한국문헌정보학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science)

한국문헌정보학회 (Korean Society For Library And Information Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대체자료 서지레코드 연결을 위한 BIBFRAME 기반 연계 구조 구축

Construction of BIBFRAME-Based Linking Structure for Interrelating Bibliographic Records for Alternative Format Materials

  • 이승민 (중앙대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과)
  • 투고 : 2021.07.22
  • 심사 : 2021.08.19
  • 발행 : 2021.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

단위저록 방식의 평면적인 서지구조를 통해 생성되는 대체자료 서지레코드는 레코드 수준에서 관련된 대체자료와의 연계가 이루어질 수 없는 한계를 보이고 있으며, 이는 장애인들이 대체자료에 대한 접근성을 충분하게 확보하기가 어렵다는 문제를 야기하고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 FRBR 기반의 BIBFRAME 구조를 적용하여, 평면적인 대체자료 서지레코드와 다면적인 BIBFRAME 구조를 연결시킬 수 있는 연계 속성 구조를 구축하였다. 이를 위해 상위 수준의 연계 속성 카테고리를 구성하고 이를 BIBFRAME의 클래스와 속성에 연결시킴으로써 레코드 수준에서 관련된 대체자료 사이의 상호 연계가 가능한 서지 구조를 제안하였다.

Bibliographic records for alternative format materials using a flat bibliographic structure based on unit record have limitations in that they cannot be linked with other related resources in record level, which makes it difficult to secure sufficient access to alternative format materials for people with disabilities. In order to address this problem, this research constructed a linking structure which adopted FRBR-based BIBFRAME structure to establish a bibliographic structure that can interrelate the bibliographic records with flat structure and the multi-level BIBFRAME structure. This research proposed a linking bibliographic structure that enables interlinking between bibliographic records for related alternative format materials by composing upper-level linking property categories and interconnecting them to classes and properties of BIBFRAME.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2020년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 인문사회분야 중견연구자지원사업의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2020S1A5A2A01047206).

참고문헌

  1. National Library for the Disabled (2011). Standardized Guidelines of Cataloging for Alternative Format Materials for People with Disabled. Final Report. Seoul: National Library for the Disabled.
  2. National Library for the Disabled (2015). Current Status of Resource Development and Information Services of National Library for the Disabled. Seoul: National Library for the Disabled.
  3. Yoon, H. Y. (2010). Analysis of alternative formats development policy for the disabled persons in the major countries. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(1), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.41.1.201003.29
  4. Lee, S. S. & Lee, J. W. (2018). Study on conversion between MARC21 and BIBFRAME 2.0. Journal of Social Science, 29(3), 73-93. https://doi.org/10.16881/jss.2018.07.29.3.73
  5. Adams, K., Santamauro, B., & Blythe, K. (2008). Successive entry, latest entry, or none of the above? How the MARC21 format, FRBR and the Concept of a Work Could Revitalize Serials Management. The Serials Librarian, 54(3/4), 193-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/03615260801974099
  6. Antelman, K. (2004). Identifying the serial work as a bibliographic entity. Library Resources & Technical Services, 48(4), 238-255.
  7. Coyle, K. (2015). FRBR, Twenty Years On. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53(3/4), 265-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2014.943446
  8. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions(IFLA) (2018). Getting Started: Implementing the Marrakesh Treaty for persons with print disabilities: A practical guide for librarians. Available: https://www.eifl.net/system/files/resources/201808/getting_started_marrakesh_en.pdf
  9. Lee, S., Nam, T., & Nam, Y. (2013). Revising cataloging rules and standards to meet the needs of people with disabilities: A proposal for South Korea. Library Resources & Technical Services, 57(1), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.57n1.18
  10. Library of Congress (2016). Overview of the BIBFRAME 2.0 Model. Available: https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/bibframe2-model.html
  11. Oliver, C. (2004). FRBR is everywhere, but what happened to the format variation issue? The Serials Librarian, 45(4), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v45n04_02
  12. Riva, P. (2004). Mapping MARC21 linking entry fields to FRBR and Tillett's Taxonomy of bibliographic relationships. Library Resources & Technical Services, 48(2), 130-143.
  13. Westlind, M. (2008). Dynamic materials force dynamic cataloguing: accessible materials in a new digital age. Library Review, 57(6), 424-429. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242530810886698
  14. Zapounidou S., Sfakakis M., & Papatheodorou C. (2017). Preserving bibliographic relationships in mappings from FRBR to BIBFRAME 2.0. In: Kamps J., Tsakonas G., Manolopoulos Y., Iliadis L., Karydis I. eds. Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. TPDL 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10450. Springer, Cham.