East Asian Economic Review

  • 제25권3호
  • /
  • Pages.310-336
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2508-1640(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2508-1667(eISSN)
대외경제정책연구원 (Korea Institute for International Economic Policy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Dynamic Asset Allocation Strategy for Optimal Portfolio Selection

  • 투고 : 2021.05.17
  • 심사 : 2021.07.27
  • 발행 : 2021.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

We use iterative numerical procedures combined with analytical methods due to Rapach and Wohar (2009) to solve for the dynamic asset allocation strategy for optimal portfolio demand. We compare different optimal portfolio demands when investors in each country have different access to overseas and domestic investment opportunities. The optimal dynamic asset allocation strategy without foreign investment opportunities leads domestic investors in Korea, Hong Kong, and Singapore to allocate more funds to domestic bonds than to domestic stocks. However, the U.S. investors allocate more wealth to domestic stocks than to domestic bonds. Investors in all countries short bills at a low level of risk aversion. Next, we investigate dynamic asset allocation strategy when domestic investors in Korea have access to foreign markets. The optimal portfolio demand leads investors in Korea to allocate most resources to domestic bonds and foreign stocks. On the other hand, the portfolio weights on foreign bonds and domestic stocks are relatively low. We also analyze dynamic asset allocation strategy for the investors in the U.S., Hong Kong, and Singapore when they have access to the Korean markets as overseas investment opportunities. Compared to the results when the investors only have access to domestic markets, the investors in the U.S. and Singapore increase the portfolio weights on domestic stocks in spite of the overseas investment opportunities in the Korean markets. The investors in the U.S., Hong Kong, and Singapore short domestic bills to invest more than initial funds in risky assets with a varying degree of relative risk aversion coefficients without exception.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by the 2020 Research Fund of Myongji University.

참고문헌

  1. Balduzzi, P. and A. W. Lynch. 1999. "Transaction Costs and Predictability: Some Utility Cost Calculations," Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 42-78.
  2. Barberis, N. C. 2000. "Investing for the Long Run When Returns Are Predictable," Journal of Finance, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 225-264. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00205
  3. Brennan, M. J., Schwartz, E. S. and R. Lagnado. 1997. "Strategic Asset Allocation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 21, no. 8-9, pp. 1377-1403. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1889(97)00031-6
  4. Campbell, J. Y. and L. M. Viceira. 1999. "Consumption and Portfolio Decisions When Expected Returns Are Time Varying," Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 433-495. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556043
  5. Campbell, J. Y. and L. M. Viceira. 2001. "Who Should Buy Long-term Bonds?" American Economic Review, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 99-127. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.1.99
  6. Campbell, J. Y. and L. M. Viceira. 2002. Strategic Asset Allocation: Portfolio Choice for Longterm Investor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  7. Campbell, J. Y., Chan, Y. L. and L. M. Viceira. 2003. "A Multivariate Model of Strategic Asset Allocation," Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 41-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00231-3
  8. Epstein, L. G. and S. E. Zin. 1989. "Substitution, Risk Aversion, and the Temporal Behavior of Consumption and Asset Returns: A Theoretical Framework," Econometrica, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 937-969. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913778
  9. Epstein, L. G. and S. E. Zin. 1991. "Substitution, Risk Aversion, and the Temporal Behavior of Consumption and Asset Returns: An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Political Economy, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 263-286. https://doi.org/10.1086/261750
  10. Kim, T. S. and E. Omberg. 1996. "Dynamic Nonmyopic Portfolio Behavior," Review of Financial Studies, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 141-161. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/9.1.141
  11. Lynch, A. W. 2000. Portfolio Choice with Many Risky Assets, Market Clearing, and Cash Flow Predictability. Available in SSRN. (accessed October 1, 2021)
  12. Lynch, A. W. 2001. "Portfolio Choice and Equity Characteristics: Characterizing the Hedging Demands Induced by Return Predictability," Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 67-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00074-5
  13. Lynch, A. W. and P. Balduzzi. 2000. "Predictability and Transaction Costs: the Impact on Rebalancing Rules and Behavior," Journal of Finance, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 2285-2310. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00287
  14. Lynch, A. W. and S. Tan. 2010. "Multiple Risky Assets, Transaction Costs and Return Predictability: Allocation Rules and Implications for U.S. Investors," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 1015-1053. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109010000360
  15. Merton, R. C. 1969. "Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-time Case," Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 247-257. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926560
  16. Merton, R. C. 1971. "Optimum Consumption and Portfolio Rules in a Continuous-time Model," Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 373-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(71)90038-x
  17. Rapach, D. E. and M. E. Wohar. 2009. "Multi-period Portfolio Choice and the Intertemporal Hedging Demands for Stocks and Bonds: International Evidence," Journal of International Money and Finance, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 427-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2008.12.004