Animal Bioscience

  • 제34권10호
  • /
  • Pages.1717-1722
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2765-0189(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2765-0235(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effect of daily calf stroking frequency during the postnatal period on the establishment of the human-calf relationship

  • 투고 : 2020.10.27
  • 심사 : 2021.01.15
  • 발행 : 2021.10.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: Stroking calves during the postnatal period could effectively improve human-calf relationships. The objective of this study is to examine how daily calf stroking frequency during the postnatal period affects the establishment of human-calf relationships. Methods: Six calves were stroked by a trainer for 6 minutes once daily for 5 days after birth (D1). Six calves were stroked by a trainer for 3 minutes twice daily for 5 days after birth (D2). A further four calves were stared at but not stroked as the control group. The overall stroking or staring duration was the same for all groups, at 6 min/d and 30 min over 5 days. The tests for reactions to the stationary trainer in an unfamiliar environment and avoidance distance measurements for an approaching trainer were conducted at 1 month and 3 months after the treatment. Results: Calves in both stroking groups approached significantly closer to the stationary trainer, vocalized less, and looked at the trainer shorter than the control group at 1 month. However, at 3 months, there was no significant difference between the D1 and the control group, whereas the D2 approached significantly closer to the trainer and vocalized less, and looked at the trainer for a shorter time than the control group. For the avoidance distance, the trainer could approach closer to both stroking groups than the control at 1 month, however, there was no difference among groups at 3 months. Conclusion: Our results suggested that the difference in the calf stroking procedure affected the established human-calf relationships, even though the total stroking duration was the same for all stroked calves. It is likely to be more effective to stroke more frequently than intensively when the aim is to establish better human-calf relationships within limited labor time.

키워드

과제정보

This research was supported by grants from the Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution, NARO (the research project for future agricultural production utilizing artificial intelligence).

참고문헌

  1. Jago JG, Krohn CC, Matthews LR. The influence of feeding and handling on the development of the human-animal interactions in young cattle. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1999;62:137-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00219-6
  2. Krohn CC, Jago JG, Boivin X. The effect of early handling on the socialisation of young calves to humans. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2001;74:121-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00161-7
  3. Lurzel S, Windschnurer I, Futschik A, Waiblinger S. Gentle interactions decrease the fear of humans in dairy heifers independently of early experience of stroking. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2016;178:16-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.02.012
  4. Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ. Human-livestock interactions. 2nd edition. NY, USA: CAB International; 2011.
  5. Grandin T. Assessment of stress during handling and transport. J Anim Sci 1997;75:249-57. https://doi.org/10.2527/1997.751249x
  6. Rushen J, de Passille AMB, Munksgaard L. Fear of people by cows and effects on milk yield, behavior, and heart rate at milking. J Dairy Sci 1999;82:720-7. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75289-6
  7. Boivin X, Gilard F, Egal D. The effect of early human contact and the separation method from the dam on responses of beef calves to humans. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2009;120:132-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.05.011
  8. Bateson P. How do sensitive periods arise and what are they for? Anim Behav 1979;27:470-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(79)90184-2
  9. Boivin X, Braastad BO. Effects of handling during temporary isolation after early weaning on goat kids' later response to humans. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1996;48:61-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(95)01019-X
  10. Coulon M, Raymond N, Andanson S, et al. Human-lamb bonding: oxytocin, cortisol and behavioural responses of lambs to human contacts and social separation. Psychonuroendocrino 2013;38:499-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.07.008
  11. Boivin X, Neindre PL, Chupin JM. Establishment of cattlehuman relationships. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1992;32:325-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80025-5
  12. Kosako T, Imura T. Effect of handling treatment during three days after birth on the subsequent reaction to humans in Japanese Black Calves. Anim Sci J 1999;70:J409-14 (In Japanese with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.2508/chikusan.70.10_409
  13. Sato S, Shiki H, Yamasaki F. The effects of early caressing on later tractability of calves. Jpn J Zootech Sci 1984;55:332-8. https://doi.org/10.2508/chikusan.55.332
  14. Fukasawa M. The calf training for loading onto vehicle at weaning. Anim Sci J 2012;83:759-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2012.01020.x
  15. Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ, Barnett JL, Borg S. Relationships between human-animal interactions and productivity of commercial dairy cows. J Anim Sci 2000;78:2821-31. https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.78112821x
  16. Kosako T, Imura T. Behavioral characteristics of Japanese Black calves during leading training in the first seven days after birth. Anim Sci J 1999;70:J415-20 (In Japanese with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.2508/chikusan.70.10_415
  17. Probst JK, Neff AS, Leiber F, Kreuzer M, Hillmann E. Gentle touching in early life reduces avoidance distance and slaughter stress in beef cattle. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2012;139:42-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.03.002
  18. Lurzel S, Munsch C, Windschnurer I, Futschik A, Palme R, Waiblinger S. The influence of gentle interactions on avoidance distance towards humans, weight gain and physiological parameters in group-housed dairy calves. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2015;172:9-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2015.09.004
  19. Smolen P, Zhang Y, Byrne JH. The right time to learn: mechanisms and optimization of spaced learning. Nat Rev Neurosci 2016;17:77-88. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2015.18
  20. Anderson MJ, Jablonski SA, Klimas DB. Spaced initial stimulus familiarization enhances novelty preference in Long-Evans rats. Behav Processes 2008;78:481-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2008.02.005
  21. Waiblinger S, Boivin X, Pedersen V, et al. Assessing the humananimal relationship in farmed species: a critical review. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2006;101:185-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.02.001
  22. Kilgour RJ, Melville GJ, Greenwood PL. Individual differences in the reaction of beef cattle to situations involving social isolation, close proximity of humans, restraint and novelty. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2006;99:21-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.09.012
  23. Waiblinger S, Menke C, Folsch DW. Influences on the avoidance and approach behaviour of dairy cows towards humans on 35 farms. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2003;84:23-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00148-5