DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Research on the impact effect of AP1000 shield building subjected to large commercial aircraft

  • Wang, Xiuqing (School of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou University) ;
  • Wang, Dayang (School of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou University) ;
  • Zhang, Yongshan (School of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou University) ;
  • Wu, Chenqing (School of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou University)
  • Received : 2020.08.30
  • Accepted : 2020.11.19
  • Published : 2021.05.25

Abstract

This study addresses the numerical simulation of the shield building of an AP1000 nuclear power plant (NPP) subjected to a large commercial aircraft impact. First, a simplified finite element model (F.E. model) of the large commercial Boeing 737 MAX 8 aircraft is established. The F.E. model of the AP1000 shield building is constructed, which is a reasonably simplified reinforced concrete structure. The effectiveness of both F.E. models is verified by the classical Riera method and the impact test of a 1/7.5 scaled GE-J79 engine model. Then, based on the verified F.E. models, the entire impact process of the aircraft on the shield building is simulated by the missile-target interaction method (coupled method) and by the ANSYS/LS-DYNA software, which is at different initial impact velocities and impact heights. Finally, the laws and characteristics of the aircraft impact force, residual velocity, kinetic energy, concrete damage, axial reinforcement stress, and perforated size are analyzed in detail. The results show that all of them increase with the addition to the initial impact velocity. The first four are not very sensitive to the impact height. The engine impact mainly contributes to the peak impact force, and the peak impact force is six times higher than that in the first stage. With increasing initial impact velocity, the maximum aircraft impact force rises linearly. The range of the tension and pressure of the reinforcement axial stress changes with the impact height. The perforated size increases with increasing impact height. The radial perforation area is almost insensitive to the initial impact velocity and impact height. The research of this study can provide help for engineers in designing AP1000 shield buildings.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51778162, 51878191) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2020A1515010993, 2015A030313511), which are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Q. Fang, H. Wu, T. Zhang, State of the art for damage and failure of nuclear power plant under large commercial aircraft impact, J. Build. Struct. 5 (2019) 1-27.
  2. H. Jiang, M.G. Chorzepa, Aircraft impact analysis of nuclear safety-related concrete structures: a review, Eng. Fail. Anal. 46 (2014) 118-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.08.008
  3. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Safety Reports Series: Safety Aspects of Nuclear Power Plants in Human Induced External Events: General Considerations, 2017. No. 86.
  4. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Safety Reports Series: Safety Aspects of Nuclear Power Plants in Human Induced External Events: Assessment of Structures, 2018, p. 87.
  5. NRC, Consideration of Aircraft Impacts for New Nuclear Power Reactors. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, RIN 3150-AI19, Washington DC, 2009.
  6. J.D. Riera, On the stress analysis of structures subjected to aircraft impact forces, Nucl. Eng. Des. 8 (1968) 415-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(68)90039-3
  7. T. Sugano, H. Tsubota, Y. Kasai, et al., Local damage to reinforced concrete structures caused by impact of aircraft engine missiles Part 1. Test program, method and results, Nucl. Eng. Des. 140 (1993) 387-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(93)90120-X
  8. T. Sugano, H. Tsubota, Y. Kasai, et al., Local damage to reinforced concrete structures caused by impact of aircraft engine missiles Part 2. Evaluation of test results, Nucl. Eng. Des. 140 (1993) 407-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(93)90121-O
