DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Spatial Gap-Filling of Hourly AOD Data from Himawari-8 Satellite Using DCT (Discrete Cosine Transform) and FMM (Fast Marching Method)

  • Youn, Youjeong (Department of Spatial Information Engineering, Division of Earth Environmental System Science, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Kim, Seoyeon (Department of Spatial Information Engineering, Division of Earth Environmental System Science, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Jeong, Yemin (Department of Spatial Information Engineering, Division of Earth Environmental System Science, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Cho, Subin (Department of Spatial Information Engineering, Division of Earth Environmental System Science, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Kang, Jonggu (Department of Spatial Information Engineering, Division of Earth Environmental System Science, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Kim, Geunah (Department of Spatial Information Engineering, Division of Earth Environmental System Science, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Lee, Yangwon (Department of Spatial Information Engineering, Division of Earth Environmental System Science, Pukyong National University)
  • Received : 2021.08.16
  • Accepted : 2021.08.25
  • Published : 2021.08.31

Abstract

Since aerosol has a relatively short duration and significant spatial variation, satellite observations become more important for the spatially and temporally continuous quantification of aerosol. However, optical remote sensing has the disadvantage that it cannot detect AOD (Aerosol Optical Depth) for the regions covered by clouds or the regions with extremely high concentrations. Such missing values can increase the data uncertainty in the analyses of the Earth's environment. This paper presents a spatial gap-filling framework using a univariate statistical method such as DCT-PLS (Discrete Cosine Transform-based Penalized Least Square Regression) and FMM (Fast Matching Method) inpainting. We conducted a feasibility test for the hourly AOD product from AHI (Advanced Himawari Imager) between January 1 and December 31, 2019, and compared the accuracy statistics of the two spatial gap-filling methods. When the null-pixel area is not very large (null-pixel ratio < 0.6), the validation statistics of DCT-PLS and FMM techniques showed high accuracy of CC=0.988 (MAE=0.020) and CC=0.980 (MAE=0.028), respectively. Together with the AI-based gap-filling method using extra explanatory variables, the DCT-PLS and FMM techniques can be tested for the low-resolution images from the AMI (Advanced Meteorological Imager) of GK2A (Geostationary Korea Multi-purpose Satellite 2A), GEMS (Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer) and GOCI2 (Geostationary Ocean Color Imager) of GK2B (Geostationary Korea Multi-purpose Satellite 2B) and the high-resolution images from the CAS500 (Compact Advanced Satellite) series soon.

Keywords

1. Introduction

Aerosol is defined as the particles in solid and liquid floating in the atmosphere and affects the mechanism of radiation transfer and cloud microphysics (Twomey, 1974; Albrecht, 1989). Because it can deteriorate atmospheric visibility and human health (Wang et al., 2009; Zanobetti and Schwartz, 2009), a quantitative understanding of aerosol distribution is essential; South Korea also makes many efforts for ground observation and remote sensing of aerosol (Lee et al., 2020). Aerosol has a relatively short duration and significant spatial variation (Jin et al., 2018), so the point-based ground observations are not sufficient to understand the aerosol characteristics in a spatially continuous scale (Higurashi et al., 1999). Hence, satellite observations become more important for the spatially and temporally continuous quantification of aerosol. Long-term satellite data can be used for the analyses of climate change and air quality trends (Kafuman et al., 2005; Hoff et al., 2009; Bae et al., 2017).

AOD (Aerosol Optical Depth) or AOT (Aerosol Optical Thickness) is the quantity to represent aerosol using the integral extinction coefficient (NMSC, 2012), the degree that aerosol disperses the radiation along the path between a satellite sensor and the land surface, by absorption and scattering of the radiation (Kinne et al., 2006). Polar-orbiting satellite sensors such as MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer), VIIRS (Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite), MISR (Multi-angle Imaging Spectroradiometer) conduct AOD observations one or twice a day (Hsu et al., 2006; Levy et al., 2007; Hsu et al., 2013; Kalashnikova et al., 2013; Levy et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2016; Garay et al., 2017), but tracking of diurnal variation of AOD is difficult (Gao et al., 2021). Meanwhile, recent geostationary satellites such as the American GOES-17 (Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite) (Schmit et al., 2005), the Japanese Himawari-8 (Bessho et al., 2016), and the Korean GeoKompsat-2 (Jee et al., 2020) provide hourly AOD products during daytime. They have more advanced spatial and temporal resolutions, spectral bands, and SNR (Signal to Noise Ratio) (Schmit et al., 2017). The performance of the retrieval algorithm was improved for a spatially and temporally continuous monitoring of AOD at an interval of 10 minutes on a 2 km grid (Lee et al., 2020).

