The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An evaluation of the stress effect of different occlusion concepts on hybrid abutment and implant supported monolithic zirconia fixed prosthesis: A finite element analysis

  • Yesilyurt, Nilgün Gulbahce (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Necmettin Erbakan University) ;
  • Tuncdemir, Ali Riza (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Necmettin Erbakan University)
  • Received : 2021.05.05
  • Accepted : 2021.07.27
  • Published : 2021.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of canine guidance occlusion and group function occlusion on the degree of stress to the bone, implants, abutments, and crowns using finite element analysis (FEA). MATERIALS AND METHODS. This study included the implant-prosthesis system of a three-unit bridge made of monolithic zirconia and hybrid abutments. Three-dimensional (3D) models of a bone-level implant system and a titanium base abutment were created using the original implant components. Two titanium implants, measuring 4 × 11 mm each, were selected. The loads were applied in two oblique directions of 15° and 30° under two occlusal movement conditions. In the canine guidance condition, loads (100 N) were applied to the canine crown only. In the group function condition, loads were applied to all three teeth. In this loading, a force of 100 N was applied to the canine, and 200-N forces were applied to each premolar. The stress distribution among all the components of the implant-bridge system was assessed using ANSYS SpaceClaim 2020 R2 software and finite element analysis. RESULTS. Maximum stress was found in the group function occlusion. The maximum stress increased with an increase in the angle of occlusal force. CONCLUSION. The canine guidance occlusion with monolithic zirconia crown materials is promising for implant-supported prostheses in the canine and premolar areas.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The present work was supported by the Necmettin Erbakan University Scientific Research Section.

