Archives of Plastic Surgery

Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A population-based study of breast implant illness

  • Magno-Padron, David A. (Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine) ;
  • Luo, Jessica (Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine) ;
  • Jessop, Terry C. (University of Utah School of Medicine) ;
  • Garlick, Jared W. (Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine) ;
  • Manum, Joanna S. (Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine) ;
  • Carter, Gentry C. (Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine) ;
  • Agarwal, Jayant P. (Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine) ;
  • Kwok, Alvin C. (Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2020.10.29
  • Accepted : 2021.05.25
  • Published : 2021.07.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background Despite evidence supporting the safety of breast implants, some women associate their implants with adverse health effects and have called this syndrome "breast implant illness." We sought to characterize breast implant illness symptoms and to report how implant removal affects their symptoms. Methods An anonymous 20 question survey was administered to the Facebook group: "UTAH Breast Implant Illness" to characterize the symptoms these women attributed to their breast implants. Several questions allowed us to evaluate how implant removal affected women's symptoms. Results Of the 182 respondents, 97% report that implants negatively affect their health and 95% identify these symptoms with breast implant illness. Ninety-six percent of respondents had implants placed for cosmetic reasons and 51% had silicone implants. The most common symptoms associated with breast implant illness are brain fog (95%), fatigue (92%), joint pain (80%), and hair loss (74%). Sixty percent of respondents learned about breast implant illness from family/friends and/or social media platforms (56%), 40% of respondents had their implants removed, and 97% report relief of their symptoms post-removal (23% complete, 74% partial). Following explantation, there was a significant improvement in all but one reported symptom. An association was found between the number of symptoms reported prior to explantation and the number of symptoms resolving following explantation. Conclusions Breast implant illness is a syndrome characterized by fatigue, decreased focus, hair loss, and joint pain after the placement of breast implants. Nearly all patients report improvement of symptoms after implant removal. Significant efforts should be made to better understand breast implant illness and its etiology.

Keywords

References

  1. Healing Breast Implant Illness [Internet]. Bowser, BC: Healing Breast Implant Illness [cited 2019 Nov 1]. Available from: https://healingbreastimplantillness.com.
  2. Magnusson MR, Cooter RD, Rakhorst H, et al. Breast implant illness: a way forward. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 143(3S A Review of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma):74S-81S. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005573
  3. American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS). Plastic surgery statistics report [Internet]. Arlington Heights, IL: ASPS; c2018 [cited 2019 Nov 1]. Available from: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2018/plastic-surgery-statistics-full-report-2018.pdf.
  4. Vera-Lastra O, Medina G, Cruz-Dominguez Mdel P, et al. Human adjuvant disease induced by foreign substances: a new model of ASIA (Shoenfeld's syndrome). Lupus 2012; 21:128-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961203311429317
  5. Miyoshi K, Miyaoka T, Kobayashi Y, et al. Hypergamma-globulinemia by prolonged adjuvanticity in man: disorders developed after augmentation mammoplasty. Jpn Med J 1964;2122:9-14.
  6. Kessler DA. The basis of the FDA's decision on breast implants. N Engl J Med 1992;326:1713-5. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199206183262525
  7. Sergott TJ, Limoli JP, Baldwin CM Jr, et al. Human adjuvant disease, possible autoimmune disease after silicone implantation: a review of the literature, case studies, and speculation for the future. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;78:104-14. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198607000-00018
  8. Janowsky EC, Kupper LL, Hulka BS. Meta-analyses of the relation between silicone breast implants and the risk of connective-tissue diseases. N Engl J Med 2000;342:781-90. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200003163421105
  9. Lipworth L, Tarone RE, McLaughlin JK. Silicone breast implants and connective tissue disease: an updated review of the epidemiologic evidence. Ann Plast Surg 2004;52:598-601. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000128087.51384.f9
  10. Tugwell P, Wells G, Peterson J, et al. Do silicone breast implants cause rheumatologic disorders? A systematic review for a court-appointed national science panel. Arthritis Rheum 2001;44:2477-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/1529-0131(200111)44:11<2477::AID-ART427>3.0.CO;2-Q
  11. Center for Devices and Radiological Health U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA update on the safety of silicone gel-filled breast implants. Silver Spring: U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2011.
  12. Coroneos CJ, Selber JC, Offodile AC 2nd, et al. US FDA breast implant postapproval studies: long-term outcomes in 99,993 patients. Ann Surg 2019;269:30-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002990
  13. Rohrich RJ, Kaplan J, Dayan E. Silicone implant illness: science versus myth? Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;144:98-109. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005710
  14. Nava MB, Catanuto G, Rocco N. Comment on "US FDA Breast Implant Post Approval Studies. Longterm Outcomes in 99,993 Patients". Ann Surg 2019;270:e63. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003294
  15. Ashar B. Statement from Binita Ashar, M.D., of the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health on agency's commitment to studying breast implant safety. Silver Spring: U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2018.
  16. UTAH Breast Implant Illness [Internet]. c2016 [cited 2020 Jan 12]. Available from: https://www.facebook.com/groups/1215360765175534/.
  17. Lee M, Ponraja G, McLeod K, et al. Breast implant illness: a biofilm hypothesis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8:e2755. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002755
  18. Tang SY, Israel JS, Afifi AM. Breast implant illness: symptoms, patient concerns, and the power of social media. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;140:765e-766e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003785
  19. Mcguire PA, Haws MJ, Nahai F. Breast implant illness: how can we help? Aesthet Surg J 2019;39:1260-3. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz227
  20. Ortiz-Ospina E. The rise of social media [Internet]. Oxford: Our World in Data; c2019 [cited 2019 Nov 1]. Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/rise-of-social-media.
  21. Pew Research Center. Peer-to-peer Health Care [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center; c2011 [cited 2019 Nov 1]. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2011/02/28/peer-to-peer-health-care-2/.
  22. Montemurro P, Porcnik A, Heden P, et al. The influence of social media and easily accessible online information on the aesthetic plastic surgery practice: literature review and our own experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2015;39:270-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0454-3
  23. Cohen Tervaert JW, Kappel RM. Silicone implant incompatibility syndrome (SIIS): a frequent cause of ASIA (Shoenfeld's syndrome). Immunol Res 2013;56:293-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-013-8401-3
  24. Colaris MJ, de Boer M, van der Hulst RR, et al. Two hundreds cases of ASIA syndrome following silicone implants: a comparative study of 30 years and a review of current literature. Immunol Res 2017;65:120-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-016-8821-y
  25. Peters W, Smith D, Fornasier V, et al. An outcome analysis of 100 women after explantation of silicone gel breast implants. Ann Plast Surg 1997;39:9-19. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199707000-00002
  26. Breiting VB, Holmich LR, Brandt B, et al. Long-term health status of Danish women with silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:217-28. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000128823.77637.8A
  27. de Boer M, Colaris M, van der Hulst RR, et al. Is explantation of silicone breast implants useful in patients with complaints? Immunol Res 2017;65:25-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-016-8813-y
  28. Rohrich RJ, Kenkel JM, Adams WP, et al. A prospective analysis of patients undergoing silicone breast implant explantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105:2529-43. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200006000-00036
  29. Adidharma W, Latack KR, Colohan SM, et al. Breast implant illness: are social media and the internet worrying patients sick? Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;145:225e-227e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006361
  30. Nielsen L. Utah No. 6 in US for number of plastic surgeons per capita [Internet]. Salt Lake City, UT: KSL News; c2017 [cited 2020 Jan 5]. Available from: https://www.ksl.com/article/43505715/utah-no-6-in-us-for-number-of-plastic-surgeons-per-capita.