DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

DNA recombinase Rad51 is regulated with UV-induced DNA damage and the DNA mismatch repair inhibitor CdCl2 in HC11 cells

  • You, Hyeong-Ju (Department of Animal Science, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Ga-Yeon (Department of Animal Science, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Seung-Yeon (Department of Animal Science, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kang, Man-Jong (Department of Animal Science, Chonnam National University)
  • Received : 2021.05.20
  • Accepted : 2021.07.12
  • Published : 2021.09.30

Abstract

Increasing the efficiency of HR (homologous recombination) is important for a successful knock-in. Rad51 is mainly involved in homologous recombination and is associated with strand invasion. The HR-related mismatch repair system maintains HR fidelity by heteroduplex rejection and repair. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to control Rad51, which plays a critical role in HR, through UV-induced DNA damage. It is also to confirm the effect on the expression of MMR related genes (Msh2, Msh3, Msh6, Mlh1, Pms2) and HR-related genes closely related to HR through treatment with the MMR inhibitor CdCl2. The mRNA expression of Rad51 gene was confirmed in both HC11 cells and mouse testes, but the mRNA expression of Dmc1 gene was confirmed only in mouse testes. The protein expression of Rad51 and Dmc1 gene increased in UV-irradiated HC11 cells. After 72 hours of treatment with 1 ㎛ of CdCl2, the mRNA expression level of Msh3, Pms2, and Rad51 decreased, but the mRNA expression level of Msh6 and Mlh1 increased in HC11 cells. There was no significant difference in Msh2 mRNA expression between CdCl2 untreated-group and the 72 hours treated group. In conclusion, HR-related gene (Rad51) was increased by UV-induced DNA damage. Treatment of the MMR inhibitor CdCl2 in HC11 cells decreased the mRNA expression of Rad51.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2019R1F1A1061424).