References

  1. Reddy MS, Sundram R, Eid Abdemagyd HA. Application of finite element model in implant dentistry: a systematic review. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2019;11:S85-S91.
  2. Datte CE, Tribst JP, Dal Piva AO, Nishioka RS, Bottino MA, Evangelhista AM, Monteiro FMM, Borges AL. Influence of different restorative materials on the stress distribution in dental implants. J Clin Exp Dent 2018;10:e439-44.
  3. Guess PC, Att W, Strub JR. Zirconia in fixed implant prosthodontics. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:633-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00317.x
  4. Zhang Y, Lawn BR. Evaluating dental zirconia. Dent Mater 2019;35:15-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.08.291
  5. Lops D, Stellini E, Sbricoli L, Cea N, Romeo E, Bressan E. Influence of abutment material on peri-implant soft tissues in anterior areas with thin gingival biotype: a multicentric prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28:1263-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12952
  6. Molina A, Sanz-Sanchez I, Martin C, Blanco J, Sanz M. The effect of one-time abutment placement on interproximal bone levels and peri-implant soft tissues: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28:443-52.
  7. Yildirim M, Fischer H, Marx R, Edelhoff D. In vivo fracture resistance of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:325-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00514-6
  8. Egilmez Ferhat, Yildirim Bicer Arzu Zeynep, Ergun Gulfem. Zirconia ceramics and their use in dental implantology. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2010;13:72-80.
  9. Conejo J, Kobayashi T, Anadioti E, Blatz MB. Performance of CAD/CAM monolithic ceramic Implant-supported restorations bonded to titanium inserts: a systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol 2017;10:139-46.
  10. Swaminathan Y, Rao G. Implant protected occlusion. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2013;11:20-5. https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-1132025
  11. Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMO, Anami LC, Borges ALS, Bottino MA. Influence of implant connection on the stress distribution in restorations performed with hybrid abutments. J Osseointegration 2019;11:507-12.
  12. Verma M, Nanda A, Sood A. Principles of occlusion in implant dentistry. J Int Clin Dent Res Organ 2015;7:27-33. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0754.172924
  13. Delgado-Ruiz RA, Calvo-Guirado JL, Romanos GE. Effects of occlusal forces on the peri-implant-bone interface stability. Periodontol 2000 2019;81:179-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12291
  14. Graves CV, Harrel SK, Rossmann JA, Kerns D, Gonzalez JA, Kontogiorgos ED, Al-Hashimi I, Abraham C. The role of occlusion in the dental implant and peri-implant condition: a review. Open Dent J 2016;10:594-601. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601610010594
  15. Sheridan RA, Decker AM, Plonka AB, Wang HL. The role of occlusion in implant therapy: a comprehensive updated review. Implant Dent 2016;25:829-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000488
  16. Chang Y, Tambe AA, Maeda Y, Wada M, Gonda T. Finite element analysis of dental implants with validation: to what extent can we expect the model to predict biological phenomena? A literature review and proposal for classification of a validation process. Int J Implant Dent 2018;4:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-018-0119-5
  17. Stanley JN. Wheeler's dental anatomy, physiology and occlusion. 11th ed., Elsevier-Health Science, Las Vegas, USA; 2019. p. 13.
  18. Robati Anaraki M, Torab A, Mounesi Rad T. Comparison of stress in implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed partial dentures between canine guidance and group function occlusal patterns: a finite element analysis. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2019;13:90-7. https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2019.014
  19. Gungor MA, Dundar M, Karaoglu C, Sonugelen M, Artun CC. The effect of margin design on stress distribution on all-ceramic materials: a finite element. Ege Univ Faculty Dent J 2005;26:145-53.
  20. de la Rosa Castolo G, Guevara Perez SV, Arnoux PJ, Badih L, Bonnet F, Behr M. Mechanical strength and fracture point of a dental implant under certification conditions: a numerical approach by finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:611-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.04.030
  21. Cattaneo PM, Dalstra M, Melsen B. The finite element method: a tool to study orthodontic tooth movement. J Dent Res 2005;84:428-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400506
  22. Gore E, Evlioglu G. Assessment of the effect of two occlusal concepts for implant-supported fixed prostheses by finite element analysis in patients with bruxism. J Oral Implantol 2014;40:68-75. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00044
  23. Lin D, Li Q, Li W, Swain M. Dental implant induced bone remodeling and associated algorithms. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2009;2:410-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.11.007
  24. Bankoglu Gungor M, Yilmaz H. Evaluation of stress distributions occurring on zirconia and titanium implant-supported prostheses: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:346-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.022
  25. DeTolla DH, Andreana S, Patra A, Buhite R, Comella B. Role of the finite element model in dental implants. J Oral Implantol 2000;26:77-81. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2000)026<0077:TROTFE>2.3.CO;2
  26. Geng JP, Tan KB, Liu GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:585-98. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.115251
  27. Srirekha A, Bashetty K. Infinite to finite: an overview of finite element analysis. Indian J Dent Res 2010;21:425-32. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.70813
  28. Fanuscu MI, Vu HV, Poncelet B. Implant biomechanics in grafted sinus: a finite element analysis. J Oral Implantol 2004;30:59-68. https://doi.org/10.1563/0.674.1
  29. Pesqueira AA, Goiato MC, Filho HG, Monteiro DR, Santos DM, Haddad MF, Pellizzer EP. Use of stress analysis methods to evaluate the biomechanics of oral rehabilitation with implants. J Oral Implantol 2014;40:217-28. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00066
  30. Rezende CE, Chase-Diaz M, Costa MD, Albarracin ML, Paschoeto G, Sousa EA, Rubo JH, Borges AF. Stress distribution in single dental implant system: three-dimensional finite element analysis based on an in vitro experimental model. J Craniofac Surg 2015;26:2196-200. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001977
  31. Morneburg TR, Proschel PA. In vivo forces on implants influenced by occlusal scheme and food consistency. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:481-6.
  32. Wood MR, Vermilyea SG; Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prost-hodontics. A review of selected dental literature on evidence-based treatment planning for dental implants: report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:447-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.08.003
  33. Koyano K, Esaki D. Occlusion on oral implants: current clinical guidelines. J Oral Rehabil 2015;42:153-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12239
  34. Engel E, Gomez-Roman G, Axmann-Krcmar D. Effect of occlusal wear on bone loss and Periotest value of dental implants. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:444-50.
  35. Bragger U, Aeschlimann S, Burgin W, Hammerle CH, Lang NP. Biological and technical complications and failures with fixed partial dentures (FPD) on implants and teeth after four to five years of function. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:26-34. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001026.x
  36. Kim Y, Oh TJ, Misch CE, Wang HL. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:26-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01067.x
  37. Leja W, Hilbe M, Stainer M, Kulmer S. Non-carious cervical lesions in relation to the occlusion type and the inclination of the individual guiding elements. Germany Dent J 1999;54:412-4.
  38. Tokiwa O, Park BK, Takezawa Y, Takahashi Y, Sasaguri K, Sato S. Relationship of tooth grinding pattern during sleep bruxism and dental status. Cranio 2008;26:287-93. https://doi.org/10.1179/crn.2008.039
  39. Misch CE, Silc JT. Using implant positions: treatment planning canine and first molar rules. Dent Today 2009;28:66, 68, 70-1.
  40. Misch CE. Dental implant prosthetics. 1st ed., St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby. 2005. p. 15.
  41. Christensen GJ. Now is the time to observe and treat dental occlusion. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:100-2. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0034