농촌계획 (Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning)

  • 제27권3호
  • /
  • Pages.103-116
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1225-8857(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-9493(eISSN)
한국농촌계획학회 (Korean Society of Rural Planning)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

소셜데이터에 나타난 고창군의 농촌관광 이미지와 주요 활동공간 - '고창군 여행' 키워드를 중심으로 -

Rural Tourism Image and Major Activity Space in Gochang County Shown in Social Data - Focusing on the Keyword 'Gochang-gun Travel' -

  • 김용진 (서울대학교 협동과정 조경학) ;
  • 손광렬 (서울대학교 협동과정 조경학) ;
  • 이동채 (서울대학교 환경대학원 환경조경학과) ;
  • 손용훈 (서울대학교 환경대학원 환경조경학과)
  • Kim, Young-Jin (Interdisciplinary Program in Landscape Architecture, Seoul National University) ;
  • Son, Gwangryul (Interdisciplinary Program in Landscape Architecture, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Dongchae (Graduate school of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University) ;
  • Son, Yong-hoon (Graduate school of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2021.07.20
  • 심사 : 2021.08.27
  • 발행 : 2021.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In this study, the characteristics of rural tourism image perceived by urban residents were analyzed through text analysis of blog data. In order to examine the images related to rural tourism, blog data written with the keyword "Gochang-gun travel" was used. LDA topic analysis, one of the text mining techniques, was used for the analysis. In the tourism image of Gochang-gun, 9 topics were derived, and 112 major places appeared. This was divided into 3 main activities and 5 object spaces through the review of keywords and the original text of blog data. As a result of the analysis, the traditional main resources of the region, Seonun mountain, Seonun temple, and Gochang-eup fortress, formed topic. On the other hand, world heritage such as dolmen and Ungok wetland did not appear as topic. In particular, the farms operated by the private sector form individual topics, and the theme farm can be seen as an important resource for tourism in Gochang-gun. Also, through the distribution of place keywords, it was possible to understand the characteristics of travel by region and the usage behavior of visitors. In the case of Gochang-gun, there was a phenomenon in which visitors were biased by region. This seems to be the result of Gochang-gun seeking to vitalize local tourism focusing on natural, ecological, and scenic resources. It is necessary to establish a plan for balanced regional development and develop other types of tourism resources. This study is different in that it identified the types and characteristics of rural tourism images in the region perceived by visitors, and the status of tourism at the regional level.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Asuncion, A., Welling, M., Smyth, P., & Teh, Y. W. (2009). On smoothing and inference for topic models. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, AUAI Press. 27-34.
  2. Azadi, H., Veronique, V., Acker, V., Zarafshani, K. & Witlox, F.(2012). Food systems: new-ruralism versus new-urbanism. J. Sci. Food Agric. 92, 2224-2226. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.5694
  3. Baek, Y.(2017). Text-mining Using R, Hanul Academy.
  4. Battisti, F. D., Ferrara, A., & Salini, S.(2015). A decade of research in statistics: a topic model approach. Scientometrics, 103, 413-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1554-1
  5. Berkel, B. & Verburg, H.(2014). Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in anagricultural landscape, Ecological Indicators. Ecological Indicator, 37, 163 - 174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.06.025
  6. Binkley, D., Heinz, D., Lawrie, D., & Overfelt, J.(2014). Understanding LDA in source code analysis. In Proceedings of the 22nd Int'l Conf. on Program Comprehension, ACM. 26-36.
  7. Blei, D.(2011). Introduction to probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 77-84.
  8. Blei, D. M.(2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133826
  9. Blei, D., & Jordan, M.(2003). Modeling annotated data. In Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, ACM. 127-134.
  10. Brauer, R. & Dymitrow, M.(2014). Quality of Life in Rural Areas: A Topic for the Rural Development Policy?. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 25, 25-54. https://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2014-0028
  11. Carlow, VM(ed.).(2017). Ruralism: The Future of Villages and Small Towns in an Urbanizing World. Berlin: Jovis.
  12. Chandra, Y., Jiang, L. C., & Wang, C.(2016). Mining social entrepreneurship strategies using topic modeling. PLoS ONE, 11(3), 1-28.
  13. David Moffat.(2006). New Ruralism: agriculture at the Metropolitan Edge. Places. 18(2). 72-75.
  14. Ding, W., & Chen, C. (2014). Dynamic topic detection and tracking: A comparison of HDP, C-word, and cocitation methods. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(10), 2084-2097. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23134
  15. Gochang-gun(2021). Gochang-gun Culture Tour, Retrieved August 24, 2021, from https://www.gochang. go.kr/tour
  16. Grant, S., Cordy, J. R., & Skillicorn, D. B. (2013). Using heuristics to estimate an appropriate number of latent topics in source code analysis. Science of Computer Programming, 78(9), 1663-1678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2013.03.015
  17. Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M.(2004). Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences, 101(1), 5228-5235. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307752101
  18. Han, J., & Kamber, M.(2011). Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, 3rd ed, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