South Korea, which is affected by the westerlies, may have a significant aerosol inflow from the continent. Citizen’s worries are increasing because of the recent serious concentration of particulate matter (Kim et al., 2021). More than 300 Air Korea stations have been set up to provide point-based real-time information on air quality nationwide. However, spatially continuous understanding of the transport of particulate matter from the continent to the Korean peninsula is still difficult, so the studies of monitoring with CTM (Chemical Transport Model) and remote sensing are conducted alternatively (Park et al., 2014; Kim et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2020). Optical remote sensing also has the disadvantage that it cannot detect AOD for the regions covered by clouds or the regions with extremely high concentrations (Li et al., 2005; Nichol et al., 2010; Zhao et al., 2019). Such missing values can increase the data uncertainty in the analyses of the Earth’s environment (Youn et al., 2020). If necessary, a stable, gap-filled AOD image database can be constructed with the help of statistical techniques. To date, various studies have been carried out for the gap-filling of satellite AOD products using spatial statistical methods such as Kriging (Yu et al., 2011) and Bayesian approaches such as BMA (Bayesian Model Ensemble) (Singh et al., 2017) and BME (Bayesian Maximum Entropy) (Tang et al., 2016). AI (Artificial Intelligence) models were also built for gap filling of AOD using multiple explanatory variables related to AOD (Zhao et al., 2019; She et al., 2020). However, the approaches based on Bayesian statistics and AI models could not ensure a semi-real-time operational application for the gap-filling of hourly AOD products if an amount of auxiliary data for explanatory variables are not timely prepared.

Under the assumption of the preparation for realtime operation, this paper presents a spatial gap-filling framework using a univariate statistical method such as DCT-PLS (Discrete Cosine Transform-based Penalized Least Square Regression) (Garcia, 2010; Wang, 2012) and FMM (Fast Matching Method) inpainting (Telea, 2004). We conducted a feasibility test for the hourly AOD product from AHI (Advanced Himawari Imager) between January 1 and December 31, 2019, and compared the accuracy statistics of the two spatial gap-filling methods.

2. Data and methods

1) Himawari-8 AOD product

JMA (Japan Meteorological Agency) has launched Himawari-8, a next-generation geostationary meteorological satellite, on October 7, 2014, and are providing meteorological products such as AMV (Atmospheric Motion Vector), CSR (Clear Sky Radiance), HCAI (High-resolution Cloud Analysis Information), AOT, and ASWind (AMV-based Sea Surface Wind). The AHI onboard Himawari-8 has 16 spectral bands, including visible and infrared radiation (Table 1). The AOT or AOD product is created by the JAXA (Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency) algorithm (Yoshida et al., 2018) and provided in the format of NetCDF (Network Common Data Form) for the information of 500 nm AOD, AE (Ångström Exponent), and QA (Quality Analysis) flag. The spatial resolution is 0.05°, and the temporal resolution is 10 minutes for level 2 data; one hour, one day, and one month for level 3 data.

Table 1. Spectral information of AHI (Advanced Himawari Imager) (JMA, 2021)

OGCSBN_2021_v37n4_777_t0001.png 이미지

The hourly product has two versions: AOT_Pure and AOT_Merged. We used the AOT_Merged because it is evaluated as a higher-quality product compared to AOT_Pure due to a statistical treatment considering the spatial and temporal variations of AOD (Kikuchi et al., 2018). This product is provided during the daytime when solar light is available (Lee and Lee, 2018). Hourly product has ten timeslots between 23 UTC (08 KST) and 09 UTC (18 KST) according to the daytime in Korea. We excluded two timeslots at 23 UTC close to dawn and 09 UTC close to sunset and used the eight images per day between 00 UTC and 07 UTC for our experiment.

2) DCT-PLS (Discrete Cosine Transform-based Penalized Least Square Regression)

DCT-PLS is a method devised for smoothing multidimensional data (Garcia, 2010; Wang, 2012). PLS (Penalized Least Square) regression pursuits a balance between original and smoothed data by minimizing Formula (1) that consists of a residual term between original and smoothed data and a penalty term for the roughness of the smoothed data (Whittaker, 1923; Wahba, 1990; Eilers, 2003).

