DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Prevalence and patterns of tooth agenesis among patients aged 12-22 years: A retrospective study

  • Eliacik, Basak Kiziltan (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Hamidiye Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Health Sciences) ;
  • Atas, Cafer (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Hamidiye Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Health Sciences) ;
  • Polat, Gunseli Guven (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Hamidiye Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Health Sciences)
  • Received : 2021.01.25
  • Accepted : 2021.03.29
  • Published : 2021.09.25

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to establish the prevalence and patterns of nonsyndromic tooth agenesis in patients referred to a tertiary health care facility. Methods: The intraoral records and panoramic radiographs of 9,874 patients aged 12-22 years were evaluated. The study group included 716 patients (371 male, 345 female) with non-syndromic agenesis of at least one tooth (except the third molars). The study data were assessed using descriptive statistics, chi-square test, and Mann-Whitney U test, while patterns were evaluated using a tooth agenesis code (TAC) tool. Results: A total of 1,627 congenitally missing teeth, were found in patients with non-syndromic tooth agenesis, with an average of 2.27 missing teeth per patient. The prevalence of tooth agenesis was 7.25%, and the most commonly missing teeth were the left mandibular second premolars (10.17%). The age group comparison revealed no significant difference in the median number of missing teeth per patient according to the cutoff values for ages between 12 and 22 years. When the missing teeth were examined separately according to quadrants, 114 different tooth agenesis patterns (upper right quadrant = 28, upper left quadrant = 27, lower left quadrant = 31, and lower right quadrant = 28) were identified, and 81 of these patterns appeared only once. Conclusions: This study highlights the benefits of applying the TAC tool in a large sample population. The application of the TAC tool in such studies will enable the development of template treatment plans by determining homogenous patterns of tooth agenesis in certain populations.

