DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Smart City Core Technology Using Quantitative Indicators of Patentes

특허의 정량적 지표를 활용한 스마트시티 주요기술 분석

  • Kwon, Won Jin (Graduate School of Information Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Jung Hoon (Graduate School of Information Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Nam Jung (Graduate School of Information Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2021.07.16
  • Accepted : 2021.09.02
  • Published : 2021.08.30

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to define detailed technologies of smart city based on excellent patents through patent analysis related to major technologies of smart city, and to use quantitative indicators to classify relatively high technology importance and identify related technologies. To achieve the purpose of the study, patent collection is conducted by reflecting literature research and expert opinions based on information related to the smart city Internet of Things/Internet of Things communication core technology. Also, DEA were used to determine the relatively high technology. The inputs and outputs used in the study used quantitative indicators to determine technical value and made up of impact assessment, performance assessment and value assessment. As a result of the analysis, various technology groups were classified into smart city-related platform technologies, information sharing technologies, and network-related technologies, and based on the results of this research, it is expected that it will be able to apply technology patents related to smart cities to research and development strategies through key detailed technologies by major technologies of Smart City.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This paper was supported by the Brain Korea 21 Plus Project in Yonsei University.

References

  1. Ahn, Y., "An Empirical Analysis Related on the Patent's Characteristics Difference depending on the Firm's Size and Management Performance in Korea", Global Business Administration Review, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2010, pp. 167-184. https://doi.org/10.17092/jibr.2010.7.1.167
  2. Banerjee, P., Gupta, B. M., and Garg, K. C., "Patent statistics as indicators of competition an analysis of patenting in biotechnology", Scientometrics, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2000, pp. 95-116. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005669810018
  3. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., and Cooper, W. W., "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis", Management Science, Vol. 39, No. 9, 1984, pp. 1078-1092.
  4. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., and Rhodes, E., "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units", European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1978, pp. 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  5. Ernst, H., "Patent Portfolios for Strategic R&D Planning", Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 15, No. 4, 1998, pp. 279-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(98)00018-6
  6. Gerybadze, A. and Reger, G., "Globalization of R&D: recent changes in the management of innovation in transnational corporations", Research Policy, Vol. 28, No. 2-3, 1999, pp. 251-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00111-5
  7. Huang, Z., Chen, H., Yip, A., Ng, G., Guo, F., Chen, Z. K., and Roco, M. C., "Longitudinal patent analysis for nanoscale science and engineering: Country, institution and technology field", Journal of Nanoparticle Research, Vol. 5, 2003, pp. 333-363. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025556800994
  8. Institute for Information & communication Technology Planning & evaluation, "Weekly Technology Trends- Smart City International Standardization Trends", 2019.
  9. Jang, H., "A Study on Priority Analysis for Activating the Convergence Smart City Service", The Korea Contents Association, Vol. 17, No. 8, 2017, pp. 152- 161.
  10. Jeong, G., "Data maps and research assessments - ignorance prevails when reason falls asleep", Science & Technology Policy Institute, Vol. 9, No. 118, 1999, pp. 45-51.
  11. Joo, E., "Trends in Patent Statistics and Analysis for Geothermal Energy", The Korean Society for New and Renewable Energy, 2007, pp. 525-528.
  12. Jung, H., and Whang, K., "The Technological Competitiveness Analysis of Aircraft-based Industries using Patent Information", The Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2008, pp. 111-127.
  13. KICI, "Telecommunications Industry Trends", 2018.
  14. Kim, C. and Lee, J., "Technology management for innovation", VisionPM, 2008.
  15. Kim, T., "Smart City, Smart City", KB Financial Group Management Institute, 2017.
  16. Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement, "Development of AI-based building design automation technology", 2020.
  17. Korea Intellectual Property Strategy Institute, "Guidelines for Utilizing Patent Performance Indicators", 2014.
  18. Korea Intellectual Property Strategy Agency, "Smart City Intelligent Infrastructure/Future Platform Patent Analysis Report", 2019.
