DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Science Lesson Plan of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers about Condensation

초등 예비교사의 응결 차시에 대한 과학 수업 설계 분석

  • Received : 2020.06.14
  • Accepted : 2021.08.09
  • Published : 2021.08.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the science lesson plan of pre-service elementary teachers about condensation. Pre-service elementary school teachers in A national university of education was included in this study. Through the analysis of prior research and expert review, a framework for analysis of science lesson plan of pre-service elementary teachers was derived. The results of the using the analysis frame are as follows: First, the ability to apply the instructional model in the science lesson plan about condensation differences in pre-service elementary teachers need to be enhanced due to deviations, and teaching on the exact understanding of condensation-related concepts of pre-service elementary teachers is also needed. Second, there is also a deviation of pre-service elementary teachers in the beginning, development, and finishing composition of lesson course, so feedback should be supplemented. Third, in the sub-domain of lesson environment, there was a demand for specific know-how on the lesson environment. Therefore, support is needed for related PCK growth. Fourth, the sub-domain of lesson evaluation have a variety of perspectives on timing and subjects, and some missing about learning objectives in the composition of evaluation content are found to require complementary teaching. In order to improve this situation, it was found that there was a need to prepare conditions for improving science teaching professionalism of pre-service elementary teachers through in-depth discussions on the teaching methods and organization related to science education in the university of education course.

본 연구에서는 초등 예비교사의 초등 4학년 물의 상태 변화 단원 속 응결 차시에 대한 과학 수업 설계를 살펴보고자 한다. 연구 대상은 A교육대학교 2학년 초등 예비교사 29명이고, 선행연구 분석과 전문가 검토를 통해 초등 예비교사의 응결 차시에 대한 과학 수업 설계 분석틀을 도출하였다. 분석틀을 활용해서 과학 수업 지도안 및 서술 문항을 살펴본 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 초등 예비교사의 응결 차시에 대한 과학 수업 설계에서 수업 모형 적용 능력은 편차가 있으므로 신장할 필요가 있고, 초등 예비교사의 응결 관련 개념의 정확한 이해 부분에 대한 지도가 필요하다. 둘째, 수업 과정 하위범주 속 수업 시작, 전개, 마무리 구성에서도 초등 예비교사의 편차가 있으므로 피드백을 통해 보완해야 한다. 셋째, 수업 환경 하위범주에서는 구체적인 수업 환경에 대한 노하우에 대한 요구가 있었다. 그러므로 관련 PCK 신장을 위한 지원이 필요하다. 넷째, 수업 평가 하위범주에서는 시기 및 주체에 대한 다양한 관점을 가지고 있고, 평가 내용 구성에서 학습 목표를 일부 누락한 경우가 있는 점은 보완 지도가 필요한 것으로 나타났다. 이런 상황을 개선하기 위해서는 교원양성과정 속 과학교육 지도 방법과 편제에 대한 면밀한 논의를 통해 초등 예비교사의 과학 수업 전문성이 신장될 수 있는 여건 마련이 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ball, A. L., Knobloch, N. A., & Hoop, S. (2007). The instructional planning experiences of beginning teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 48(2), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2007.02056
  2. Bar, V., & Travis, A. S. (1991). Children's views concerning phase changes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(4), 363-382. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280409
  3. Barrass, R., (1984), Some misconceptions and misunderstandings perpetuated by teachers and textbooks of biology. Journal of Biological Education, 18(3), 201-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1984.9654636
  4. Beveridge, M. (1985). The development of young children's understanding of the process of evaporation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55(1), 84-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1985.tb02611.x
  5. Black, P. (1995). Can teachers use assessment to improve learning. British Journal of Curriculum and Assessment, 5(2), 7-11.
  6. Cha, Y., & Kang, H. (2020). Comparing characteristics in plan and practice of elementary school teachers' science-gifted classes and invention-gifted classes based on PCK. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 39(3), 338-352. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2020.39.3.338
  7. Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815-843. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20171
  8. Choi, B., Kim, H., Kang, S., & Kim, Y. (1994). Effectiveness of SPACE instructional strategies for the conceptual change of the elementary school children on evaporation and condensation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 14(3), 272-284.
  9. Choi, B., Kim, H., Kang, S., & Shin, I. (1993). Children's conception on evaporation and condensation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 13(1), 92-99.
