Journal of Forest and Environmental Science

  • 제37권3호
  • /
  • Pages.169-192
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2288-9744(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-9752(eISSN)
강원대학교 산림과학연구소 (Institute of Forest Science, kangwon National University)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Tree Diversity, Population Structure, Regeneration and Conservation Status in Sacred Groves of Jhargram District, South-West Bengal, India

  • Sen, Uday Kumar (Ecology and Taxonomy Laboratory, Department of Botany and Forestry, Vidyasagar University) ;
  • Bhakat, Ram Kumar (Ecology and Taxonomy Laboratory, Department of Botany and Forestry, Vidyasagar University)
  • 투고 : 2021.03.21
  • 심사 : 2021.06.03
  • 발행 : 2021.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Sacred groves are large areas of virgin or human-modified landscape with a diverse range of species that have been protected by local people for centuries due to cultural, religious beliefs, and taboo that the deities live in them and protect the villagers from various calamities. The present study was carried out for quantitative analysis of diversity, population structure, regeneration and conservation status of tree species in the four 36.86 ha sacred groves of Jhargram district in West Bengal. Tree species composition, population structure and regeneration status were analyzed by randomly establishing of 1 ha subplots within the sacred groves. Density, frequency, basal area, abundance, evenness, and other diversity indices were calculated for adult trees with girth at breast height (GBH) >31 cm. A total of 146 tree species belonging to 116 genera distributed in 44 families from 21 orders were recorded. Pterospermum suberifolium, family Malvaceae showed the highest Species Importance Value Index (SIVI, 21.33) and Fabaceae showed the highest Family Importance Value Index (FIVI, 35.59) values respectively. Individuals are categorised into three groups, seedling, sapling and adult based on girth classes. The majority of tree species exhibited good (52.74%) regeneration followed by fairly (24.66%), poor (15.75%) and no regeneration (6.85%) respectively. With the healthy existence of the sacred grove, the overall population structure of tree species showed a strong regeneration potential. The current data will be useful in determining the current status of tree species and will be used by the forest department, politicians, and conservationists to establish management plans for the conservation of priority species in the region. Since the study areas were sacred groves, tribal members were keen to preserve them due to their religious significance.

키워드

과제정보

Special thanks to all informants who generously shared their knowledge about the identification and traditional uses of plants. We are grateful for the proper field identification of plant species by Dr. G. G. Maity, ex-Professor of Kalyani University and S. Ghosh, Teacher of Digri Sanatorium High School, for manuscript preparation. We thank two anonymous reviewers for extremely useful comments.