  19. Korea Internet & Security Agency, "Measures to Improve the Legal System for the Promotion of the Internet of Things", 2014.
  20. Korea Internet & Security Agency, "Indepth Analysis Internet of Things Security Threat Trends", 2014.
  21. Korea Internet & Security Agency, "Smart City Promotion Status by City", 2015.
  22. Korea Institute of Intellectual Property, "Development of Intellectual Property Competitiveness and Characteristic Indicators - Development of Characteristic Analysis Indicators of Intellectual Property Portfolio", Infrastructure Basic Research Task Report, 2012.
  23. Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning, "2018 Technology Level Evaluation for 120 Critical Science and Technology", 2018.
  24. Kum, Y., Jeon, J., and Seol, H., "A Study on Technological Opportunity Monitoring Using Patents", Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 2010, pp. 192-199.
  25. Lee, H., "Analysis of Security Technology for Internet of things", The Journal of The Institute of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2017, pp. 43-48. https://doi.org/10.7236/JIIBC.2017.17.4.43
  26. Lee, H., Seol, H., Sung, N., Hong, Y. S., and Park, Y., "An analytic network process approach to measuring design change impacts in modular products", Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2010, pp. 75-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820802232517
  27. LG CNS, "Evolution of Smart Platforms for the Advancement of Smart Cities", 2018.
  28. Mariagrazia Squicciarini, "Measuring patent quality and radicalness: New indicators", OECD Expert Workshop, 2012.
  29. Mariagrazia Squicciarini, Helene Dernis and Chiara Criscuolo, "Measuring Patent Quality: Indicators of technological and economic value", OECD, 2013.
  30. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, "U-city Activation Support Plan", 2014.
  31. Ministry of Future Creation and Science, "Standard Performance Indicators for National R&D Projects - Guidelines for Establishing Performance Goals and Indicators", 2013.
  32. Moon, Y., "How do I value technology?", Industrial Technology Information Service, 2000.
  33. NIA, "Smart City Development Outlook and Korea's Competitiveness", IT&Future Strategy 2016.
  34. Park, K., Han, S., Han, H., Kyung, S., Bae, W., and Rhee, Y., "A Study on the Trend of Technology for the Treatment of Oil from Oilsands by Patent Analysis", Clean technology, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2009, pp. 210-223.
  35. Park, S., "Development of a Categorized Checklist for Valuation of Patent Technology", Korea Institute of Intellectual Property, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2007, pp. 30-56. https://doi.org/10.34122/jip.2007.06.2.1.30
  36. Park, Y., Park, G., Yun, B., Lee, Y., and Jung, S., "A Study on the Methodology of Valuation of High-Technology", Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, pp. 175-194, 2001.
  37. Rue, S., "Industry Forecast-IoT Service based on Blockchai", Korean Institute of Information Technology, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2017, pp. 15-20. https://doi.org/10.14801/jkiit.2017.15.2.15
  38. Statistics Korea, "Indicator Creation Methodology Policy Indicator Design and Utilization", 2019.
  39. Seol, H., Lee, S., and Kim, C., "Identifying new business areas using patent information: A DEA and text mining approach", Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, pp. 2933-2941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.083
  40. Son, S., "Strengthening competitiveness of basic source technology and patent policy", Science and Technology Policy Institute, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2009, pp. 41-48.
  41. Telecommunications Technology Association, "Smart City Concept and Standardization Status of Key Convergence Cases in the Fourth Industrial Revolution", 2018.
  42. Telecommunications Technology Association, "ICT Standardization Strategy Map-Smart City", 2019.
  43. Tseng, Y. H., Lin, C. J., and Lin, Y. I., "Text Mining Techniques for Patent Analysis", Information Processing Management, Vol. 43, No. 5, 2007, pp. 1216- 1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2006.11.011
  44. Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., and Jaffe, A., "University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window on the Basicness of Invention", Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1997, pp. 19-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599700000006
  45. Yoon, B. and Park, Y., "A Text-mining-based Patent Network: Analytical Tool for High-technology Trend", The Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2004, pp. 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2003.09.003
  46. Yoon, N., "Prediction of development strategy through patent analysis of blockchain technology", Korea University Graduate School of Engineering & Technology, 2018
  47. You, Y., Choi, K., and Jeong, E,, "Technology Trend of Smart Clothing: Based on Patent Information Analysis", The Korea Contents Society, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2013, pp. 440-451.