References

  1. Banan M. 2020. Recent advances in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-ins in mammalian cells. J. Biotechnol. 308:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2019.11.010
  2. Banerjee S and Flores-Rozas H. 2005. Cadmium inhibits mismatch repair by blocking the ATPase activity of the MSH2-MSH6 complex. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:1410-1419. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki291
  3. Brown MS and Bishop DK. 2014. DNA strand exchange and RecA homologs in meiosis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 7:a016659. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a016659
  4. Ceccaldi R, Rondinelli B, D'Andrea AD. 2016. Repair pathway choices and consequences at the double-strand break. Trends Cell Biol. 26:52-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2015.07.009
  5. Chakraborty U and Alani E. 2016. Understanding how mismatch repair proteins participate in the repair/anti-recombination decision. FEMS Yeast Res. 16:fow071. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/fow071
  6. Clark AB and Kunkel TA. 2004. Cadmium inhibits the functions of eukaryotic MutS complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 279:53903-53906. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.C400495200
  7. Elliott B and Jasin M. 2001. Repair of double-strand breaks by homologous recombination in mismatch repair-defective mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:2671-2682. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.21.8.2671-2682.2001
  8. Elvers I, Johansson F, Groth P, Erixon K, Helleday T. 2011. UV stalled replication forks restart by re-priming in human fibroblasts. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:7049-7057. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr420
  9. Hinch AG, Becker PW, Li T, Moralli D, Zhang G, Bycroft C, Green C, Keeney S, Shi Q, Davies B, Donnelly P. 2020. The configuration of RPA, RAD51, and DMC1 binding in meiosis reveals the nature of critical recombination intermediates. Mol. Cell 79:689-701.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2020.06.015
  10. Jin YH, Clark AB, Slebos RJ, Al-Refai H, Taylor JA, Kunkel TA, Resnick MA, Gordenin DA. 2003. Cadmium is a mutagen that acts by inhibiting mismatch repair. Nat. Genet. 34:326-329. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1172
  11. Kansikas M, Kasela M, Kantelinen J, Nystrom M. 2014. Assessing how reduced expression levels of the mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 affect repair efficiency. Hum. Mutat. 35:1123-1127. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22605
  12. Lahue RS, Au KG, Modrich P. 1989. DNA mismatch correction in a defined system. Science 245:160-164. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2665076
  13. Mao Z, Bozzella M, Seluanov A, Gorbunova V. 2008. DNA repair by nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination during cell cycle in human cells. Cell Cycle 7:2902-2906. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.7.18.6679
  14. Maruyama T, Dougan SK, Truttmann MC, Bilate AM, Ingram JR, Ploegh HL. 2015. Increasing the efficiency of precise genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9 by inhibition of nonhomologous end joining. Nat. Biotechnol. 33:538-542. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3190
  15. McCready S, Muller JA, Boubriak I, Berquist BR, Ng WL, DasSarma S. 2005. UV irradiation induces homologous recombination genes in the model archaeon, Halobacterium sp. NRC-1. Saline Syst. 1:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1448-1-3
  16. Miura H, Quadros RM, Gurumurthy CB, Ohtsuka M. 2018. Easi-CRISPR for creating knock-in and conditional knock-out mouse models using long ssDNA donors. Nat. Protoc. 13:195-215. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2017.153
  17. Park DS, Kim S, Koo DB, Kang MJ. 2019. Current status of production of transgenic livestock by genome editing technology. J. Anim. Reprod. Biotechnol. 34:148-156. https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.34.3.148
  18. Quadros RM, Miura H, Harms DW, Akatsuka H, Sato T, Aida T, Redder R, Richardson GP, Inagaki Y, Sakai D, Buckley SM, Seshacharyulu P, Batra SK, Behlke MA, Zeiner SA, Jacobi AM, Izu Y, Thoreson WB, Urness LD, Mansour SL, Ohtsuka M, Gurumurthy CB. 2017. Easi-CRISPR: a robust method for one-step generation of mice carrying conditional and insertion alleles using long ssDNA donors and CRISPR ribonucleoproteins. Genome Biol. 18:92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1220-4
  19. Rapp A and Greulich KO. 2004. After double-strand break induction by UV-A, homologous recombination and nonhomologous end joining cooperate at the same DSB if both systems are available. J. Cell Sci. 117:4935-4945. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01355
  20. Sherrer SM, Penland E, Modrich P. 2018. The mutagen and carcinogen cadmium is a high-affinity inhibitor of the zinc-dependent MutLα endonuclease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 115:7314-7319. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807319115
  21. Song J, Yang D, Xu J, Zhu T, Chen YE, Zhang J. 2016. RS-1 enhances CRISPR/Cas9- and TALEN-mediated knock-in efficiency. Nat. Commun. 7:10548. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10548
  22. Spies M and Fishel R. 2015. Mismatch repair during homologous and homeologous recombination. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 7:a022657. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a022657
  23. Tashiro S, Walter J, Shinohara A, Kamada N, Cremer T. 2000. Rad51 accumulation at sites of DNA damage and in postreplicative chromatin. J. Cell Biol. 150:283-292. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.150.2.283
  24. Tham KC, Hermans N, Winterwerp HH, Cox MM, Wyman C, Kanaar R, Lebbink JH. 2013. Mismatch repair inhibits homeologous recombination via coordinated directional unwinding of trapped DNA structures. Mol. Cell 51:326-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.07.008
  25. Vignard J, Mirey G, Salles B. 2013. Ionizing-radiation induced DNA double-strand breaks: a direct and indirect lighting up. Radiother. Oncol. 108:362-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2013.06.013
  26. Vispe S, Cazaux C, Lesca C, Defais M. 1998. Overexpression of Rad51 protein stimulates homologous recombination and increases resistance of mammalian cells to ionizing radiation. Nucleic Acids Res. 26:2859-2864. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/26.12.2859
  27. Yin Y and Petes TD. 2015. Recombination between homologous chromosomes induced by unrepaired UV-generated DNA damage requires Mus81p and is suppressed by Mms2p. PLoS Genet. 11:e1005026. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005026