참고문헌

  1. Abunie AA, Dalle G. 2018. Woody Species Diversity, Structure, and Regeneration Status of Yemrehane Kirstos Church Forest of Lasta Woreda, North Wollo Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Int J For Res 2018: 5302523.
  2. Adom D, Umachandran K, Asante DB, Ziarati P, Sawicka B. 2019. The Concept, State, Roles and Management of Protected Areas in Ghana: A Review. Acta Sci Agric 3: 68-76.
  3. Anderson T. 1862. Catalogue of Plants Indigenous in the Neighbourhood of Calcutta with Directions for Examination and Preservation of Plants. Government Press, Calcutta.
  4. Ayyappan N, Parthasarathy N. 1999. Biodiversity inventory of trees in a large-scale permanent plot of tropical evergreen forest at Varagalaiar, Anamalais, Western Ghats, India. Biodivers Conserv 8: 1533-1554. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008940803073
  5. Bennet SSR. 1979. Flora of Howrah District. International Book Distributors, Dehra Dun.
  6. Berger WH, Parker FL. 1970. Diversity of planktonic foraminifera in deep-sea sediments. Science 168: 1345-1347. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.168.3937.1345
  7. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C. 2000. Rediscovery of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as Adaptive Management. Ecol Appl 10: 1251-1262. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1251:ROTEKA]2.0.CO;2
  8. Bhagwat SA, Rutte C. 2006. Sacred groves: potential for biodiversity management. Front Ecol Environ 4: 519-524. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[519:SGPFBM]2.0.CO;2
  9. Booth TH, Broadhurst LM, Pinkard E, Prober SM, Dillon SK, Bush D, Pinyopusarerk K, Doran JC, Ivkovich M, Young AG. 2015. Native forests and climate change: lessons from eucalypts. For Ecol Manag 347: 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.03.002
  10. Brillouin L. 1956. Science and Information Theory. Academic Press, New York, NY.
  11. Curtis JT. 1959. The Vegetation of Wisconsin: An Ordination of Plant Communities. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
  12. Datta SC, Majumdar NC. 1966. Flora of Calcutta and Vicinity. Bull Bot Soc Bengal 20: 16-120.
  13. Development & Planning Department Government of West Bengal. 2011. District Human Development Report: Paschim Medinipur. Government of West Bengal Enterprise, Kolkata.
  14. Doffana ZD. 2017. Sacred natural sites, herbal medicine, medicinal plants and their conservation in Sidama, Ethiopia. Cogent Food Agric 3: 1365399. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2017.1365399
  15. Dutta G, Devi A. 2013. Plant diversity, population structure, and regeneration status in disturbed tropical forests in Assam, Northeast India. J For Res 24: 715-720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-013-0409-y
  16. Eilu G, Hafashimana DLN, Kasenene JM. 2004. Density and species diversity of trees in four tropical forests of the Albertine rift, western Uganda. Divers Distrib 10: 303-312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00089.x
  17. Gentry AH. 1995. Diversity and floristic composition of neotropical dry forests. In: Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests (Bullock SH, Mooney HA, Medina E, eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 146-194.
  18. Goltenboth F, Timotius K, Milan P, Margraf J. 2006. Ecology of Insular Southeast Asia: The Indonesian Archipelago. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 297-383.
  19. Haines HH. 1921-1925. The Botany of Bihar and Orissa. Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta.
  20. Hooker JD. 1872-1897. The Flora of British India. Vol. I-VII. Reeve, London.
  21. Immanuel R. Thiruppathi M, Balasubramanian A. 2018. Social Forestry and Agroforestry: Past Triumphs and Future Horizons. Empyreal Publishing House, Guwahati.
  22. IUCN. 2021. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2021-1. https://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 10 May 2021.
  23. Jain SK, Rao RR. 1977. A Handbook of Field and Herbarium Methods. Today and Tomorrow's Printers and Publishers, New Delhi.
  24. Jha CS, Singh JS. 1990. Composition and Dynamics of Dry Tropical Forest in Relation to Soil Texture. J Veg Sci 1: 609-614. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235566
  25. Kadavul K, Parthasarathy N. 1999. Plant biodiversity and conservation of tropical semi-evergreen forest in the Shervarayan hills of Eastern Ghats, India. Biodivers Conserv 8: 419-437. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008899824399
  26. Kambhar S, Kotresha K. 2014. Diversity of Tree Species in Gadag District, Karnataka, India. GRIN Verlag, Munich.
