Journal of Ecology and Environment

The Ecological Society of Korea (한국생태학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Small-scale spatial genetic structure of Asarum sieboldii metapopulation in a valley

  • Jeong, Hyeon Jin (Department of Biology Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Jae Geun (Department of Biology Education, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2021.05.18
  • Accepted : 2021.06.23
  • Published : 2021.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Asarum sieboldii Miq., a species of forest understory vegetation, is an herbaceous perennial belonging to the family Aristolochiaceae. The metapopulation of A. sieboldii is distributed sparsely and has a short seed dispersal distance by ants as their seed distributor. It is known that many flowers of A. sieboldii depend on self-fertilization. Because these characteristics can affect negatively in genetic structure, investigating habitat structure and assessment of genetic structure is needed. A total of 27 individuals in a valley were sampled for measuring genetic diversity, genetic distance, and genetic differentiation by RAPDPCR. Results: The habitat areas of A. sieboldii metapopulation were relatively small (3.78~33.60 m2) and population density was very low (five to seven individuals in 20×20 m quadrat). The habitat of A. sieboldii was a very shady (relative light intensity = 0.9%) and mature forest with a high evenness value (J = 0.81~0.99) and a low dominance value (D = 0.19~0.28). The total genetic diversity of A. sieboldii was quite high (h = 0.338, I = 0.506). A total of 33 band loci were observed in five selected primers, and 31 band loci (94%) were polymorphic. However, genetic differentiation along the valley was highly progressed (Gst = 0.548, Nm = 0.412). The average genetic distance between subpopulations was 0.387. The results of AMOVA showed 52.77% of variance occurs among populations, which is evidence of population structuring. Conclusions: It is expected that a small-scale founder effect had occurred, an individual spread far from the original subpopulation formed a new subpopulation. However, geographical distance between individuals would have been far and genetic flow occurred only within each subpopulation because of the low density of population. This made significant genetic distance between the original and new population by distance. Although genetic diversity of A. sieboldii metapopulation is not as low as concerned, the subpopulation of A. sieboldii can disappear by stochastic events due to small subpopulation size and low density of population. To prevent genetic isolation and to enhance the stable population size, conservative efforts such as increasing the size of each subpopulation or the connection between subpopulations are needed.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Yewon Seo of Siheung high school and EunSu Kim of Shincheon high school for helping with band scoring.

