참고문헌
- 권유안. (2012). 첫 음절 토큰 빈도와 타입 빈도가 단어 및 유사 단어 어휘 판단 시간에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 24(4), 315-333,
- 권유안, 이창환, 임희석, & 이윤형. (2015). 한글 글자 교환 효과의 부재에 대한 사건관련 뇌파증거. Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society, 17(3), 1531-1543.
- 김제홍, 이창환, & 남기춘. (2018). 한국어 명사 어절 재인에서 나타나는 음절교환 효과 한국심리학회지; 인지 및 생물, 30(3), 261-268.
- 이선경, & 이윤형, (2018). 단일어와 합성어를 통해 살펴 본 청각 단어 재인 시 형태소 정보의 영향. 한국심리학회지; 인지 및 생물, 30(1), 35-51.
- 이창환, & 김제홍 (2018). 한국어 다음절 단어 재인에 있어서 글자 교환 효과. 언어과학연구, 86, 339-352.
- 이창환, & 이윤형 (2014). Absence of Letter Transposition Effects in Korean Word Recognition. 언어과학, 21(4), 229-246.
- Alvarez, C. J., Carreiras, M., & Taft, M. (2001). Syllables and morphemes: Contrasting frequency effects in Spanish. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(2), 545-555. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.27.2.545
- Alvarez, C., Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2004). Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition?. Language and Cognitive processes, 19(3), 427-452. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000242
- Carreiras, M., Alvarez, C. J., & Devega, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of memory and language, 32(6), 766-780. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1038
- Christianson, K., Johnson, R. L., & Rayner, K. (2005). Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1327-1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1327
- Davis, C. J., & Bowers, J. S. (2004). What do letter migration errors reveal about letter position coding in visual word recognition?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(5), 923-941. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.30.5.923
- Davis, C. J., & Bowers, J. S. (2006). Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: Evidence from orthographic similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(3), 535-557. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.535
- Frankish, C., & Turner, E. (2007). SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(2), 189-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.002
- Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: a model of letter position coding. Psychological review, 115(3), 577-601. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012667
- Grainger, J., & Segui, J. (1990). Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies. Perception & psychophysics, 47(2), 191-198. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205983
- Grainger, J., & Whitney, C. (2004). Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe?. Trends in cognitive sciences, 8(2), 58-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.11.006
- Grainger, J., Kiyonaga, K., & Holcomb, P. J. (2006). The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1021-1026. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01821.x
- Jacobs, A. M., & Grainger, J. (1992). Testing a semistochastic variant of the interactive activation model in different word recognition experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 18(4), 1174-1188. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.18.4.1174
- Lee, C. H., & Taft, M. (2009). Are onsets and codas important in processing letter position? A comparison of TL effects in English and Korean. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(4), 530-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.002
- Lee, C. H., & Taft, M. (2011). Subsyllabic structure reflected in letter confusability effects in Korean word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(1), 129-134. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-010-0028-y
- Lee, C. H., Kwon, Y., Kim, K., & Rastle, K. (2015). Syllable transposition effects in Korean word recognition. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 44(3), 309-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9353-7
- Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2006). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a syllable level?. Experimental Psychology, 53(4), 308-315. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.53.4.308
- Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Do orthotactics and phonology constrain the transposed-letter effect?. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(1), 69-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701578146
- Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of memory and language, 51(2), 231-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.005
- Perea, M., Rosa, E., & Gomez, C. (2005). The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(2), 301-314. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206493
- Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(7-8), 942-971. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802069730
- Rastle, K., Lally, C., & Lee, C. H. (2019). No flexibility in letter position coding in Korean. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(4), 458-473. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000617
- Taft, M., & Nillsen, C. (2013). Morphological decomposition and the transposed-letter (TL) position effect. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(7), 917-938. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.679662
- Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2007). Cambridge University versus Hebrew University: The impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 913-918. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194121
- Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2009). transposition effects are not universal: The impact of transposing letters in Hebrew. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(3), 285-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.05.003
- Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2011). Words with and without internal structure: What determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing?. Cognition, 118(2), 141-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.013