  27. Kanneboyena O, Suthari S, Raju VS. 2015. Ethnomedicinal Knowledge of Inhabitants from Gundlabrahmeswaram Wildlife Sanctuary (Eastern Ghats), Andhra Pradesh, India. Am J Ethnomed 2: 333-346.
  28. Khan ML, Khumbongmayum AD, Tripathi RS. 2008. The Sacred Groves and Their Significance in Conserving Biodiversity: An Overview. Int J Ecol Environ Sci 34: 277-291.
  29. Khumbongmayum AD, Khan ML, Tripathi RS. 2006. Biodiversity conservation in sacred groves of Manipur, northeast India: population structure and regeneration status of woody species. In: Human Exploitation and Biodiversity Conservation. Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation, vol 3 (Hawksworth DL, Bull AT, eds). Springer, Dordrecht, pp 99-116.
  30. Kossi A, Mazalo KP, Novinyo SK, Kouami K. 2021. Impacts of traditional practices on biodiversity and structural characteristics of sacred groves in northern Togo, West Africa. Acta Oecol 110: 103680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2020.103680
  31. Laloo R, Kharlukhi L, Jeeva S, Mishra B. 2006. Status of medicinal plants in the disturbed and the undisturbed sacred forests of Meghalaya, northeast India: population structure and regeneration efficacy of some important species. Curr Sci 90: 225-232.
  32. Magurran AE. 1988. Ecological Diversity and It's Measurement. Croom Helm, London.
  33. Mandal H, Sarkar A. 2013. Traditional Wisdom and Sustainable Living: A Study on the Indian Tribal Societies. Gyan Pub House, New Delhi.
  34. Markle LT, Overholt WA, Overholt KA. 2014. Natural Area Weeds: Invasive Solanum spp. in Florida. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. Accessed 27 May 2021.
  35. Merritt CH. 2010. Reframing Hope: Vital Ministry in a New Generation. Alban Institute, Herndon, VA.
  36. Mgaya E. 2020. Traditional institutions' management of sacred forests in Tanzania: history, narratives, and evidence from Njombe region, 1880s-2019. PhD thesis. Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand. (in English)
  37. Mishra B, Tripathi O, Tripathi R, Pandey HN. 2004. Effects of anthropogenic disturbance on plant diversity and community structure of a sacred grove in Meghalaya, northeast India. Biodivers Conserv 13: 421-436. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOC.0000006509.31571.a0
  38. Mitra JN. 1958. Flowering Plants of Eastern India. The World Press Private, Calcutta.
  39. Mukul SA, Herbohn J, Firn J. 2020. Rapid recovery of tropical forest diversity and structure after shifting cultivation in the Philippines uplands. Ecol Evol 10: 7189-7211. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6419
  40. Mukul SA, Manzoor Rashid AZM, Uddin MB. 2012. The role of spiritual beliefs in conserving wildlife species in religious shrines of Bangladesh. Biodiversity 13: 108-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2012.694596
  41. Mwavu EN. 2007. Human impact, plant communities, diversity and regeneration in Budongo Forest Reserve, northwestern Uganda. PhD thesis. University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. (in English)
  42. Mygatt J, Medeiros J. 2009. Lab Manual to the Flora of New Mexico. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM.
  43. Ojo LO, Ola-Adams BA. 1996. Measurement of tree diversity in the Nigerian rainforest. Biodivers Conserv 5: 1253-1270. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051575
  44. Oosting HJ. 1956. The Study of Plant Communities: An Introduction to Plant Ecology. 2nd ed. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, CA.
  45. Pallardy SG. 2008. Physiology of Woody Plants. 3rd ed. Academic Press, Burlington, MA.
  46. Panda PC, Mahapatra AK, Acharya PK, Debata AK. 2013. Plant diversity in tropical deciduous forests of Eastern Ghats, India: a landscape level assessment. Int J Biodivers Conserv 5: 625-639.
  47. Perez-Luque AJ, Bonet FJ, Perez-Perez R, Aspizua R, Lorite J, Zamora R. 2014. Sinfonevada: dataset of Floristic diversity in Sierra Nevada forests (SE Spain). PhytoKeys 35: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.35.6363
  48. Pianka E. 1966. Latitudinal Gradients in Species Diversity: A Review of Concepts. Am Nat 100: 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1086/282398
  49. Pradhan A, Mishra SP, Behera N. 2017. Diversity, Population structure and Regeneration potential of tree species in a community conserved sacred forest from Western Odisha, India. Indian For 143: 566-572.
  50. Prain D. 1963. Bengal Plants. Vol. 2. Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta.