\(F(\hat{y})=R S S+s P(\hat{y})=\|\hat{y}-y\|^{2}+s P(\hat{y})\)       (1)

where y is an original data; ˆyis the smoothed data; RSS is the residual sum of squares; sP(ˆy)is the penalty for the smoothed data. Because PLS can be formulated by the DCT (Discrete Cosine Transform) for multidimensional data (Garcia, 2010; Wang, 2012), DCT-PLS can be applied spatially for the gap-filling of gridded data.

\(F(\hat{X})=\left\|W^{1 / 2}{ }^{\circ}(\hat{X}-X)\right\|^{2}+s\|\Delta \hat{X}\|^{2}\)      (2)

where X is an original data with missing pixels; Xˆis the gap-filled data; Wis a weight matrix having the same dimension as X(a binary matrix with 0 for null pixels and 1 for not null pixels); | · | is Euclidean norm; Δ is Laplace operator; ° is Hadamard product; sis a smoothing parameter to overcome over or under-smoothing.

3) FMM (Fast Marching Method)

FMM inpainting technique, a weighted average using neighboring pixels around a null pixel, is appropriate for high-resolution image processing because of its fast calculation (Telea, 2004). If Ω is the null-pixel area to be filled and ε is the search radius, a temporal procedure is necessary to determine the sequence for Ω to fill from border to inside (Fig. 1). To fill the pixel p on the border of Ω, all the values q inside Bε(p) are summarized by a normalized weighting function w(p, q) consisting of three components, namely, directional, geometric, and level-set weights. An image pixel value I(p) is defined as

OGCSBN_2021_v37n4_777_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Principle of FMM inpainting (Telea, 2004).

\(I(p)=\frac{\sum_{q \in B_{ε}(p)} w(p, q)[I(q)+\nabla I(q)(p-q)]}{\left.\sum_{q \in B_{ε}(p)}\right) w(p, q)}\)       (3)

\(w(p, q)=\operatorname{dir}(p, q) * d s t(p, q) * \operatorname{lev}(p, q)\)       (4)

\(\operatorname{dir}(p, q)=\frac{p-q}{\|p-q\|} \cdot \mathrm{N}(\mathrm{p})\)       (5)

\(d s t(p, q)=\frac{d_{0}^{2}}{\|p-q\|^{2}}\)       (6)

\(\operatorname{lev}(p, q)=\frac{T_{0}}{1+|T(p)-T(q)|}\)       (7)

where I is the image value for a pixel q; Tis the propagated value for a pixel; ∇I denotes the image gradient; N denotes the normal direction that the propagation proceeds. dir(p, q) is the weight for the directional component; dst(p, q) is the weight for geometric distance; lev(p, q) is the weight for the level set distance that pixels close to the contour through p contribute more than farther pixels (Telea, 2004). Both dst(p, q) and lev(p, q) are relative with respect to the reference distance d0and T0, which indeed are set to the interpixel distance, i.e., to 1.

4) Experiment setup

The study area for a gap-filling experiment of AHI hourly AOD product is around South Korea (33.73~38.72°N and 125.78~129.77°E) with 8, 000 pixels (100×80) in a 0.05° grid. The experiment period is between January 1 and December 31, 2019. Out of the 2, 920 (365×8) images for daytime (00 to 07 UTC), we used 2, 914 except for the six missing images. Table 2 shows the null pixel statistics for the 2, 914 images. Based on the statistics, we applied DCT-PLS and FMM to only 201 images with a null pixel ratio under 0.6. For an objective performance test, we created two random blocks with 10×10 null pixels in the AOD images and conducted the spatial gap-filling followed by the pixel-to-pixel comparisons between the original and the gap filled blocks. If a null pixel takes up more than half of a random block, it is discarded, and a new random block is created. This produced 30, 164 pixels for the accuracy validation. Under such a setting, we carried out the spatial gap-filling of the AOD images using DCT-PLS and FMM and calculated the accuracy statistics for the 30, 164 pixels in terms of MBE (Mean Bias Error), MAE (Mean Absolute Error), RMSE (Root Mean Square Error), and CC (Correlation Coefficient).

