The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of the effects of horizontal and vertical micro-osteoperforations on the biological response and tooth movement in rabbits

  • Kim, Seok-gon (Department of Orthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dental Science, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kook, Yoon-Ah (Department of Orthodontics, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Lim, Hee Jin (Department of Orthodontics, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Park, Patrick (Santa Monica College) ;
  • Lee, Won (Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dentistry, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Park, Jae Hyun (Postgraduate Orthodontic Program, Arizona School of Dentistry & Oral Health, A.T. Still University) ;
  • Bayome, Mohamed (Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University) ;
  • Kim, Yoonji (Department of Orthodontics, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • Received : 2020.09.09
  • Accepted : 2021.01.27
  • Published : 2021.09.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the amount of tooth movement after multiple horizontal (MH) and single vertical (SV) micro-osteoperforations (MOPs), and evaluate the histological changes after orthodontic force application in rabbits. Methods: The mandibles of 24 white rabbits were subjected to two experimental interventions: MH and SV MOPs. Defect volume of the MOPs between the two groups was kept similar. A force of 100 cN was applied via a coil spring between the incisor teeth and the first premolars. The amount of tooth movement was measured. Differences in the amount of tooth movement and bone variables at three time points and between the two groups were evaluated using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results: The first premolar showed a mesial movement of 1.47 mm in the MH group and 1.84 mm in the SV group, which was significantly different at Week 3 (p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in bone volume and bone fraction between the groups. Tartrate-resistant acidic phosphatase-positive cell count was also significantly greater at Week 3 than at Week 1 in both the SV and MH groups. Conclusions: The amount of tooth movement showed significant differences between Weeks 1 and 3 in the SV and MH MOP groups, but showed no differences between the two groups. Therefore, SV MOP could be considered an effective tool for enhancing tooth movement, especially for molar distalization, uprighting, and protraction to an edentulous area.

