Animal Bioscience

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A novel combination of sodium metabisulfite and a chemical mixture based on sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate, and sodium nitrite for aerobic preservation of fruit and vegetable discards and lactic acid fermentation in a total mixed ration for ruminants

  • Ahmadi, Farhad (Food Bio-science Major, College of Medical Life Sciences, Konkuk University) ;
  • Lee, Won Hee (Food Bio-science Major, College of Medical Life Sciences, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kwak, Wan Sup (Food Bio-science Major, College of Medical Life Sciences, Konkuk University)
  • Received : 2020.12.29
  • Accepted : 2021.02.21
  • Published : 2021.09.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: Our recent findings confirmed the effectiveness of sodium metabisulfite (SMB) in controlling the growth of undesirable microorganisms in fruit and vegetable discards (FVD); however, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are susceptible to its antibacterial effects. Two series of experiments were conducted to enable the survivability of LAB during silage fermentation of a total mixed ration (TMR) containing SMB-treated FVD. Methods: In Exp. 1, the objective was to isolate a strain of LAB tolerable to the toxic effect of SMB. In Exp. 2, the SMB load was minimized through its partial replacement with a chemical mixture (CM) based on sodium benzoate (57%), potassium sorbate (29%), and sodium nitrite (14%). FVD was treated with SMB + CM (2 g each/kg biomass) and added to the TMR at varying levels (0%, 10%, or 20%), with or without KU18 inoculation. Results: The KU18 was screened as a presumptive LAB strain showing superior tolerance to SMB in broth medium, and was identified at the molecular level using 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis as Lactobacillus plantarum. Inoculation of KU18 in TMR containing SMB was not successful for the LAB development, biomass acidification, and organoleptic properties of the resultant silage. In Exp. 2, based on the effectiveness and economic considerations, an equal proportion of SMB and CM (2 g each/kg FVD) was selected as the optimal loads for the subsequent silage fermentation experiment. Slight differences were determined in LAB development, biomass acidification, and sensorial characteristics among the experimental silages, suggesting the low toxicity of the preservatives on LAB growth. Conclusion: Although KU18 strain was not able to efficiently develop in silage mass containing SMB-treated FVD, the partial substitution of SMB load with the CM effectively alleviated the toxic effect of SMB and allowed LAB development during the fermentation of SMB + CM-treated FVD in TMR.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by Konkuk University in 2020.