  9. T. Sugano, H. Tsubota, Y. Kasai, et al., Full-scale aircraft impact test for evaluation of impact force, Nucl. Eng. Des. 140 (1993) 373-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(93)90119-T
  10. Riedel, Noldgen Werner, et al., Local damage to Ultra High Performance Concrete structures caused by an impact of aircraft engine missiles, Nucl. Eng. Des. 210 (2010) 2633-2642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.07.036
  11. R.L. Frano, G. Forasassi, Preliminary evaluation of aircraft impact on a near term nuclear power plant, Nucl. Eng. Des. 241 (12) (2011) 5245-5250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.08.079
  12. R.L. Frano, L. Stefanini, Investigation of the behaviour of a LILW superficial repository under aircraft impact, Nucl. Eng. Des. 300 (2016) 552-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.02.017
  13. W.K. Zheng, Research on the Impacting Load of the Nuclear Power Plant Impacted by a Large Commercial Aircraft, Tsinghua University, 2013.
  14. J.B. Liu, W.K. Zheng, Impact load analysis on a nuclear power plant impacted by a large commercial aircraft, J. Vib. Shock 33 (2014) 97-101.
  15. T. Zhang, H. Wu, Q. Fang, et al., Numerical simulations of nuclear power plant containment subjected to aircraft impact, Nucl. Eng. Des. 320 (2017) 207-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.05.029
  16. T. Zhang, H. Wu, Q. Fang, et al., Influences of nuclear containment radius on the aircraft impact force based on the Riera function, Nucl. Eng. Des. 293 (2015) 196-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.07.056
  17. T. Huang, T. Zhang, Z.F. Dong, et al., An analysis of the dynamic response of nuclear containment under the impact of a large commercial aircraft, J. Vib. Shock 37 (2018) 8-14.
  18. J.B. Liu, P. Han, Numerical analyses of a shield building subjected to a large commercial aircraft impact, Shock Vib. (2018) 1-17.
  19. F. Lin, H. Tang, Nuclear containment structure subjected to commercial aircraft crash and subsequent vibrations and fire, Nucl. Eng. Des. 322 (2017) 68-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.06.030
  20. D.Y. Wang, Y.S. Zhang, C.Q. Wu, et al., Seismic performance of base-isolated AP1000 shield building with consideration of fluid-structure interaction, Nucl. Eng. Des. 353 (2019) 110241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110241
  21. D.Y. Wang, C.Q. Wu, W.C. Huang, et al., Vibration investigation on fluid-structure interaction of AP1000 shield building subjected to multi earth-quake excitations, Ann. Nucl. Energy 126 (APR) (2019) 312-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.11.021
  22. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, AP1000 design control document, Rev. 19 (2011).
  23. Boeing Commercial Airplanes, D6-38A004 737 MAX Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning, America, 2017.
  24. The Boeing Company, 737-783, view [EB/OL], http://www.boeing.com/commercial/airports/3view.page, 2015.
  25. European Aviation Safety Agency, EASA. E. 115 Type-Certificate Data Sheet for LEAP-1B Series Engines, 2018. Germany.
  26. European Aviation Safety Agency, EASA. IM. A. 120 Type-Certificate Data Sheet for BOEING 737, 2018. Germany.
  27. T. Zhang, Q. Fang, H. Wu, et al., Numerical simulation on response and damage of nuclear containment under aircraft impact, Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology(Natural Science Edition) 4 (2014) 335-340.
  28. L. Lin, X.Z. Lu, P.F. Han, et al., Analysis of impact force of large commercial aircraft on rigid wall and nuclear power plant containment, J. Vib. Shock 9 (2015) 158-163.
  29. N. Jones, Structural Impact, Cambridge University Press, 1997.
  30. S.R. Bodner, P.S. Symonds, Test and theoretical investigation of the plastic deformation of cantilever beams subjected to impulsive loading, J. Appl. Mech. 29 (1962) 719-728. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3640660
  31. G.R. Cowper, P.S. Symonds, Strain-hardening and Strain-Rate Effects in the Impact Loading of Cantilever Beams, Brown Univ Providence Ri, 1957.
  32. H.C. Yao, P. Tan, F.L. Zhou, Load time history analysis method for commercial aircraft impact on rigid wall, J. Nat. Disasters 28 (2) (2019) 49-59.
  33. L.S.T.C. Ls-Dyna, Keyword User's Manual, Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2017. R10.0.