Keywords

References

  1. Igarashi K, Mitani H, Adachi H, Shinoda H. Anchorage and retentive effects of a bisphosphonate (AHBuBP) on tooth movements in rats. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:279-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70048-6
  2. Iseri H, Kisnisci R, Bzizi N, Tuz H. Rapid canine retraction and orthodontic treatment with dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:533-41; quiz 625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.01.022
  3. Patterson BM, Dalci O, Darendeliler MA, Papadopoulou AK. Corticotomies and orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;74:453-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.10.011
  4. Gantes B, Rathbun E, Anholm M. Effects on the periodontium following corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics. Case reports. J Periodontol 1990;61:234-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1990.61.4.234
  5. Chung KR, Oh MY, Ko SJ. Corticotomy-assisted orthodontics. J Clin Orthod 2001;35:331-9.
  6. Kook YA, Lee W, Kim SH, Chung KR. Corticotomyassisted space closure in adult patients with missing lower molars. J Clin Orthod 2013;47:85-95; quiz 139.
  7. Mostafa YA, Mohamed Salah Fayed M, Mehanni S, ElBokle NN, Heider AM. Comparison of corticotomyfacilitated vs standard tooth-movement techniques in dogs with miniscrews as anchor units. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:570-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.052
  8. Ruso S, Campbell PM, Rossmann J, Opperman LA, Taylor RW, Buschang PH. Bone response to buccal tooth movements-with and without flapless alveolar decortication. Eur J Orthod 2014;36:613-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjt057
  9. Tsai CY, Yang TK, Hsieh HY, Yang LY. Comparison of the effects of micro-osteoperforation and corticision on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement in rats. Angle Orthod 2016;86:558-64. https://doi.org/10.2319/052015-343.1
  10. Librizzi Z, Kalajzic Z, Camacho D, Yadav S, Nanda R, Uribe F. Comparison of the effects of three surgical techniques on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement in a rat model. Angle Orthod 2017;87:717-24. https://doi.org/10.2319/123016-940.1
  11. Hatrom AA, Zawawi KH, Al-Ali RM, Sabban HM, Zahid TM, Al-Turki GA, et al. Effect of piezocision corticotomy on en-masse retraction. Angle Orthod 2020;90:648-54. https://doi.org/10.2319/092719-615.1
  12. Shahabee M, Shafaee H, Abtahi M, Rangrazi A, Bardideh E. Effect of micro-osteoperforation on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement-a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 2020;42:211-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjz049
  13. Mittal R, Attri S, Batra P, Sonar S, Sharma K, Raghavan S. Comparison of orthodontic space closure using micro-osteoperforation and passive self-ligating appliances or conventional fixed appliances. Angle Orthod 2020;90:634-9. https://doi.org/10.2319/111119-712.1
  14. Wilcko MT, Wilcko WM, Pulver JJ, Bissada NF, Bouquot JE. Accelerated osteogenic orthodontics technique: a 1-stage surgically facilitated rapid orthodontic technique with alveolar augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:2149-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.095
  15. Baloul SS, Gerstenfeld LC, Morgan EF, Carvalho RS, Van Dyke TE, Kantarci A. Mechanism of action and morphologic changes in the alveolar bone in response to selective alveolar decortication-facilitated tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139(4 Suppl):S83-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.09.026
  16. Dutra EH, Ahmida A, Lima A, Schneider S, Nanda R, Yadav S. The effects of alveolar decortications on orthodontic tooth movement and bone remodelling in rats. Eur J Orthod 2018;40:423-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjx080
  17. Charavet C, Lecloux G, Bruwier A, Rompen E, Maes N, Limme M, et al. Localized piezoelectric alveolar decortication for orthodontic treatment in adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Dent Res 2016;95:1003-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516645066
  18. Sivarajan S, Doss JG, Papageorgiou SN, Cobourne MT, Wey MC. Mini-implant supported canine retraction with micro-osteoperforation: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthod 2019;89:183-9. https://doi.org/10.2319/011518-47.1
  19. Aboalnaga AA, Salah Fayed MM, El-Ashmawi NA, Soliman SA. Effect of micro-osteoperforation on the rate of canine retraction: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial. Prog Orthod 2019;20:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-019-0274-0
  20. Fu T, Liu S, Zhao H, Cao M, Zhang R. Effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive orthodontic tooth movement acceleration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2019;98:1469-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034519878412
  21. Liou EJ, Huang CS. Rapid canine retraction through distraction of the periodontal ligament. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:372-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70181-7
  22. Yu JY, Lee W, Park JH, Bayome M, Kim Y, Kook YA. Histologic effects of intentional-socket-assisted orthodontic movement in rabbits. Korean J Orthod 2012;42:207-17. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2012.42.4.207
  23. McBride MD, Campbell PM, Opperman LA, Dechow PC, Buschang PH. How does the amount of surgical insult affect bone around moving teeth? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145(4 Suppl):S92-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.10.020
  24. Kim T, Handa A, Iida J, Yoshida S. RANKL expression in rat periodontal ligament subjected to a continuous orthodontic force. Arch Oral Biol 2007;52:244-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2006.10.003
  25. Kim J, Kook YA, Bayome M, Park JH, Lee W, Choi H, et al. Comparison of tooth movement and biological response in corticotomy and micro-osteoperforation in rabbits. Korean J Orthod 2019;49:205-13. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2019.49.4.205
  26. Cramer CL, Campbell PM, Opperman LA, Tadlock LP, Buschang PH. Effects of micro-osteoperforations on tooth movement and bone in the beagle maxilla. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019;155:681-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.06.015
  27. van Gemert LN, Campbell PM, Opperman LA, Buschang PH. Localizing the osseous boundaries of micro-osteoperforations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019;155:779-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.07.022
  28. Chen YW, Wang HC, Gao LH, Liu C, Jiang YX, Qu H, et al. Osteoclastogenesis in local alveolar bone in early decortication-facilitated orthodontic tooth movement. PLoS One 2016;11:e0153937. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153937
  29. Alkebsi A, Al-Maaitah E, Al-Shorman H, Abu Alhaija E. Three-dimensional assessment of the effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement during canine retraction in adults with Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;153:771-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.11.026
  30. Murphy C, Kalajzic Z, Chandhoke T, Utreja A, Nanda R, Uribe F. The effect of corticision on root resorption with heavy and light forces. Angle Orthod 2016;86:17-23. https://doi.org/10.2319/112514-843.1
  31. Patterson BM, Dalci O, Papadopoulou AK, Madukuri S, Mahon J, Petocz P, et al. Effect of piezocision on root resorption associated with orthodontic force: a microcomputed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;151:53-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.06.032
  32. Zou M, Li C, Zheng Z. Remote corticotomy accelerates orthodontic tooth movement in a rat model. Biomed Res Int 2019;2019:4934128.