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics, 15(4), 699-718.
  11. Park, J. H., Shin, J. H., Lee, S. J., & Ma, M. Y. (2017). Analyzing students' works with quantitative and qualitative graphs using two frameworks of covariational reasoning. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 27(1), 23-49.
  12. Park, H. J. (2007). The case study for the construction of similarities and affordance. The Mathematical Education, 46(4), 371-388.
  13. Park, H. J., & Lee, J. H. (2006). An analysis of similarities that students construct in the process of problem solving. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 16(2), 115-138.
  14. Lee, J. H. Kim, J. H., & Kim, S. H. (2003). Middle school students' analogical transfer in algebra word problem solving. The Mathematical Education, 42(3), 353-368.
  15. Jeon, H. O., Lee, K. H., & Pang, J. S. (2009). Case study of the sixth grade students' quantitative reasoning. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 19(1), 81-98.
  16. Hwang, H. J., Kim, S. J. (2019). A study on the meaning of reflection and meta-cognition in mathematics education. Communications of Mathematical Education, 33(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2019.33.1.35
  17. Merriam, S. B. (2005). 정성연구방법론과 사례연구. (강윤수, 고상숙, 권오남, 류희찬, 박만구, 방정숙, 이중권, 정인철, 황우형 역). 서울: 교우사. (원저 1998년 출판)
  18. Carlson, M., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S., & Hsu, E. (2002). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 352-378. https://doi.org/10.2307/4149958
  19. Lobato, J. (1997). Transfer reconceived: How 'sameness' is produced in mathematical activity, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
  20. Moore, K. C., & Carlson, M. P. (2012). Students' images of problem contexts when solving applied problems. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.09.001
  21. Polya, G. (2002). 어떻게 문제를 풀 것인가. (우정호 역). 서울: 교우사. (원저 1971년 출판)
  22. Smith, J. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2008). Quantitative reasoning and the development of algebraic reasoning. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 95-132). New York: Erlbaum.
  23. Tall, D. (1991). The psychology of advanced mathematical thinking. In D. O. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 3-21). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  24. Wagner, J. F. (2003). The Construction of similarity: context sensitivity and the trasfer of mathematical knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.