Table 2. Null pixel statistics for AHI hourly AOD data, January 1 to December 31, 2019

OGCSBN_2021_v37n4_777_t0002.png 이미지

3. Results and discussions

Regarding the 30, 164 pixels from the 201 images of AHI hourly AOD, we calculated the accuracy statistics by comparing the original and gap-filled images (Tables 3 and 4). DCT-PLS produced the CC of 0.988 and the MAE of 0.020. In the case of FMM with the search radius of 3, 4, 5, and 6 pixels, the result from ε=3 or ε=4 was slightly better than others. Because a too narrow or wide radius can increase the uncertainty in the result (Fan et al., 2013), ε=4 was determined as optimal in this experiment. The result of FMM had a CC of 0.980 and MAE of 0.028, which is very similar to that of DCT-PLS. When a gap-filling for a wider area is required, a wider search radius is necessary unless it worsens accuracy. Indeed, the setup of the search radius should be determined by the characteristics of the missing pixel distribution.

Table 3. Accuracy statistics of gap-filled AHI hourly AOD using DCT-PLS

OGCSBN_2021_v37n4_777_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Accuracy statistics of gap-filled AHI hourly AOD using FMM

OGCSBN_2021_v37n4_777_t0004.png 이미지

Fig. 2 is the scatterplot to show the comparison between the actual and gap-filled AOD values by DCT-PLS, and Fig. 3 is the gap-filling result of FMM (ε=4). The random null blocks for validation were filled with very similar values to the actual AOD by both DCT-PLS and FMM, so the scatterplots appeared concentrated around the 1:1 line.

OGCSBN_2021_v37n4_777_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Observed vs. predicted AHI hourly AOD using DCT-PLS.

OGCSBN_2021_v37n4_777_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Observed vs. predicted AHI hourly AOD using FMM.

Table 5 is the AOD statistics gathered from all pixels of the 201 images: (a) original images with random gaps, (b) gap-filled images using DCT-PLS, and (c) gap-filled images using FMM. Minimum values for the original image, DCT-PLS, and FMM were 0.00, and the maximum values were 2.37 for the three datasets. The mean value was 0.33 for the original data and 0.32 for DCT-PLS and FMM; the standard deviation was 0.13 for the original data and DCT-PLS and 0.14 for FMM. Also, the histogram for the three datasets was very similar, but a slight underestimation by PCT-PLS and FMM was shown (Fig. 4).

Table 5. Hourly AOD data statistics before and after gap-filling

OGCSBN_2021_v37n4_777_t0005.png 이미지

OGCSBN_2021_v37n4_777_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Hourly AOD histograms: (a) original images with random gaps, (b) gap-filled images using DCT-PLS, and (c) gap-filled images using FMM.

Fig. 5 shows a few examples for the map of gap filled AHI hourly AOD using DCT-PLS and FMM. In the case of March 19 (07 UTC), the null-pixel area is not large, and the two methods yield a similar result. The original data of June 4 (07 UTC) had a large null pixel area around the DMZ (demilitarized zone). The result of DCT-PLS showed a gradual change, but FMM produced an abrupt change in the AOD values because it fills the border pixel first and moves to the nearest neighbor. Overall, both methods showed fast calculation and high accuracy for the images with the null pixel ratio under 0.6. Also, they are the univariate gap-filling method that does not require auxiliary explanatory variables, which means that they can be applied to a real-time operational framework for the spatial gap-filling of satellite images.

OGCSBN_2021_v37n4_777_f0005.png 이미지

OGCSBN_2021_v37n4_777_f0006.png 이미지

Fig. 5. Maps for gap-filled AHI hourly AOD by DCT-PLS and FMM.

4. Conclusions

This paper examined the spatial gap-filling methods for the AHI hourly AOD product using DCT-PLS and FMM inpainting to solve missing values and conducted the feasibility tests for quantitative validation of the methods. When the null-pixel area is not very large (null pixel ratio < 0.6), both methods produced a high accuracy of the CC > 0.98 for the random blind tests. Since they are a univariate method with no need for additional explanatory variables, they could be used as a real-time operational algorithm for spatial gap-filling. However, most of the AHI hourly AOD images have a null pixel ratio over 0.6, so the other gap-filling methods using AI with extra explanatory variables may be necessary. These univariate and multivariate gap-filling methods should be tested for the low-resolution images from the AMI (Advanced Meteorological Imager) of GK2A (Geostationary Korea Multi-purpose Satellite 2A), GEMS (Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer) and GOCI2 (Geostationary Ocean Color Imager) of GK2B (Geostationary Korea Multi-purpose Satellite 2B) and the high-resolution images from the CAS500 (Compact Advanced Satellite) series soon.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the “Graduate School of Particulate Matter Specialization” of Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute grant funded by the Ministry of Environment, Republic of Korea.