  10. Costu, B., Ayas, A., & Niaz, M. (2012). Investigating the effectiveness of a POE-based teaching activity on students' understanding of condensation. Instructional Science, 40(1), 47-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9169-2
  11. Davies, D., & Rogers, M. (2000). Pre-service primary teachers' planning for science and technology activities: Influences and constraints. Research in Science and Technological Education, 18(2), 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/713694980
  12. Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. In Examining pedagogical content knowledge. Springer, Dordrecht.
  13. Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. NY: Teachers College Press.
  14. Gyeonggido Office of Education. (2017). Curriculum Literacy Comprehension Material. Gyeonggido, Korea: Author.
  15. Han, S., Kang, S., & Noh, T. (2010). Preservice elementary school teachers' awareness of students' misconceptions about science topics. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(4), 474-483.
  16. Hokayem, H., & Schwarz, C. (2014). Engaging fifth graders in scientific modeling to learn about evaporation and condensation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 49-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9395-3
  17. Hong, M. (2013). Activity types in lesson plans on social studies by elementary pre-service teachers. Journal of Social Studies Lesson Study, 1(1), 1-21.
  18. Jang, M. (2006). Analysis of pre-service teachers' lesson planing strategies in elementary school science. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 25(2), 191-205.
  19. Jang, M. (2009). Elementary teachers' understandings and instructional strategies on students' science misconceptions. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 28(4), 425-439.
  20. Jang, N. (2009). College students' misconception about the volume change of solution during acid/base titration: Partial molar volume of salt. Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 317-320. https://doi.org/10.21796/JSE.2009.33.2.317
  21. Jeong, H. (2009). A study on the instruction design experiences of elementary school teachers. Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 157-191. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.25.3.157
  22. Jeong, H. (2010). An analysis on the lesson plans from the class-participation point of view. The Journal of Elementary Education, 23(1), 261-281.
  23. Johannessen, L. R. (2003). Strategies for initiating authentic discussion. The English Journal, 93(1), 73-79. https://doi.org/10.2307/3650574
  24. Jones, M. G., & Vesilind, E. M. (1996). Putting practice into theory: Changes in the organization of preservice teachers' pedagogical knowledge. American Educational Research Journal, 33(1), 91-117. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033001091
  25. Jung, J., & Lee, B. (2016). Analysis on the mismatch between instructional design and teaching practice of pre-service science teachers in teaching practicum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(3), 435-443. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.3.0435
  26. Kang, D., Paik, S., & Park, K. (2004). The patterns of students' conceptions and teachers' teaching practices on dissolution. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 48(4), 399-413. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2004.48.4.399
  27. Kang, J., & Jhun, Y. (2019). A comparison of viewpoints on the good lesson between elementary school pre-service teachers and experienced teachers. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 38(1), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2019.38.1.31
  28. Kang, S., Seo, E., & Kim, D. (2019). Earth science prospective teachers' perceptions on the relationship between absolute humidity and dew point temperature. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 40(6), 624-638. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2019.40.6.624
  29. Kim, G., & Jeon, M. (2017). Exploring teachers' pedagogical design capacity: How mathematics teachers plan and design their mathematics lessons. The Mathematical Education, 56(4), 365-385. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2017.56.4.365
  30. Kim, H., Jang, M., & Joung, Y. (2012). The pre-service teacher's conceptions of 'the color of gases': focusing on the survey from freshmen at a national university of education. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(2), 253-268. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2012.31.2.253
  31. Kim, H. (1990). A methodology of the status study and the remediation of children's misconceptions of elementary science concepts. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 10(2), 11-24.
  32. Kim, J., & Choi, S. (2020). The analysis of problem aspects in preparation of instructional teaching plan for preliminary korean teachers using the Rasch mode. Journal of CheongRam Korean Language Education, 73, 61-97.
  33. Kim, J., Jeong, J., & Kim, Y. (2009). Understandings about evaporation and condensation through a drawing in the third grade students of the middle school. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 25(1), 275-288.
  34. Kim, J., Kim, H., Jin, S., & Choi, S. (2019). A study regarding the development and validation of assessment criteria for lesson planning for preliminary Korean teachers using the Rasch mode. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 35(3), 127-146. https://doi.org/10.14333/kjte.2019.35.3.127
  35. Kim, S. (2011). Exploring theoretical aspects of effective lesson planning. The Journal of Elementary Education, 24(3), 97-115.
  36. Kim, S. (2020). The effect of PCK based NOS program using the context of science inquiry experiment for preservice science teachers. Biology Education, 48(1), 76-87. https://doi.org/10.15717/BIOEDU.2020.48.1.76
  37. Koh, C. (2013). A study on the characteristics of 'Good' instruction which elementary school teachers. The Journal of Human Studies, 31, 183-213.