Keywords

References

  1. Nowak AJ, Christensen JR, Mabry TR, Townsend JA, Wells MH. Pediatric dentistry: infancy through adolescence. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2019.
  2. Endo T, Ozoe R, Kubota M, Akiyama M, Shimooka S. A survey of hypodontia in Japanese orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:29-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.024
  3. Goya HA, Tanaka S, Maeda T, Akimoto Y. An orthopantomographic study of hypodontia in permanent teeth of Japanese pediatric patients. J Oral Sci 2008;50:143-50. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.50.143
  4. Tan SP, van Wijk AJ, Prahl-Andersen B. Severe hypodontia: identifying patterns of human tooth agenesis. Eur J Orthod 2011;33:150-4. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq046
  5. Arai K. Tooth agenesis patterns in Japanese orthodontic patients with nonsyndromic oligodontia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019;156:238-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.09.015
  6. Kaldy A, Balaton G. [Severe hypodontia in permanent dentition. Orthodontic treatment of oligodontia in children]. Fogorv Sz 2012;105:161-5. Hungarian.
  7. Filius MAP, Cune MS, Creton M, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM, Visser A. Oral health-related quality of life in Dutch children diagnosed with oligodontia. A cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16:2371. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132371
  8. Locker D, Jokovic A, Prakash P, Tompson B. Oral health-related quality of life of children with oligodontia. Int J Paediatr Dent 2010;20:8-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2009.01001.x
  9. Silva Meza R. Radiographic assessment of congenitally missing teeth in orthodontic patients. Int J Paediatr Dent 2003;13:112-6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-263X.2003.00436.x
  10. Iezzi G, Perrotti V, Piattelli A, D'Arcangelo C, Altieri F, Cassetta M. Split crest technique for implant treatment of agenesis of the upper lateral incisors: results of a randomized pilot histological and clinical study at 24-month follow-up. Braz Oral Res 2020;34:e118. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0118
  11. Sisman Y, Uysal T, Gelgor IE. Hypodontia. Does the prevalence and distribution pattern differ in orthodontic patients? Eur J Dent 2007;1:167-73. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1698333
  12. Aren G, Guven Y, Guney Tolgay C, Ozcan I, Bayar OF, Kose TE, et al. The prevalence of dental anomalies in a Turkish population. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent 2015;49:23-8.
  13. Cantekin K, Dane A, Miloglu O, Kazanci F, Bayrakdar S, Celikoglu M. Prevalence and intra-oral distribution of agenesis of permanent teeth among Eastern Turkish children. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2012;13:53-6.
  14. Kirzioglu Z, Koseler Sentut T, Ozay Erturk MS, Karayilmaz H. Clinical features of hypodontia and associated dental anomalies: a retrospective study. Oral Dis 2005;11:399-404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2005.01138.x
  15. Gokkaya B, Motro M, Kargul B. Prevalence and characteristics of non-syndromic hypodontia among Turkish orthodontic patient population. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2015;5:170-5. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.159952
  16. van Wijk AJ, Tan SP. A numeric code for identifying patterns of human tooth agenesis: a new approach. Eur J Oral Sci 2006;114:97-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00340.x
  17. Souza-Silva BN, Vieira WA, Bernardino IM, Batista MJ, Bittencourt MAV, Paranhos LR. Non-syndromic tooth agenesis patterns and their association with other dental anomalies: a retrospective study. Arch Oral Biol 2018;96:26-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2018.08.014
  18. Gkantidis N, Katib H, Oeschger E, Karamolegkou M, Topouzelis N, Kanavakis G. Patterns of nonsyndromic permanent tooth agenesis in a large orthodontic population. Arch Oral Biol 2017;79:42-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.02.020
  19. Park MK, Shin MK, Kim SO, Lee HS, Lee JH, Jung HS, et al. Prevalence of delayed tooth development and its relation to tooth agenesis in Korean children. Arch Oral Biol 2017;73:243-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2016.10.024
  20. Lauwers L, Wojcik T, Delbarre A, Movaghar R, Ferri J. [Hypodontia: therapeutic strategy elaborated from 30 cases]. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 2009;110:263-8. French. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stomax.2008.10.010
  21. Nunn JH, Carter NE, Gillgrass TJ, Hobson RS, Jepson NJ, Meechan JG, et al. The interdisciplinary management of hypodontia: background and role of paediatric dentistry. Br Dent J 2003;194:245-51. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809925
  22. Ota S, Hirakata C, Endo T. Prevalence and patterns of tooth agenesis among malocclusion classes in a Japanese orthodontic population. J Oral Sci 2019;61:504-7. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.18-0319
  23. Konstantonis D, Alexandropoulos A, Konstantoni N, Nassika M. A cross-sectional analysis of the prevalence of tooth agenesis and structural dental anomalies in association with cleft type in non-syndromic oral cleft patients. Prog Orthod 2017;18:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-017-0169-x
  24. Al-Abdallah M, AlHadidi A, Hammad M, Al-Ahmad H, Saleh R. Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies: a comparison between maxillary and mandibular tooth agenesis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;148:793-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.05.024
  25. Zhang J, Liu HC, Lyu X, Shen GH, Deng XX, Li WR, et al. Prevalence of tooth agenesis in adolescent Chinese populations with or without orthodontics. Chin J Dent Res 2015;18:59-65.
  26. Bozga A, Stanciu RP, Manuc D. A study of prevalence and distribution of tooth agenesis. J Med Life 2014;7:551-4.
  27. Mani SA, Mohsin WS, John J. Prevalence and patterns of tooth agenesis among Malay children. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2014;45: 490-8.
  28. Guan G, Wang Y, Lo T, Preston B. Prevalence of tooth agenesis in orthodontic patient population in Western New York. N Y State Dent J 2013;79:31-5.
  29. Celikoglu M, Kazanci F, Miloglu O, Oztek O, Kamak H, Ceylan I. Frequency and characteristics of tooth agenesis among an orthodontic patient population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010;15:e797-801.
  30. Dang HQ, Constantine S, Anderson PJ. The prevalence of dental anomalies in an Australian population. Aust Dent J 2017;62:161-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12443