DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Efficacy of medications in adult patients with trigeminal neuralgia compared to placebo intervention: a systematic review with meta-analyses

  • Peterson-Houle, Georgia M. (Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of South California) ;
  • AbdelFattah, Magda R. (Department of Restorative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, University of Texas Health Science Center School of Dentistry) ;
  • Padilla, Mariela (Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of South California) ;
  • Enciso, Reyes (Division of Dental Public Health and Pediatric Dentistry, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California)
  • Received : 2021.07.01
  • Accepted : 2021.08.27
  • Published : 2021.10.01

Abstract

Background: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is characterized by brief, unilateral, sharp, stabbing, and shooting pain of the fifth cranial nerve. The objective of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to determine the effect of medications compared to placebo in adult patients with TN. Methods: Review authors identified randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and EMBASE up to February 2021. We assessed the inclusion and exclusion criteria as well as the risk of bias of the studies based on the Cochrane Handbook. A total of 324 unduplicated references were scanned independently and reduced to eight relevant RCTs, with 89 patients included. Medications investigated included oral carbamazepine, subcutaneous sumatriptan, lidocaine (intranasal, 8% spray on the oral mucosa or intravenous), buprenorphine (ganglionic local opioid analgesia), and oral Nav1.7, a selective sodium channel blocker. Results: Meta-analyses showed that overall patients receiving lidocaine reported a significantly lower post-treatment intensity of pain -3.8 points on a 0-10 scale (95% Cl = -4.653 to -2.873; P < 0.001). Patients who received lidocaine were 8.62 times more likely to have pain improvement than patients on placebo (P < 0.001). In one RCT, patients receiving oral carbamazepine showed a significant improvement in pain intensity of -32% compared to the placebo (P < 0.001). In one trial, patients receiving 3 mg subcutaneous sumatriptan had a significantly lower intensity of pain on average -6.1 points on a scale of 0-10 compared to placebo (P < 0.001) and a significant improvement in pain intensity of -75% compared to the improvement in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Patients who received subcutaneous sumatriptan were 10 times more likely to have pain improvement than those who received placebo (P = 0.001) in one study. Due to the unclear/high risk of bias and small sample size, the quality of the evidence for lidocaine in the treatment of TN was low. Conclusion: Further studies are needed for carbamazepine, sumatriptan, buprenorphine, and oral Nav1.7 sodium channel blockers, as only one study reported outcomes.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The protocol was registered in PROSPERO on 13/02/2021 with # CRD42021214636. Drs. Peterson-Houle, AbdelFattah, Padilla, and Enciso contributed to the conceptualization and methodology. Drs. Peterson-Houle and Dr. AbdelFattah conducted data extraction with Dr. Enciso for validation. Dr. Enciso conducted an electronic search and formal statistical analysis. Drs. Peterson-Houle, AbdelFattah, Padilla, and Enciso wrote the original draft and participated in the writing (review and editing) of the final manuscript.