References

  1. Albrecht, B.A., 1989. Aerosols, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness, Science, 245(4923): 1227-1230. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.245.4923.1227
  2. Bae, M.S., D.J. Park, K.H. Lee, S.S. Cho, K.Y. Lee, and K. Park, 2017. Determination of analytical approach for ambient PM 2.5 free amino acids using LC-MSMS, Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 33(1): 54-63 (in Korean with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2017.33.1.054
  3. Bessho, K., K. Date, M. Hayashi, A. Ikeda, T. Imai, H. Inoue, Y. Kumagai, T. Miyakawa, H. Murata, T. Ohno,A. Okuyama, R. Oyama,Y. Sasaki, Y. Shimazu, K. Shimoji, Y. Sumaida, M. Suzuki, H. Taniguchi, H. Tsuchiyama, D. Uesawa, H. Yokota, and R. Yoshida, 2016. An introduction to Himawari-8/9 Japan's new-generation geostationary meteorological satellites, Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, 94(2): 151-183. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2016-009
  4. Eilers, P.H., 2003. A perfect smoother, Analytical Chemistry, 75(14): 3631-3636. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac034173t
  5. Fan, Q., X. Hu, and L. Zhang, 2013. Image painting based FMM algorithm using gradient matrix, Proc. of the 1st IEEE/IIAE International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Image Processing 2013 (ICISIP2013), Kitakyushu, JP, Sep. 26-27, pp. 47-50.
  6. Gao, L., L. Chen, C. Li, J. Li, H. Che, and Y. Zhang, 2021. Evaluation and possible uncertainty source analysis of JAXA Himawari-8 aerosol optical depth product over China, Atmospheric Research, 248: 105248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105248
  7. Garay, M.J., O.V. Kalashnikova, and M.A. Bull, 2017. Development and assessment of a higher-spatial-resolution (4.4 km) MISR aerosol optical depth product using AERONET-DRAGON data, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 17(8): 5095-5106. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5095-2017
  8. Garcia, D., 2010. Robust smoothing of gridded data in one and higher dimensions with missing values, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 54(4): 1167-1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2009.09.020
  9. Higurashi, A., T. Nakajima, B.N. Holben, A. Smirnov, R. Frouin, and B. Chatenet, 1999. A study of global aerosol optical climatology with two-channel AVHRR remote sensing, Journal of Climate, 13(12): 2011-2027. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<2011:ASOGAO>2.0.CO;2
  10. Hoff, R., H. Zhang, N. Jordan, A. Prados, J. Engel-Cox, A. Huff, S. Weber, E. Zell, S. Kondragunta, J. Szykman, B. Jonhs, F. Dimmick, A. Wimmers, J. Al-Saadi, and C. Kittaka, 2009. Applications of the three-dimensional air quality system to western US air quality: IDEA, Smog Blog, Smog Stories, AirQuest, and the Remote Sensing Information Gateway, Journal of the Air&Waste Management Association, 59(8): 980-989. https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.59.8.980
  11. Hsu, N.C., M.J. Jeong, C. Bettenhausen, A.M. Sayer, R. Hansell, C.S. Seftor, J. Huang, and S.C. Tsay, 2013. Enhanced deep blue aerosol retrieval algorithm: The second generation, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118(16): 9296-9315. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50712
  12. Hsu, N.C., S.C. Tsay, M.D. King, and J.R. Herman, 2006. Deep blue retrievals of Asian aerosol properties during ACE-Asia, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44(11): 3180-3195. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.879540
  13. Jee, J.B., K.T. Lee, K.H. Lee, and I.S. Zo, 2020. Development of GK-2AAMI aerosol detection algorithm in the East-Asia region using Himawari-8AHI data, Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 56(2): 207-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-019-00156-3
  14. Jin, K., 2018. LEO and GEO satellite programs for space-borne measurement of aerosol, Current Industrial and Technological Trends in Aerospace, 16(1): 53-62 (in Korean with English abstract).
  15. JMA(Japanese Meteorological Agency), 2021, Himawari User's Guide, available at https://www.data.jma.go.jp/mscweb/en/support/support.html, Accessed on Aug. 4, 2021.
  16. Kalashnikova, O.V., M.J. Garay, J.V. Martonchik, and D.J. Diner, 2013. MISR dark water aerosol retrievals: operational algorithm sensitivity to particle non-sphericity, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 6(8): 2131-2154. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2131-2013
