The Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An analysis of in-service teachers' perceived interactivity with AI teachers through RPP(Role-Play Presentation)

RPP(Role-Play Presentation)를 통한 교사의 AI 교사와의 지각된 상호작용성 분석

  • Received : 2021.08.08
  • Accepted : 2021.08.23
  • Published : 2021.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As many changes in the future society represented by the age of artificial intelligence(AI) are expected to come, efforts are being made to draw the shape of the future education and various research methods are being employed to support the attempts. While many research studies use methods for deriving generalized results such as expert survey and trend analysis in along with a review of literature, there are attempts to apply the scenario methodology to explore ideas and information needed within a changing context. A scenario method, one of the experiential learning strategies, aims to seek various and alternative approaches by establishing a plan from the present conditions considering future changes. In this study, in-service teachers' perceptions and expectations of the interactivity between human and AI teachers were visualized by applying the role-play presentation technique that grafted the concept of role-play game to the scenario method. In addition, the mandal-art method was introduced to support in conducting productive discussion during the teachers' collaboration. This method appeared to help to depict teachers' perceptions of AI teachers in the detailed and concrete form, which may flow in the abstract otherwise. Through analyses of the teachers' role-play presentations with the implementation of the madal-art method it was suggested that most teachers would want to collaborate with an AI teacher for improved instruction and individualized student learning while they would take the instructional authority over the AI teacher in the classroom.

본 연구에서는 롤플레이 게임(Role-play Game) 개념을 차용한 역할연기발표(Role-play Presentation) 기법을 적용하여 미래 교육에서 인간 교사-인공지능 교사 간의 상호작용성에 대한 교사의 인식과 기대감을 시각화함으로써 교사들의 협업과정에서 성과 있는 토론활동을 수행할 수 있도록 하였다. 분석 결과 교사는 수업 상황에서 인간 교사가 수업의 주도권과 학생과의 상호작용 활성화를 전제로 수업의 질적 향상과 개별학습을 지원할 수 있는 보조 도구로써의 인공지능 교사의 상호작용 요인들을 제안하고 있었다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2020년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 일반공동연구지원사업의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2020S1A5A2A03044887)