References

  1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia 2013; 33: 629-808. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102413485658
  2. Vincent M, Wang S, Olesen J. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia 2018; 38: 1-211.
  3. van Kleef M, van Genderen WE, Narouze S, Nurmikko TJ, van Zundert J, Geurts JW, et al. World Institute of Medicine. 1. Trigeminal neuralgia. Pain Pract 2009; 9: 252-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00298.x
  4. Desouza DD, Hodaie M, Davis KD. Structural magnetic resonance imaging can identify trigeminal system abnormalities in classical trigeminal neuralgia. Front Neuroanat 2016; 10: 95. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2016.00095
  5. Liu P, Zhong W, Liao C, Liu M, Zhang W. Narrow foramen ovale and rotundum: a role in the etiology of trigeminal neuralgia. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27: 2168-70. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003021
  6. Nurmikko TJ, Eldridge PR. Trigeminal neuralgia - Pathophysiology, diagnosis and current treatment. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 117-32. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/87.1.117
  7. Campbell FG, Graham JG, Zilkha KJ. Clinical trial of carbazepine (Tegretol) in trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1966; 29: 265-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.29.3.265
  8. Rockliff BW, Davis EH. Controlled sequential trials of carbamazepine in trigeminal neuralgia. Arch Neurol 1966; 15: 129-36. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1966.00470140019003
  9. Killian JM, Fromm GH. Carbamazepine in the treatment of neuralgia. Use of side effects. Arch Neurol 1968; 19: 129-36. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1968.00480020015001
  10. Rasmussen P, Riishede J. Facial pain treated with carbamazepin (Tegretol). Acta Neurol Scand 1970; 46: 385-408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.1970.tb05803.x
  11. Sindrup SH, Jensen TS. Pharmacotherapy of trigeminal neuralgia. Clin J Pain 2002; 18: 22-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002508-200201000-00004
  12. Shehata HS, El-Tamawy MS, Shalaby NM, Ramzy G. Botulinum toxin-type A: could it be an effective treatment option in intractable trigeminal neuralgia? J Headache Pain 2013; 14: 92. https://doi.org/10.1186/1129-2377-14-92
  13. Hirakawa R, El-Bizri N, Shryock JC, Belardinelli L, Rajamani S. Block of Na+ currents and suppression of action potentials in embryonic rat dorsal root ganglion neurons by ranolazine. Neuropharmacology 2012; 62: 2251-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.01.021
  14. Faingold CL, Browning RA. Mechanisms of anticonvulsant drug action. II. Drugs primarily used for absence epilepsy. Eur J Pediatr 1987; 146: 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00647274
  15. Abdelsayed M, Sokolov S. Voltage-gated sodium channels: pharmaceutical targets via anticonvulsants to treat epileptic syndromes. Channels 2013; 7: 146-52. https://doi.org/10.4161/chan.24380
  16. Ghodke-Puranik Y, Thorn CF, Lamba JK, Leeder JS, Song W, Birnbaum AK, et al. Valproic acid pathway: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2013; 23: 236-41. https://doi.org/10.1097/FPC.0b013e32835ea0b2
  17. Patel R, Dickenson AH. Mechanisms of the gabapentinoids and α 2δ-1 calcium channel subunit in neuropathic pain. Pharmacol Res Perspect 2016; 4: 1-13.
  18. Butterworth JF 4th, Strichartz GR. Molecular mechanisms of local anesthesia: a review. Anesthesiology 1990; 72: 711-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199004000-00022
  19. Kalso E. Sodium channel blockers in neuropathic pain. Curr Pharm Des 2005; 11: 3005-11. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612054865028
  20. Slater D, Kunnathil S, McBride J, Koppala R. Pharmacology of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and opioids. Semin Intervent Radiol 2010; 27: 400-11. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1267855
  21. Di Stefano G, Truini A. Pharmacological treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Expert Rev Neurother 2017; 17: 1003-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2017.1370375
  22. Do TM, Unis GD, Kattar N, Ananth A, McCoul ED. Neuromodulators for atypical facial pain and neuralgias: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 2021; 131: 1235-53. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.29162
  23. Dressler D, Adib Saberi F. Botulinum toxin: mechanisms of action. Eur Neurol 2005; 53: 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000083259
  24. Holland M, Noeller J, Buatti J, He W, Shivapour ET, Hitchon PW. The cost-effectiveness of surgery for trigeminal neuralgia in surgically naive patients: a retrospective study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2015; 137: 34-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.06.011
  25. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  26. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.2 (updated February 2021). Cochrane, 2021. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
  27. Cochran W. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 1954; 10: 101-29. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001666
  28. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002; 21: 1539-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186
