References
- Ahmed, W. & Soroya, M. S. (2015). Where do the special libraries stand?: a source's appraisal. PLISJ, 46(3), 27-33.
- Ahmed, W. & Soroya, M. S. (2016). Library and information science education as ignition source for services in non-academic special libraries. Library Review, 65(4/5), 350-368. https://doi.org/10.1108/lr-08-2015-0083
- Bilawar, M. P. B. (2013). Special library: a gigantic information centre for specials. American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences, 23(228), 134-140.
- Bower, T. & Bradford, D. (2007). How to get more from your quantitative LibQUAL+ dataset: making results practical. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 8(2), 110-126. https://doi.org/10.1108/14678040710760612
- Detlor, B. & Ball, K. (2015). Getting more value from the LibQUAL+® survey: the merits of qualitative analysis and importance-satisfaction matrices in assessing library patron comments. College & Research Libraries, 76(6), 796-810. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.76.6.796
- Ihsan, M., Pulungan, R., & Afiahayati, A. (2018). Evaluating library services quality using GDSS-AHP, LibQual, and IPA. IJCCS, 12(1), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijccs.32142
- Kagrbo, J. A. (2003). Times presents: appraising special library services in Sierra Leone. Education Libraries Journal, 46(3), 28-33. https://doi.org/10.1300/j118v24n01_06
- Koh, S., Yoo, J. J., & Boger, Jr. C. A. (2009). Importance-performance analysis with benefit segmentation of spa goers. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 22(5), 718-735. https://doi.org/10.1108/95961190980000610
- Mallya, J. & Patwardhan, V. (2018). Hospitality students' perception of college library service quality. Journal of Library & Information Technology, 38(2), 125-131. https://doi.org/10.14429/ djlit.38.2.11449
- Mount, E. & Massoud, R. (1999). Special Libraries and Information Centers: An Introductory Text (4th ed.). Washington DC: SLA Publishing.
- Nitecki, D. A. (1996). Changing the concept and measure of service quality in academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 22(3), 181-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-1333(96)90056-7
- Park, S. & Kim, J. (2019). A study on the evaluation of service quality in special library of local autonomous entity research institution. Journal of Korean Society for Information Management, 36(1), 73-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2019.36.1.073
- Park, S. & Nam, Y. (2020). A study on the users' levels of satisfaction and recognition after participating in cultural events in the special library: focusing on K special library. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 31(2), 27-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2020.31.2.027
- Perng, C., Wang, S. L., & Chiou, W. C. (2009). A conceptual framework of library reader service from customer relationship management perspective. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 2(1), 11-20.
- Phadermrod, B., Crowder, R. M., & Wills, G. B. (2019). Importance-performance analysis based SWOT analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 44, 194-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.03.009
- Ro, J. & Noh, Y. (2019) A study on the analysis of importance-performance on the use factor of complex cultural space in library. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(4), 511-537. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.50.201912.511
- Silva, F. & Fernandes, P. O. (2012). Empirical study on the student satisfaction in higher education: importance-satisfaction analysis. Business and Industrial Engineering, 6(6), 1609-1614.
- Singh, S. P. (2006). Special libraries in India: some current trends. Library Review, 55(8), 520-530. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242530610689365
- Thompson, B., Cook, C., & Thompson, R. L. (2002). Reliability and structure of LibQUAL+TM scores: measuring perceived library service quality. Libraries and the Academy, 2(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2002.0022
- Valenza, J. K., Boyer, B. L., & Curtis, D. (2014). Curation in special libraries. Library Technology Reports, 50(7), 36-44.