Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

  • 제47권4호
  • /
  • Pages.327-334
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2234-7550(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-5930(eISSN)
대한구강악안면외과학회 (The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Direct transparotid approach via a modified mini-preauricular incision for open reduction and internal fixation of subcondylar fractures

  • Lee, Jung-Soo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital) ;
  • Kang, Sang-Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2020.11.30
  • 심사 : 2021.02.01
  • 발행 : 2021.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

A transparotid approach, with a retromandibular or preauricular incision, is an alternative surgical approach for treating a subcondylar fracture and reducing the potential for complications such as injury to the facial nerves. However, retromandibular and preauricular incisions are both created far away from the parotid gland-dissection area. Thus, it is necessary to undermine the skin and retract it anteriorly to access the surgical field. Here, we introduce a modified approach wherein the incision allows for direct access to the fracture site. This approach may be adopted to shorten the incision length, reduce the retraction trauma at the surgical site, and help prevent injury to the facial nerve.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Rashid A, Eyeson J, Haider D, van Gijn D, Fan K. Incidence and patterns of mandibular fractures during a 5-year period in a London teaching hospital. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;51:794-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.04.007
  2. Kang DH. Surgical management of a mandible subcondylar fracture. Arch Plast Surg 2012;39:284-90. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2012.39.4.284
  3. Haug RH, Assael LA. Outcomes of open versus closed treatment of mandibular subcondylar fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59:370-5; discussion 375-6. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2001.21868
  4. Worsaae N, Thorn JJ. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of unilateral dislocated low subcondylar fractures: a clinical study of 52 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;52:353-60; discussion 360-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(94)90436-7
  5. Kang SH, Choi EJ, Kim HW, Kim HJ, Cha IH, Nam W. Complications in endoscopic-assisted open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular condyle fractures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012;113:201-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.02.005
  6. Nam SM, Lee JH, Kim JH. The application of the Risdon approach for mandibular condyle fractures. BMC Surg 2013;13:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-13-25
  7. Van Hevele J, Nout E. Complications of the retromandibular transparotid approach for low condylar neck and subcondylar fractures: a retrospective study. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;44:73-8. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2018.44.2.73
  8. Kanno T, Sukegawa S, Tatsumi H, Karino M, Nariai Y, Nakatani E, et al. Does a retromandibular transparotid approach for the open treatment of condylar fractures result in facial nerve injury? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;74:2019-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.05.022
  9. Bhutia O, Kumar L, Jose A, Roychoudhury A, Trikha A. Evaluation of facial nerve following open reduction and internal fixation of subcondylar fracture through retromandibular transparotid approach. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;52:236-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.12.002
  10. Liao HT, Wang PF, Chen CT. Experience with the transparotid approach via a mini-preauricular incision for surgical management of condylar neck fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2015;43:1595-601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.07.023
  11. Shi D, Patil PM, Gupta R. Facial nerve injuries associated with the retromandibular transparotid approach for reduction and fixation of mandibular condyle fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2015;43:402-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2014.12.009
  12. Knepil GJ, Kanatas AN, Loukota RJ. Classification of surgical approaches to the mandibular condyle. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;49:664-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.02.009
  13. Ruiz R, Schlund M, Raoul G, Kyheng M, Fontaine C, Nicot R. Mandibular subcondylar fracture accessibility with transparotid approach by rhytidectomy and modified Risdon approach: an anatomical comparative study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2018;46:2256-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2018.10.011
  14. Saylam C, Ucerler H, Orhan M, Ozek C. Anatomic landmarks of the buccal branches of the facial nerve. Surg Radiol Anat 2006;28:462-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-006-0127-7
  15. Tang W, Gao C, Long J, Lin Y, Wang H, Liu L, et al. Application of modified retromandibular approach indirectly from the anterior edge of the parotid gland in the surgical treatment of condylar fracture. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:552-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.066
  16. Liu P, Li F, Peng L. An anatomical landmark for retromandibular transparotid approach to treat subcondylar fractures. J Craniofac Surg 2021;32:e427-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000007233
  17. Yabe T, Tsuda T, Hirose S, Ozawa T. Preauricular transparotid approach to mandibular condylar fractures without dissecting facial nerves. J Craniofac Surg 2013;24:1365-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318285d9a3
  18. Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, et al. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113:1960-5; discussion 1966-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000122207.28773.56
  19. Kudur MH, Pai SB, Sripathi H, Prabhu S. Sutures and suturing techniques in skin closure. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2009;75:425-34. https://doi.org/10.4103/0378-6323.53155