  19. Jeollabuk-do(2021). Jeollabuk-do Total Tour, Retrieved August 24, 2021, from https://tour.jb.go.kr/
  20. Jeong, H., & Jung, N.(2010). Research on a Modification of Rural Amenity Landscape Survey Table: Centered on 2008 Rural Amenity Selection 100, KSRP, 16(4), 171-178.
  21. Karl, A., Wisnowski, J., & Rushing, W. H.(2015). A practical guide to text mining with topic extraction. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 7(5), 326-340. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.1361
  22. Kim, D.,(1989). A Contexual Understanding on the Recent Changes in the Rural Landscape of Korea: with Special Reference to 'Saemaul' Movement. Journal of Cultural and Historical Geography, 1, 23-38.
  23. Kim, J., & Baek, S.(2016). Analysis of Issues on the College and University Structural Reform Evaluation Using Text Big Data Analytics, Asian Journal of Education, 17(3), 409-436. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2016.09.17.3.409
  24. Kim, J., & Gim, U.(2013). Review and Proposal of Central place Improvement Project in Basic Settlement Area-Centered on Comprehensive Improvement Project of the Seat of Eup(Dong)Myon, JKRDA, 25(4), 133-152.
  25. Kim, K., & Lee, S.(2004). A Study on the Change Process and Characteristics of the Development Policy in Rural Area. Journal of the Korean Institute of Rural Architecture, 6(3), 1-14.
  26. Kim, S., Choi, Y., & Yoon, H.(2019). The Analysis of the Visitors' Experiences in Yeonnam-dong before and after the Gyeongui Line Park Project: A Text Mining Approach. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 47(4), 33-49. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2019.47.4.033
  27. Kim, Y., & Son, Y.(2017). The Residents' Perceptions on the Revitalization Project of Rural Centers Utilizing IPA: The Case of Janggye-myeon of Jangsu-gun, KSRP, 23(3), 133-145.
  28. Kim, Y., & Son, Y.(2018). Features of the Rural Revitalization Projects in Jang-su County Using LDA Topic Analysis of News Data: Focused on Keyword of Tourism and Livelihood, KSRP, 24(4), 69-80.
  29. KTO(2021a). Data Lab, Retrieved August 24, 2021, from https://korean.visitkorea.or.kr/
  30. KTO(2021b). Visit Korea, Retrieved August 24, 2021, from https://datalab.visitkorea.or.kr/
  31. Lee, D., Ok, J., Hong, k., Youn, S., Park, C., & Yoo, H.(2005). A study on assessment and classification about rural landscape resources: Centered on comprehensive development project of rural village, KSRP, 11(2), 21-34.
  32. Lee, J.(2013). A Study on the Micro-Discourse about Seoul Forest in Personal Media: Focused on Sense of Place. Master's Thesis, Seoun National University. Korea.
  33. Lee, J., Jeong, Y., & Im, S.(2006). A Study on the Assessment of Rurality Characteristics in Rural Amenity Resources. Journal of the Korean Society of Rural Planning, 12(2), 1-9.
  34. Lee, S., & Son, Y.(2018). Identifying Landscape Perceptions of Visitors' to the Taean Coast National Park Using Social Media Data: Focused on Kkotji Beach, Sinduri Coastal Sand Dune, and Manlipo Beach. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 46(5), 10-21. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2018.46.5.010
  35. Lucas, C., Nielsen, R. A., Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., Storer, A., & Tingley, D.(2015). Computer-assisted text analysis for comparative politics. Political Analysis, 23(2), 254-277. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpu019
  36. MAFRA(2014). Performance Analysis of Rural Center Development and Maintenance Projects and Future Strategy.
  37. MAFRA(2016). A New Approach to Rural Development.
  38. Newman, G. & Saginor, J.(2016). Priorities for Advancing the Concept of New Ruralism. Sustainability, 8(3), 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8030269
  39. RDA(2005). Rural Landscape Management Guidelines for Amenity Creation.
  40. RDA(2013). Conservation of Traditional Landscape in Rural Area: Guideline.
  41. Shin, M., & Shin, J.(2015). A Study on Evaluation of the Rurality by the Distance of View. KSRP, 21(2), 63-77.
  42. RRI(2018). A Study on the Development and Application of the Technology Elements for Residential Environment in Rural Area.
  43. Sibella Kraus.(2006). A Call for New Ruralism. Frameworks.
  44. Son, E., Park, B., & Yoon, J.(2014). The Economic Impact Analysis of Rural Tourism Development Projects. Journal of Agricultural Extension & Community Development, 21(3), 155-179. https://doi.org/10.12653/jecd.2014.21.3.0155
  45. Son, J., Lee, Y., & Ryu, S.(2019). A Study on Intermediary Support Organization for Green Tourism Activation: Focus on Pyeong-Chang County. Tourism Research, 44(3), 107-125. https://doi.org/10.32780/KTIDOI.2019.44.3.107
  46. Son, Y., & Kim, Y.(2019). The Image of Ruralism in Korea through a Text Mining for Online News Media analysis. KSRP, 25(4), 13-26.
  47. Son, Y., Lee, C. & Saito, Y.(2014). Research Paper: Landscape Changes in Suburban Villages Resulting from Plant Locations. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning, 20(1), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2014.20.1.013
  48. Steyvers, M., & Griffths, T.(2007). Probabilistic topic models. In Landauer, T. K., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S. & Kintsch, W.(Eds.), Latent Semantic Analysis: A Road to Meaning. (427-448). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erbaum Associates Publishers.
  49. Viviers, J., Cornelius, S.G. & Cilliers, E.J(2017). Considering New Urbanism, New Ruralism and Green Urbanism in Response to Multifunctionality: The Case of Verkykerskop, South Africa. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment. 223, 73-87.
  50. Wiedemann, G.(2013). Opening up to big data: computer-assisted analysis of textual data in social science. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 14(2), Art.