References

  1. Ahmadi F, Lee YH, Lee WH, Oh YK, Park K, Kwak WS. Long-term anaerobic conservation of fruit and vegetable discards without or with moisture adjustment after aerobic preservation with sodium metabisulfite. Waste Manag 2019;87:258-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.010
  2. Ahmadi F, Lee YH, Lee WH, Oh YK, Park K, Kwak WS. Preservation of fruit and vegetable discards with sodium metabisulfite. J Environ Manage 2018;224:113-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.044
  3. Ahmadi F, Lee WH, Oh YK, Park K, Kwak WS. Fruit and vegetable discards preserved with sodium metabisulfite as a high-moisture ingredient in total mixed ration for ruminants: effect on in vitro ruminal fermentation and in vivo metabolism. Asian-Australas J Anim 2020;33:446-55. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0596
  4. Natskoulis PI, Lappa IK, Panagou EZ. Evaluating the efficacy of turbimetric measurements as a rapid screening technique to assess fungal susceptibility to antimicrobial compounds as exemplified by the use of sodium metabisulfite. Food Res Int 2018;106:1037-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.01.058
  5. Xu CC, Cai Y, Zhang JG, Ogawa M. Fermentation quality and nutritive value of a total mixed ration silage containing coffee grounds at ten or twenty percent of dry matter. J Anim Sci 2007;85:1024-9. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2005-628
  6. Xu C, Cai Y, Fukasawa M, Matsuyama H, Moriya N. The effect of replacing brewers' grains with barley tea grounds in total mixed ration silage on feed intake, digestibility and ruminal fermentation in wethers. Anim Sci J 2008;79:575-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2008.00566.x
  7. Bueno AVI, Lazzari G, Jobim CC, Daniel JLP. Ensiling total mixed ration for ruminants: a review. Agronomy 2020;10:879. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060879
  8. McDonald P, Henderson N, Heron S. The biochemistry of silage. Marlow, Bucks, UK: Chalcombe Publications; 1991.
  9. Irwin SV, Fisher P, Graham E, Malek A, Robidoux A. Sulfites inhibit the growth of four species of beneficial gut bacteria at concentrations regarded as safe for food. PLoS One 2017;12:e0186629. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186629
  10. Knicky M, Sporndly R. The ensiling capability of a mixture of sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate, and sodium nitrite. J Dairy Sci 2011;94:824-31. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3364
  11. Knicky M, Sporndly R. Short communication: Use of a mixture of sodium nitrite, sodium benzoate, and potassium sorbate in aerobically challenged silages. J Dairy Sci 2015;98:5729-34. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9332
  12. Knicky M, Sporndly R. Sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate and sodium nitrite as silage additives. J Sci Food Agric 2009;89:2659-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3771
  13. Sneath PHA, Mair NS, Sharpe ME, Holt JG. Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology. Vol. 2. Baltimore, MD, USA: Williams and Wilkins; 1986.
  14. Lee MRF, Fleming HR, Cogan T, Hodgson C, Davies DR. Assessing the ability of silage lactic acid bacteria to incorporate and transform inorganic selenium within laboratory scale silos. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2019;253:125-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.05.011
  15. Kim YI, Kwak WS. Isolation and identification of lactic acid bacteria from spent mushroom substrate for silage making and determination of optimal medium conditions for growth. J Anim Sci Technol 2012;54:435-42. https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2012.54.6.435
  16. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994;22:4673-80. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673
  17. Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers P, Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 1956;28:350-6. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017
  18. AOAC International. Official methods of analysis. 19th ed. Arlington, VA, USA: AOAC Int.; 2012.
  19. Romero-Gil V, Garcia-Garcia P, Garrido-Fernandez A, Arroyo-Lopez FN. Susceptibility and resistance of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts against preservatives with potential application in table olives. Food Microbiol 2016;54:72-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2015.10.014
  20. Taylor SL, Higley NA, Bush RK. Sulfites in foods: uses, analytical methods, residues, fate, exposure assessment, metabolism, toxicity, and hypersensitivity. Adv Food Res 1986;30:1-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2628(08)60347-X
  21. Jay JM. Modern food microbiology. New York, USA: Chapman and Hall; 1996.
  22. Gardner PR, Gardner DP, Gardner AP. Globins scavenge sulfur trioxide anion radical. J Biol Chem 2015;290:27204-14. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M115.679621
  23. Ahmadi F, Lee WH, Oh YK, Park K, Kwak WS. Microbial, nutritional, and antioxidant stability of fruit and vegetables discards treated with sodium metabisulfite during aerobic and anaerobic storage. Waste Biomass Valorization 2021;12:347-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-020-00968-9
  24. Muck R, Kung L. Effects of silage additives on ensiling. In: Proceedings from the Silage: field to feedbunk, North American Conference, Ithaca, NY, USA. Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service Publication; 1997.
  25. Woolford MK. Microbiological screening of food preservatives, cold sterilants and specific antimicrobial agents as potential silage additives. J Sci Food Agric 1975;26:226-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740260214
  26. Lingvall P, Lattemae P. Influence of hexamine and sodium nitrite in combination with sodium benzoate and sodium propionate on fermentation and hygienic quality of wilted and long cut grass silage. J Sci Food Agric 1999;79:257-64. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199902)79:2<257::AID-JSFA186>3.0.CO;2-J
  27. Chang, JI, Hsu TE. Effects of compositions on food waste composting. Bioresour Technol 2008;99:8068-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.03.043
  28. Kim JS, Lee YH, Kim YI, et al. Effect of microbial inoculant or molasses on fermentative quality and aerobic stability of sawdust-based spent mushroom substrate. Bioresour Technol 2016;216:188-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.056
  29. Muck RE. Silage microbiology and its control through additives. Rev Bras Zootec 2010;39:183-91. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010001300021
  30. Masar M, Dankova M, Olvecka E, Stachurova A, Kaniansky D, Stanislawski B. Determination of free sulfite in wine by zone electrophoresis with isotachophoresis sample pretreatment on a column-coupling chip. J Chromatogr A 2004;1026:31-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2003.11.038