  51. Ramanujam MP, Cyril KPK. 2003. Woody species diversity of four sacred groves in the Pondicherry region of South India. Biodivers Conserv 12: 289-299. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021926002101
  52. Ramirez-Barahona S, Sauquet H, Magallon S. 2020. The delayed and geographically heterogeneous diversification of flowering plant families. Nat Ecol Evol 4: 1232-1238. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1241-3
  53. Raunkiaer C. 1918. [Statistical research on training vegetable]. Biol Med 1: 1-80. French.
  54. Ray R, Ray A. 2020. Medicinal practices of sacred natural site: a socio-religious approach for successful implementation of primary healthcare services. Ethnobot Res Appl 20: 1-46.
  55. Ray R, Subash Chandran MD, Ramachandra TV. 2014. Socio-cultural protection of endemic trees in humanised landscape. Biodivers Conserv 23: 1977-1994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0699-1
  56. Reddy AM, Babu MVS, Rao RR. 2019. Ethnobotanical study of traditional herbal plants used by local people of Seshachalam Biosphere Reserve in Eastern Ghats, India. Herba Pol 65: 40-54. https://doi.org/10.2478/hepo-2019-0006
  57. Sanyal MN. 1994. Flora of Bankura District, West Bengal. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra Dun.
  58. Sen UK, Bhakat RK. 2019. Floristic composition, biological spectrum and conservation status of a sacred grove from Jhargram district, West Bengal, India. Indian J For 42: 161-172.
  59. Sen UK, Bhakat RK. 2020. Quantitative Analysis of Floristic Composition, Biological Spectrum and Leaf Spectrum of a Sacred Grove in Jhargram District, West Bengal, India. Biogenesis 8: 157-171. https://doi.org/10.24252/bio.v8i2.16407
  60. Sen UK, Bhakat RK. 2021a. Floristic composition and biological spectrum of a sacred grove in West Midnapore district, West Bengal, India. Acta Ecol Sin 41: 106-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2020.09.005
  61. Sen UK, Bhakat RK. 2021b. Conservation of resources by religious and social prohibitions by Santal communities in South West Bengal, India. Time Mind 14: 3-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1751696X.2021.1865641
  62. Sen UK. 2018. Assessment of diversity, population structure, regeneration and conservation status of tree species in a sacred grove of west Midnapore district, West Bengal, India. Int J Bot Stud 3: 33-42.
  63. Senbeta F, Schmitt C, Woldemariam T, Boehmer HJ, Denich M. 2014. Plant diversity, vegetation structure and relationship between plant communities and environmental variables in the Afromontane Forests of Ethiopia. Sinet: Ethiop J Sci 37: 113-130.
  64. Shankar U. 2001. A case of high tree diversity in a sal (Shorea robusta)-dominated lowland forest of Eastern Himalaya: Floristic composition, regeneration and conservation. Curr Sci 81: 776-786.
  65. Sharma S, Kumar R. 2020. Sacred groves of India: repositories of a rich heritage and tools for biodiversity conservation. J For Res 32: 899-916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-020-01183-x
  66. Simpson EH. 1949. Measurement of Diversity. Nature 163: 688. https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0
  67. Sukumaran S, Jeeva S, Raj ADS, Kannan D. 2008. Floristic Diversity, Conservation Status and Economic Value of Miniature Sacred Groves in Kanyakumari District, Tamil Nadu, Southern Peninsular India. Turk J Bot 32: 185-199.
  68. Swaine MD. 1996. Rainfall and Soil Fertility as Factors Limiting Forest Species Distributions in Ghana. J Ecol 84: 419-428. https://doi.org/10.2307/2261203
  69. Swamy P, Sundarapandian S, Chandrasekar P, Chandrasekaran S. 2000. Plant species diversity and tree population structure of a humid tropical forest in Tamil Nadu, India. Biodivers Conserv 9: 1643-1669. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026511812878
  70. Thorley A, Gunn CM. 2008. Sacred Sites: An Overview. The Gaia Foundation, London.
  71. Turner NJ, Cocksedge W. 2001. Aboriginal Use of Non-Timber Forest Products in Northw estern North America. J Sustain For 13: 31-58. https://doi.org/10.1300/J091v13n03_04
  72. Twilley RR. 1995. Properties of mangrove ecosystems related to the energy signature of coastal environments. In: Maximum Power: The Ideas and Applications of H.T. Odum (Odum HT, Hall CAS, eds). University Press of Colorado, Niwot, pp 43-62.
  73. Wattenberg I, Breckle S. 1995. Tree species diversity of a premontane rain forest in the Cordillera de Tilaran, Costa Rica. Ecotropica 1: 21-30.
  74. WCVP. 2021. World Checklist of Vascular Plants, version 2.0. http://wcvp.science.kew.org/. Accessed 3 May 2021.
  75. Whittaker RH. 1975. Communities and Ecosystems. 2nd ed. MacMillan, New York, NY.