References

  1. An, Y. S. (2015). The Study on Effective & Creative Problem Solving Process through Analysis on Creativity, Thinking Mechanism and Existing Problem Solving Techniques. Doctoral dissertation, Kongju National University, Kong Ju.
  2. Armstrong, J. S. (2001). Role Playing: A Method to Forecast Decisions. In Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners (Ed. J. Scott Armstrong). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  3. Baker, T. & Smith, L. (2019). Educ-AI-Tion Rebooted? Exploring the Future of Artificial Intelligence in Schools and Colleges. London: NESTA.
  4. Bellotti, F., Berta, R., De Gloria, A., Lavagnino, E., Antonaci, A., Dagnino, F. M., &. Ott, M. (2013). A gamified short course for promoting entrepreneurship among ICT engineering students, In advanced learning technologies, 2013(7), 31-32.
  5. Belova, N., Eilks, I., & Feierabend, T. (2015). The Evaluation of Role-Playing in the Context of Teaching Climate Change. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 165-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9477-x
  6. Bowman, S. L. & Standiford, A. (2015). Educational larp in the middle school classroom: A mixed method case study, International Journal of Role-Playing, 5(1), 4-25.
  7. Brusilovsky, P. & Peylo, C. (2003) Adaptive and intelligent web-based educational system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Eucation, 13, 156-169.
  8. Cha, H. H. (2013). The Effects of Mandala Art Group Therapy on Adult Females' Brain Wave and Prefrontal Lobe's Executive Functions, using Kim's Neurophysiological Tests. Doctoral dissertation. Seoul University of Buddhism Graduate School, Seoul.
  9. Chang, H. & Nam, J. (2021). The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Elementary Mathematics Education -Focusing on the math class support system "Knock-knock! Math Expedition"-. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 31, S105-S123.
  10. Chung, Y. (2021). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence(AI) on Education in the Perspective of Education 4.0 Paradigm. The Journal of Studies in Kangwon Community Culture, 43, 203-240.
  11. Dawson, M. R. W. (1998). Understanding Cognitive Science. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  12. Ee, J. H. & Huh, N. (2018). A study on the relationship between artificial intelligence and change in mathematics education. Communications of Mathematical Education, 32(1), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2018.32.1.23
  13. Hines, A. (1996), "Jobs and Infotech: Work in the Information Society", E. Cornish, ed., Exploring Your Future: Living, Learning, and Working in the Information Age, Bethesda: World Future Society, 7-11.
  14. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence In Education. 정제영, 이선복 역(2020). 인공지능 시대의 미래교육. Seoul: Pakyoung Story.
  15. Holstein, K. (2019). Designing Real-time Teacher Augmentation to Combine Strengths of Human and AI Instruction. Doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University.
  16. Holstein, K., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2017). Intelligent tutors as teachers' aides: exploring teacher needs for real-time analytics in blended classrooms. . In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference. pp. 257-266.
  17. Holstein, K., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2019). Designing for Complementarity: Teacher and Student Needs for Orchestration Support in AI-Enhanced Classrooms. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2019). (pp. 157-171). Springer, Cham.
  18. Hwang, H. J. & Huh, N. (2016). The Study on the Integrate Thinking Ability in Problem Based Learning Program Using Historical Materials in Mathematics. Communications of Mathematical Education, 30(2), 161-178. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2016.30.2.161
  19. Jo, J., Yang, D. & Choi, B. (2005). Investigation into Industrial Application of Creative Knowledge Creation Model Using Whole Brain Theory and Creative Thinking Tools. Knowledge Management Research. 6(2): 1-22.
  20. Jung, J. H. (2006). Forecasting Methodology: Theory and Practice. KDI Country Economy 10, 118-125.
  21. Jurczyk-Romanowska, E. (2016). Games in University Education. European J ournal of Social Sciences Education and Research, 6(2), 114-122. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v6i2.p114-122
  22. Kenneth, H., Bruce M. M., & Vincent, A. (2017). Intelligent Tutors as Teachers' Aides: Exploring Teacher Needs for Real-time Analytics in Blended Classrooms. LAK '17: Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference, 257-266, Retrieved July. 23, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027451
  23. Kim, H. K., Park, C., Jeong, S., & Ko, H. K. (2018). A View on Complementary Relation of Human teacher and AI teacher in Future Education. Education and Culture Research, 24(6), 189-207.
  24. Kim, K. A., Ryu, B. R., Kim, J. H., Kim, J. H., Park, S. H., & Lee, M. J. (2018). Future Education Scenarios: Focused on Elementary and Secondary Education. CNU J ournal of Education Studies, 39(3), 1-29.
  25. Kim, M. R., Jung, K. Y., & Noh, J. (2019). Examining Development of Collaborative Artificial Intelligence in the Context of Classroom Instruction. East Asian Math. Journal, 35(4), 507-528.
  26. Kim, S., Kim, C., Jung, C., Park, J., Kim, J., & Suh, K. (2017), Development of Evaluation Indicators for Web-based Agricultural Water Information System using Mandal-Art Method, Journal Of The Korean Society Of Rural Planning, 23(4), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.7851/Ksrp.2017.23.4.049
  27. Kim, Y. J. (2017). A Study on the Development of Pictogram Design Educational Program at School Special Rooms for Information Exchange -For the high school students. Master's thesis, Graduate School of Education of Kyung Hee University, Seoul.
  28. Ko, H. K. (2020). A Study on Development of School Mathematics Contents for Artificial Intelligence (AI) Capability. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 23(2), 223-237.