  38. Kwon, C., & Yi, S. (2011). Science teaching professionalism changes of high-career elementary school teachers through instructional consulting. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 4(3), 278-296. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2011.4.3.278
  39. Lee, H., Lee, S., Kim, H., & Park, H. (2012). An analysis of the form and the content of elementary school lesson plan in Korea. The Journal of Elementary Education, 25(4), 1-29.
  40. Lim, S., Yoon, H., & Bang, D. (2019). An analysis of articulation in 'Matter' field of the 2015 revised science curriculum with semantic network analysis. School Science Journal, 13(3), 303-318. https://doi.org/10.15737/SSJ.13.3.201908.303
  41. Lee, Y., & Lee, S. (1998). Study on students' concepts of evaporation and condensation in elementary school. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 17(1), 89-103.
  42. Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of research in science teaching, 41(4), 370-391. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20007
  43. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In Examining pedagogical content knowledge. Springer Netherlands.
  44. Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational technology research and development, 50(3), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505024
  45. Ministry of Education. (2015). Science curriculum (Notice 2015-74). Sejong: Author.
  46. Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
  47. Na, J., & Jang, B. (2018). The characteristics of lesson planning of pre-service elementary teachers to develop scientific communication skills for elementary school students. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 37(1), 54-65. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2018.37.1.054
  48. Newmann, F., & Wehlage, G. (1993). Five standards of authentic instruction. Educational leadership, 50(7), 8-12.
  49. Pang, J., & Cho, S. (2014). A survey of lesson plan for mathematics instruction by elementary school teachers. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 14(4), 365-390.
  50. Park, K. (2018). A study on pre-service elementary teachers' instructional design experience. The Journal of Elementary Education, 31(4), 47-70. https://doi.org/10.29096/jee.31.4.03
  51. Park, S. (2007). Teacher efficacy as an affective affiliate of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 27(8), 743-754.
  52. Seo, E., Lee, H., & Yoo, P. (2014). A study on elementary school students' conceptions of evaporation and condensation. Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education, 26(6), 1392-1401. https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2014.26.6.1392
  53. Shin, C., & Song, J. (2021). A study on science teaching orientation and PCK components as they appeared in science lessons by an experienced elementary teacher: Focusing on 'Motion of objects' and 'Light and lens'. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 41(2), 155-169. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2021.41.2.155
  54. Spektor-Levy, O., Eylon, B. S., & Scherz, Z. (2009). Teaching scientific communication skills in science studies: Does it make a difference?. International journal of science and mathematics education, 7(5), 875-903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9150-6
  55. Suh, J. (2015). A study of problematic aspects of teaching plan and microteaching for pre-service teachers in korean language classes.- Focused on mutual and self assessment for teaching plan and microteaching-. The Journal of Korean Language and Literature Education, 58, 1-34.
  56. Sung, S. (2018). Development of teachers' professionalism scale on elementary science teaching (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Gyeongin National University of Education, Incheon, Korea.
  57. Sung, S., Lee, G., & Yeo, S. (2016). An analysis of the elementary teachers' conceptions on the inquiry activity about 'Make a fossil model' - Focusing the 6th, 7th, 2007 revised, 2009 revised elementary science textbook -. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 35(2), 229-242. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2016.35.2.229
  58. Tytler, R. (2000). A comparison of year 1 and year 6 students' conceptions of evaporation and condensation: dimensions of conceptual progression. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 447-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900289723
  59. Varelas, M., Pappas, C. C., & Rife, A. (2006). Exploring the role of intertextuality in concept construction: Urban second graders make sense of evaporation, boiling, and condensation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(7), 637-666. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20100
  60. Wang, T. L., & Tseng, Y. K. (2018). The comparative effectiveness of physical, virtual, and virtual-physical manipulatives on third-grade students' science achievement and conceptual understanding of evaporation and condensation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(2), 203-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9774-2
  61. Yang, C., Lee, J., & Noh, T. (2014). The characteristics of lesson planning of pre-service secondary science teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(2), 187-195. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.2.0187
  62. Yang, J., & Choi, A. (2020). Pedagogical content knowledge for science practice-based instruction developed by science teachers in a teacher learning community. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 40(5), 565-582. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2020.40.5.565
  63. Yeo, S. (2001). Future elementary teachers' understanding of phenomena related to evaporation and condensation. The Bulletin of Science Education, 13, 209-224.
  64. Yoo, P., & Yang, J. (2003). A study in the elementary school students' conception on evaporation and condensation. Journal of Science Education Research, 28, 185-198.