  17. Kaufman, Y.J., I. Koren, L.A. Remer, D. Rosenfeld, and Y. Rudich, 2005. The effect of smoke, dust, and pollution aerosol on shallow cloud development over the Atlantic Ocean, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(32): 11207-11212. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0505191102
  18. Kikuchi, M., H. Murakami, K. Suzuki, T.M. Nagao, and A. Higurashi, 2018. Improved hourly estimates of aerosol optical thickness using spatiotemporal variability derived from Himawari-8 geostationary satellite, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 56(6): 3442-3455. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2018.2800060
  19. Kim, K., D. Lee, K.Y. Lee, K. Lee, and Y. Noh, 2016. Estimation of surface-level PM 2.5 concentration based on MODIS aerosol optical depth over Jeju, Korea, Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, 32(5): 413-421 (in Korean with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2016.32.5.2
  20. Kim, S.M., J. Yoon, K.J. Moon, D.R. Kim, J.H. Koo, M. Choi, K.N. Kim, and Y.G. Lee, 2018. Empirical estimation and diurnal patterns of surface PM 2.5 concentration in Seoul using GOCIAOD, Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, 34(3): 451-463 (in Korean with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.7780/KJRS.2018.34.3.2
  21. Kim, S., Y. Jeong, Y. Youn, S. Cho, J. Kang, G. Kim, and Y. Lee, 2021. A Comparison between multiple satellite AOD products using AERONET sun photometer observations in South Korea: Case study of MODIS, VIIRS, Himawari-8, and Sentinel-3, Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, 37(3): 543-557 (in Korean with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.7780/KJRS.2021.37.3.14
  22. Kinne, S., M. Schulz, C. Textor, S. Guibert, Y. Balkanski, S.E. Bauer, T. Berntsen, T.F. Berglen, O. Boucher, M. Chin, W. Collins, F. Dentener, T. Diehl, R. Easter, J. Feichter, D. Fillmore, S. Ghan, P. Ginoux, S. Gong, A. Grini,J. Hendricks, M. Herzog, L. Horowitz, I. Isaksen, T. Iversen, A. Kirkevag, S. Kloster, D. Koch, J.E. Kristjansson, M. Krol, A. Lauer, J.F. Lamarque, G. Lesins, X. Liu, U. Lohmann, V. Montanaro, G. Myhre, J. Penner, G. Pitari, S. Reddy, O. Seland, P. Stier, T. Takemura, and X. Tie, 2006. An AeroCom initial assessment-optical properties in aerosol component modules of global models, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 6(7): 1815-1834. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1815-2006
  23. Lee, G.T., S.W. Ryu, T.Y. Lee, and M.S. Suh, 2020. Analysis of AOD characteristics retrieved from Himawari-8 using sun photometer in South Korea, Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, 36(3): 425-439 (in Korean with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2020.36.3.3
  24. Lee, K.H. and K.T. Lee, 2018. Detection and classification of major aerosol type using the Himawari-8/AHI Observation Data, Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 34(3): 493-507 (in Korean with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2018.34.3.493
  25. Levy, R.C., L. Remer, S. Mattoo, E. Vermote, and Y. . Kaufman, 2007. Second-generation operational algorithm: Retrieval of aerosol properties over land from inversion of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer spectral reflectance, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 112(D13): D13211.
  26. Levy, R.C., S. Mattoo, L.A. Munchak, L.A. Remer, A.M. Sayer, F. Patadia, and N.C. Hsu, 2013. The Collection 6 MODIS aerosol products over land and ocean, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 6(11): 2989-3034. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2989-2013
  27. Li, C., A.H. Lau, J. Mao, and D.A. Chu, 2005. Retrieval, validation, and application of the 1-km aerosol optical depth from MODIS measurements over Hong Kong, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43(11): 2650-2658. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2005.856627
  28. Nichol, J.E., M.S. Wong, and J. Wang, 2010. A 3D aerosol and visibility information system for urban areas using remote sensing and GIS, Atmospheric Environment, 44(21-22): 2501-2506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.04.036
  29. NMSC(National Meteorological Satellite Center), 2012. Technical analysis report of Aerosol Optical Depth algorithm (AOD-v2.0), National Meteorological Satellite Center, KR.
  30. Park, R.S., S. Lee, S.-K. Shin, and C.H. Song, 2014, Contribution of ammonium nitrate to aerosol optical depth and direct radiative forcing by aerosols over East Asia, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14(4): 2185-2201. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2185-2014