  29. Kolb, A. Y. & David A. K. (2009). The Learning Way: Meta-Cognitive Aspects of Experiential Learning. Simulation and Gaming 40(3), 297-327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878108325713
  30. Kolb, A. Y., David A., Kolb, A, P., & Garima, S. (2014). On Becoming an Experiential Educator: The Educator Role Profile. Simulation and Gaming 45(2,), 204-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878114534383
  31. Lee, H. S. & Lee, J. (2021). Applying Artificial Intelligence in Physical Education and Future Perspectives. Sustainability, 13(351), 1-16.
  32. Lee, S. G., Lee, J. H, & Ham, Y. M. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and College Mathematics Education. Communications of Mathematical Education, 34(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2020.34.1.1
  33. Lim, M. (2020). A Study on the Direction of Technology Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 33(4), 81~102. https://doi.org/10.24062/kpae.2020.33.4.81
  34. Mehrabi, F., Morstatter, N., Saxena, K., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(6), 1-35.
  35. Microsoft (2018). Class of 2030 and life-ready learning: The technology imperative. Retrieved July. 25, 2021, from http://edudownloads.azureedge.net/msdownloads/13679_EDU_Thought_Leadership_Summary_revisions_5.10.18.pdf
  36. Mitchell, V., Ross, T., May, A., Sims, R., & Parker, C. (2016). Empirical investigation of the impact of using co-design methods when generating proposals for sustainable travel solutions. CoDesign 12(4), 205-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1091894
  37. Nelson, K. (2018). The Future of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Techwell Insights. Retrieved July. 28, 2021, from https://www.techwell.com/techwell-insights/2018/07/future-artificial-intelligence-education
  38. Oulton, C., Dillon, J., & Grace, M. (2004). Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000072746
  39. Park, J. H. & Shin, N. M. (2017). Students' perceptions of ArtificialI ntelligence Technology and Artificial Intelligence Teachers. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 34(2), 169-192. https://doi.org/10.24211/TJKTE.2017.34.2.169
  40. Park, M. (2020). Applications and Possibilities of Artificial Intelligence in Mathematics Education. Communications of Mathematical Education, 34(4), 545-561. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2020.34.4.545
  41. Park, H. (2021). A Study on the Application of Educational AI to Moral Education for Character Education of Elementary School Students: Usability and ethical considerations. Korean Elementary Moral Education Society. 73, 207-247.
  42. Putra, B. A., Setiawan, M. I., & Dhaniarti, S. T. (2018). Entrepeneurship-Based Course Design: A Case Study of Its Application in Human Resource Planning and Development Course, Educational Access and Excellence, 1, 160.
  43. Ryu, H. & Han, G. (2016). A Design Thinking Process with 'Aspie': Developing a New Intervention for People with Asperger's Syndrome. Hanyang Medical Review. 36(1): 11-16. https://doi.org/10.7599/hmr.2016.36.1.11
  44. Ryu, S. (2019). A Study of the Learning Model of Group Discussion for PBL(Problem-based Learning) Development of a Collaborative Learning Model Using Madal-art and RPP(Role-play Presentation). Education and Culture Research, 25(2), 359-377.
  45. Serholt, S., Barendregt, W., Leite, I., Hastie, H., Jones, A., Paiva, A., & Castellano, G. (2014) Teachers' views on the use of empathic robotic tutors in the classroom. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication, The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on, 955-960.
  46. Shin, D. (2020a). Artificial Intelligence in Primary and Secondary Education: A Systematic Review. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics 30(3), 531-552. https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2020.08.30.3.531
  47. Shin, D. (2020b). An Analysis Prospective Mathematics Teachers' Perception on the Use of Artificial Intelligence(AI) in Mathematics Education. Communications of Mathematical Education, 34(3), 215-234. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2020.34.3.215
  48. Stromer-Galley, J. (2004). Interactivity-as-Product and Interactivity-as-Process. The Information Society. 20(5), 391-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240490508081
  49. Trischler, J., Pervan, S. J., Kelly, S. J., & Scott, D. R. (2018). The value of codesign: the effect of customer involvement in service design teams. Journal of Service Research 21(1), 75-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670517714060
  50. Tuomi, I. (2020). The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in education. Retrieved March 25, 2021, from https://research4committees.blog/2020/09/07/the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-ai-in-education/
  51. Voskoglou, M. G. & Salem, A. B. M. (2020). Benefits and Limitations of the Artificial with Respect to the Traditional Learning of Mathematics. Mathematics, 8, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8010001
  52. Wee, K. N. L. (2004). A problem-based learning approach in entrepreneurship education: promoting authentic entrepreneurial learning, International Journal of Technology Management, 28(7), 685-701. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2004.005777
  53. Wilhelm, J. (2002). Action strategies for deepening comprehension. New York: Scholastic.
  54. Yang, Q., Zimmerman, J., Steinfeld, A., Carey, L., & Antaki, J. F. (2016). Investigating the Heart Pump Implant Decision Process: Opportunities for Decision Support Tools to Help. In CHI 2016, 4477-4488. ACM.
  55. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marin, V., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). "Systematic Review of Research on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education - Where Are the Educators?" International J ournal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0