과제정보
The authors thank Dr Raul Diez of the RD Orthodontic and Pediatric Dentistry Clinic, Naiara Ortega of the Mechanics Department of the University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) and of the CFAA, The Aeronautics Advanced Manufacturing Center (https://www.ehu.eus/en/web/cfaa/) for their support and assistance in the conduct of this research work.
참고문헌
- Ahrberg D, Lauer HC, Ahrberg M, Weigl P. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2016;20:291-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1504-6
- Joda T, Bragger U. Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: a cost/time analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:1430-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12476
- Lee SJ, Gallucci GO. Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:111-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02430.x
- Patzelt SB, Lamprinos C, Stampf S, Att W. The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparative study. J Am Dent Assoc 2014;145:542-51. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.2014.23
- Marghalani A, Weber HP, Finkelman M, Kudara Y, El Rafie K, Papaspyridakos P. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for partially edentulous arches: An evaluation of accuracy. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:574-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.002
- Renne W, Ludlow M, Fryml J, Schurch Z, Mennito A, Kessler R, Lauer A. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118:36-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.024
- Gjelvold B, Chrcanovic BR, Korduner EK, Collin-Bagewitz I, Kisch J. Intraoral digital impression technique compared to conventional impression technique. A randomized clinical trial. J Prosthodont 2016;25:282-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12410
- Iturrate M, Eguiraun H, Solaberrieta E. Accuracy of digital impressions for implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis, using an auxiliary geometry part-an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2019;30:1250-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13549
- Luo H, Xu J, Hoa Binh N, Liu S, Zhang C, Chen K. A simple calibration procedure for structured light system. Opt Lasers Eng 2014;57:6-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2014.01.010
- Martinez-Pellitero S, Cuesta E, Giganto S, Barreiro J. New procedure for qualification of structured light 3D scanners using an optical feature-based gauge. Opt Lasers Eng 2018;110:193-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2018.06.002
- Revilla-Leon M, Jiang P, Sadeghpour M, Piedra-Cascon W, Zandinejad A, Ozcan M, Krishnamurthy VR. Intraoral digital scans-Part 1: influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:372-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.003
- Dury MR, Woodward SD, Brown SB, McCarthy MB. Surface finish and 3D optical scanner measurement performance for precision engineering. Proc - ASPE 2016 Annu Meet 2016;167-72.
- Chen Y, Zhai Z, Li H, Yamada S, Matsuoka T, Ono S, Nakano T. Influence of liquid on the tooth surface on the accuracy of intraoral scanners: an in vitro study. J Prosthodont 2021 Apr 7. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13358.
- Imburgia M, Logozzo S, Hauschild U, Veronesi G, Mangano C, Mangano FG. Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health 2017;17:92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0383-4
- Aragon ML, Pontes LF, Bichara LM, Flores-Mir C, Normando D. Validity and reliability of intraoral scanners compared to conventional gypsum models measurements: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod 2016;38:429-34. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjw033
- Lim JH, Park JM, Kim M, Heo SJ, Myung JY. Comparison of digital intraoral scanner reproducibility and image trueness considering repetitive experience. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:225-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.05.002
- Fukazawa S, Odaira C, Kondo H. Investigation of accuracy and reproducibility of abutment position by intraoral scanners. J Prosthodont Res 2017;61:450-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.01.005
- Guth JF, Runkel C, Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Edelhoff D, Keul C. Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:1445-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1902-4
- Hack GD, Patzelt SBM. Evaluation of the accuracy of six intraoral scanning devices: an in-vitro investigation. Am Dent Assoc 2015;10:1-5.
- Ali AO. Accuracy of digital impressions achieved from five different digital impression systems. Dentistry 2015;5:300.
- Patzelt SB, Emmanouilidi A, Stampf S, Strub JR, Att W. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:1687-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1132-y
- Patzelt SB, Bishti S, Stampf S, Att W. Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data. J Am Dent Assoc 2014;145:1133-40. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.2014.87
- Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:121-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60028-1
- Ender A, Mehl A. In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining fullarch dental impressions. Quintessence Int 2015;46:9-17.
- Mangano FG, Admakin O, Bonacina M, Lerner H, Rutkunas V, Mangano C. Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health 2020;20:263. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01254-9
- van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D, Ren Y. Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS One 2012;7:e43312. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043312
- Guth JF, Edelhoff D, Schweiger J, Keul C. A new method for the evaluation of the accuracy of full-arch digital impressions in vitro. Clin Oral Investig 2016;20:1487-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1626-x
- Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2010;38:553-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.03.015
- Pradies G, Zarauz C, Valverde A, Ferreiroa A, Martinez-Rus F. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions based on wavefront sampling technology. J Dent 2015;43:201-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.12.007
- Ender A, Zimmermann M, Attin T, Mehl A. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions. Clin Oral Investig 2016;20:1495-504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1641-y
- Andriessen FS, Rijkens DR, van der Meer WJ, Wismeijer DW. Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111:186-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.010
- Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:313-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.011
- Zhang F, Suh KJ, Lee KM. Validity of intraoral scans compared with plaster models: an in-vivo comparison of dental measurements and 3D surface analysis. PLoS One 2016;11:e0157713. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157713
- Zimmermann M, Koller C, Rumetsch M, Ender A, Mehl A. Precision of guided scanning procedures for full-arch digital impressions in vivo. J Orofac Orthop 2017;78:466-471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-017-0103-3
- Kuhr F, Schmidt A, Rehmann P, Wostmann B. A new method for assessing the accuracy of full arch impressions in patients. J Dent 2016;55:68-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.10.002
- Pan Y, Tam JM, Tsoi JK, Lam WY, Huang R, Chen Z, Pow EH. Evaluation of laboratory scanner accuracy by a novel calibration block for complete-arch implant rehabilitation. J Dent 2020;102:103476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103476
- ISO 12836. Dentistry - Digitizing devices for CAD/CAM systems for indirect dental restorations - test methods for assessing accuracy. International Standards Organization (ISO); Geneva; Switzerland, 2015. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/68414.html Accessed July 15, 2021.
- Iturrate M, Lizundia E, Amezua X, Solaberrieta E. A new method to measure the accuracy of intraoral scanners along the complete dental arch: a pilot study. J Adv Prosthodont 2019;11:331-40. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.6.331
- ISO 5725-1. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results - Part 1: General principles and definitions. International Standards Organization (ISO); Geneva; Switzerland, 1994. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/11833.html Accessed August 4, 2021.