References

  1. Aguilar R, Quesada M, Ashworth L, Herrerias-Diego Y, Lobo J. Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation in plant populations: susceptible signals in plant traits and methodological approaches. Mol Ecol. 2008;17(24):5177-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03971.x.
  2. Awad DA, Roze D. Effects of partial selfing on the equilibrium genetic variance, mutation load, and inbreeding depression under stabilizing selection. Evolution. 2018;72(4):751-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13449.
  3. Braun-Blanquet J. Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzuge der vegetationskunde. 3rd ed. Wien: Springer; 1964.
  4. Doligez A, Baril C, Joly HI. Fine-scale spatial genetic structure with nonuniform distribution of individuals. Genetics. 1998;148(2):905-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/148.2.905.
  5. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S. Arlequin ver. 3.0: An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online. 2005;1:47-50.
  6. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics. 1992;131(2):479-91. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/131.2.479.
  7. GBIF Secretariat. GBIF Backbone Taxonomy. 2021. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15468/39omei Accessed 16 May 2021.
  8. Huff DR, Peakall R, Smouse PE. RAPD variation within and among natural populations of outcrossing buffalograss [Buchloe dactyloides (Nutt.) Engelm.]. Theor Appl Genet. 1993;86(8):927-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00211043.
  9. Kawano S, Nagai Y. Further observations on the reproductive biology of Erythronium japonicum Decne (Liliaceae). J Phytogeogr Taxo. 1982;30:90-7.
  10. Kharouba HM, Vellend M. Flowering time of butterfly nectar food plants is more sensitive to temperature than the timing of butterfly adult flight. J Anim Ecol. 2015;84(5):1311-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12373.
  11. Kim IK, Nam JW. Changes in adult emergence timing of Luehdorfia puziloi (Erschoff) (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) responding to temperature rise in South Korea. Poster session presented at KSCC International Conference 2018, July. (in Korean)
  12. Lewontin RC. The Apportionment of Human Diversity. In: Dobzhansky T, Hecht MK, Steere WC, editors. Evolutionary Biology. New York: Springer; 1972. p. 381-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9063-3_14.
  13. Liu Z, Kondo N, Xu T, Cai S. A preliminary study on genetic diversity of Asarum sieboldii Miq. Sci Pap Online. 2007;6:11.
  14. Llorens TM, Tapper SL, Coates DJ, McArthur S, Hankinson M, Byrne M. Does population distribution matter? Influence of a patchy versus continuous distribution on genetic patterns in a wind-pollinated shrub. J Biogeogr. 2017;44(2):361-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12843.
  15. Lynch M, Conery J, Burger R. Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations. Am Nat. 1995;146(4):489-518. https://doi.org/10.1086/285812.
  16. Margalef R. Information theory in biology. Gen Syst. 1958;3:36-71.
  17. McDermott JM, McDonald BA. Gene flow in plant pathosystems. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1993;31(1):353-73. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.31.090193.002033.
  18. McNaughton SJ. Relationships among functional properties of Californian grassland. Nature. 1967;216(5111):168-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/216168b0.
  19. Meier AJ, Bratton SP, Duffy DC. Possible ecological mechanisms for loss of vernalherb diversity in logged eastern deciduous forests. Ecol Appl. 1995;5(4):935-46. https://doi.org/10.2307/2269344.
  20. Nakonechnaya OV, Koren OG. Genetic variability of Asarum sieboldii (Aristolochiaceae) in the population of Primorsky region. Bull KrasGAU. 2017;1:132-5.
  21. Nam BE, Nam JM, Kim JG. Effects of habitat differences on the genetic diversity of Persicaria thunbergii. J Ecol Environ. 2016;40(1):11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-016-0012-1.
  22. Nam BE, Park HJ, Son GY, Kim JG. An analysis of the genetic diversity of a riparian marginal species, Aristolochia contorta. J Wet Res. 2020;22(2):100-5. https://doi.org/10.17663/JWR.2020.22.2.100
  23. Nei M. Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat. 1972;106(949):283-92. https://doi.org/10.1086/282771.
  24. Nei M. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1973;70(12):3321-3. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.70.12.3321.
  25. Nesterova SV, Nakonechnaya OV. Reproductive Biology of Asarum sieboldii Miq. Biol Bull. 2018;45(5):448-53. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359018050126.
  26. Nybom H. Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants. Mol Ecol. 2004;13(5):1143-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02141.x.
  27. Palfi Z, Spooner PG, Robinson W. Seed dispersal distances by ants increase in response to anthropogenic disturbances in Australian roadside environments. Front Ecol Evol. 2017;5:132. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2017.00132.
  28. Pielou EC. An introduction to mathematical ecology. New York: Wiley Interscience; 1969.
  29. Pielou EC. Ecological Diversity. New York: Wiley; 1975.
  30. Qiao Y, Miao S, Silva LC, Horwath WR. Understory species regulate litter decomposition and accumulation of C and N in forest soils: A long-term dual-isotope experiment. For Ecol Manage. 2014;329:318-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.025.
  31. Shin YH. Coloured Butterflies of Korea. Seoul: Academy press; 1991. (in Korean)
  32. So S, Kim M. Genetic variation and population structure of Asarum misandrum (Aristolochiaceae) in Korea. Korean J Plant Taxon. 2013;43(3):181-7. https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2013.43.3.181.
  33. Stebbins GL. Self fertilization and population variability in the higher plants. Am Nat. 1957;91(861):337-54. https://doi.org/10.1086/281999.
  34. Wallace LE. Examining the effects of fragmentation on genetic variation in Platanthera leucophaea (Orchidaceae): inferences from allozyme and random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Plant Species Biol. 2002;17(1):37-49. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-1984.2002.00072.x.
  35. Wang Y, Gao Y. Study on spontaneous self-pollination mechanism of Asarum sieboldii. Hunan Agric Sci Technol. 2012;13(1):127-48.
  36. Whittaker RH. Dominance and diversity in land plant communities. Science. 1965;147(3655):250-9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.147.3655.250.
  37. Yamaki K, Terabayashi S, Okada M, Pak JH. A new species and a new variety of Asarum (Aristolochiaceae) from Korea. J Jpn Bot. 1996;71:1-10.
  38. Yeh FC, Yang R, Boyle TJ, Ye Z, Xiyan JM. PopGene32, Microsoft Windows-based freeware for population genetic analysis, version 1.32. Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 2000.