  29. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 383-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026
  30. Kanai A, Saito M, Hoka S. Subcutaneous sumatriptan for refractory trigeminal neuralgia. Headache 2006; 46: 577-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00405.x
  31. Kanai A, Suzuki A, Kobayashi M, Hoka S. Intranasal lidocaine 8% spray for second-division trigeminal neuralgia. Br J Anaesth 2006; 97: 559-63. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/ael180
  32. Niki Y, Kanai A, Hoshi K, Okamoto H. Immediate analgesic effect of 8% lidocaine applied to the oral mucosa in patients with trigeminal neuralgia. Pain Med 2014; 15: 826-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/pme.12349
  33. Spacek A, Orlicek F, Wober C, Brannath W, Neiger FX, Wessely P, et al. Ganglionic local opioid analgesia in refractory trigeminal neuralgia: Just a placebo? A randomized, controlled, double-blind, cross-over study. Pain Clinic 2002; 14: 195-200. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856902320761379
  34. Stavropoulou E, Argyra E, Zis P, Vadalouca A, Siafaka I. The effect of intravenous lidocaine on trigeminal neuralgia: a randomized double blind placebo controlled trial. ISRN Pain 2014; 2014: 853826. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/853826
  35. Zakrzewska JM, Palmer J, Morisset V, Giblin GM, Obermann M, Ettlin DA, et al. Safety and efficacy of a Nav1.7 selective sodium channel blocker in patients with trigeminal neuralgia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised withdrawal phase 2a trial. Lancet Neurol 2017; 16: 291-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30005-4
  36. Task Force on Taxonomy of the International Association for the Study of Pain. Classification of chronic pain, Descriptions of Chronic Pain Syndromes and Definitions of Pain Terms. In: Classification of Chronic Pain, 2nd edition, Edited by Merskey H, Bogduk N. Seattle, IASP Press. 1994, pp 59-71.
  37. Kelly AM. The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain. Emerg Med J 2001; 18: 205-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.18.3.205
  38. Martin WJ, Forouzanfar T. The efficacy of anticonvulsants on orofacial pain: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 111: 627-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.01.033
  39. Oomens MA, Forouzanfar T. Pharmaceutical management of trigeminal neuralgia in the elderly. Drugs Aging 2015; 32: 717-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-015-0293-6
  40. Sindrup SH, Jensen TS. Efficacy of pharmacological treatments of neuropathic pain: an update and effect related to mechanism of drug action. Pain 1999; 83: 389-400 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00154-2
  41. Obermann M. Update on the challenges of treating trigeminal neuralgia. Orphan Drugs Res Rev 2015; 5: 11-6. https://doi.org/10.2147/ODRR.S53046
  42. Sreenivasan P, Raj S V., Ovallath S. Treatment options in trigeminal neuralgia an update. Eur J Gen Med 2014; 11: 209-16.
  43. Watson CPN. Management issues of neuropathic trigeminal pain from a medical perspective. J Orofac Pain 2004; 18: 366-73.
  44. Zakrzewska JM, McMillan R. Trigeminal neuralgia: the diagnosis and management of this excruciating and poorly understood facial pain. Postgrad Med J 2011; 87: 410-6. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2009.080473
  45. Yang F, Lin Q, Dong L, Gao X, Zhang S. Efficacy of 8 different drug treatments for patients with trigeminal neuralgia: a network meta-analysis. Clin J Pain 2018; 34: 685-90. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000577
  46. Brar Y, Hosseini SA, Saadabadi A. Sumatriptan. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021 Jan-.
  47. Moran J, Neligan A.Treatment resistant trigeminal neuralgia relieved with oral sumatriptan: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2009; 3: 72293.
  48. Sridharan K, Sivaramakrishnan G. Interventions for refractory trigeminal neuralgia: a bayesian mixed treatment comparison network meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Clin Drug Investig 2017; 37: 819-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-017-0553-9
  49. Induru RR, Davis MP. Buprenorphine for neuropathic pain-targeting hyperalgesia. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2009; 26: 470-3. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049909109341868
  50. Vinik A, Casellini C, Nevoret M-L. Diabetic Neuropathies. In: Endotext [Internet]. Edited by Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, et al. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc., 2000.
  51. Malamed SF, Gagnon S, Leblanc D. A comparison between articaine HCl and lidocaine HCl in pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent 2000; 22: 307-11.
  52. Gil-Gouveia R, Goadsby PJ. Neuropsychiatric side-effects of lidocaine: examples from the treatment of headache and a review. Cephalalgia 2009; 29: 496-508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01800.x
  53. Koliqi R, Polidori C, Islami H. Prevalence of side effects treatment with carbamazepine and other antiepileptics in patients with epilepsy. Mater Sociomed 2015; 27: 167-71. https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2015.27.167-171
  54. Olesen J, Bes A, Kunkel R, Lance JW. ICHD-2. Headache Classification Committee of The International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd ed. Cephalalgia 2004; 24: 1-160.