  31. Schmit, T.J., M.M. Gunshor, W.P. Menzel, J.J. Gurka, J. Li, and A.S. Bachmeier, 2005. Introducing the next-generation Advanced Baseline Imager on GOES-R, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 86(8): 1079-1096. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-86-8-1079
  32. Schmit, T.J., P. Griffith, M.M. Gunshor, J.M. Daniels, S.J. Goodman, and W.J. Lebair, 2017. Acloser look at the ABI on the GOES-Rseries, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 98(4): 681-698. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00230.1
  33. She, L., H.K. Zhang, Z. Li, G. de Leeuw, and B. Huang, 2020. Himawari-8 Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) Retrieval using a deep neural network trained using AERONET observations, Remote Sensing, 12(24): 4125. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12244125
  34. Singh, M.K., R. Gautam, and P. Venkatachalam, 2017. Bayesian merging of MISR and MODIS aerosol optical depth products using error distributions from AERONET, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 10(12): 5186-5200. https://doi.org/10.1109/jstars.2017.2734331
  35. Tang, Q., Y. Bo, and Y. Zhu, 2016. Spatiotemporal fusion of multiple-satellite aerosol optical depth (AOD) products using Bayesian maximum entropy method, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 121(8): 4034-4048. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024571
  36. Telea, A., 2004. An image inpainting technique based on the fast marching method, Journal of Graphics Tools, 9(1): 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10867651.2004.10487596
  37. Twomey, S.J. A.E., 1974. Pollution and the planetary albedo, Atmospheric Environment (1967), 8(12): 1251-1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(74)90004-3
  38. Wahba, G.,1990. Spline models for observational data, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  39. Wang, G., D. Garcia, Y. Liu, R. De Jeu, and A. J. Dolman, 2012. A three-dimensional gap filling method for large geophysical datasets: Application to global satellite soil moisture observations, Environmental Modelling & Software, 30: 139-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.10.015
  40. Wang, K., R.E. Dickinson, and S. Liang, 2009. Clearsky visibility has decreased overland globally from 1973 to 2007, Science, 323(5920): 1468-1470. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167549
  41. Whittaker, E.T., 1923. On a new method of graduation, Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society, 41: 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0013091500077853
  42. Yang, S.H., J.I. Jeong, R.J. Park, M.J. Kim, 2020. Impact of meteorological changes on particulate matter and aerosol optical depth in Seoul during the months of June over recent decades, Atmosphere, 11(12): 1282. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11121282
  43. Yoshida, M., M. Kikuchi, T.M. Nagao, H. Murakami, T. Nomaki, and A. Higurashi, 2018. Common retrieval of aerosol properties for imaging satellite sensors, Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, Ser. II, 96B: 193-209. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2018-039
  44. Youn, Y., S. Kim, Y. Jeong, S. Cho, and Y. Lee, 2020. Evaluation of the DCT-PLS method for spatial gap filling of gridded data, Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, 36(6): 1407-1419 (in Korean with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2020.36.6.1.10
  45. Yu, C., L. Chen, L. Su, M. Fan, and S. Li, 2011. Kriging interpolation method and its application in retrieval of MODIS aerosol optical depth, Proc. of 19th International Conference on Geoinformatics, Shanghai, CN, Jun. 24-26, pp. 1-6.
  46. Zanobetti, A., and J. Schwartz, 2009. The effect of fine and coarse particulate air pollution on mortality: a national analysis, Environmental health perspectives, 117(6): 898-903. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0800108
  47. Zhang, H., S. Kondragunta, I. Laszlo, H. Liu, L.A. Remer,J. Huang, S. Superczynski, and P. Ciren, 2016. An enhanced VIIRS aerosol optical thickness (AOT) retrieval algorithm over land using a global surface reflectance ratio database, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 121(18): 10717-10738. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD024859
  48. Zhao, C., Z. Liu, Q. Wang, J. Ban, N.X. Chen, and T. Li, 2019. High-resolution daily AOD estimated to full coverage using the random forest model approach in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, Atmospheric Environment, 203: 70-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.01.045